ICEBAG
143 Posts
ICEBAG
Report
Block User
Degen 09; multi chain degen; strategist; marketing guy
0 Following
4 Followers
28 Liked
Posts
·
--
@Solana led stablecoin growth in the past 24 hours, adding $312.5M, with @Tron and @Arbitrum close behind.
$SOL +$312.5M
$TRON +$214.0M
$ARB +$178.9M
$BNB +$40.0M
$base +$30.3M
$ETH +$15.8M
#Optimism +$10.7M
$XRPLF +$8.0M
#NEARProtocol +$3.6M
#tempo +$2.9M
Via @tokenterminal
@Solana led stablecoin growth in the past 24 hours, adding $312.5M, with @Tron and @Arbitrum close behind.
$SOL +$312.5M
$TRON +$214.0M
$ARB +$178.9M
$BNB +$40.0M
$base +$30.3M
$ETH +$15.8M
#Optimism +$10.7M
$XRPLF +$8.0M
#NEARProtocol +$3.6M
#tempo +$2.9M
Via @tokenterminal
$SOL +$312.5M
$TRON +$214.0M
$ARB +$178.9M
$BNB +$40.0M
$base +$30.3M
$ETH +$15.8M
#Optimism +$10.7M
$XRPLF +$8.0M
#NEARProtocol +$3.6M
#tempo +$2.9M
Via @tokenterminal
36
·
--
How to Compare Two Cross-Chain Swap Routes on STON.fi
Cross-chain swaps can feel confusing, especially when you have multiple routes to choose from.
But don’t look at the exchange rate alone. Here are the key things to compare:
1. Source & Destination
Check the network you’re sending from and the network where you want to receive your assets.
Example: $TON → Ethereum or $TON → $TRON.
2. Final Amount
The most important number is how much you will actually receive after fees and other costs.
3. Route & Execution
Look at how the swap will be executed. STON.fi Omniston uses RFQ and resolvers to find cross-chain liquidity and facilitate execution.
4. Fees & Price Impact
A route showing a better rate isn’t automatically better. Check the fees and how they affect your final amount.
5. Speed
If two routes provide similar final amounts, execution time can become an important factor.
6. Destination Address
Before confirming, make sure the destination network and address are compatible with the asset you want to receive.
Simple rule:
Route A → Better final amount + reasonable fees + faster execution
Route B → Lower quoted cost + slower execution + lower final amount
When comparing cross-chain routes, ask yourself:
“How much will I receive, how much will I pay, and how long will it take?”
That’s more useful than looking at the exchange rate alone.
One Swap. Across Chains.
🌐: https://app.ston.fi/
How to Compare Two Cross-Chain Swap Routes on STON.fi
Cross-chain swaps can feel confusing, especially when you have multiple routes to choose from.
But don’t look at the exchange rate alone. Here are the key things to compare:
1. Source & Destination
Check the network you’re sending from and the network where you want to receive your assets.
Example: $TON → Ethereum or $TON → $TRON.
2. Final Amount
The most important number is how much you will actually receive after fees and other costs.
3. Route & Execution
Look at how the swap will be executed. STON.fi Omniston uses RFQ and resolvers to find cross-chain liquidity and facilitate execution.
4. Fees & Price Impact
A route showing a better rate isn’t automatically better. Check the fees and how they affect your final amount.
5. Speed
If two routes provide similar final amounts, execution time can become an important factor.
6. Destination Address
Before confirming, make sure the destination network and address are compatible with the asset you want to receive.
Simple rule:
Route A → Better final amount + reasonable fees + faster execution
Route B → Lower quoted cost + slower execution + lower final amount
When comparing cross-chain routes, ask yourself:
“How much will I receive, how much will I pay, and how long will it take?”
That’s more useful than looking at the exchange rate alone.
One Swap. Across Chains.
🌐: https://app.ston.fi/
Cross-chain swaps can feel confusing, especially when you have multiple routes to choose from.
But don’t look at the exchange rate alone. Here are the key things to compare:
1. Source & Destination
Check the network you’re sending from and the network where you want to receive your assets.
