撸分项目贵在坚持
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
6 Months
价值投资标杆
4 Following
30 Followers
321 Liked
235 Shared
All
Quotes
PINNED
See original
#lagrange
I am truly happy for the team as the number of Lagrange users continues to grow. This is a recognition of its value in the market, and I believe more people will join this big family in the future. The experience of using Lagrange is smooth, and the user interface is friendly; even beginners can quickly get started. The technical team behind it is exceptional, continuously optimizing the product experience. I believe such a project will go further. @Lagrange Official #lagrange
$LA
I am truly happy for the team as the number of Lagrange users continues to grow. This is a recognition of its value in the market, and I believe more people will join this big family in the future. The experience of using Lagrange is smooth, and the user interface is friendly; even beginners can quickly get started. The technical team behind it is exceptional, continuously optimizing the product experience. I believe such a project will go further. @Lagrange Official #lagrange
$LA
PINNED
See original
#WalletConnect
After experiencing the #WalletConnect features of @WalletConnect , I was completely captivated; cross-application operations are incredibly smooth. As the ecosystem develops, the value support of $WCT tokens is becoming increasingly solid. The project addresses real pain points, and the team is very reliable, making it worth investing in and paying attention to in the long term.
After experiencing the #WalletConnect features of @WalletConnect , I was completely captivated; cross-application operations are incredibly smooth. As the ecosystem develops, the value support of $WCT tokens is becoming increasingly solid. The project addresses real pain points, and the team is very reliable, making it worth investing in and paying attention to in the long term.
See original
Innovation is not feasible, and very few can do copy and paste. The gap in代差 is unknown.
The general made it clear, directly throwing it in our faces: You Chinese people, do you want to live a good life? Do you want to work on chips, AI, and other high-tech? Sorry, as long as you have this thought, you are my enemy.
This statement can be described as very straightforward and domineering, and behind it lies a game that has long begun, fully surrounding China's rise in technology:
From chips to AI, from hardware to software, the other side's actions have been quite unambiguous, even to the point of putting their “technological hegemony” intentions on the table.
Starting with the chip, this “technological lifeline”, the earliest symbolic event of this blockade must mention the 2019 incident where Huawei was added to the entity list.
At that time, Huawei was relying on its self-developed Kirin chips and leading 5G technology, enjoying tremendous success, with smartphone shipments nearly reaching the global first threshold. As a result, the other side directly issued a ban, prohibiting American companies from supplying Huawei.
I thought this was harsh enough, but unexpectedly, in 2020, they doubled down, even making it so that overseas foundries like TSMC could not produce chips for Huawei below 10nm, directly cutting off the production line of Kirin chips.
During that time, Huawei's mobile phone business instantly fell into a low point. After the stock of chips was used up, high-end models were temporarily out of stock, and market share dropped from its peak. Even the Honor brand had to be spun off to seek self-preservation. This operation truly played the “strangling” tactic to the extreme.
But they still felt it was not enough, and brought in allies like Japan and the Netherlands to jointly restrict the export of high-end lithography machines, aiming to fundamentally cut off the possibility of Chinese companies producing advanced process chips, clearly not wanting us to have any opportunity to rise in the chip field.
I thought this series of punches could pin down China's chip industry, but unexpectedly, this instead forced out our “will to survive” and creativity.
SMIC unexpectedly managed to produce 7nm chips using its self-developed N+1 process without high-end lithography machines. When the Huawei Mate 60 Pro emerged, it directly made the outside world exclaim “breaking the blockade,” and the Kirin 9000S chip in that phone is the best proof of domestic technological breakthroughs.
Looking at the AI field, the other side's blockade has become even more severe.
Starting in 2022, the United States listed advanced AI chips like NVIDIA's H100 on the ban list against China, with a lofty reason, claiming it was to “prevent technological abuse.” But anyone with clear sight knows it is just to prevent our AI industry from having sufficient computing power support.
Later, it even escalated, attempting to globally ban Huawei's self-developed Ascend chips.
Besides hardware, the software aspect was not spared either. Earlier this year, they imposed a DeepSeek ban, trying to intervene even in our large language models, attempting to cut off our AI development path from the algorithmic level.
Even more exaggerated is that their entity list is getting longer and longer, with now over 1,000 Chinese institutions and enterprises on the list, of which companies in the AI field account for more than 40%, including star companies like iFlytek and SenseTime.
