Binance Square
#quantumcomputing

quantumcomputing

278,513 views
1,575 Discussing
DRACO CHAIN
·
--
⚡ $NVDA SHATTERS COMPUTATIONAL LIMITS WITH A 90% QUANTUM EFFICIENCY BREAKTHROUGH! 🔍 Institutional capital follows generational infrastructure shifts, and $NVDA just demonstrated structural dominance beyond classical architecture. 📊 Harnessing 8,192 supercomputer GPUs, the team successfully modeled a 104-qubit fault-tolerant quantum framework, compressing weeks of high-tier computation into mere days. 💡 The critical catalyst lies in validating magic state cultivation, which slashes physical qubit requirements by roughly 90%. While engineering hurdles remain before full commercial deployment, smart money recognizes that foundational compute bottlenecks are dissolving at an exponential velocity. 🤔 Will this quantum validation trigger an aggressive repricing across AI and decentralized high-performance computing sectors? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #NVDA #AI #QuantumComputing #TechTrends 🎯 🦈
⚡ $NVDA SHATTERS COMPUTATIONAL LIMITS WITH A 90% QUANTUM EFFICIENCY BREAKTHROUGH! 🔍

Institutional capital follows generational infrastructure shifts, and $NVDA just demonstrated structural dominance beyond classical architecture. 📊 Harnessing 8,192 supercomputer GPUs, the team successfully modeled a 104-qubit fault-tolerant quantum framework, compressing weeks of high-tier computation into mere days.

💡 The critical catalyst lies in validating magic state cultivation, which slashes physical qubit requirements by roughly 90%. While engineering hurdles remain before full commercial deployment, smart money recognizes that foundational compute bottlenecks are dissolving at an exponential velocity.

🤔 Will this quantum validation trigger an aggressive repricing across AI and decentralized high-performance computing sectors? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #NVDA #AI #QuantumComputing #TechTrends

🎯 🦈
Article
Google Just Cut Quantum Errors 40x. Here's What It Means for Bitcoin's ClockOn October 15, Google Quantum ($QNT ) AI published a paper in Science showing that "magic state cultivation" works on its Willow processor. The result: roughly a 40-fold drop in errors and 99.99% fidelity on a specialized quantum state that error-corrected machines need. In the same news cycle, Quantinuum reported a new error-correction record on its Helios system. For anyone holding $BTC or $ETH , the practical question is whether this moves the date when a quantum computer can break the signatures protecting your coins. My read: it moves the conversation faster than it moves the calendar. Here is the evidence. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED Magic states are special quantum states that a computer consumes to run the full range of useful calculations, and they must be made again and again. Producing them cleanly has been one of the most expensive parts of error correction, because earlier approaches needed large amounts of hardware just to manufacture them. Google's cultivation method works more like a filter: it injects a rough state, runs repeated checks, and discards any attempt where a flaw shows up. On Willow, that cut errors about 40-fold versus states prepared without it. Quantinuum, meanwhile, reports Helios logical fidelity of 99.9995%, about five errors per million operations. That figure comes from the company's announcement as relayed in Seeking Alpha's Wall Street Lunch; its August earnings release described the result as "near five-nines," so treat the exact decimal as company-reported. WHY CRYPTO READERS SHOULD CARE Bitcoin and Ethereum both secure ownership with elliptic-curve signatures. The risk is not to mining or consensus. It is that a large, error-corrected quantum computer could eventually derive a private key from an exposed public key. In March 2026, a Google Quantum AI paper estimated that breaking Bitcoin's curve could take fewer than 500,000 physical qubits, about a 20-fold cut from the roughly 9 million assumed before. Error-correction progress like this week's is exactly the kind of work that makes such estimates more realistic. KEY NUMBERS TO KNOW ▪️ 40x and 99.99%: Google's Oct 15 result. Context: the experiment used 54 of Willow's 105 qubits and retained only about 8% of attempts, so it proves the method works, not that it is cheap at scale. ▪️ About 1 in 10 billion: the error rate the paper cites as needed for RSA-2048, roughly a million times cleaner than this result. RSA is the older benchmark; elliptic curves like Bitcoin's are estimated to need fewer resources, so this is a gap, not a safety margin. ▪️ Under 500,000 physical qubits (about 1,200 logical): Google's March 31 estimate for attacking Bitcoin's curve. It is a resource estimate on paper, not a demonstrated attack. ▪️ 19,397 physical qubits: IonQ's September 8 estimate for its own architecture, with an attack taking about 26 days. Different hardware assumptions produce very different numbers, which is why headline qubit counts deserve scrutiny. ▪️ 48 logical qubits versus roughly 1,200 needed: Helios (98 physical qubits) has shown 48 fully error-corrected logical qubits, so the gap to Google's estimate is still large. In April, public quantum hardware broke a 15-bit elliptic-curve key; Bitcoin uses 256 bits. WHAT WOULD CONFIRM THE RISK IS ACCELERATING Cultivation demonstrated at larger scale and inside the error-correcting codes used for full machines, since Google itself says scaling remains the open challenge. Further cuts to published resource estimates. And any single machine combining high-quality magic states with hundreds of logical qubits, which would shift this from a paper threat to an engineering schedule. WHAT WOULD INVALIDATE IT Results that fail to hold when moved out of the small code used in this experiment, which the research notes does not guarantee the same precision. Resource estimates that stop falling or start rising as real-world overheads appear. Or faster-than-expected migration on the defensive side, which shrinks the pool of exposed coins before any attacker exists. WHAT I'M WATCHING The defense is moving, but slowly. BIP-360, a proposal for a quantum-resistant output type, was merged into Bitcoin's BIP repository on February 11, 2026. A merge is documentation, not activation, and the proposal does not itself choose a post-quantum signature algorithm. A companion proposal, BIP-361, proposes a far more aggressive phase-out of legacy address types and is contested. One analyst roadmap puts a possible BIP-360 activation in 2027-2029, which is a projection, not a schedule. Ethereum formed a dedicated post-quantum team in January 2026. On exposure, Citi Institute estimated roughly $648 billion in digital assets across all chains sits at quantum risk. Expert timelines still diverge sharply: Blockstream CEO Adam Back has argued a cryptographically relevant machine is 20 to 40 years away, while Google's own numbers have been compressing the estimate. Coins whose public keys are already visible on-chain are generally considered the most exposed. Note on naming: Quantinuum trades on Nasdaq under the ticker QNT, which is unrelated to the Quant (QNT) crypto token. Do you think Bitcoin's developers can ship and activate a quantum-resistant upgrade before the hardware catches up, or is the community moving too slowly? Not financial advice. Always DYOR. Follow for Daily Hot Analytics Like This. @MistralAK #QNT #QuantumComputing #TRUMP {spot}(QNTUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT) {spot}(BTCUSDT)