Example: $TON → Ethereum or $TON → $TRON.
2. Final Amount
The most important number is how much you will actually receive after fees and other costs.
3. Route & Execution
Look at how the swap will be executed. STON.fi Omniston uses RFQ and resolvers to find cross-chain liquidity and facilitate execution.
4. Fees & Price Impact
A route showing a better rate isn’t automatically better. Check the fees and how they affect your final amount.
5. Speed
If two routes provide similar final amounts, execution time can become an important factor.
6. Destination Address
Before confirming, make sure the destination network and address are compatible with the asset you want to receive.
Simple rule:
Route A → Better final amount + reasonable fees + faster execution
Route B → Lower quoted cost + slower execution + lower final amount
When comparing cross-chain routes, ask yourself:
“How much will I receive, how much will I pay, and how long will it take?”
That’s more useful than looking at the exchange rate alone.
One Swap. Across Chains.
🌐: https://app.ston.fi/
52
·
--
Most people are still trading $ARC like its launch week.
91% of DeFi TVL
already sitting in @Morpho and @aave tells you the real story here isnt memecoins, its credit markets forming faster than anyone priced in.
Launchpads got the attention while $USDC credit is quietly becoming the actual base layer.
That rotation (launchpads to credit to RWA♻️) is the trade nobody is positioned for yet.
𝑩𝒖𝒕 𝒊𝒔 5 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒏𝒐𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒊𝒏 ?
#Arguspad went from a 2.8M pre launch MC to 16-17M while still running 11-20M a day after the hype faded.
#TollyLabs ( $TOLLY )Lis sitting on the 2nd deepest native token book I can find, backed by a launchpad plus trading terminal setup that actually makes sense long term.
Everything else copy pasted the launchpad model and died with the mainnet spike. These two didn’t, so right now thats a short list.
As usual, Once the initial mainnet hype fades, most of the launchpad tokens that popped off will fade with it. The ones still pulling real volume and holding liquidity after the hype clears are the actual signal, not the ones that spiked on day one and went quiet
Most people are still trading $ARC like its launch week.
91% of DeFi TVL
already sitting in @Morpho and @aave tells you the real story here isnt memecoins, its credit markets forming faster than anyone priced in.
Launchpads got the attention while $USDC credit is quietly becoming the actual base layer.
That rotation (launchpads to credit to RWA♻️) is the trade nobody is positioned for yet.
𝑩𝒖𝒕 𝒊𝒔 5 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒏𝒐𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒊𝒏 ?
#Arguspad went from a 2.8M pre launch MC to 16-17M while still running 11-20M a day after the hype faded.
#TollyLabs ( $TOLLY )Lis sitting on the 2nd deepest native token book I can find, backed by a launchpad plus trading terminal setup that actually makes sense long term.
Everything else copy pasted the launchpad model and died with the mainnet spike. These two didn’t, so right now thats a short list.
As usual, Once the initial mainnet hype fades, most of the launchpad tokens that popped off will fade with it. The ones still pulling real volume and holding liquidity after the hype clears are the actual signal, not the ones that spiked on day one and went quiet
91% of DeFi TVL
already sitting in @Morpho and @aave tells you the real story here isnt memecoins, its credit markets forming faster than anyone priced in.
Launchpads got the attention while $USDC credit is quietly becoming the actual base layer.
That rotation (launchpads to credit to RWA♻️) is the trade nobody is positioned for yet.
𝑩𝒖𝒕 𝒊𝒔 5 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒏𝒐𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒂 𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒊𝒏 ?
#Arguspad went from a 2.8M pre launch MC to 16-17M while still running 11-20M a day after the hype faded.
#TollyLabs ( $TOLLY )Lis sitting on the 2nd deepest native token book I can find, backed by a launchpad plus trading terminal setup that actually makes sense long term.
Everything else copy pasted the launchpad model and died with the mainnet spike. These two didn’t, so right now thats a short list.