In the chip field, more than 300 companies have received special attention, with leading manufacturers like HiSilicon and SMIC being repeatedly sanctioned. Research units in the supercomputing field like Zhongke Shuguang have not been spared either. This is not normal technological competition; it is clearly a comprehensive encirclement.
But ironically, the other side's sanctions have instead become a catalyst for improving our AI industry's ecosystem.
The Ascend chips were not banned; on the contrary, they secured an order for the world's largest AI data center in Saudi Arabia. After using our technology, the performance of Malaysia's sovereign AI servers improved while energy consumption decreased.
Large models like DeepSeek were not brought down either; instead, they attracted a large number of small and medium developers through an open-source model, building their own algorithmic ecosystem.
Even the CEO of NVIDIA had to admit that the export controls on AI to China have already failed. After all, our AI industry chain has transformed from “following others” to “innovating on our own.” This operation has truly backfired on them.
So ultimately, the reason the other side takes our intentions in chips and AI as a symbol of “enemies” is fundamentally because they fear we will break their technological monopoly.
In the past, they relied on technological advantages to easily earn high profits and dominate the discourse in the tech field. But once we achieve breakthroughs in key areas like chips and AI, it not only allows us to live well but also enables more developing countries to enjoy technological dividends, which undoubtedly undermines the foundation of their “hegemonic cake.”
They thought that by relying on bans and sanctions they could lock down our development, but they forgot that what Chinese people excel at is breaking through under pressure. From the initial “backup plan” to the current complete industrial chain layout, from single technological breakthroughs to a perfect ecosystem, in this game, their domineering rhetoric and encirclement tactics have instead become the best “booster” for our technological rise.
This statement can be described as very straightforward and domineering, and behind it lies a game that has long begun, fully surrounding China's rise in technology:
From chips to AI, from hardware to software, the other side's actions have been quite unambiguous, even to the point of putting their “technological hegemony” intentions on the table.
Starting with the chip, this “technological lifeline”, the earliest symbolic event of this blockade must mention the 2019 incident where Huawei was added to the entity list.
At that time, Huawei was relying on its self-developed Kirin chips and leading 5G technology, enjoying tremendous success, with smartphone shipments nearly reaching the global first threshold. As a result, the other side directly issued a ban, prohibiting American companies from supplying Huawei.
I thought this was harsh enough, but unexpectedly, in 2020, they doubled down, even making it so that overseas foundries like TSMC could not produce chips for Huawei below 10nm, directly cutting off the production line of Kirin chips.
During that time, Huawei's mobile phone business instantly fell into a low point. After the stock of chips was used up, high-end models were temporarily out of stock, and market share dropped from its peak. Even the Honor brand had to be spun off to seek self-preservation. This operation truly played the “strangling” tactic to the extreme.
But they still felt it was not enough, and brought in allies like Japan and the Netherlands to jointly restrict the export of high-end lithography machines, aiming to fundamentally cut off the possibility of Chinese companies producing advanced process chips, clearly not wanting us to have any opportunity to rise in the chip field.
I thought this series of punches could pin down China's chip industry, but unexpectedly, this instead forced out our “will to survive” and creativity.
SMIC unexpectedly managed to produce 7nm chips using its self-developed N+1 process without high-end lithography machines. When the Huawei Mate 60 Pro emerged, it directly made the outside world exclaim “breaking the blockade,” and the Kirin 9000S chip in that phone is the best proof of domestic technological breakthroughs.
Looking at the AI field, the other side's blockade has become even more severe.
Starting in 2022, the United States listed advanced AI chips like NVIDIA's H100 on the ban list against China, with a lofty reason, claiming it was to “prevent technological abuse.” But anyone with clear sight knows it is just to prevent our AI industry from having sufficient computing power support.
Later, it even escalated, attempting to globally ban Huawei's self-developed Ascend chips.
Besides hardware, the software aspect was not spared either. Earlier this year, they imposed a DeepSeek ban, trying to intervene even in our large language models, attempting to cut off our AI development path from the algorithmic level.
Even more exaggerated is that their entity list is getting longer and longer, with now over 1,000 Chinese institutions and enterprises on the list, of which companies in the AI field account for more than 40%, including star companies like iFlytek and SenseTime.