Google Just Cut Quantum Errors 40x. Here's What It Means for Bitcoin's Clock

On October 15, Google Quantum ($QNT ) AI published a paper in Science showing that "magic state cultivation" works on its Willow processor. The result: roughly a 40-fold drop in errors and 99.99% fidelity on a specialized quantum state that error-corrected machines need. In the same news cycle, Quantinuum reported a new error-correction record on its Helios system. For anyone holding $BTC or $ETH , the practical question is whether this moves the date when a quantum computer can break the signatures protecting your coins. My read: it moves the conversation faster than it moves the calendar. Here is the evidence.
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED
Magic states are special quantum states that a computer consumes to run the full range of useful calculations, and they must be made again and again. Producing them cleanly has been one of the most expensive parts of error correction, because earlier approaches needed large amounts of hardware just to manufacture them. Google's cultivation method works more like a filter: it injects a rough state, runs repeated checks, and discards any attempt where a flaw shows up. On Willow, that cut errors about 40-fold versus states prepared without it.
Quantinuum, meanwhile, reports Helios logical fidelity of 99.9995%, about five errors per million operations. That figure comes from the company's announcement as relayed in Seeking Alpha's Wall Street Lunch; its August earnings release described the result as "near five-nines," so treat the exact decimal as company-reported.
WHY CRYPTO READERS SHOULD CARE
Bitcoin and Ethereum both secure ownership with elliptic-curve signatures. The risk is not to mining or consensus. It is that a large, error-corrected quantum computer could eventually derive a private key from an exposed public key. In March 2026, a Google Quantum AI paper estimated that breaking Bitcoin's curve could take fewer than 500,000 physical qubits, about a 20-fold cut from the roughly 9 million assumed before. Error-correction progress like this week's is exactly the kind of work that makes such estimates more realistic.
KEY NUMBERS TO KNOW
▪️ 40x and 99.99%: Google's Oct 15 result. Context: the experiment used 54 of Willow's 105 qubits and retained only about 8% of attempts, so it proves the method works, not that it is cheap at scale.
▪️ About 1 in 10 billion: the error rate the paper cites as needed for RSA-2048, roughly a million times cleaner than this result. RSA is the older benchmark; elliptic curves like Bitcoin's are estimated to need fewer resources, so this is a gap, not a safety margin.
▪️ Under 500,000 physical qubits (about 1,200 logical): Google's March 31 estimate for attacking Bitcoin's curve. It is a resource estimate on paper, not a demonstrated attack.
▪️ 19,397 physical qubits: IonQ's September 8 estimate for its own architecture, with an attack taking about 26 days. Different hardware assumptions produce very different numbers, which is why headline qubit counts deserve scrutiny.
▪️ 48 logical qubits versus roughly 1,200 needed: Helios (98 physical qubits) has shown 48 fully error-corrected logical qubits, so the gap to Google's estimate is still large. In April, public quantum hardware broke a 15-bit elliptic-curve key; Bitcoin uses 256 bits.
WHAT WOULD CONFIRM THE RISK IS ACCELERATING
Cultivation demonstrated at larger scale and inside the error-correcting codes used for full machines, since Google itself says scaling remains the open challenge. Further cuts to published resource estimates. And any single machine combining high-quality magic states with hundreds of logical qubits, which would shift this from a paper threat to an engineering schedule.
WHAT WOULD INVALIDATE IT
Results that fail to hold when moved out of the small code used in this experiment, which the research notes does not guarantee the same precision. Resource estimates that stop falling or start rising as real-world overheads appear. Or faster-than-expected migration on the defensive side, which shrinks the pool of exposed coins before any attacker exists.
WHAT I'M WATCHING
The defense is moving, but slowly. BIP-360, a proposal for a quantum-resistant output type, was merged into Bitcoin's BIP repository on February 11, 2026. A merge is documentation, not activation, and the proposal does not itself choose a post-quantum signature algorithm. A companion proposal, BIP-361, proposes a far more aggressive phase-out of legacy address types and is contested. One analyst roadmap puts a possible BIP-360 activation in 2027-2029, which is a projection, not a schedule. Ethereum formed a dedicated post-quantum team in January 2026. On exposure, Citi Institute estimated roughly $648 billion in digital assets across all chains sits at quantum risk. Expert timelines still diverge sharply: Blockstream CEO Adam Back has argued a cryptographically relevant machine is 20 to 40 years away, while Google's own numbers have been compressing the estimate. Coins whose public keys are already visible on-chain are generally considered the most exposed. Note on naming: Quantinuum trades on Nasdaq under the ticker QNT, which is unrelated to the Quant (QNT) crypto token.
Do you think Bitcoin's developers can ship and activate a quantum-resistant upgrade before the hardware catches up, or is the community moving too slowly?
Not financial advice. Always DYOR.
Follow for Daily Hot Analytics Like This. @MistralAK
#QNT #QuantumComputing #TRUMP
🚨 A Critical Privacy Upgrade Could Be Coming $ZEC is facing an important long-term privacy challenge as quantum computing advances. Developer Zakura has proposed a fix aimed at preventing future quantum attackers from linking shielded swaps through a publicly exposed Zcash address. The concern is significant: if a wallet's address becomes a linkable identifier, transaction privacy could be weakened even when shielded features are used. Why It Matters The proposal highlights a key distinction between transaction confidentiality today and protection against future quantum threats. While practical quantum attacks capable of breaking current cryptography are not established, preparing early could help strengthen Zcash's long-term security. Market Analysis For $ZEC this development could reinforce the project's privacy-focused narrative and bring renewed attention to its technical roadmap. However, a developer proposal alone does not guarantee implementation, adoption, or an immediate price rally. What to Watch Next - Technical details and peer review of Zakura's proposal - Whether the solution is adopted by Zcash developers - Potential implications for shielded transactions and wallet security - Market reaction as the proposal develops Conclusion: Quantum resistance could become an increasingly important differentiator for privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. Zcash's ability to address these risks without compromising usability will be worth watching. #Zcash #CryptoNews #QuantumComputing {spot}(ZECUSDT)
🚨 A Critical Privacy Upgrade Could Be Coming