As usual, Once the initial mainnet hype fades, most of the launchpad tokens that popped off will fade with it. The ones still pulling real volume and holding liquidity after the hype clears are the actual signal, not the ones that spiked on day one and went quiet
71
·
--
The clean metric for tokenized RWA on Stellar is not the total value locked. It actually is on how many times the book turns over.
Take the Money that moved in a Month and divide it by the Total value sitting on the chain. That’s the Audit nobody runs.
@StellarOrg RWA book turns over once every 8 months. @ethereum turns over almost once a month. Most of that $3.28 billion on Stellar is fund shares built to be bought and held, not traded.
• @Spiko_finance ’s eurSAFO fund sits near $968 million. • Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market fund, called BENJI, holds about $450 million.
• @Ondo tokenized treasury product, USDY, holds $535 million.
• Onebond product, VuMe Bond 2030, holds $500 million with a single holder.
That last one should end the debate on whether this is a real market.
Meanwhile Stellar’s stablecoins also turns over about 23 times a month, beating Ethereum’s roughly 11. The Chain itself isn’t slow. The Assets sitting on it are parked.
Asset managers leaned towards Stellar because settlement is cheap and they get direct control over who can hold their tokens, not because there’s an active two sided market for these funds.
So, Until something forces these Tokens into Lending, into use as Collateral, or onto a Regulated Trading Venue, turnover will stay a rounding error next to the total value.
Someone said, Issuance without a second buyer is just a prettier NAV file 🤔 👀
#RWA #Stellar #stable
The clean metric for tokenized RWA on Stellar is not the total value locked. It actually is on how many times the book turns over.
Take the Money that moved in a Month and divide it by the Total value sitting on the chain. That’s the Audit nobody runs.
@StellarOrg RWA book turns over once every 8 months. @ethereum turns over almost once a month. Most of that $3.28 billion on Stellar is fund shares built to be bought and held, not traded.
• @Spiko_finance ’s eurSAFO fund sits near $968 million. • Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market fund, called BENJI, holds about $450 million.
• @Ondo tokenized treasury product, USDY, holds $535 million.
• Onebond product, VuMe Bond 2030, holds $500 million with a single holder.
That last one should end the debate on whether this is a real market.
Meanwhile Stellar’s stablecoins also turns over about 23 times a month, beating Ethereum’s roughly 11. The Chain itself isn’t slow. The Assets sitting on it are parked.
Asset managers leaned towards Stellar because settlement is cheap and they get direct control over who can hold their tokens, not because there’s an active two sided market for these funds.
So, Until something forces these Tokens into Lending, into use as Collateral, or onto a Regulated Trading Venue, turnover will stay a rounding error next to the total value.
Someone said, Issuance without a second buyer is just a prettier NAV file 🤔 👀
#RWA #Stellar #stable
Take the Money that moved in a Month and divide it by the Total value sitting on the chain. That’s the Audit nobody runs.
@StellarOrg RWA book turns over once every 8 months. @ethereum turns over almost once a month. Most of that $3.28 billion on Stellar is fund shares built to be bought and held, not traded.
• @Spiko_finance ’s eurSAFO fund sits near $968 million. • Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market fund, called BENJI, holds about $450 million.
• @Ondo tokenized treasury product, USDY, holds $535 million.
• Onebond product, VuMe Bond 2030, holds $500 million with a single holder.
That last one should end the debate on whether this is a real market.
Meanwhile Stellar’s stablecoins also turns over about 23 times a month, beating Ethereum’s roughly 11. The Chain itself isn’t slow. The Assets sitting on it are parked.
Asset managers leaned towards Stellar because settlement is cheap and they get direct control over who can hold their tokens, not because there’s an active two sided market for these funds.
So, Until something forces these Tokens into Lending, into use as Collateral, or onto a Regulated Trading Venue, turnover will stay a rounding error next to the total value.
Someone said, Issuance without a second buyer is just a prettier NAV file 🤔 👀
#RWA #Stellar #stable
80
·
--
The bullrun is officially BACK!
Congrats to all who held. 🥂🥂
$SOL
The bullrun is officially BACK!