In the chip field, more than 300 companies have received special attention, with leading manufacturers like HiSilicon and SMIC being repeatedly sanctioned. Research units in the supercomputing field like Zhongke Shuguang have not been spared either. This is not normal technological competition; it is clearly a comprehensive encirclement.
But ironically, the other side's sanctions have instead become a catalyst for improving our AI industry's ecosystem.
The Ascend chips were not banned; on the contrary, they secured an order for the world's largest AI data center in Saudi Arabia. After using our technology, the performance of Malaysia's sovereign AI servers improved while energy consumption decreased.
Large models like DeepSeek were not brought down either; instead, they attracted a large number of small and medium developers through an open-source model, building their own algorithmic ecosystem.
Even the CEO of NVIDIA had to admit that the export controls on AI to China have already failed. After all, our AI industry chain has transformed from “following others” to “innovating on our own.” This operation has truly backfired on them.
So ultimately, the reason the other side takes our intentions in chips and AI as a symbol of “enemies” is fundamentally because they fear we will break their technological monopoly.
In the past, they relied on technological advantages to easily earn high profits and dominate the discourse in the tech field. But once we achieve breakthroughs in key areas like chips and AI, it not only allows us to live well but also enables more developing countries to enjoy technological dividends, which undoubtedly undermines the foundation of their “hegemonic cake.”
They thought that by relying on bans and sanctions they could lock down our development, but they forgot that what Chinese people excel at is breaking through under pressure. From the initial “backup plan” to the current complete industrial chain layout, from single technological breakthroughs to a perfect ecosystem, in this game, their domineering rhetoric and encirclement tactics have instead become the best “booster” for our technological rise.
See original
$BNB
Is there no money in the market? The volume is so low
$SOL $XRP
Is there no money in the market? The volume is so low
$SOL $XRP
BNB
Holding
Cumulative PNL
+13.26 USDT
See original
A serious businessman hoarding 15 billion in cryptocurrency? Those in physical business need to hoard 15 billion in cryptocurrency. Unheard of.
動區 BlockTempo
--
The Prince Group's statement in response to the seizure of $15 billion in bitcoins: Founder Chen Zhi was framed, and one day he will be cleared of his name.
The Prince Group of Cambodia issued an official statement, stating that the Prince Group and its chairman Chen Zhi have never participated in illegal activities, and vowed to completely vindicate the Prince Group and its chairman Chen Zhi. (Background: Timeline) The process by which Chen Zhi of the Prince Group was 'hacked' by the U.S. government for 127,000 bitcoins! Perhaps the truth will never be known.) (Background information: Seizure of 127,000 bitcoins! The U.S. strikes against Southeast Asia's 'Pig Butchering Empire' Prince Group, simultaneously sanctioning Huaiwang Group) The founder and chairman of the Prince Group in Cambodia, Chen Zhi, was indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice in October this year on charges of wire fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, with a potential maximum sentence of up to 40 years. The U.S. Treasury has further designated the Prince Group as a 'transnational criminal organization,' accusing it of operating at least 10 fraud parks in Cambodia, involving cryptocurrency 'pig butchering' and forced labor. Subsequently, the U.S. and U.K. launched simultaneous sanctions, with U.S. authorities seizing approximately $15 billion worth of bitcoins held by Chen Zhi, setting a record for the largest seizure of crypto assets by law enforcement agencies in a single case. The U.K. National Crime Agency (NCA) also froze the Prince Group's assets in the U.K., with jurisdictions in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and other Asian regions also following suit. The Prince Group strongly retaliated: this is 'illegal seizure.' Faced with assets frozen by multiple countries globally, the Prince Group issued a bilingual official statement on its website on November 11, released by the top U.S. law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, fully armed, stating that the Prince Group and its chairman Chen Zhi have never participated in illegal activities, vowing to completely vindicate the Prince Group and its chairman Chen Zhi. Below is the original text of the Prince Group's official statement: Official Statement from the Prince Group The Prince Group firmly denies any allegations that the group or its chairman Chen Zhi is engaged in illegal activities. The recent allegations are baseless and clearly intended to legitimize the illegal seizure of assets worth billions of dollars. However, these unfounded accusations, repeated by the media and echoed other unverified claims, have caused undue harm to the thousands of innocent employees, partners, and communities served by the group. The group has always adhered to the commitment of integrity, responsible investment, and sustainable economic growth in the region. For over a decade, the group has operated transparently and fully complied