$ZEC is facing an important long-term privacy challenge as quantum computing advances.

Developer Zakura has proposed a fix aimed at preventing future quantum attackers from linking shielded swaps through a publicly exposed Zcash address. The concern is significant: if a wallet's address becomes a linkable identifier, transaction privacy could be weakened even when shielded features are used.

Why It Matters

The proposal highlights a key distinction between transaction confidentiality today and protection against future quantum threats. While practical quantum attacks capable of breaking current cryptography are not established, preparing early could help strengthen Zcash's long-term security.

Market Analysis

For $ZEC this development could reinforce the project's privacy-focused narrative and bring renewed attention to its technical roadmap. However, a developer proposal alone does not guarantee implementation, adoption, or an immediate price rally.

What to Watch Next

- Technical details and peer review of Zakura's proposal
- Whether the solution is adopted by Zcash developers
- Potential implications for shielded transactions and wallet security
- Market reaction as the proposal develops

Conclusion: Quantum resistance could become an increasingly important differentiator for privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. Zcash's ability to address these risks without compromising usability will be worth watching.

#Zcash #CryptoNews #QuantumComputing
Article
The Silent Seismic Shift: How "Quantum Computing" Will Reshape the Crypto Landscape? 🌌💻 @Square-Creator-e09b35ba9dfd charts, support levels, and resistance zones, a silent technological arms race is taking place behind the scenes in global tech labs: the race for Quantum Computing. This technology is not just an upgrade to our current computers; it is a monumental scientific leap capable of processing complex data in mere seconds—tasks that would take traditional supercomputers thousands of years to solve. So, what does this quantum supremacy mean for the crypto world? And how will it impact your investment portfolio? 🛡️ Cryptography vs. The Quantum Might Blockchain and cryptocurrencies rely fundamentally on complex cryptographic algorithms to secure wallets and validate transactions. The entry of quantum computers into the arena means these ultimate machines could, in the future, potentially crack traditional encryption. However, there is no need to panic. This is not a sudden attack, but a massive turning point that will separate fundamentally strong projects from the weak ones. ⚖️ The Great Purge: Active Projects vs. Ghost Coins The real impact of quantum computing won't be the destruction of the market, but rather a "Great Purge" and filtration process. The market will split into two distinct categories: 1. Projects with Active Technical Foundations: Leading cryptocurrencies and heavy-development projects (such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and robust Layer-1 networks) have already spent years developing what is known as "Post-Quantum Cryptography" (PQC). These networks will undergo flexible upgrades and forks to secure their infrastructure and protect user funds long before any actual threat materializes. 2. Coins with No Real Projects or Active Development (Abandoned Projects): This is the real red flag for investors. Cryptocurrencies that lack active development teams, or rely on outdated, copy-pasted code without continuous maintenance, will find themselves completely defenseless. The absence of technical adaptability will leave their networks exposed and incapable of upgrading their defenses. 💡 The Smart Investor’s Guide The goal of understanding this transition is not fear, but strategic asset selection: • Look for Active Development: Before making a long-term investment in any coin, ensure the project has a flexible technical roadmap and an active developer community constantly updating the network on various platforms. • Solid Fundamentals Always Win: A coin's true value stems from its utility and technological adaptability. The future does not threaten crypto; it refines it to ensure only the most secure and advanced systems prevail! What are your thoughts? 👇 Do you consider "continuous technical updates and project strength" a strict rule before buying a coin, or do you focus solely on short-term speculation? #QuantumComputing #CryptoAnalysis # #QuantumComputing #CryptoAnalysis" #BinanceSquare #CryptoFutures #BlockchainTechnology $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT) $SOL {future}(SOLUSDT) $ETH {future}(ETHUSDT)