Congrats to all who held. 🥂🥂
$SOL
Congrats to all who held. 🥂🥂
$SOL
2
1.1k
·
--
This $STRIP ITTC sale is ON (August 7)
This isn’t just early access to a token. It is full early access to the base layer for Cross chain Assets that can actually be acted on, not just moved around.
Everyone has been watching $Stripchain build the piece that nobody else was.
Instead of renting liquidity route by route from solvers, it owned a protocol Level Bridge, Mints Synthetic assets, and treats solvers as Programmable Applications instead of just inventory holders.
This my friend, is the difference between a Swap Engine and a unified Computer.
$Stripchain Sale link:
🌐 https://ico.stripchain.xyz?wl=WLeqRQr49XAm
This $STRIP ITTC sale is ON (August 7)
This isn’t just early access to a token. It is full early access to the base layer for Cross chain Assets that can actually be acted on, not just moved around.
Everyone has been watching $Stripchain build the piece that nobody else was.
Instead of renting liquidity route by route from solvers, it owned a protocol Level Bridge, Mints Synthetic assets, and treats solvers as Programmable Applications instead of just inventory holders.
This my friend, is the difference between a Swap Engine and a unified Computer.
$Stripchain Sale link:
🌐 https://ico.stripchain.xyz?wl=WLeqRQr49XAm
This isn’t just early access to a token. It is full early access to the base layer for Cross chain Assets that can actually be acted on, not just moved around.
Everyone has been watching $Stripchain build the piece that nobody else was.
Instead of renting liquidity route by route from solvers, it owned a protocol Level Bridge, Mints Synthetic assets, and treats solvers as Programmable Applications instead of just inventory holders.
This my friend, is the difference between a Swap Engine and a unified Computer.
$Stripchain Sale link:
🌐 https://ico.stripchain.xyz?wl=WLeqRQr49XAm
77
·
--
Everyone’s excited about intents. Almost nobody is asking why every intent protocol turned into the same thing: A Fancy Swap engine.
Near Intents, most “chain abstraction” plays, they solved identity, not assets. You get one address that can represent you across chains. Cool. But the assets themselves never left home. Your BTC is still just BTC sitting on Bitcoin. When you submit an intent, a market maker fronts the destination asset from their own inventory and rebalances later. That’s it. That’s the whole trick. The protocol’s own liquidity never touches the transaction, it’s just outsourced to whoever’s holding inventory that day.
@Stripchain is building the part everyone skipped. Public testnet v1 is live on Arbitrum Sepolia across Bitcoin, Solana, Ethereum, Sui, and Arbitrum, and it’s the first protocol actually going after unified liquidity, not just unified identity.
Why is the timing is right?
Solver based intents hit a ceiling fast so you can only rent so much market maker inventory before it becomes the bottleneck. @Stripchain flips that, owns the liquidity through a protocol level bridge instead of borrowing it route by route, and treats solvers as programmable applications instead of just asset lenders.
What edge does this give?
This isn’t a swap app with extra steps. It’s the base layer for cross chain assets that can actually be acted on, not just moved.
Testnet is open right now, no code needed.
Go generate your StripAccount, fund it, mint your synthetic assets, and get in before v2 gates access.
Community program and the ITTC sale waitlist both open soon, early testnet users get a first look.
🌐 home.stripchain.xyz
Everyone’s excited about intents. Almost nobody is asking why every intent protocol turned into the same thing: A Fancy Swap engine.
Near Intents, most “chain abstraction” plays, they solved identity, not assets. You get one address that can represent you across chains. Cool. But the assets themselves never left home. Your BTC is still just BTC sitting on Bitcoin. When you submit an intent, a market maker fronts the destination asset from their own inventory and rebalances later. That’s it. That’s the whole trick. The protocol’s own liquidity never touches the transaction, it’s just outsourced to whoever’s holding inventory that day.
@Stripchain is building the part everyone skipped. Public testnet v1 is live on Arbitrum Sepolia across Bitcoin, Solana, Ethereum, Sui, and Arbitrum, and it’s the first protocol actually going after unified liquidity, not just unified identity.
Why is the timing is right?