with all applicable laws; when all evidence is presented, this will be indisputable. We have hired a world-class legal team led by the top U.S. law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. We firmly believe that when the truth is revealed, the Prince Group and its chairman Chen Zhi will be completely vindicated. The legal team moved to criticize the U.S. government for 'insufficient evidence.' Meanwhile, as early as November 10, Matthew Schwartz, the lead attorney from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP commissioned by the Prince Group, submitted a 5-page emergency motion to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, requesting the government to immediately provide 'evidence chain of fund flows.' According to screenshots of this motion posted by (Feng Media), Boies Schiller Flexner wrote in a letter to the judge: Dear Judge Kovner: This law firm represents the potential claimant Chen Zhi in the above-mentioned civil forfeiture case, and respectfully requests an extension of the deadline for third parties to file claims against the 'defendant property' until January 19, 2026. This extension is approximately 60 days for Mr. Chen (as the government has directly served him with a seizure notice, and his claim is currently due on November 18); for other claimants notified through announcements, it is approximately 30 days (their claims are due around December 15). See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Supplemental Rule G(5)(a)(ii). This is Mr. Chen's first request for an extension of the claim deadline. The government opposes this application, allegedly on the grounds that there is 'no good cause as described in Supplemental Rule G(5)(a)(i) to deviate from the deadline set by the rule.' The following reasons explain that this moderate extension is appropriate, including: (a) Coordinating the claim deadlines of all potential claimants; (b) Allowing Mr. Chen and other potential claimants time to address the complex conflicts of interest and agent selection issues that have arisen due to the simultaneous initiation of sanctions (which led to resignations of several senior executives and directors of various companies); (c) Providing Mr. Chen sufficient time to trace the vast amount of bitcoins involved in this case, most of which were stolen nearly five years ago. This extension does not harm the government, as it has effectively controlled the 'defendant property' for at least a year (well before filing this lawsuit). The government took over a year from the seizure of the 'defendant property' to formally file the lawsuit, so potential claimants need more than several weeks to draft and complete their claims, which is reasonable and should not be surprising. Source: Feng Media The indictment (ECF No. 1) accuses criminal organizations of operating cryptocurrency investment fraud and other fraudulent activities at locations owned by the Prince Group (Complaint ¶¶ 20-23). Although the government simply claims that the seized bitcoins constitute 'illegal proceeds of the Prince Group' (Id. ¶ 38), a careful reading of the indictment reveals that there are no charges linking the seized bitcoins to the so-called fraudulent activities. The government seems to assert again without evidence or details: that the criminal proceeds were used to fund bitcoin mining operations (Id. ¶ 42), and that the newly mined bitcoins were later mixed with other bitcoins transferred from exchanges controlled by entities associated with the Prince Group (Id. ¶ 45). However, the indictment completely neglects the following key question: Why does the government believe that mining operations are funded with criminal proceeds? Why do those wallets contain illegal bitcoins? The indictment clearly shows that the outcome of this case will largely depend on fund tracing. The government claims that the FBI 'conducted extensive blockchain tracing to analyze the flow of the defendant's cryptocurrency' (Id.). They also had ample time to complete this work. According to public information, most of the bitcoins seized in this case were actually stolen assets during the hacking of Lubian.com in December 2020, an incident currently recognized as the largest cryptocurrency theft in history. These stolen bitcoins slept in the hacker's wallet for over four years, only reappearing in this civil forfeiture proceeding as 'defendant property.' In July 2024, this batch of bitcoins was transferred to a wallet controlled by the FBI. Therefore, the government has had several years to trace this batch of bitcoins, and at least 16 months have passed since it was transferred to the FBI wallet in July 2024 to prepare for this forfeiture lawsuit. Source: Feng Media Related Reports Kaohsiung's largest OTC 'Golden Bull Hundred Exchange' has become a money laundering tool for fraud groups, with love pig butchering schemes raising over 50 million. Is the mysterious buyer of Tao Zhu Yin Yuan the financial influencer 'Shan Jia Lang'? Four months ago exposed 'deposit.' Three women from nine companies in Taiwan are involved in the 'Prince Group' fraud empire! Using cryptocurrency for money laundering and setting up shell companies in luxury homes. "The Prince Group's statement in response to the seizure of $15 billion in bitcoins: Founder Chen Zhi was framed, and one day he will be cleared of his name." This article was first published in BlockTempo (the most influential blockchain news media).
