quantumcomputers
124,173 views
194 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Bitcoin Is Not at Quantum Risk — But Traders Still Overreact
Is Bitcoin Really Under Threat?
Headlines scream about quantum computers breaking Bitcoin, but the reality is far less dramatic. Only a tiny fraction of BTC is exposed, and practical danger is decades away.
still, like Ethereum today, Bitcoin’s strength is often invisible. When technology works perfectly and the network runs smoothly, the market doesn’t cheer — it just ignores it. That’s exactly what can make the next big move explosive.
How Bitcoin Could Be Vulnerable — And Why It Isn’t
Bitcoin relies on two cryptographic pillars:
ECDSA + Schnorr signatures
SHA-256 hashing
Quantum computers could theoretically attack these. But only 1.6 million BTC in legacy addresses are exposed — and just 10,200 BTC could realistically move markets.
Even if a quantum hacker existed today, cracking these wallets would take years per address. Panic is unnecessary — just like traders ignore Ethereum’s upgrades even when fees drop and Layer 1 activity surges.
The Quantum Computing Reality Check
Modern quantum computers are far from powerful enough.Google’s Willow has 105 qubits; breaking Bitcoin in a day would need 13 million — 100,000× stronger.
Experts predict cryptographically relevant quantum computers won’t appear until the 2030s or later.
So the immediate threat? None.
And the psychological threat? That’s another story.
Emotional Truth: Technology vs Market Attention
Traders often forget that real progress doesn’t guarantee instant price action.
Look at Ethereum:
Fees droppedThroughput increasedL1 activity returnedETH continued burning
Yet price barely moves. The market no longer hypes what “just works.”
Bitcoin is similar. Its architecture and defensive upgrades are solid, but traders fear headlines more than they appreciate stability.
This is the invisible stage where future wealth is being quietly built, unseen by the crowd. Patience beats panic.
Why This Matters to Traders
Ignore the hype, focus on fundamentals — BTC’s security is solid.Understand psychology — markets often ignore good news until scarcity or awareness hits.Risk management still matters — protect funds, diversify addresses, and keep calm.
When the crowd isn’t talking, it’s often the best time to act. Just like Ethereum quietly becoming essential L1 infrastructure, Bitcoin quietly strengthens, unseen — until the next rally.
Conclusion
Quantum threats are decades away, and BTC is far from vulnerable. Only a tiny fraction is at risk, and soft forks allow proactive upgrades.
The bigger lesson? Markets ignore what works. They hype what’s noisy. Bitcoin’s quiet strength, like Ethereum’s silent upgrades, is a signal — the stage is set for long-term gains, but only the patient notice.
$BTC $ETH
#WhaleDeRiskETH #quantumcomputers #quantum
Headlines scream about quantum computers breaking Bitcoin, but the reality is far less dramatic. Only a tiny fraction of BTC is exposed, and practical danger is decades away.
still, like Ethereum today, Bitcoin’s strength is often invisible. When technology works perfectly and the network runs smoothly, the market doesn’t cheer — it just ignores it. That’s exactly what can make the next big move explosive.
How Bitcoin Could Be Vulnerable — And Why It Isn’t
Bitcoin relies on two cryptographic pillars:
ECDSA + Schnorr signatures
SHA-256 hashing
Quantum computers could theoretically attack these. But only 1.6 million BTC in legacy addresses are exposed — and just 10,200 BTC could realistically move markets.
Even if a quantum hacker existed today, cracking these wallets would take years per address. Panic is unnecessary — just like traders ignore Ethereum’s upgrades even when fees drop and Layer 1 activity surges.
The Quantum Computing Reality Check
Modern quantum computers are far from powerful enough.Google’s Willow has 105 qubits; breaking Bitcoin in a day would need 13 million — 100,000× stronger.
Experts predict cryptographically relevant quantum computers won’t appear until the 2030s or later.
So the immediate threat? None.
And the psychological threat? That’s another story.
Emotional Truth: Technology vs Market Attention
Traders often forget that real progress doesn’t guarantee instant price action.
Look at Ethereum:
Fees droppedThroughput increasedL1 activity returnedETH continued burning
Yet price barely moves. The market no longer hypes what “just works.”
Bitcoin is similar. Its architecture and defensive upgrades are solid, but traders fear headlines more than they appreciate stability.
This is the invisible stage where future wealth is being quietly built, unseen by the crowd. Patience beats panic.
Why This Matters to Traders
Ignore the hype, focus on fundamentals — BTC’s security is solid.Understand psychology — markets often ignore good news until scarcity or awareness hits.Risk management still matters — protect funds, diversify addresses, and keep calm.
When the crowd isn’t talking, it’s often the best time to act. Just like Ethereum quietly becoming essential L1 infrastructure, Bitcoin quietly strengthens, unseen — until the next rally.
Conclusion
Quantum threats are decades away, and BTC is far from vulnerable. Only a tiny fraction is at risk, and soft forks allow proactive upgrades.