Solver based intents hit a ceiling fast so you can only rent so much market maker inventory before it becomes the bottleneck. @Stripchain flips that, owns the liquidity through a protocol level bridge instead of borrowing it route by route, and treats solvers as programmable applications instead of just asset lenders.
What edge does this give?
This isn’t a swap app with extra steps. It’s the base layer for cross chain assets that can actually be acted on, not just moved.
Testnet is open right now, no code needed.
Go generate your StripAccount, fund it, mint your synthetic assets, and get in before v2 gates access.
Community program and the ITTC sale waitlist both open soon, early testnet users get a first look.
🌐 home.stripchain.xyz
Near Intents, most “chain abstraction” plays, they solved identity, not assets. You get one address that can represent you across chains. Cool. But the assets themselves never left home. Your BTC is still just BTC sitting on Bitcoin. When you submit an intent, a market maker fronts the destination asset from their own inventory and rebalances later. That’s it. That’s the whole trick. The protocol’s own liquidity never touches the transaction, it’s just outsourced to whoever’s holding inventory that day.
@Stripchain is building the part everyone skipped. Public testnet v1 is live on Arbitrum Sepolia across Bitcoin, Solana, Ethereum, Sui, and Arbitrum, and it’s the first protocol actually going after unified liquidity, not just unified identity.
Why is the timing is right?
Solver based intents hit a ceiling fast so you can only rent so much market maker inventory before it becomes the bottleneck. @Stripchain flips that, owns the liquidity through a protocol level bridge instead of borrowing it route by route, and treats solvers as programmable applications instead of just asset lenders.
What edge does this give?
This isn’t a swap app with extra steps. It’s the base layer for cross chain assets that can actually be acted on, not just moved.
Testnet is open right now, no code needed.
Go generate your StripAccount, fund it, mint your synthetic assets, and get in before v2 gates access.
Community program and the ITTC sale waitlist both open soon, early testnet users get a first look.
🌐 home.stripchain.xyz
76
·
--
#Ethereum is the dominant destination for onchain borrowing, currently home to 67% of all DeFi loans.
https://blockworks.com/analytics/lending
$ETH
#Ethereum is the dominant destination for onchain borrowing, currently home to 67% of all DeFi loans.
https://blockworks.com/analytics/lending
$ETH
https://blockworks.com/analytics/lending
$ETH
2
·
--
Is "cold wallet = safe" still a valid take?
Or has that mental model just got broken
Is "cold wallet = safe" still a valid take?
Or has that mental model just got broken
Or has that mental model just got broken
62
·
--
Robinhood feels like Solana without rapers, bundlers, serial ruggers and insider information groups.
Refreshing.
$rHOOD #Robinhood
Robinhood feels like Solana without rapers, bundlers, serial ruggers and insider information groups.
Refreshing.
$rHOOD #Robinhood
Refreshing.
$rHOOD #Robinhood
HOODUS-0,02%
85
·
--
Terence Kwok has now blown up two companies.
#TinkLabs: raised $160M from #SoftBank and others, grew recklessly, ran out of cash, shut down. Investors wiped. Employees left without jobs.
He came back with #HumanityProtocol. Palm scan identity, inf-fi narrative, one of the hottest projects of the cycle. Looked like a redemption arc.
It wasn’t.
Before the hack even happened, the$H community was already raising flags.
Unfair reward distributions, insider favoritism, a $60K USDC transfer from a community wallet directly to a team wallet. The trust was already cracking.
Now in June 2026: hackers got the private keys, drained $31M, minted 100 million new $H tokens and dumped them. Token down 85% in hours.
Here’s what this actually is though.
Two separate failures with the same fingerprint. Tink Labs failed because of operational recklessness. Humanity Protocol failed because of trust erosion before the “supposed” hack even landed.
When your community is already documenting wallet transfers and calling out favoritism, you don’t have the goodwill to survive a crisis. The hack was the match. The foundation was already gasoline.
Their info-fi run was real and the project had genuine momentum; But momentum built on a compromised trust layer doesn’t survive contact with a black swan event.
Fool the market once, that’s bad luck.