The Silent Seismic Shift: How "Quantum Computing" Will Reshape the Crypto Landscape? 🌌💻

@رقم 1
charts, support levels, and resistance zones, a silent technological arms race is taking place behind the scenes in global tech labs: the race for Quantum Computing. This technology is not just an upgrade to our current computers; it is a monumental scientific leap capable of processing complex data in mere seconds—tasks that would take traditional supercomputers thousands of years to solve.
So, what does this quantum supremacy mean for the crypto world? And how will it impact your investment portfolio?
🛡️ Cryptography vs. The Quantum Might
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies rely fundamentally on complex cryptographic algorithms to secure wallets and validate transactions. The entry of quantum computers into the arena means these ultimate machines could, in the future, potentially crack traditional encryption.
However, there is no need to panic. This is not a sudden attack, but a massive turning point that will separate fundamentally strong projects from the weak ones.
⚖️ The Great Purge: Active Projects vs. Ghost Coins
The real impact of quantum computing won't be the destruction of the market, but rather a "Great Purge" and filtration process. The market will split into two distinct categories:
1. Projects with Active Technical Foundations: Leading cryptocurrencies and heavy-development projects (such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and robust Layer-1 networks) have already spent years developing what is known as "Post-Quantum Cryptography" (PQC). These networks will undergo flexible upgrades and forks to secure their infrastructure and protect user funds long before any actual threat materializes.
2. Coins with No Real Projects or Active Development (Abandoned Projects): This is the real red flag for investors. Cryptocurrencies that lack active development teams, or rely on outdated, copy-pasted code without continuous maintenance, will find themselves completely defenseless. The absence of technical adaptability will leave their networks exposed and incapable of upgrading their defenses.
💡 The Smart Investor’s Guide
The goal of understanding this transition is not fear, but strategic asset selection:
• Look for Active Development: Before making a long-term investment in any coin, ensure the project has a flexible technical roadmap and an active developer community constantly updating the network on various platforms.
• Solid Fundamentals Always Win: A coin's true value stems from its utility and technological adaptability.
The future does not threaten crypto; it refines it to ensure only the most secure and advanced systems prevail!
What are your thoughts? 👇
Do you consider "continuous technical updates and project strength" a strict rule before buying a coin, or do you focus solely on short-term speculation?
#QuantumComputing #CryptoAnalysis #
#QuantumComputing #CryptoAnalysis" #BinanceSquare #CryptoFutures #BlockchainTechnology
$BTC
$SOL
$ETH
"Crypto Twitter is asking the question nobody wanted to answer: is 30% of all Bitcoin already living on borrowed time? 👀 Nine blockchain organizations just launched the Quantum Alliance, an open standards body modeled on the IETF to define what "quantum-ready" actually means (Decrypt, Oct 17). Its headline number is hard to ignore: roughly 6.04M $BTC, about 30% of total supply, sits quantum-exposed at rest. 📊 Why it matters Most major chains secure accounts with elliptic-curve signatures. Once an address's public key lands on a public ledger, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor's algorithm could theoretically reverse-engineer the private key and seize the funds. through a market the Alliance puts at roughly $2.9T (Decrypt). Timelines keep tightening. A model co-built by two Alliance contributors flags March 2028 as an early window, and a Google Quantum AI study slashed the estimated qubits needed to break Bitcoin's cryptography to under 500,000. ⚠️ BUT NO MACHINE CAN DO THIS YET. And read this plainly: nine firms announcing a coalition is intent, not a protocol change. No binding standard, no migration, no enforcement mechanism, just coordination. That said, parallel efforts have real money behind them: Coinbase urged Bitcoin developers to start the quantum migration now, warning preparations take years, and a BlackRock, Strategy, and Coinbase-backed consortium committed $15M to the problem (Decrypt). The counterpoint Bitcoiners will cite: most exposed coins sit in old addresses, including Satoshi-era UTXOs that never moved. The real risk vector is reusing an address after signing, since signing reveals the public key. So: is this the wake-up call that finally starts Bitcoin's post-quantum migration, or a standards-body press release that ships nothing? 🐂🐻 Not financial advice. DYOR. #crypto #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #Security"
"Crypto Twitter is asking the question nobody wanted to answer: is 30% of all Bitcoin already living on borrowed time? 👀

Nine blockchain organizations just launched the Quantum Alliance, an open standards body modeled on the IETF to define what "quantum-ready" actually means (Decrypt, Oct 17). Its headline number is hard to ignore: roughly 6.04M $BTC , about 30% of total supply, sits quantum-exposed at rest.

