Binance Square
#eip8288

eip8288

570 views
8 Discussing
BitFrog
ยท
--
Article
Simplifying Ethereumโ€™s Main Thread: Beyond 8 MB/sSummary: Vitalik says that using precompiles and the EVM for cryptography has hit a throughput bottleneck. EIP-8288 proposes moving verification off the main thread, leaving only a recursive proof on-chain. On October 19, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin continued to outline the EIP-8288 roadmap on X. He cited a specific constraint: even with PeerDAS and blocks-in-blobs, data throughput above around 8 MB/s would begin to face practical pressure. In the context of cryptographic support, this sentence points to a conflict that is drawing near. Ethereum needs to accommodate an ever-growing number of signature schemes and proof systems, but if every form of cryptographic support is crammed on-chain as a precompiled contract or through EVM execution, calldata usage will continue to balloon. 8 MB/s is not some distant theoretical red line; it is a physical limit that main-thread scaling is already running up against.

Simplifying Ethereumโ€™s Main Thread: Beyond 8 MB/s

Summary: Vitalik says that using precompiles and the EVM for cryptography has hit a throughput bottleneck. EIP-8288 proposes moving verification off the main thread, leaving only a recursive proof on-chain.
On October 19, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin continued to outline the EIP-8288 roadmap on X. He cited a specific constraint: even with PeerDAS and blocks-in-blobs, data throughput above around 8 MB/s would begin to face practical pressure.
In the context of cryptographic support, this sentence points to a conflict that is drawing near. Ethereum needs to accommodate an ever-growing number of signature schemes and proof systems, but if every form of cryptographic support is crammed on-chain as a precompiled contract or through EVM execution, calldata usage will continue to balloon. 8 MB/s is not some distant theoretical red line; it is a physical limit that main-thread scaling is already running up against.
๐Ÿš€ $ETH SET TO SLASH GAS WITH RECURSIVE STARK MEMPOOL! ๐ŸŸข ๐Ÿ“Š Vitalikโ€™s EIPโ€‘8288 pushes signatures and proofs out of the core, letting nodes batch STARKs in the mempool. The result? Quantumโ€‘safe transactions could tumble from 10โ€ฏMโ€ฏGas to mere tens of thousands, opening the door for Falcon, MLโ€‘DSA and private account abstraction without a single EVM tweak. ๐ŸŒŠ โšก This lowโ€‘overhead design (โ‰ˆ100โ€‘300โ€ฏKB per block + 96โ€ฏbytes per statement) is a classic smartโ€‘money play, priming the network for RISCโ€‘Vโ€‘based recursive proof engines and a fresh wave of privacyโ€‘first dApps. ๐Ÿฆˆ ๐Ÿ’ฌ How will this reshape your $ETH strategy in the next upgrade cycle? ๐Ÿ‘‡ โš ๏ธ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐Ÿท๏ธ #ETH #EIP8288 #Scaling #Crypto ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ’Ž
๐Ÿš€ $ETH SET TO SLASH GAS WITH RECURSIVE STARK MEMPOOL! ๐ŸŸข

๐Ÿ“Š Vitalikโ€™s EIPโ€‘8288 pushes signatures and proofs out of the core, letting nodes batch STARKs in the mempool. The result? Quantumโ€‘safe transactions could tumble from 10โ€ฏMโ€ฏGas to mere tens of thousands, opening the door for Falcon, MLโ€‘DSA and private account abstraction without a single EVM tweak. ๐ŸŒŠ

โšก This lowโ€‘overhead design (โ‰ˆ100โ€‘300โ€ฏKB per block + 96โ€ฏbytes per statement) is a classic smartโ€‘money play, priming the network for RISCโ€‘Vโ€‘based recursive proof engines and a fresh wave of privacyโ€‘first dApps. ๐Ÿฆˆ

๐Ÿ’ฌ How will this reshape your $ETH strategy in the next upgrade cycle? ๐Ÿ‘‡

โš ๏ธ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

๐Ÿท๏ธ #ETH #EIP8288 #Scaling #Crypto

๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ’Ž
Verified
Article
Vitalik wants to make privacy and cheap quantum signatures on EthereumOn September 9, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published on X a post that quickly circulated through the crypto market. In it, the Ethereum co-founder highlighted EIP-8288 and said he expects to see it included in I-star โ€” the hard fork planned after Hegota. According to him, the proposal would unlock โ€œextreme amounts of power,โ€ especially in quantum-resistant signatures and in privacy protocols. The CoinMarketCap text, which went viral in Portuguese, captured the essence well: ultra-cheap quantum-proof signatures and private transactions at a fraction of the current gas cost. But what exactly is at stake?