The bigger lesson? Markets ignore what works. They hype what’s noisy. Bitcoin’s quiet strength, like Ethereum’s silent upgrades, is a signal — the stage is set for long-term gains, but only the patient notice.
$BTC $ETH
#WhaleDeRiskETH #quantumcomputers #quantum
Will Quantum Computers Destroy Crypto? The Truth Explained
Quantum Computer Explained In Simple Words:
A normal computer uses bits, each bit is either 0 or 1, however quantum computers use qubits. A qubit can be 0 or 1 or both at the same time(this third scenario is called superposition). On top of that, qubits can be linked together in a weird way called Entanglement, meaning changing one can instantly affect the other.
In simple words, A normal computer tries every door one by one, while a quantum computer can try many doors at the same time. That’s why they’re powerful — for certain types of problems. However they are only good at specific mathematical problems, not everything.
Do Quantum Computers Exist Right Now?
Yes, companies like Google, IBM, Microsoft, have built early quantum machines. However, they are extremely unstable, make a lot of errors and require near absolute-zero temperatures. So technically, they are not practical yet. So we are likely decades away from real quantum computers.
Why Do People Say Quantum Computers Threaten Crypto?
Most cryptocurrencies($BTC , $ETH ) rely on Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) and Public-Key Cryptography. A quantum algorithm called Shor’s Algorithm could theoretically derive private keys from public keys and break digital signatures. If that happens, someone could steal coins, wallet security would collapse and Blockchain trust would be shaken.
It’s Not Just Crypto — It’s Everything
If quantum computers break encryption, they don’t just attack Bitcoin. They would also break:
i) Online banking systems
ii) Credit cards
iii) Military communication
iv) Government data
v) HTTPS websites
vi) Email encryption
vii) Cloud security
viii) VPN systems
ix) Stock exchanges
x) Nuclear facility systems
Basically: the entire digital world.
The Myth: “Quantum Will Kill Bitcoin”
This idea is exaggerated because:
i) Most Bitcoin addresses don’t expose their public key until you spend.
If you never move coins, they’re harder to attack.
ii) Developers can upgrade crypto.
Crypto can move to Post-quantum cryptography and Quantum-resistant signature schemes.
iii) The world will see it coming.
Building a large-scale quantum computer cannot be hidden. It would take years of public research. There would be warning signs.
Possible Solutions:
The good news is that developers are already working on the solution before it even hits us. Here are some of possible solutions:
i) Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)
These are encryption methods designed to resist quantum attacks. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is already standardizing quantum-resistant algorithms.
ii) Migration Strategy
If quantum computers get close to dangerous levels, Users could transfer coins to quantum-safe wallets
Should Crypto Investors Be Worried?
Right now, we have more serious things to worry about like regulation of cryptocurrencies, market cycles, liquidity, ensuring proper security of your accounts, poor risk management. There is a famous saying, “Don’t Count Your Chickens Before They Hatch”. So this quantum risk has not even hatched and we are counting it.
Final Thoughts:
Quantum computers are real and very powerful in theory. However, they are most likely to advance medicine, improve material science and optimize logistics. They are very unlikely to come into wrong hands because they could be more precious than nuclear technology.
#quantumcomputers
A normal computer uses bits, each bit is either 0 or 1, however quantum computers use qubits. A qubit can be 0 or 1 or both at the same time(this third scenario is called superposition). On top of that, qubits can be linked together in a weird way called Entanglement, meaning changing one can instantly affect the other.
In simple words, A normal computer tries every door one by one, while a quantum computer can try many doors at the same time. That’s why they’re powerful — for certain types of problems. However they are only good at specific mathematical problems, not everything.
Do Quantum Computers Exist Right Now?
Yes, companies like Google, IBM, Microsoft, have built early quantum machines. However, they are extremely unstable, make a lot of errors and require near absolute-zero temperatures. So technically, they are not practical yet. So we are likely decades away from real quantum computers.
Why Do People Say Quantum Computers Threaten Crypto?
Most cryptocurrencies($BTC , $ETH ) rely on Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) and Public-Key Cryptography. A quantum algorithm called Shor’s Algorithm could theoretically derive private keys from public keys and break digital signatures. If that happens, someone could steal coins, wallet security would collapse and Blockchain trust would be shaken.
It’s Not Just Crypto — It’s Everything
If quantum computers break encryption, they don’t just attack Bitcoin. They would also break:
i) Online banking systems
ii) Credit cards
iii) Military communication
iv) Government data
v) HTTPS websites
vi) Email encryption
vii) Cloud security
viii) VPN systems
ix) Stock exchanges
x) Nuclear facility systems
Basically: the entire digital world.
The Myth: “Quantum Will Kill Bitcoin”
This idea is exaggerated because:
i) Most Bitcoin addresses don’t expose their public key until you spend.
If you never move coins, they’re harder to attack.
ii) Developers can upgrade crypto.
Crypto can move to Post-quantum cryptography and Quantum-resistant signature schemes.
iii) The world will see it coming.
Building a large-scale quantum computer cannot be hidden. It would take years of public research. There would be warning signs.