📊 Why it matters

Most major chains secure accounts with elliptic-curve signatures. Once an address's public key lands on a public ledger, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor's algorithm could theoretically reverse-engineer the private key and seize the funds. through a market the Alliance puts at roughly $2.9T (Decrypt).

Timelines keep tightening. A model co-built by two Alliance contributors flags March 2028 as an early window, and a Google Quantum AI study slashed the estimated qubits needed to break Bitcoin's cryptography to under 500,000.

⚠️ BUT NO MACHINE CAN DO THIS YET. And read this plainly: nine firms announcing a coalition is intent, not a protocol change. No binding standard, no migration, no enforcement mechanism, just coordination. That said, parallel efforts have real money behind them: Coinbase urged Bitcoin developers to start the quantum migration now, warning preparations take years, and a BlackRock, Strategy, and Coinbase-backed consortium committed $15M to the problem (Decrypt).

The counterpoint Bitcoiners will cite: most exposed coins sit in old addresses, including Satoshi-era UTXOs that never moved. The real risk vector is reusing an address after signing, since signing reveals the public key.

So: is this the wake-up call that finally starts Bitcoin's post-quantum migration, or a standards-body press release that ships nothing? 🐂🐻

Not financial advice. DYOR.
#crypto #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #Security"
⚠️ Can a Super Computer Crack Bitcoin? Google's Willow Chip Started Today's Big Debate Big story everyone is talking about today, Oct 17: is Bitcoin $BTC safe from quantum computers? What happened, in simple words: • Google published a new result in the journal Science on Oct 15: its Willow quantum chip cut errors about 40 times, reaching 99.99% accuracy on special quantum states • On the same day, Oct 15, nine crypto companies launched a "Quantum Alliance" in Lisbon to prepare safer, quantum-resistant standards • Their estimate: about 6.04 to 6.4 million BTC — around 30.2% of all mined Bitcoin — sit in wallets whose public keys are already visible, including about 1.1 million BTC linked to Satoshi Nakamoto What does this mean, simply? A Bitcoin wallet has a secret private key and a public key. In theory, a very powerful quantum computer could one day work out the private key from a visible public key. That is why these old, visible-key wallets get the most attention. Now the calm, honest part — please do not panic: • No computer today can crack Bitcoin. Willow has only 105 qubits, while Google's own earlier estimate said an attack could need fewer than 500,000 qubits • Only about 8% of Willow's test attempts passed its quality checks, so this is progress, not a finished machine • Most active wallets can move to safer addresses in the future. Experts disagree on timing — some models say late 2020s, others say the 2030s And tonight's price check at 8:20 PM PKT: Bitcoin held steady near $81,540, down only -0.18% in 24 hours, between a high of $81,821 and a low of $80,809. The market did not panic over this news — it stayed calm and watched. The simple lesson: this is a long-term security upgrade story, not an emergency today. Good projects prepare early, and that is exactly what the new Alliance says it wants to do. Educational content only, not financial advice. #BinanceSquare #WriteToEarn #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing
⚠️ Can a Super Computer Crack Bitcoin? Google's Willow Chip Started Today's Big Debate

Big story everyone is talking about today, Oct 17: is Bitcoin $BTC safe from quantum computers?

What happened, in simple words:
• Google published a new result in the journal Science on Oct 15: its Willow quantum chip cut errors about 40 times, reaching 99.99% accuracy on special quantum states
• On the same day, Oct 15, nine crypto companies launched a "Quantum Alliance" in Lisbon to prepare safer, quantum-resistant standards
• Their estimate: about 6.04 to 6.4 million BTC — around 30.2% of all mined Bitcoin — sit in wallets whose public keys are already visible, including about 1.1 million BTC linked to Satoshi Nakamoto

What does this mean, simply? A Bitcoin wallet has a secret private key and a public key. In theory, a very powerful quantum computer could one day work out the private key from a visible public key. That is why these old, visible-key wallets get the most attention.

Now the calm, honest part — please do not panic:
• No computer today can crack Bitcoin. Willow has only 105 qubits, while Google's own earlier estimate said an attack could need fewer than 500,000 qubits
• Only about 8% of Willow's test attempts passed its quality checks, so this is progress, not a finished machine
• Most active wallets can move to safer addresses in the future. Experts disagree on timing — some models say late 2020s, others say the 2030s

And tonight's price check at 8:20 PM PKT: Bitcoin held steady near $81,540, down only -0.18% in 24 hours, between a high of $81,821 and a low of $80,809. The market did not panic over this news — it stayed calm and watched.

The simple lesson: this is a long-term security upgrade story, not an emergency today. Good projects prepare early, and that is exactly what the new Alliance says it wants to do.

Educational content only, not financial advice.
#BinanceSquare #WriteToEarn #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing
Is Bitcoin really at risk from quantum computers? ⚛️ Google just announced a major breakthrough, slashing error rates by 40x with 99.9% accuracy. Naturally, this reignited fears of "Q-Day"—the theoretical moment quantum tech could crack crypto signatures. The reality? Don't panic. No machine today is anywhere near powerful enough to breach Bitcoin's encryption, and post-quantum security upgrades are already in the works. 🛡️ #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #CryptoNews
Is Bitcoin really at risk from quantum computers? ⚛️

Google just announced a major breakthrough, slashing error rates by 40x with 99.9% accuracy. Naturally, this reignited fears of "Q-Day"—the theoretical moment quantum tech could crack crypto signatures.