Do it twice with the same pattern and the market starts asking a different question entirely.
Terence Kwok has now blown up two companies.
#TinkLabs: raised $160M from #SoftBank and others, grew recklessly, ran out of cash, shut down. Investors wiped. Employees left without jobs.
He came back with #HumanityProtocol. Palm scan identity, inf-fi narrative, one of the hottest projects of the cycle. Looked like a redemption arc.
It wasn’t.
Before the hack even happened, the$H community was already raising flags.
Unfair reward distributions, insider favoritism, a $60K USDC transfer from a community wallet directly to a team wallet. The trust was already cracking.
Now in June 2026: hackers got the private keys, drained $31M, minted 100 million new $H tokens and dumped them. Token down 85% in hours.
Here’s what this actually is though.
Two separate failures with the same fingerprint. Tink Labs failed because of operational recklessness. Humanity Protocol failed because of trust erosion before the “supposed” hack even landed.
When your community is already documenting wallet transfers and calling out favoritism, you don’t have the goodwill to survive a crisis. The hack was the match. The foundation was already gasoline.
Their info-fi run was real and the project had genuine momentum; But momentum built on a compromised trust layer doesn’t survive contact with a black swan event.
Fool the market once, that’s bad luck.
Do it twice with the same pattern and the market starts asking a different question entirely.
#TinkLabs: raised $160M from #SoftBank and others, grew recklessly, ran out of cash, shut down. Investors wiped. Employees left without jobs.
He came back with #HumanityProtocol. Palm scan identity, inf-fi narrative, one of the hottest projects of the cycle. Looked like a redemption arc.
It wasn’t.
Before the hack even happened, the$H community was already raising flags.
Unfair reward distributions, insider favoritism, a $60K USDC transfer from a community wallet directly to a team wallet. The trust was already cracking.
Now in June 2026: hackers got the private keys, drained $31M, minted 100 million new $H tokens and dumped them. Token down 85% in hours.
Here’s what this actually is though.
Two separate failures with the same fingerprint. Tink Labs failed because of operational recklessness. Humanity Protocol failed because of trust erosion before the “supposed” hack even landed.
When your community is already documenting wallet transfers and calling out favoritism, you don’t have the goodwill to survive a crisis. The hack was the match. The foundation was already gasoline.
Their info-fi run was real and the project had genuine momentum; But momentum built on a compromised trust layer doesn’t survive contact with a black swan event.
Fool the market once, that’s bad luck.
Do it twice with the same pattern and the market starts asking a different question entirely.
78
·
--
32 $BTC sold by one man and you all moved crazy 🤣
You never ever grounded…you where are loser who only followed noise.
The rich will keep feeding on you until you have & use sense of your own. Look the man just bought your deep🤣🤣 1500+ $BTC
Welcome to the game baby!!
Where are the boys saying “its over”?
32 $BTC sold by one man and you all moved crazy 🤣
You never ever grounded…you where are loser who only followed noise.
The rich will keep feeding on you until you have & use sense of your own. Look the man just bought your deep🤣🤣 1500+ $BTC
Welcome to the game baby!!
Where are the boys saying “its over”?
You never ever grounded…you where are loser who only followed noise.
The rich will keep feeding on you until you have & use sense of your own. Look the man just bought your deep🤣🤣 1500+ $BTC
Welcome to the game baby!!
Where are the boys saying “its over”?
86
·
--
Telegram's CEO; Pavel Durov just announced he's rebranding $TON to $GRAM the original name.

$Ton = chain
Ticker = $GRAM
This is the fourth step in his plan to make $TON great again
Thoughts?
Telegram's CEO; Pavel Durov just announced he's rebranding $TON to $GRAM the original name.

$Ton = chain
Ticker = $GRAM
This is the fourth step in his plan to make $TON great again
Thoughts?

$Ton = chain
Ticker = $GRAM
This is the fourth step in his plan to make $TON great again
Thoughts?
86
·
--
A whale on Hyperliquid is holding 19,752 $ETH long worth $39 MILLION at 20x leverage from an entry of $2,012.