See original
The price has dropped to 0.1, what’s the problem with a 1 to 1 exchange! The key is in the quantity, the total amount of price fluctuation remains unchanged.
Binance News
--
Bank of Korea warns of risks associated with Korean won-denominated stablecoins, recommends traditional banks lead issuance
According to ChainCatcher, the Bank of Korea released a report warning about the risks of stablecoins denominated in Korean won, emphasizing that private issuance institutions lack the trust necessary to maintain monetary stability. It recommends that traditional banks lead stablecoin issuance.
The central bank pointed out that monetary stability relies on trust rather than technology, citing examples of the risks of stablecoins losing their peg, such as the collapse of Terra/Luna and USDC falling to $0.88 during the Silicon Valley Bank crisis. Non-US dollar stablecoins face more severe risks due to limited circulation.
Despite the warnings, financial innovation in South Korea continues to advance. In September, BDACS partnered with Woori Bank to launch Korea's first compliant Korean won stablecoin KRW1, built on the Avalanche blockchain.
The central bank pointed out that monetary stability relies on trust rather than technology, citing examples of the risks of stablecoins losing their peg, such as the collapse of Terra/Luna and USDC falling to $0.88 during the Silicon Valley Bank crisis. Non-US dollar stablecoins face more severe risks due to limited circulation.
Despite the warnings, financial innovation in South Korea continues to advance. In September, BDACS partnered with Woori Bank to launch Korea's first compliant Korean won stablecoin KRW1, built on the Avalanche blockchain.
See original
The price has dropped to 0.1, so what's the problem with exchanging 1 for 1! The key is the quantity; as long as the total remains unchanged.
Binance News
--
Bank of Korea warns of risks associated with Korean won-denominated stablecoins, recommends traditional banks lead issuance
According to ChainCatcher, the Bank of Korea released a report warning about the risks of stablecoins denominated in Korean won, emphasizing that private issuance institutions lack the trust necessary to maintain monetary stability. It recommends that traditional banks lead stablecoin issuance.
The central bank pointed out that monetary stability relies on trust rather than technology, citing examples of the risks of stablecoins losing their peg, such as the collapse of Terra/Luna and USDC falling to $0.88 during the Silicon Valley Bank crisis. Non-US dollar stablecoins face more severe risks due to limited circulation.
Despite the warnings, financial innovation in South Korea continues to advance. In September, BDACS partnered with Woori Bank to launch Korea's first compliant Korean won stablecoin KRW1, built on the Avalanche blockchain.
The central bank pointed out that monetary stability relies on trust rather than technology, citing examples of the risks of stablecoins losing their peg, such as the collapse of Terra/Luna and USDC falling to $0.88 during the Silicon Valley Bank crisis. Non-US dollar stablecoins face more severe risks due to limited circulation.
Despite the warnings, financial innovation in South Korea continues to advance. In September, BDACS partnered with Woori Bank to launch Korea's first compliant Korean won stablecoin KRW1, built on the Avalanche blockchain.
See original
The off-season has begun
Alpha players' awkward situation: the whales have long met the points requirement, yet collectively "lie flat" and don't claim the airdrops; retail investors want to take advantage but can't even touch the threshold, only able to wait anxiously for the second round, and when they see the rewards, they complain about them being too small.
In recent days, almost no one has reached out for the 210 point airdrop—it's not that they aren't tempted, but large accounts are holding 1 k–10 k U in capital to earn points as easily as drinking water, continuing to hoard while waiting for "Big Hair"; small fund users can't scrape together a few interactions even if they sell everything, it's difficult to earn points, and even harder to claim them.
As a result, on-chain data is very quiet: the airdrop hangs there, but the addresses remain still, and the market is quieter than a bear market.
In recent days, almost no one has reached out for the 210 point airdrop—it's not that they aren't tempted, but large accounts are holding 1 k–10 k U in capital to earn points as easily as drinking water, continuing to hoard while waiting for "Big Hair"; small fund users can't scrape together a few interactions even if they sell everything, it's difficult to earn points, and even harder to claim them.
As a result, on-chain data is very quiet: the airdrop hangs there, but the addresses remain still, and the market is quieter than a bear market.
See original
$LINEA
Did the babies receive the rewards from this event,
or am I the only one who didn't receive it.