Possible Solutions:
The good news is that developers are already working on the solution before it even hits us. Here are some of possible solutions:
i) Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)
These are encryption methods designed to resist quantum attacks. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is already standardizing quantum-resistant algorithms.
ii) Migration Strategy
If quantum computers get close to dangerous levels, Users could transfer coins to quantum-safe wallets
Should Crypto Investors Be Worried?
Right now, we have more serious things to worry about like regulation of cryptocurrencies, market cycles, liquidity, ensuring proper security of your accounts, poor risk management. There is a famous saying, “Don’t Count Your Chickens Before They Hatch”. So this quantum risk has not even hatched and we are counting it.
Final Thoughts:
Quantum computers are real and very powerful in theory. However, they are most likely to advance medicine, improve material science and optimize logistics. They are very unlikely to come into wrong hands because they could be more precious than nuclear technology.
#quantumcomputers
Why Quantum Fears Around Bitcoin Are Premature
Quantum computing is often framed as an existential threat to Bitcoin, but that framing skips over how far the technology still has to go.
Key Takeaways
Quantum computing is a long-term issue, not an immediate threat to Bitcoin.Current quantum hardware is far too weak to break Bitcoin’s security.Bitcoin can gradually upgrade its cryptography if the risk becomes real.
An analysis from digital asset manager CoinShares suggests that the discussion is less about imminent danger and more about long-term preparation for a system that now safeguards trillions of dollars in value.
Where Bitcoin’s defenses actually stand
Bitcoin’s security model is more nuanced than many critics assume. Most coins sit in modern address types that keep public keys hidden until funds are spent. Without access to those public keys, even an advanced attacker would have nothing to exploit. Only a narrow slice of older addresses behaves differently, which naturally limits the scale of any potential vulnerability.
The real constraint is not theory, but hardware. To threaten Bitcoin in practice, quantum computers would need millions of stable, error-corrected qubits. Today’s machines operate with a fraction of that capacity and struggle with reliability. Even optimistic projections place such capabilities well into the future, leaving a wide window for the Bitcoin ecosystem to adapt.
Why time works in Bitcoin’s favor
That extended timeline matters because Bitcoin is not frozen in place. Its open-source structure allows developers to introduce new cryptographic standards as threats evolve. If quantum computing advances to a meaningful level, quantum-resistant signature schemes can be rolled out through gradual network upgrades rather than emergency fixes.
Even under a scenario where quantum progress accelerates, analysts expect no abrupt shock to the market. Any coins that could become exposed would do so slowly, giving holders time to move funds. As a result, liquidity effects would likely unfold over years, not days or weeks.
The risk of moving too fast
CoinShares also flags a different danger: acting prematurely. Forcing major protocol changes before they are necessary could introduce bugs, complexity, or network fragmentation. A cautious, phased approach allows Bitcoin to strengthen its defenses without creating new problems in the process.
Quantum computing remains a topic worth monitoring, but not one that demands alarm. The technology is still distant, Bitcoin’s current exposure is limited, and the network is built to evolve. For now, quantum risk sits firmly in the category of long-term engineering challenges rather than immediate threats to Bitcoin’s security or credibility.
#quantumcomputers
Key Takeaways
Quantum computing is a long-term issue, not an immediate threat to Bitcoin.Current quantum hardware is far too weak to break Bitcoin’s security.Bitcoin can gradually upgrade its cryptography if the risk becomes real.
An analysis from digital asset manager CoinShares suggests that the discussion is less about imminent danger and more about long-term preparation for a system that now safeguards trillions of dollars in value.
Where Bitcoin’s defenses actually stand
Bitcoin’s security model is more nuanced than many critics assume. Most coins sit in modern address types that keep public keys hidden until funds are spent. Without access to those public keys, even an advanced attacker would have nothing to exploit. Only a narrow slice of older addresses behaves differently, which naturally limits the scale of any potential vulnerability.
The real constraint is not theory, but hardware. To threaten Bitcoin in practice, quantum computers would need millions of stable, error-corrected qubits. Today’s machines operate with a fraction of that capacity and struggle with reliability. Even optimistic projections place such capabilities well into the future, leaving a wide window for the Bitcoin ecosystem to adapt.
Why time works in Bitcoin’s favor
That extended timeline matters because Bitcoin is not frozen in place. Its open-source structure allows developers to introduce new cryptographic standards as threats evolve. If quantum computing advances to a meaningful level, quantum-resistant signature schemes can be rolled out through gradual network upgrades rather than emergency fixes.
Even under a scenario where quantum progress accelerates, analysts expect no abrupt shock to the market. Any coins that could become exposed would do so slowly, giving holders time to move funds. As a result, liquidity effects would likely unfold over years, not days or weeks.
The risk of moving too fast
CoinShares also flags a different danger: acting prematurely. Forcing major protocol changes before they are necessary could introduce bugs, complexity, or network fragmentation. A cautious, phased approach allows Bitcoin to strengthen its defenses without creating new problems in the process.