Vitalik wants to make privacy and cheap quantum signatures on Ethereum

On September 9, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published on X a post that quickly circulated through the crypto market. In it, the Ethereum co-founder highlighted EIP-8288 and said he expects to see it included in I-star โ€” the hard fork planned after Hegota. According to him, the proposal would unlock โ€œextreme amounts of power,โ€ especially in quantum-resistant signatures and in privacy protocols.
The CoinMarketCap text, which went viral in Portuguese, captured the essence well: ultra-cheap quantum-proof signatures and private transactions at a fraction of the current gas cost. But what exactly is at stake?
ยท
--
๐Ÿ“ฐ At ETHShanghai 2026, Vitalik detailed EIP-8288. The core idea isnโ€™t to build yet another more complex on-chain verification system, but to keep a large number of signatures and proofs in the mempool for aggregation firstโ€”then write only a single aggregated proof into the block. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Now, a typical Ethereum transaction consumes about 21,000 gas, while verifying a single ECDSA signature alone requires around 4,000 gas. With quantum-safe signatures, costs could rise to 100,000โ€“300,000 gas. For privacy protocols, ZK operations usually cost at least 350,000 gas, and in complex cases even up to 1,000,000 gas. Even more extreme: if you pursue both quantum safety and privacy at the same time, STARK proofs can consume roughly 8 million gas. Based on the estimates in the talk, Ethereumโ€™s throughput could drop from about 25 TPS to around 0.25 TPSโ€”the stronger the security and privacy, the harder transactions become to run. ๐Ÿ’ก EIP-8288โ€™s approach is to have mempool nodes collect transactions along with their signatures and proofs, perform aggregation before the transactions enter the block. The chain no longer stores these huge original objects; in the end, it only verifies one STARK proof that covers the entire batch of transactions. Each dependencyโ€™s data takes up about 96 bytes, and some are even as small as 65 bytes. This design builds on EIP-8141 native account abstraction. Transactions can clearly declare their signature schemes and verification algorithms. Vitalik likened it to a kind of โ€œspecialized shardingโ€: split out the heaviest verification work, handle it in parallel off-chain by nodes, while the consensus layer only needs to manage the data volumeโ€”kept to roughly 100โ€“300 KB per block. ๐Ÿค” Of course, having a clear technical path doesnโ€™t mean all problems will automatically disappear after deployment. The real key is whether the aggregation process can run reliably, and whether nodes are willing to take on this off-chain computation. Do you think EIP-8288 will first drive privacy applications, or quantum-safe wallets? #ไปฅๅคชๅŠ #EIP8288 #Vitalik #ๅŒบๅ—้“พๆŠ€ๆœฏ
๐Ÿ“ฐ At ETHShanghai 2026, Vitalik detailed EIP-8288. The core idea isnโ€™t to build yet another more complex on-chain verification system, but to keep a large number of signatures and proofs in the mempool for aggregation firstโ€”then write only a single aggregated proof into the block.
๐Ÿ”ฅ Now, a typical Ethereum transaction consumes about 21,000 gas, while verifying a single ECDSA signature alone requires around 4,000 gas. With quantum-safe signatures, costs could rise to 100,000โ€“300,000 gas. For privacy protocols, ZK operations usually cost at least 350,000 gas, and in complex cases even up to 1,000,000 gas.
Even more extreme: if you pursue both quantum safety and privacy at the same time, STARK proofs can consume roughly 8 million gas. Based on the estimates in the talk, Ethereumโ€™s throughput could drop from about 25 TPS to around 0.25 TPSโ€”the stronger the security and privacy, the harder transactions become to run.
๐Ÿ’ก EIP-8288โ€™s approach is to have mempool nodes collect transactions along with their signatures and proofs, perform aggregation before the transactions enter the block. The chain no longer stores these huge original objects; in the end, it only verifies one STARK proof that covers the entire batch of transactions. Each dependencyโ€™s data takes up about 96 bytes, and some are even as small as 65 bytes.

This design builds on EIP-8141 native account abstraction. Transactions can clearly declare their signature schemes and verification algorithms. Vitalik likened it to a kind of โ€œspecialized shardingโ€: split out the heaviest verification work, handle it in parallel off-chain by nodes, while the consensus layer only needs to manage the data volumeโ€”kept to roughly 100โ€“300 KB per block.
๐Ÿค” Of course, having a clear technical path doesnโ€™t mean all problems will automatically disappear after deployment. The real key is whether the aggregation process can run reliably, and whether nodes are willing to take on this off-chain computation. Do you think EIP-8288 will first drive privacy applications, or quantum-safe wallets?
#ไปฅๅคชๅŠ #EIP8288 #Vitalik #ๅŒบๅ—้“พๆŠ€ๆœฏ
Vitalik Buterin calls for EIP-8288 maximalism to end the precompile war on Ethereum - Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for the adoption of EIP-8288 maximalism. - In a post on X on 19/10/2026, he argued that complex cryptographic algorithms should be handled client-side using STARKs, rather than added to Ethereumโ€™s main chain. - The reason: the network should not have to keep adding new precompiles every time a new cryptographic scheme emerges. - The original CoinGape article says more details will be updated. #Ethereum #VitalikButerin #EIP8288 #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare $eth vlikevn Titanbot Source: CoinGape
Vitalik Buterin calls for EIP-8288 maximalism to end the precompile war on Ethereum

- Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for the adoption of EIP-8288 maximalism.
- In a post on X on 19/10/2026, he argued that complex cryptographic algorithms should be handled client-side using STARKs, rather than added to Ethereumโ€™s main chain.
- The reason: the network should not have to keep adding new precompiles every time a new cryptographic scheme emerges.
- The original CoinGape article says more details will be updated.