$LINEA
Did the babies receive the rewards from this event,
or am I the only one who didn't receive it.
$LINEA
See original
$OPEN
Have you received the rewards for this event, Baozi?
Or am I the only one who hasn't received them?
$OPEN
Have you received the rewards for this event, Baozi?
Or am I the only one who hasn't received them?
$OPEN
See original
$FF transaction activity quota of 100,000 shares, small portion of pig trotter rice
#币安HODLer空投FF
Participate in the small portion pig trotter rice event, there are still spots available, brothers hurry up and get on the bus. $FF
Participate in the small portion pig trotter rice event, there are still spots available, brothers hurry up and get on the bus. $FF
See original
Only with order distribution records does it have credibility😇
Thank you Binance! September has come to an end, in the first half of the month I brushed 16+2, in the second half 15+2, received 13, 1505u, this month is more than the previous three months combined! Caught a good time!!!
🤡
40 knives, small fur
See original
$DOGE
In (Dogecoin), is the strategy of buying more as it drops effective?
In (Dogecoin), is the strategy of buying more as it drops effective?
S
DOGE/USDT
Price
0.28113
See original
$TRADOOR
The intraday line is flat, but the squeeze is too intense.
The intraday line is flat, but the squeeze is too intense.
https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/
#BNBATH
BNB reaches new heights, ecology and capital jointly promote value leap
Recently, the price of BNB broke through the $1000 mark, achieving a growth of over 7000 times compared to the fundraising price in 2017, and its market capitalization remains the fourth largest in the global cryptocurrency market, demonstrating strong momentum. This wave of rising prices is not a coincidence, but rather the result of deep ecological cultivation and capital recognition.
BNB Chain completed network integration through the "One BNB" strategy, and Op BNB achieved a transaction processing capacity of 4600 transactions/second, with the total locked value in the ecosystem increasing by 58.2% year-on-year. Meanwhile, traditional asset management giants like Franklin Templeton have entered the market, and Huaxing Capital has established a special fund to allocate BNB, bridging the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world.
From transaction fee discounts to diverse applications such as DeFi and NFTs, the practical value of BNB continues to solidify. However, abnormal signals in the derivatives market also remind investors to be wary of short-term volatility risks. $BNB
BNB reaches new heights, ecology and capital jointly promote value leap
Recently, the price of BNB broke through the $1000 mark, achieving a growth of over 7000 times compared to the fundraising price in 2017, and its market capitalization remains the fourth largest in the global cryptocurrency market, demonstrating strong momentum. This wave of rising prices is not a coincidence, but rather the result of deep ecological cultivation and capital recognition.
BNB Chain completed network integration through the "One BNB" strategy, and Op BNB achieved a transaction processing capacity of 4600 transactions/second, with the total locked value in the ecosystem increasing by 58.2% year-on-year. Meanwhile, traditional asset management giants like Franklin Templeton have entered the market, and Huaxing Capital has established a special fund to allocate BNB, bridging the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world.
From transaction fee discounts to diverse applications such as DeFi and NFTs, the practical value of BNB continues to solidify. However, abnormal signals in the derivatives market also remind investors to be wary of short-term volatility risks. $BNB
See original
#BNBATH
BNB Hits New All-Time High: The Inevitable Resonance of Ecology and Capital
Recently, the price of BNB broke through $860, setting a new all-time high, with a market capitalization jumping to 186th place globally, surpassing well-known companies like Nike, showcasing a strong trend in the cryptocurrency market. This surge is not coincidental; it is the result of ecological construction, deflationary mechanisms, and the resonance of institutional capital.
The ecological foundation is the core support. BNB Chain is advancing a technological upgrade by 2025, aiming to increase throughput by ten times and reduce final confirmation time to within 150 milliseconds, while leading the stablecoin usage field with 11.8 million active addresses. At the same time, MVB activities have incubated over 200 projects, and with the expectation of USYC interest-bearing stablecoins coming to fruition, ecological vitality continues to be released.
The deflationary mechanism reinforces scarcity. Since 2025, BNB has completed three quarterly burns, with a total of 5.72 million tokens burned, valued at over $2.7 billion, significantly boosting market confidence due to its deflationary attributes.