Quantum computing remains a topic worth monitoring, but not one that demands alarm. The technology is still distant, Bitcoin’s current exposure is limited, and the network is built to evolve. For now, quantum risk sits firmly in the category of long-term engineering challenges rather than immediate threats to Bitcoin’s security or credibility.
#quantumcomputers
I see that many people on the internet are saying that Satoshi Bitcoin is dead because quantum computers are coming.
They say Bitcoin is finished.
But it is not directly possible that quantum can destroy Bitcoin.
If that were true,then WhatsApp,Banks and credit cards would also be finished.
People have been saying for the past 10 years that quantum computer will destroy Bitcoin.If quantum breaks Bitcoin,it will also breaks banks, credit cards, and the entire security system.
Bitcoin is not dead.Fear is recycled.
$BTC
#quantumcomputers
They say Bitcoin is finished.
But it is not directly possible that quantum can destroy Bitcoin.
If that were true,then WhatsApp,Banks and credit cards would also be finished.
People have been saying for the past 10 years that quantum computer will destroy Bitcoin.If quantum breaks Bitcoin,it will also breaks banks, credit cards, and the entire security system.
Bitcoin is not dead.Fear is recycled.
$BTC
#quantumcomputers
Quantum computers are not an immediate threat to Bitcoin.$ARB $NKN
Out of ~19.7 million BTC, only around 10,200 BTC sit in wallets big enough to move the market if compromised.
About 1.6 million $BTC still use older address formats.
Cracking Bitcoin would require ~13 million qubits - far beyond today’s tech.
Current quantum computers operate with hundreds of qubits, not millions.
This level of quantum power is likely many years away, giving Bitcoin time to adapt.
#quantum
#quantumcomputers
#bitcoin
#BTC
#crupto
Out of ~19.7 million BTC, only around 10,200 BTC sit in wallets big enough to move the market if compromised.
About 1.6 million $BTC still use older address formats.
Cracking Bitcoin would require ~13 million qubits - far beyond today’s tech.
Current quantum computers operate with hundreds of qubits, not millions.
This level of quantum power is likely many years away, giving Bitcoin time to adapt.
#quantum
#quantumcomputers
#bitcoin
#BTC
#crupto
Why Quantum Computing Isn’t a Serious Risk for Bitcoin Yet:
New research says today’s quantum computers are far too weak to threaten Bitcoin’s cryptography, leaving the network years to prepare.
Quantum computing may not be as much of an immediate threat to Bitcoin as some have warned, and any real risk might still be years away.
That’s according to a new research note from digital asset investment firm CoinShares, which argues that while Bitcoin’s cryptography is theoretically vulnerable to future quantum advances, current technology falls far short of posing a practical danger.
“Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerability is not an immediate crisis but a foreseeable engineering consideration, with ample time for adaptation,“ researchers at the firm wrote.
Quantum attacks involve powerful quantum computers breaking cryptographic keys that secure Bitcoin or other blockchains, enabling attackers to derive private keys from public information.
Such attacks that are aimed at Bitcoin are not imminent because breaking its core cryptography would require quantum machines far beyond anything that exists today, the researchers argue.
“From a cryptography and engineering standpoint, the quantum threat to Bitcoin remains a medium-to-long-term risk, not an imminent crisis,” Andy Zhou, co-founder and CEO of blockchain security firm BlockSec, told Decrypt. “Even under optimistic assumptions about quantum progress, the industry still has meaningful time to prepare and upgrade.”
The idea behind post-quantum cryptography has been “under rigorous international standardization for years,” Zhou explained, citing how the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) had already released its first set of finalized post-quantum cryptography standards in 2024.
The standards include “several quantum-resistant encryption and signature algorithms that are ready for use,” and also have additional algorithms under backup consideration and broader deployment guidance, he explained.
#QuantumCrypto #quantumcomputers
New research says today’s quantum computers are far too weak to threaten Bitcoin’s cryptography, leaving the network years to prepare.
Quantum computing may not be as much of an immediate threat to Bitcoin as some have warned, and any real risk might still be years away.
That’s according to a new research note from digital asset investment firm CoinShares, which argues that while Bitcoin’s cryptography is theoretically vulnerable to future quantum advances, current technology falls far short of posing a practical danger.
“Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerability is not an immediate crisis but a foreseeable engineering consideration, with ample time for adaptation,“ researchers at the firm wrote.
Quantum attacks involve powerful quantum computers breaking cryptographic keys that secure Bitcoin or other blockchains, enabling attackers to derive private keys from public information.
Such attacks that are aimed at Bitcoin are not imminent because breaking its core cryptography would require quantum machines far beyond anything that exists today, the researchers argue.
“From a cryptography and engineering standpoint, the quantum threat to Bitcoin remains a medium-to-long-term risk, not an imminent crisis,” Andy Zhou, co-founder and CEO of blockchain security firm BlockSec, told Decrypt. “Even under optimistic assumptions about quantum progress, the industry still has meaningful time to prepare and upgrade.”
The idea behind post-quantum cryptography has been “under rigorous international standardization for years,” Zhou explained, citing how the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) had already released its first set of finalized post-quantum cryptography standards in 2024.