The reality? Don't panic. No machine today is anywhere near powerful enough to breach Bitcoin's encryption, and post-quantum security upgrades are already in the works. 🛡️

#Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #CryptoNews
·
--
Bullish
416.6941 $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT) in just a few seconds, two 2013-era wallets transferred funds to the same address and the channels are already saying: “three Satoshi-era wallets” and “quantum computer cracks old bitcoins” there are two wallets. 167.8402 BTC lay dormant for 13 years, 248.8539 BTC for 12 (Onchain Lens data). And 2013 is no longer the Satoshi era both transfers were in the same block, about five seconds apart, to the same place. My take: it’s an owner consolidating their coins, not a thief cracking two wallets in sync the blockchain, though, won’t say who signed, or whether this was a sale the quantum theory is just a claim without a source. No one has publicly demonstrated a Shor attack yet I don’t hold BTC myself. I’m just sick of fear being presented as news I’m waiting to see whether these 416.6941 BTC make it to an exchange. What do you think: the owner or quantum computers? #bitcoin #QuantumComputing
416.6941 $BTC
in just a few seconds, two 2013-era wallets transferred funds to the same address

and the channels are already saying: “three Satoshi-era wallets” and “quantum computer cracks old bitcoins”

there are two wallets. 167.8402 BTC lay dormant for 13 years, 248.8539 BTC for 12 (Onchain Lens data). And 2013 is no longer the Satoshi era

both transfers were in the same block, about five seconds apart, to the same place. My take: it’s an owner consolidating their coins, not a thief cracking two wallets in sync

the blockchain, though, won’t say who signed, or whether this was a sale

the quantum theory is just a claim without a source. No one has publicly demonstrated a Shor attack yet

I don’t hold BTC myself. I’m just sick of fear being presented as news

I’m waiting to see whether these 416.6941 BTC make it to an exchange. What do you think: the owner or quantum computers?

#bitcoin #QuantumComputing
The Zcash team is preparing for the quantum computing era! They plan to fix privacy issues with ZEC swaps by ensuring that every swap on the NEAR network has its own unique key, preventing refund addresses from exposing users' payment histories. With quantum computing potentially threatening current encryption, this privacy upgrade couldn't come at a better time! #Privacy #QuantumComputing $ZEC $NEAR Zcash devs are prepping for quantum computing era! They're fixing ZEC swap privacy by giving each NEAR transaction its own key, preventing refund addresses from exposing payment histories. Perfect timing as quantum computing threatens current encryption! #Privacy #QuantumComputing $ZEC $NEAR
The Zcash team is preparing for the quantum computing era! They plan to fix privacy issues with ZEC swaps by ensuring that every swap on the NEAR network has its own unique key, preventing refund addresses from exposing users' payment histories. With quantum computing potentially threatening current encryption, this privacy upgrade couldn't come at a better time! #Privacy #QuantumComputing $ZEC $NEAR

Zcash devs are prepping for quantum computing era! They're fixing ZEC swap privacy by giving each NEAR transaction its own key, preventing refund addresses from exposing payment histories. Perfect timing as quantum computing threatens current encryption! #Privacy #QuantumComputing $ZEC $NEAR
⚛️ Google just hit 99.99% on a quantum test. Should $BTC worry? 1️⃣ 40x fewer errors via "magic state cultivation" on Willow 2️⃣ 99.99% T-state fidelity: a new record (The Block) 3️⃣ 2029: Google's own deadline to switch to post-quantum crypto • Project Eleven: no change to Q-day timelines yet • BTC $81.4K (-1.2%), lost the $81,688 Asia low, 1H RSI 40 🎯 My take: quantum is a slow, years-long risk; for now watch $80.4K, reclaim $82K to calm it 💬 Should Bitcoin start its quantum upgrade now or wait? 👇 #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #Google
⚛️ Google just hit 99.99% on a quantum test. Should $BTC worry?
1️⃣ 40x fewer errors via "magic state cultivation" on Willow
2️⃣ 99.99% T-state fidelity: a new record (The Block)
3️⃣ 2029: Google's own deadline to switch to post-quantum crypto
• Project Eleven: no change to Q-day timelines yet
• BTC $81.4K (-1.2%), lost the $81,688 Asia low, 1H RSI 40
🎯 My take: quantum is a slow, years-long risk; for now watch $80.4K, reclaim $82K to calm it
💬 Should Bitcoin start its quantum upgrade now or wait? 👇
#Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #Google
Nine crypto companies have formed the Quantum Alliance to jointly address emerging quantum security threats following warnings that 6.4 million bitcoin face future risks. While the alliance marks a proactive step toward safeguarding blockchain infrastructure, members currently disagree on the exact timeline of the threat and whether vulnerable $BTC holdings should eventually be frozen. This institutional coordination highlights long-term network security priorities as developers prepare cryptographic upgrades for the post-quantum era. #QuantumComputing #CryptoSecurity #BlockchainTech #CyberSecurity
Nine crypto companies have formed the Quantum Alliance to jointly address emerging quantum security threats following warnings that 6.4 million bitcoin face future risks. While the alliance marks a proactive step toward safeguarding blockchain infrastructure, members currently disagree on the exact timeline of the threat and whether vulnerable $BTC holdings should eventually be frozen. This institutional coordination highlights long-term network security priorities as developers prepare cryptographic upgrades for the post-quantum era.