Institutional entry becomes a new engine. Nano Labs plans to purchase $1 billion worth of BNB, Windtree aims to raise $200 million to build a BNB treasury, and Wall Street institutions are also involved in establishing reserve companies, creating strong support from the funding side. Technical indicators show that whale capital is leading the inflow, and the short squeeze further propels the upward trend, with the thousand-dollar mark just within reach.
$BNB
BNB Hits New All-Time High: The Inevitable Resonance of Ecology and Capital
Recently, the price of BNB broke through $860, setting a new all-time high, with a market capitalization jumping to 186th place globally, surpassing well-known companies like Nike, showcasing a strong trend in the cryptocurrency market. This surge is not coincidental; it is the result of ecological construction, deflationary mechanisms, and the resonance of institutional capital.
The ecological foundation is the core support. BNB Chain is advancing a technological upgrade by 2025, aiming to increase throughput by ten times and reduce final confirmation time to within 150 milliseconds, while leading the stablecoin usage field with 11.8 million active addresses. At the same time, MVB activities have incubated over 200 projects, and with the expectation of USYC interest-bearing stablecoins coming to fruition, ecological vitality continues to be released.
The deflationary mechanism reinforces scarcity. Since 2025, BNB has completed three quarterly burns, with a total of 5.72 million tokens burned, valued at over $2.7 billion, significantly boosting market confidence due to its deflationary attributes.
Institutional entry becomes a new engine. Nano Labs plans to purchase $1 billion worth of BNB, Windtree aims to raise $200 million to build a BNB treasury, and Wall Street institutions are also involved in establishing reserve companies, creating strong support from the funding side. Technical indicators show that whale capital is leading the inflow, and the short squeeze further propels the upward trend, with the thousand-dollar mark just within reach.
$BNB
See original
Lucky Draw Activity
#BNBATH
《When BNB 'Baths' Reach New Heights, 'Coins' Must Celebrate Together》
BNB has reached a historic high, akin to a hearty 'BNBATH'—in the wave of cryptocurrency, it washes away market doubts and 'bathes' in new growth. As the core token of the Binance ecosystem, $BNB is not only trading fuel but also the 'bathrobe' of on-chain innovation, wrapping the warmth of decentralized finance.
At this moment, participating in the #BNBATH event and posting in-depth topics with hashtags is not only for BNB to 'scrub' (empower voice) but also for oneself to 'bathe' (share the prize pool). In the on-chain world, every interaction is a bubble, ultimately stacking up the industry's 'bathhouse culture'—lively, win-win, and filled with professional value's steaming. Come, join this 'washing party' of cryptocurrency revelry! $BNB
《When BNB 'Baths' Reach New Heights, 'Coins' Must Celebrate Together》
BNB has reached a historic high, akin to a hearty 'BNBATH'—in the wave of cryptocurrency, it washes away market doubts and 'bathes' in new growth. As the core token of the Binance ecosystem, $BNB is not only trading fuel but also the 'bathrobe' of on-chain innovation, wrapping the warmth of decentralized finance.
At this moment, participating in the #BNBATH event and posting in-depth topics with hashtags is not only for BNB to 'scrub' (empower voice) but also for oneself to 'bathe' (share the prize pool). In the on-chain world, every interaction is a bubble, ultimately stacking up the industry's 'bathhouse culture'—lively, win-win, and filled with professional value's steaming. Come, join this 'washing party' of cryptocurrency revelry! $BNB
See original
This is (Golden Fortune Full Bag)
币安Binance华语
--
The fourth phase of the picture guessing battle is here! 🔥
Looking for the smartest little partners on the internet—big imagination, quick answers, only then can you have the chance to debut in the C position! 🤯✨
💬 Write your answer in the comments:
Randomly select 5 lucky winners, each receiving 20 USDT
Additionally, 5 of the most imaginative answers will be directly rewarded with 30 USDT! 🎁
Come and showcase your unique inspiration, meme king, let's go! 🦆
Looking for the smartest little partners on the internet—big imagination, quick answers, only then can you have the chance to debut in the C position! 🤯✨
💬 Write your answer in the comments:
Randomly select 5 lucky winners, each receiving 20 USDT
Additionally, 5 of the most imaginative answers will be directly rewarded with 30 USDT! 🎁
Come and showcase your unique inspiration, meme king, let's go! 🦆
See original
$S
Strong entry, 10U to start regular investment
Strong entry, 10U to start regular investment
B
S/USDT
Price
0.2996
Login to explore more contents