The standards include “several quantum-resistant encryption and signature algorithms that are ready for use,” and also have additional algorithms under backup consideration and broader deployment guidance, he explained.
#QuantumCrypto #quantumcomputers
⚡🖥️ MICHAEL SAYLOR ANNUNCIA IL “BITCOIN SECURITY PROGRAM” CONTRO LE MINACCE DEL QUANTUM COMPUTING 🖥️⚡
Michael Saylor, cofondatore e presidente esecutivo di Strategy, ha dichiarato che la società lancerà un Bitcoin Security Program in collaborazione con la comunità globale di cybersecurity e criptovalute.
L’obiettivo è affrontare una delle sfide tecnologiche più complesse dei prossimi anni: la minaccia del calcolo quantistico alla sicurezza della rete Bitcoin.
I computer quantistici, ancora in fase iniziale, potrebbero un giorno essere in grado di decifrare gli algoritmi crittografici che proteggono le transazioni e i portafogli digitali.
Saylor intende guidare uno sforzo collettivo per anticipare questo rischio, coordinando ricercatori, sviluppatori e istituzioni tecnologiche per sviluppare soluzioni “quantum-resistant”.
Il programma mira a rafforzare le basi crittografiche di Bitcoin e a promuovere standard di sicurezza condivisi tra l’industria blockchain e i principali esperti mondiali in sicurezza informatica.
Con questa iniziativa, Strategy vuole posizionarsi come leader nella protezione di Bitcoin a lungo termine, riaffermando la sua fiducia nella rete come riserva digitale di valore anche nell’era del quantum computing.
#BreakingCryptoNews #MichaelSaylor #strategy #quantumcomputers #bitcoin $BTC
Michael Saylor, cofondatore e presidente esecutivo di Strategy, ha dichiarato che la società lancerà un Bitcoin Security Program in collaborazione con la comunità globale di cybersecurity e criptovalute.
L’obiettivo è affrontare una delle sfide tecnologiche più complesse dei prossimi anni: la minaccia del calcolo quantistico alla sicurezza della rete Bitcoin.
I computer quantistici, ancora in fase iniziale, potrebbero un giorno essere in grado di decifrare gli algoritmi crittografici che proteggono le transazioni e i portafogli digitali.
Saylor intende guidare uno sforzo collettivo per anticipare questo rischio, coordinando ricercatori, sviluppatori e istituzioni tecnologiche per sviluppare soluzioni “quantum-resistant”.
Il programma mira a rafforzare le basi crittografiche di Bitcoin e a promuovere standard di sicurezza condivisi tra l’industria blockchain e i principali esperti mondiali in sicurezza informatica.
Con questa iniziativa, Strategy vuole posizionarsi come leader nella protezione di Bitcoin a lungo termine, riaffermando la sua fiducia nella rete come riserva digitale di valore anche nell’era del quantum computing.
#BreakingCryptoNews #MichaelSaylor #strategy #quantumcomputers #bitcoin $BTC
🖥️⚡ ETHEREUM SI PREPARA ALL’ERA QUANTISTICA ENTRO IL 2030 🖥️⚡
L’Ethereum Foundation ha elevato la sicurezza post-quantistica a priorità strategica, creando un team dedicato e finanziando ricerca per oltre 2 milioni di dollari per rendere il consenso resistente ai computer quantistici entro il 2030.
L’obiettivo è migrare gradualmente verso firme post‑quantum (hash-based, lattice-based, zk-STARK), senza downtime né perdita di fondi, sfruttando già oggi devnet multi-client con client come Lighthouse e Grandine.
Il nuovo responsabile del team PQ, Thomas Coratger, spiega che Ethereum sta sviluppando una roadmap di consenso post-quantum, integrata con il percorso “Lean Ethereum”, che punta a massimizzare semplicità, sicurezza e scalabilità mantenendo la rete futura‑proof.
Vitalik Buterin stima un 20% di probabilità che macchine quantistiche in grado di rompere l’attuale crittografia emergano prima del 2030, motivo per cui la migrazione non può essere rimandata all’ultimo momento.
Il piano comprende: nuove primitive crittografiche resistenti al quantum, account astratti e smart contract wallet quantum-safe, oltre a procedure d’emergenza nel caso in cui un “quantum shock” colpisse improvvisamente ECDSA.
Ethereum vuole arrivare al 2030 con un consenso post-quantum operativo, trasformando il rischio quantistico in un vantaggio competitivo di lungo periodo per l’intero ecosistema.
#BreakingCryptoNews #Ethereum #quantumcomputers $ETH
L’Ethereum Foundation ha elevato la sicurezza post-quantistica a priorità strategica, creando un team dedicato e finanziando ricerca per oltre 2 milioni di dollari per rendere il consenso resistente ai computer quantistici entro il 2030.
L’obiettivo è migrare gradualmente verso firme post‑quantum (hash-based, lattice-based, zk-STARK), senza downtime né perdita di fondi, sfruttando già oggi devnet multi-client con client come Lighthouse e Grandine.