#QuantumComputing #CryptoSecurity #BlockchainTech #CyberSecurity
·
--
Bullish
📢 A reassuring message from Arthur Hayes to Bitcoin holders Arthur Hayes believes that progress in quantum computing is not a reason to sell Bitcoin, noting that the real risk lies with users who repeatedly reuse wallet addresses. 🔐 In the blockchain world, security practices and private key management remain among the most important protective measures, regardless of future technological advances. The challenge is not always the technology itself, but how it is used. $BNB $BTC $ETH #Crypto #blockchain #Security #quantumcomputing
📢 A reassuring message from Arthur Hayes to Bitcoin holders
Arthur Hayes believes that progress in quantum computing is not a reason to sell Bitcoin, noting that the real risk lies with users who repeatedly reuse wallet addresses.
🔐 In the blockchain world, security practices and private key management remain among the most important protective measures, regardless of future technological advances.
The challenge is not always the technology itself, but how it is used.
$BNB $BTC $ETH
#Crypto #blockchain #Security #quantumcomputing
Satoshi-era Bitcoin: A greater quantum threat with Google's Willow breakthrough - Google's Willow chip reduces quantum computing errors by about 40 times - Removes one of the hardware hurdles facing any attempt to crack Bitcoin wallets - Special quantum states make advanced computing more reliable #BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #Willow $btc btc vlikevn Titanbot Source: CoinDesk
Satoshi-era Bitcoin: A greater quantum threat with Google's Willow breakthrough

- Google's Willow chip reduces quantum computing errors by about 40 times
- Removes one of the hardware hurdles facing any attempt to crack Bitcoin wallets
- Special quantum states make advanced computing more reliable
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing #Willow

$btc btc

vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinDesk
Google confirmed a quantum breakthrough, and the crypto community has started seriously talking about “Q-day”—the day quantum computers will be able to break today’s cryptography. Protocols that aren’t ready for post-quantum security are at risk. ETH ($2,461) and BTC ($81,968) remain resilient for now, but the race to develop quantum-resistant solutions has already begun. How close is the real quantum threat to your assets? $BTC $ETH #QuantumComputing #Blockchain
Google confirmed a quantum breakthrough, and the crypto community has started seriously talking about “Q-day”—the day quantum computers will be able to break today’s cryptography. Protocols that aren’t ready for post-quantum security are at risk. ETH ($2,461) and BTC ($81,968) remain resilient for now, but the race to develop quantum-resistant solutions has already begun.

How close is the real quantum threat to your assets?

$BTC $ETH #QuantumComputing #Blockchain
Coinbase flags the quantum‑ready upgrades Bitcoin custodians must tackle. In a technical blog posted on October 13, Coinbase – custodian of roughly 5 % of all Bitcoin – outlined the requirements for a quantum‑resistant custody solution. New digital signature schemes must fit Bitcoin’s scarce block space and work for both custodians and everyday wallets. Coinbase highlights P2MR (proposed in BIP‑360) and P2TRv2 as output designs that can host future post‑quantum signatures without a complete redesign. It proposes hybrid wallets that can spend with either an ECDSA/Schnorr signature or a post‑quantum key during the transition. The firm warns that stateful post‑quantum signatures, while smaller and faster, can enable forgery if signing state is reused, making recovery difficult for exchanges and individual users. Evaluation criteria include signature size, verification speed, transaction fees, full‑node workload, hardware‑wallet compatibility and multi‑party computation (MPC). Candidates under review are ML‑DSA, the prospective FN‑DSA standard and SHRINCS. Coinbase also raises the issue of late‑migrating wallets. BIP‑361, led by Jameson Lopp and four other developers, proposes phased restrictions on quantum‑vulnerable addresses, while BitMEX Research suggested a “canary” freeze that triggers only when a spend proves a quantum computer exists. Do you think phased freezes or canary triggers better protect Bitcoin’s censorship‑resistance while addressing quantum risk? #Bitcoin #Crypto #FinTech #QuantumComputing #Custody
Coinbase flags the quantum‑ready upgrades Bitcoin custodians must tackle.

In a technical blog posted on October 13, Coinbase – custodian of roughly 5 % of all Bitcoin – outlined the requirements for a quantum‑resistant custody solution.

New digital signature schemes must fit Bitcoin’s scarce block space and work for both custodians and everyday wallets.

Coinbase highlights P2MR (proposed in BIP‑360) and P2TRv2 as output designs that can host future post‑quantum signatures without a complete redesign.

It proposes hybrid wallets that can spend with either an ECDSA/Schnorr signature or a post‑quantum key during the transition.

The firm warns that stateful post‑quantum signatures, while smaller and faster, can enable forgery if signing state is reused, making recovery difficult for exchanges and individual users.

Evaluation criteria include signature size, verification speed, transaction fees, full‑node workload, hardware‑wallet compatibility and multi‑party computation (MPC).