#Ethereum #VitalikButerin #EIP8288 #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare

$eth

vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinGape
ยท
--
Vitalik Buterin proposed implementing the EIP-8288 update in the Ethereum network, which would radically reduce the cost of private transactions. The blockchain co-founder plans to include this initiative in a hard fork scheduled immediately after the upcoming Hegota upgrade. The core of the proposal is to aggregate cryptographic proofs before transactions reach a block. According to Buterinโ€™s calculations, this technological solution would reduce gas costs for private operations protected against quantum attacks from 10 million to tens of thousands of units. Additionally, the upgrade would simplify the integration and support of new types of digital signatures within the Ethereum ecosystem. #EthereumUpgrades #VitalikButerin #EIP8288 #CryptoPrivacy #EthereumNews
Vitalik Buterin proposed implementing the EIP-8288 update in the Ethereum network, which would radically reduce the cost of private transactions. The blockchain co-founder plans to include this initiative in a hard fork scheduled immediately after the upcoming Hegota upgrade.

The core of the proposal is to aggregate cryptographic proofs before transactions reach a block. According to Buterinโ€™s calculations, this technological solution would reduce gas costs for private operations protected against quantum attacks from 10 million to tens of thousands of units. Additionally, the upgrade would simplify the integration and support of new types of digital signatures within the Ethereum ecosystem.

#EthereumUpgrades #VitalikButerin #EIP8288 #CryptoPrivacy #EthereumNews
ยท
--
๐Ÿš€ $ETH RECURSIVE STARK MEMPOOL UNVEILS QUANTUMโ€‘SAFE EDGE ๐Ÿ’Ž ๐Ÿ“Š Vitalikโ€™s EIPโ€‘8288 pushes signature aggregation out of the execution core, letting smartโ€‘money nodes batch STARK proofs in the mempool. This recursive design slashes onโ€‘chain computation, turning a 10โ€ฏMโ€‘gas quantumโ€‘safe transaction into a fewโ€‘tensโ€‘ofโ€‘thousandsโ€ฏgas โ€“ a liquidityโ€‘friendly shift that institutional builders canโ€™t ignore. ๐Ÿฆˆ โšก By offโ€‘loading proofs, block builders gain a leaner data footprint (โ‰ˆโ€ฏ100โ€‘300โ€ฏKB per block) and pave the way for RISCโ€‘V as the native ISA for recursive STARKs. Expect private account abstraction and new proof schemes to accelerate, reshaping order flow dynamics. ๐Ÿ“Œ ๐Ÿ’ฌ How will this cost compression alter your allocation to privacyโ€‘focused dApps? ๐Ÿ‘‡ โš ๏ธ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐Ÿท๏ธ #ETH #EIP8288 #Ethereum #Layer2 #Crypto ๐Ÿฆˆ ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿš€ $ETH RECURSIVE STARK MEMPOOL UNVEILS QUANTUMโ€‘SAFE EDGE ๐Ÿ’Ž

๐Ÿ“Š Vitalikโ€™s EIPโ€‘8288 pushes signature aggregation out of the execution core, letting smartโ€‘money nodes batch STARK proofs in the mempool. This recursive design slashes onโ€‘chain computation, turning a 10โ€ฏMโ€‘gas quantumโ€‘safe transaction into a fewโ€‘tensโ€‘ofโ€‘thousandsโ€ฏgas โ€“ a liquidityโ€‘friendly shift that institutional builders canโ€™t ignore. ๐Ÿฆˆ

โšก By offโ€‘loading proofs, block builders gain a leaner data footprint (โ‰ˆโ€ฏ100โ€‘300โ€ฏKB per block) and pave the way for RISCโ€‘V as the native ISA for recursive STARKs. Expect private account abstraction and new proof schemes to accelerate, reshaping order flow dynamics. ๐Ÿ“Œ

๐Ÿ’ฌ How will this cost compression alter your allocation to privacyโ€‘focused dApps? ๐Ÿ‘‡

โš ๏ธ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

๐Ÿท๏ธ #ETH #EIP8288 #Ethereum #Layer2 #Crypto

๐Ÿฆˆ ๐Ÿš€
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
โšก๏ธ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Trusted by the worldโ€™s largest crypto exchange.
๐Ÿ‘ Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number