Il nuovo responsabile del team PQ, Thomas Coratger, spiega che Ethereum sta sviluppando una roadmap di consenso post-quantum, integrata con il percorso “Lean Ethereum”, che punta a massimizzare semplicità, sicurezza e scalabilità mantenendo la rete futura‑proof.
Vitalik Buterin stima un 20% di probabilità che macchine quantistiche in grado di rompere l’attuale crittografia emergano prima del 2030, motivo per cui la migrazione non può essere rimandata all’ultimo momento.
Il piano comprende: nuove primitive crittografiche resistenti al quantum, account astratti e smart contract wallet quantum-safe, oltre a procedure d’emergenza nel caso in cui un “quantum shock” colpisse improvvisamente ECDSA.
Ethereum vuole arrivare al 2030 con un consenso post-quantum operativo, trasformando il rischio quantistico in un vantaggio competitivo di lungo periodo per l’intero ecosistema.
#BreakingCryptoNews #Ethereum #quantumcomputers $ETH
Just in: Michael Saylor announces @MicroStrategy is launching a Bitcoin Security Program. It will coordinate with global cybersecurity & crypto leaders to defend against future quantum computing threats. The future of BTC security starts now.
#bitcoin #quantumcomputers #CyberSecurity
#bitcoin #quantumcomputers #CyberSecurity
Many of people thinks that quantum computer can destroy $BTC crypto what do you think? I make research on it Inshallah ❤️
#quantumcomputers
#quantumcomputers
Vitalik Buterin warns QUANTUM COMPUTERS could threaten Bitcoin and Ethereum by 2028.
-> He said that there’s a 20% risk that quantum computers could break Bitcoin and Ethereum before 2030.
-> He urges post-quantum upgrades now, not later.
-> Ethereum is moving fast with a $1M prize, a special team, and account abstraction.
-> Bitcoin is slower due to its strict consensus process.
#TSLALinkedPerpsOnBinance #quantumcomputers #Vitalik $BTC
$ETH
-> He said that there’s a 20% risk that quantum computers could break Bitcoin and Ethereum before 2030.
-> He urges post-quantum upgrades now, not later.
-> Ethereum is moving fast with a $1M prize, a special team, and account abstraction.
-> Bitcoin is slower due to its strict consensus process.
#TSLALinkedPerpsOnBinance #quantumcomputers #Vitalik $BTC
$ETH
🔐 EXPLAINED: Quantum-resistant tokens use advanced cryptography to protect against quantum computing threats, securing blockchain networks and digital assets.#quantumcomputers #QuantumResistantLedger #Write2Earn! #NewsAboutCrypto
Quantum Computers and Cryptography: Is Bitcoin at Risk?
Quantum computers are considered one of the most promising technologies of the future. They promise computing power far beyond that of classical computers. However, this revolution could also pose a threat to modern cryptography—and thus to systems like Bitcoin.
The critical question is: Can quantum computers break Bitcoin? And if so, will Bitcoin need an upgrade?
How Quantum Computers Threaten Cryptography
The security of modern cryptography relies on mathematical problems that are difficult for classical computers to solve. Bitcoin primarily uses two algorithms:
1. SHA-256 (for hash functions)
2. ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm, for digital signatures)
Quantum computers could specifically attack ECDSA using Shor’s Algorithm, which can break elliptic curve cryptography. In theory, this would allow an attacker to derive private keys from public addresses—a nightmare scenario for Bitcoin.
Does This Also Affect SHA-256?
Fortunately, SHA-256 (and similar hash functions) are only minimally vulnerable to quantum attacks. Grover’s Algorithm could theoretically cut search times in half, but even then, attacking Bitcoin mining or transaction hashes would be extremely resource-intensive.
Is Bitcoin Really at Risk?
The good news: Not anytime soon.
1. Quantum computers are not yet powerful enough
- Current quantum computers have only a few error-prone qubits.
1. Breaking ECDSA would require thousands of error-corrected qubits—something that is still years or decades away.
2. Bitcoin transactions are often "quantum-resistant"
- As long as Bitcoin addresses are used only once (as recommended), the risk is low.
- Only publicly known addresses (e.g., unused funds in old wallets) would be vulnerable.
3. The community can adapt
- If quantum computers become a real threat, Bitcoin can upgrade to quantum-resistant cryptography (e.g., Lamport signatures or lattice-based cryptography).
Will Bitcoin Need an Upgrade? Long-term: Yes.
Once quantum computers become practically viable, Bitcoin will need to update its signature algorithms. However, progress is slow enough that the community will have time to respond.
Possible Solutions:
- Post-quantum cryptography (e.g., XMSS, SPHINCS+)
- Schnorr signatures (already part of Bitcoin’s protocol, offering better scalability and serving as a foundation for quantum-resistant upgrades)
- Hybrid systems (combining ECDSA with quantum-resistant signatures)
Conclusion: Bitcoin is (Still) Safe
Quantum computers pose a potential threat, but not an immediate one. Bitcoin developers have time to prepare, and promising quantum-resistant solutions already exist.