Candidates under review are ML‑DSA, the prospective FN‑DSA standard and SHRINCS.

Coinbase also raises the issue of late‑migrating wallets. BIP‑361, led by Jameson Lopp and four other developers, proposes phased restrictions on quantum‑vulnerable addresses, while BitMEX Research suggested a “canary” freeze that triggers only when a spend proves a quantum computer exists.

Do you think phased freezes or canary triggers better protect Bitcoin’s censorship‑resistance while addressing quantum risk?

#Bitcoin #Crypto #FinTech #QuantumComputing #Custody
🚨 SUI TAKES A STEP TOWARD QUANTUM-RESISTANT SECURITY! 🔐 Mysten Labs reports that $SUI has completed its first native quantum-resistant transaction on Devnet, marking a major milestone for blockchain security. 🔹 Technology: ML-DSA-65 post-quantum signatures 🔹 Goal: Strengthen account security against future quantum-computing threats 🔹 Mainnet target: Q1 2027, subject to audits and testnet feedback ⚡ This could be an important step toward more resilient blockchain infrastructure. However, the mainnet rollout is not complete yet. 👀 Will quantum-resistant security become a major advantage for SUI? #SUI #SuiNetwork #CryptoNewsCommunity #Blockchain #QuantumComputing {spot}(SUIUSDT)
🚨 SUI TAKES A STEP TOWARD QUANTUM-RESISTANT SECURITY! 🔐

Mysten Labs reports that $SUI has completed its first native quantum-resistant transaction on Devnet, marking a major milestone for blockchain security.

🔹 Technology: ML-DSA-65 post-quantum signatures
🔹 Goal: Strengthen account security against future quantum-computing threats
🔹 Mainnet target: Q1 2027, subject to audits and testnet feedback

⚡ This could be an important step toward more resilient blockchain infrastructure. However, the mainnet rollout is not complete yet.

👀 Will quantum-resistant security become a major advantage for SUI?

#SUI #SuiNetwork #CryptoNewsCommunity #Blockchain #QuantumComputing
Coinbase holds 5% of all Bitcoin and is sounding the alarm: we need to start preparing for quantum hackers now! It recommends flexible addresses, quantum-resistant backup keys, and a separate discussion about those "lost" bitcoins. #比特币 #量子计算 $BTC Coinbase holds 5% of all Bitcoin & is shouting: Quantum prep starts NOW! They're pushing for flexible addresses, quantum-resistant backup keys, and a separate chat about those "lost" coins. #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing $BTC
Coinbase holds 5% of all Bitcoin and is sounding the alarm: we need to start preparing for quantum hackers now! It recommends flexible addresses, quantum-resistant backup keys, and a separate discussion about those "lost" bitcoins. #比特币 #量子计算 $BTC

Coinbase holds 5% of all Bitcoin & is shouting: Quantum prep starts NOW! They're pushing for flexible addresses, quantum-resistant backup keys, and a separate chat about those "lost" coins. #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing $BTC
Bitcoin quantum-safe protection costs have dropped by 82%! There are now 6 million bitcoins that need protection from quantum computing threats. Cheaper GPU computation supports specialized QSB transactions, but traditional signatures and miner access remain limited. #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing $BTC Bitcoin's quantum-safe protection just got 82% cheaper! Researchers racing to secure 6 million BTC from quantum threats. Cheaper GPU computation enables specialized QSB transactions, while traditional signatures still limit practical use. #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing $BTC
Bitcoin quantum-safe protection costs have dropped by 82%! There are now 6 million bitcoins that need protection from quantum computing threats. Cheaper GPU computation supports specialized QSB transactions, but traditional signatures and miner access remain limited. #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing $BTC

Bitcoin's quantum-safe protection just got 82% cheaper! Researchers racing to secure 6 million BTC from quantum threats. Cheaper GPU computation enables specialized QSB transactions, while traditional signatures still limit practical use. #Bitcoin #QuantumComputing $BTC
🔐 $TRX goes post-quantum on testnet, price sits at a 30-day low 1️⃣ Justin Sun: quantum-safe signatures now live on the Nile testnet 2️⃣ Uses FN-DSA-512 (Falcon family), a NIST-backed scheme 3️⃣ Mainnet "any time", per Sun, but no date is set 📉 TRX $0.3311: tagged $0.3307 today, lowest in 30 days 📊 Under falling 4H 20/50 EMA ($0.333/$0.334), RSI 35 🎯 My take: news isn't price yet; reclaim $0.3388 or $0.33 gives way 💬 Should every chain ship quantum-safe keys before 2030? 👇 #Tron #QuantumComputing #PostQuantum
🔐 $TRX goes post-quantum on testnet, price sits at a 30-day low
1️⃣ Justin Sun: quantum-safe signatures now live on the Nile testnet
2️⃣ Uses FN-DSA-512 (Falcon family), a NIST-backed scheme
3️⃣ Mainnet "any time", per Sun, but no date is set
📉 TRX $0.3311: tagged $0.3307 today, lowest in 30 days
📊 Under falling 4H 20/50 EMA ($0.333/$0.334), RSI 35
🎯 My take: news isn't price yet; reclaim $0.3388 or $0.33 gives way
💬 Should every chain ship quantum-safe keys before 2030? 👇
#Tron #QuantumComputing #PostQuantum
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number