Shocking! So many politicians, celebrities, and institutions may be behind PEPE?
$PEPE $SHIB In a nutshell: No government has publicly supported PEPE, but the “indirect involvement” of celebrities, politicians, institutions, and KOLs is far more complicated than you might think. Below, events are listed in order, making it easy to distinguish what’s suspected, what’s confirmed, and the connections behind the scenes. I. Celebrity tier: Musk is the most cryptic; Sun Yuchen is the most definitive 1. Musk: symbolic interaction, never publicly endorsed it (actions confirmed, intent suspected) He once changed his X account name to “Kekius Maximus” and his avatar to Pepe the Frog; PEPE rose 14%–20% in a single day. He posted Pepe the Frog images multiple times, and each time PEPE rose 3%–12% in the short term.
With the so-called “supercycle,” once-dominant MEMEs have at least this much further to go: $DOGE 10x, $SHIB 50x, $PEPE 30x. At these multiples, can you be free?
AI is not a risk of the future. It is already an amplifier, scaling up vulnerabilities in today’s blockchains. Smart contracts, wallet firmware, oracles, governance contracts, and legacy codebases—all can be repeatedly scanned, dissected, and replicated by AI if they’re open source. “Passed an audit” no longer means “secure.” The real danger is that vulnerabilities are being discovered faster than they can be fixed. According to Binance Research, AI’s success rate in smart contract exploit testing is roughly twice its detection rate, and the cost of scanning a single contract has fallen to about $1.22. Anthropic’s simulated research also shows that AI can generate working exploit scripts for real smart contracts in a sandbox and find zero-day vulnerabilities in contracts it has never encountered before. In the first half of 2026, losses from on-chain security incidents totaled about $1.316 billion, including 204 code vulnerability incidents—a very high frequency. The Coldcard incident illustrates the problem: a long-standing firmware flaw could allow attackers to systematically derive wallet seeds, resulting in losses ranging from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. But let’s be clear: we can’t simply claim that all thefts happen “because of AI alone.” AI has indeed lowered the barrier to attack and increased the likelihood that old code will be dug up. But many incidents still stem from engineering mistakes, misconfigurations, weak access controls, and inadequate audit coverage. A more accurate assessment is this: AI is making “old vulnerabilities” lethal again.
Bitcoin is trying to stage a counter-trend rebound! Institutional funds are quietly entering the market. Are you willing to jump on this wave of行情? After a round of 'surrender-style selling', the market has washed out a large number of weak positions, and there is still room for upward movement technically! But can the rebound go far? The key lies in whether there is new capital to take over! $BTC $SHIB $PEPE