Bitcoin won’t be cracked overnight—but the community must stay vigilant. Once quantum computing makes significant advances, an upgrade will be necessary. Until then, the network remains secure.
Further Topics:
- Post-quantum cryptography
- Quantum-Resistant Ledger (QRL)
- Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) for quantum security
#quantumcomputers #Cryptography
$BTC
The critical question is: Can quantum computers break Bitcoin? And if so, will Bitcoin need an upgrade?
How Quantum Computers Threaten Cryptography
The security of modern cryptography relies on mathematical problems that are difficult for classical computers to solve. Bitcoin primarily uses two algorithms:
1. SHA-256 (for hash functions)
2. ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm, for digital signatures)
Quantum computers could specifically attack ECDSA using Shor’s Algorithm, which can break elliptic curve cryptography. In theory, this would allow an attacker to derive private keys from public addresses—a nightmare scenario for Bitcoin.
Does This Also Affect SHA-256?
Fortunately, SHA-256 (and similar hash functions) are only minimally vulnerable to quantum attacks. Grover’s Algorithm could theoretically cut search times in half, but even then, attacking Bitcoin mining or transaction hashes would be extremely resource-intensive.
Is Bitcoin Really at Risk?
The good news: Not anytime soon.
1. Quantum computers are not yet powerful enough
- Current quantum computers have only a few error-prone qubits.
1. Breaking ECDSA would require thousands of error-corrected qubits—something that is still years or decades away.
2. Bitcoin transactions are often "quantum-resistant"
- As long as Bitcoin addresses are used only once (as recommended), the risk is low.
- Only publicly known addresses (e.g., unused funds in old wallets) would be vulnerable.
3. The community can adapt
- If quantum computers become a real threat, Bitcoin can upgrade to quantum-resistant cryptography (e.g., Lamport signatures or lattice-based cryptography).
Will Bitcoin Need an Upgrade? Long-term: Yes.
Once quantum computers become practically viable, Bitcoin will need to update its signature algorithms. However, progress is slow enough that the community will have time to respond.
Possible Solutions:
- Post-quantum cryptography (e.g., XMSS, SPHINCS+)
- Schnorr signatures (already part of Bitcoin’s protocol, offering better scalability and serving as a foundation for quantum-resistant upgrades)
- Hybrid systems (combining ECDSA with quantum-resistant signatures)
Conclusion: Bitcoin is (Still) Safe
Quantum computers pose a potential threat, but not an immediate one. Bitcoin developers have time to prepare, and promising quantum-resistant solutions already exist.
Bitcoin won’t be cracked overnight—but the community must stay vigilant. Once quantum computing makes significant advances, an upgrade will be necessary. Until then, the network remains secure.
Further Topics:
- Post-quantum cryptography
- Quantum-Resistant Ledger (QRL)
- Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) for quantum security
#quantumcomputers #Cryptography
$BTC
🔥 The First Quantum-Ready Chain? $ICP . And Nobody’s Talking About It.
Everyone thinks #quantumcomputers will destroy crypto.
Wrong. Quantum will only destroy chains built on old, static private keys —
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Cosmos, Cardano… basically the whole market.
But #icp is different.
✨ #ICP. runs on chain-key cryptography — rotating, distributed, threshold-secured.
No single private key. No single point to attack.
And it can upgrade its cryptography live without breaking smart contracts or wallets.
That’s not an advantage…
That’s quantum-era survival.
But here’s the twist nobody sees:
Quantum won’t just protect #ICPCoin —
Quantum will supercharge it. 🚀
Quantum boosts:
• threshold signatures
• randomness
• zk-proofs
• cross-chain signing
• MPC
• AI inference inside canisters
And because ICP is the only full-stack decentralized cloud, quantum compute plugs directly into the network — not bolted on like other chains.
Most blockchains will panic-fork, patch, or outright fail when quantum arrives.
@Internet Computer won’t. It was designed from day one to evolve.
That’s why the upside is massive.
#InternetComputer isn’t just another blockchain —
it’s a quantum-secure, quantum-accelerated decentralized cloud.
We’re early. Very early. 🚀
Everyone thinks #quantumcomputers will destroy crypto.
Wrong. Quantum will only destroy chains built on old, static private keys —
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Cosmos, Cardano… basically the whole market.
But #icp is different.
✨ #ICP. runs on chain-key cryptography — rotating, distributed, threshold-secured.
No single private key. No single point to attack.
And it can upgrade its cryptography live without breaking smart contracts or wallets.
That’s not an advantage…
That’s quantum-era survival.
But here’s the twist nobody sees:
Quantum won’t just protect #ICPCoin —
Quantum will supercharge it. 🚀
Quantum boosts:
• threshold signatures
• randomness
• zk-proofs
• cross-chain signing
• MPC
• AI inference inside canisters
And because ICP is the only full-stack decentralized cloud, quantum compute plugs directly into the network — not bolted on like other chains.
Most blockchains will panic-fork, patch, or outright fail when quantum arrives.
@Internet Computer won’t. It was designed from day one to evolve.
That’s why the upside is massive.