He has now put up a $1.96M account to swing that size and he's already down $556K on it.
$ETH only has to slip another $37 to $1,947 and the whole thing gets wiped. 🤯🤯
His week looks flawless but his lifetime record is a coin flip and this is the toss that decides if he stays in the game.
$ETH doesn't even need to crash. It just needs one red candle. Let’s see how it ends
A whale on Hyperliquid is holding 19,752 $ETH long worth $39 MILLION at 20x leverage from an entry of $2,012.
He has now put up a $1.96M account to swing that size and he's already down $556K on it.
$ETH only has to slip another $37 to $1,947 and the whole thing gets wiped. 🤯🤯
His week looks flawless but his lifetime record is a coin flip and this is the toss that decides if he stays in the game.
$ETH doesn't even need to crash. It just needs one red candle. Let’s see how it ends
He has now put up a $1.96M account to swing that size and he's already down $556K on it.
$ETH only has to slip another $37 to $1,947 and the whole thing gets wiped. 🤯🤯
His week looks flawless but his lifetime record is a coin flip and this is the toss that decides if he stays in the game.
$ETH doesn't even need to crash. It just needs one red candle. Let’s see how it ends
87
·
--
Clearly ,$BTC took a hit this week, but top projects like #Tron, #YZi Labs, #KuCoin, #Avalanche are still rolling out gigs
who can help a brother get in, fam 🙏
Clearly ,$BTC took a hit this week, but top projects like #Tron, #YZi Labs, #KuCoin, #Avalanche are still rolling out gigs
who can help a brother get in, fam 🙏
who can help a brother get in, fam 🙏
5
·
--
News:
#Bitcoin Cash dropped to $343 and the market barely flinched.
Here’s the thing: when BRC Inc. starts showing cash flow cracks, it’s not just a company problem. It’s a signal that BCH’s narrative has no institutional backstop left.
No #ETF tailwind. No developer momentum. No conviction buyers.
This is what a slow bleed looks like before it accelerates.
News:
#Bitcoin Cash dropped to $343 and the market barely flinched.
Here’s the thing: when BRC Inc. starts showing cash flow cracks, it’s not just a company problem. It’s a signal that BCH’s narrative has no institutional backstop left.
No #ETF tailwind. No developer momentum. No conviction buyers.
This is what a slow bleed looks like before it accelerates.
#Bitcoin Cash dropped to $343 and the market barely flinched.
Here’s the thing: when BRC Inc. starts showing cash flow cracks, it’s not just a company problem. It’s a signal that BCH’s narrative has no institutional backstop left.
No #ETF tailwind. No developer momentum. No conviction buyers.
This is what a slow bleed looks like before it accelerates.
1
540
·
--
Ferrari $RACE fell -7% after unveiling its first EV, the 1,050HP “Ferrari Luce” starting at €550K.
Investors are skeptical traditional Ferrari buyers want a silent electric car.
The company also projected €9B 2030 revenue, ~€800M below expectations.
$RACE is now down 41% from its 2025 peak.
Ferrari $RACE fell -7% after unveiling its first EV, the 1,050HP “Ferrari Luce” starting at €550K.
Investors are skeptical traditional Ferrari buyers want a silent electric car.
The company also projected €9B 2030 revenue, ~€800M below expectations.
$RACE is now down 41% from its 2025 peak.
Investors are skeptical traditional Ferrari buyers want a silent electric car.
The company also projected €9B 2030 revenue, ~€800M below expectations.
$RACE is now down 41% from its 2025 peak.
84
·
--
Jane Street made $134,000,000 by shorting $LUNA in 2022, while most people lost everything.
Also, Jane Street had a private Telegram channel for insider info, which they used to depeg UST in May 2022.
These guys should be jailed.
Jane Street made $134,000,000 by shorting $LUNA in 2022, while most people lost everything.
Also, Jane Street had a private Telegram channel for insider info, which they used to depeg UST in May 2022.
These guys should be jailed.
Also, Jane Street had a private Telegram channel for insider info, which they used to depeg UST in May 2022.
These guys should be jailed.
78
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number