As soon as $ORDI fell, many people came out to use their own research and cognition to start selling bears. Since the popularity is here, I will also add fuel to the fire. Anyway, I am also a person who watches the excitement, and it is reasonable to express my own opinions.
Of course, I am not calling for short selling, but I am just explaining that the problems in the research project are not the reasons for short selling. Although I know that there are many people in this market who do not pretend to understand, but it seems that there is no need to debate their cognition.
In the final analysis, research is not a reason to go short if there is a problem. It is a kind of cognitive sharing, an output of making cognitive money.
The problem with the research project is to be vigilant and vigilant about holdings, which allows traders to grasp the value of the measurement. The height of value in the traders' own minds. If they can escape the top by relying on your research, your Research is useful. If the research reveals that there are problems with the project, just call it short. If you don’t consider the pros and cons and rules of the market, will you pay for their losses?
I had a negative attitude towards the #ORDI survey before, but I bought it and I made money. I also made other friends who played with me make money. I may not have a firm long-term hold, but at least I moved to one. What I think is a profit. Isn’t this the true meaning of research to traders?
I first published the BRC-20 survey on May 6. Because I didn’t know much about it at the time, I didn’t make inscriptions. I only made some summaries and possibilities of inscription issues. At that time, I had already discovered many problems. That’s it. If what you mentioned is the reason why ORDI is a garbage currency, then I will summarize the reasons why ORDI is a garbage currency:
ORDI is not a decentralized token. It is very reasonable from the perspective of issuance method and decentralization method. But in terms of technology, the inscription is engraved on the distributed decentralized ledger, and its information is only recorded in the block that was packaged at that time, and then recorded by the front-end ledger. This means that the inscription is packaged and carried on the chain and recorded off-chain. Quantity and serial numbers and other information. Is the off-chain accounting method different from the distributed accounting method? Does this count as an argument to prove that it is a garbage coin?
BRC20 without a smart contract itself is not a currency issuance protocol, and BRC20, the so-called currency issuance protocol, is not a standard tokenization protocol.The protocol stipulates the format and functionality in a unified way. The creation of ORDI is only text. The four letters are determined not by BRC20 but by the blockchain. Let’s take a closer look at the ERC20 protocol in the smart contract. The code, including security conditions, functional functions, definition methods, serial number functions and other functions, is called a protocol. If you create a txt text and write an object data {name, account, mit, max} in the text in a JSON fixed format, also called a protocol, then there is no meaning or necessity in applying for #ETF批准 .
Of course, problems are problems. The trading market still depends on the operation of market capital. A lot of research has been done, and it is the most ridiculous thing to not make money in the end. So in the end, I hope everyone can respect each other, treat everything objectively, and can express their opinions. Views and opinions on things, but please allow others to maintain their own rational understanding. Since there is a contract, the confrontation of long and short views is allowed. Otherwise, where is the fuel for the rise? Who will lose money if it falls?
💙Peace & Love❤️