#InternetComputer isn’t just another blockchain —
it’s a quantum-secure, quantum-accelerated decentralized cloud.
We’re early. Very early. 🚀
## ⚡ The Perfect Storm: Why NOW is the Quantum-AI Moment:Becoming the foundation of the next crypto
The quantum threat isn't coming - it's here. Smart investors are already positioning themselves in quantum-resistant cryptocurrencies that will survive and thrive in the post-quantum world.
### 🥇 **Top Quantum-Resistant Champions**
#### **1. Algorand (ALGO)** - The Quantum Pioneer
- **Quantum Defense**: Algorand leads with Falcon technology, securing blockchain history against quantum threats
- **Why It's Hot**: First major blockchain to implement quantum-resistant signatures
- **Bullish Factor**: Considered by many the only project that is truly quantum-safe
- **Investment Thesis**: Early mover advantage in quantum resistance with proven technology
#### **2. Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR)** - Government-Grade Security
- **Quantum Shield**: Employs SHA-384 cryptography, a level of security that even the most powerful quantum computers are unlikely to breach
- **Secret Weapon**: Compliance with top-secret government standards
- **Market Position**: Enterprise adoption accelerating rapidly
- **Growth Potential**: Massive institutional backing driving adoption
#### **3. Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL)** - Purpose-Built Protection
- **Core Focus**: Uses QRL to protect transactions on a platform built with resistance against quantum computing attacks
- **Technical Edge**: Incorporating advanced cryptographic techniques like XMSS and Winternitz One-Time Signature
- **Investment Case**: Pure-play quantum resistance with dedicated development team
#### **4. IOTA (MIOTA)** - IoT Quantum Shield
- **Unique Position**: Exploring quantum-resistant solutions with advanced cryptographic techniques
- **Market Opportunity**: IoT device security in quantum era
- **Bullish Catalyst**: Growing IoT market needs quantum-safe solutions
**singularityNet(AGIX)
**Fetch.ai(FET)
**Virtual protocol(VIRTUAL)
**Grass network($GRASS)
This are the to Next gen-Ai Tokens
#Trade smart
#quantumcomputers #NextGenToken
#CryptoBullish
### 🥇 **Top Quantum-Resistant Champions**
#### **1. Algorand (ALGO)** - The Quantum Pioneer
- **Quantum Defense**: Algorand leads with Falcon technology, securing blockchain history against quantum threats
- **Why It's Hot**: First major blockchain to implement quantum-resistant signatures
- **Bullish Factor**: Considered by many the only project that is truly quantum-safe
- **Investment Thesis**: Early mover advantage in quantum resistance with proven technology
#### **2. Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR)** - Government-Grade Security
- **Quantum Shield**: Employs SHA-384 cryptography, a level of security that even the most powerful quantum computers are unlikely to breach
- **Secret Weapon**: Compliance with top-secret government standards
- **Market Position**: Enterprise adoption accelerating rapidly
- **Growth Potential**: Massive institutional backing driving adoption
#### **3. Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL)** - Purpose-Built Protection
- **Core Focus**: Uses QRL to protect transactions on a platform built with resistance against quantum computing attacks
- **Technical Edge**: Incorporating advanced cryptographic techniques like XMSS and Winternitz One-Time Signature
- **Investment Case**: Pure-play quantum resistance with dedicated development team
#### **4. IOTA (MIOTA)** - IoT Quantum Shield
- **Unique Position**: Exploring quantum-resistant solutions with advanced cryptographic techniques
- **Market Opportunity**: IoT device security in quantum era
- **Bullish Catalyst**: Growing IoT market needs quantum-safe solutions
**singularityNet(AGIX)
**Fetch.ai(FET)
**Virtual protocol(VIRTUAL)
**Grass network($GRASS)
This are the to Next gen-Ai Tokens
#Trade smart
#quantumcomputers #NextGenToken
#CryptoBullish
It doesn’t stop there is so much money to make with the expert duke, she’s really the best crypto expert out there and has guided me to millions too
#quantumcomputers
$IO
$IP
$IN
#quantumcomputers
$IO
$IP
$IN
{T}`{Ë}`{L}`{Ê}`{G}`{R}`{Ã}`{M} ---> DUKEFXTRADER
i have been into crypto trading for over three years and during my time alone encountered a lot of losses in the market but i started making crypto investment with duke over a six months period now and i make good profits weekly from my crypto investment with the expert, have made more than $500,000 profit with the expert, work with her.......
{T}`{Ë}`{L}`{Ê}`{G}`{R}`{Ã}`{M} ---> DUKEFXTRADER
$ALICE
$ETH
$ASTER
i have been into crypto trading for over three years and during my time alone encountered a lot of losses in the market but i started making crypto investment with duke over a six months period now and i make good profits weekly from my crypto investment with the expert, have made more than $500,000 profit with the expert, work with her.......
{T}`{Ë}`{L}`{Ê}`{G}`{R}`{Ã}`{M} ---> DUKEFXTRADER
$ALICE
$ETH
$ASTER
Login to explore more contents