LC药师先生_万币侯

Brothers, I found that we have all misunderstood the focus before. For a whole day, we only discussed the business logic of OpenAI OpenClaw, but ignored the most terrifying alchemy in the design of @Vanarchain , remember? There’s a mechanism where fiat currency enters - automatically buying to become $VANRY . Wow, if this mechanism connects with the billion-level traffic of OpenAI, what kind of net inflow would that be?

1. OpenAI's users are ordinary people and Fortune 500 companies. They don’t have USDT or Binance accounts; they only have credit cards and dollars. In theory, they can’t use blockchain. But Vanar has long set up: Web2 users swipe cards (pay Gas/subscribe) ➡️ Vanar backend receives dollars ➡️ System/market maker automatically repurchases $VANRY ➡️ On-chain destruction/payment.

2. The “passive buying” of 100 million times a day is the terrifying part of OpenClaw + OpenAI. The future Agents are not operated by humans; they are run by programs.
• If OpenClaw brings 10 million active Agents.
• Each Agent runs only 10 tasks a day (memory retrieval, reasoning).
• That means 100 million interactions a day.

3. Although Vanar's transaction fee is only $0.0005, which seems negligible. But please note, this is a rigid buy order. Regardless of whether the K line rises or falls, as long as Agents work, as long as companies use AI, this money must be spent.

It's like you don’t hold oil, but you need to burn fuel to drive. AI is the same: Web2 users don’t even know Vanry exists, but with every click of the mouse and every awakening of AI, they are passively buying $VANRY from the market. Once you understand this, it all becomes clear!
#vanar

I just saw someone in the square cursing: “Fogo dropped from 0.07 to 0.023, this is a zero-sum game, what are you analyzing every day for?” After reading this, I laughed: “It's just to attract traffic,” because he also added # @ $ afterward.

Attracting traffic is not scary; posting some milk pictures or skirting the edge is understandable, after all, not everyone in the square is doing research, otherwise it would become a Binance hub. But what’s scary is doing research and then using incorrect provocative opinions and information to attract traffic, which is not good, because it will bring negative biases about this project to those who haven’t researched it. It’s like your mom sees someone in the friend circle posting “People in the crypto space are now living on the 'cutoff line'” and worries about you every day.

Open your eyes and look at the outside world: BTC dropped from 126000 to the 6xxxx range, a halving. BNB dropped from over 1300 to over 600, also a halving. As for other altcoins, it’s common to see drops of 90%, 95%. Are they all zero-sum games? In this muddy bear market, do you expect Fogo to stand alone and reverse the trend? That’s not called a public chain, that’s called a capital game (certain river? certain Pinpin?).

On this point, we must have common sense. What is DYOR? The most important part is the “O,” your own research, your own strategy. So don’t blame some project for your own “trading incompetence.”

If you rushed in at $0.06 and then shouted TO THE MOON, but after the price broke down, you dreamed of quickly breaking even, holding a bad hand stubbornly until now. That's not called trading, that’s called a giant baby.

In the financial market, no one will pay for your trades and decisions. So let’s talk about the current $0.023 of $FOGO . No one says this is the absolute bottom. But as a rational person, let’s do some math: now Fogo's price is 70% cheaper than its peak, but the locked amount of Ignition (TVL) has multiplied several times compared to its peak. The price is falling, but the value is rising.

But for those who truly participate in the market, now is a relatively low-risk, relatively controllable, and executable DCA phase. What should really be concerned about is how much position to buy, how long to lock, where to set the stop loss, and whether you can withdraw before the next major UNLOCK.

So mindless criticism is the easiest. But those who survive in this market have never relied on venting emotions, but rather on calmly calculating odds when others are panicking.
#Fogo @Fogo Official

Looking at the trend of $BCH , I once thought it was BTC. Can going long on this still result in a liquidation?

This week I刷@Vanarchain official Twitter, my first reaction was: how is it like a "repeater".

OpenClaw collaboration also calls Memory, speaking on stage in Dubai also calls Memory, in AMA it’s still Memory, even when sending inspirational quotes it emphasizes Memory (memory). Logically speaking, such repetitive talk would annoy anyone who hears it—yet on the contrary, the community is getting more and more into it, discussions are getting bigger, and the consensus has become firmer. This issue illustrates a point: they are not "marketing a concept", but repeatedly hitting a pain point that everyone cannot avoid: AI's amnesia.

Current AI seems very smart, but its working style is more like a "temporary worker": no matter how clearly you say it in this window, change the scene, change the platform, or even have a long conversation, it starts to lose track. Drawing the wrong picture is just a waste of time; if it loses track during transactions, customer service, or risk control, that's an accident.

So Vanar's "repeating" this week is not actually repetition, but nailing it down: to hammer the "memory" nail into everyone's minds—AI needs to truly become productive; the first thing is not to speak better, but to remember, connect, and clearly explain why it does so.

So people aren’t annoyed, but rather getting more into it. Because the market has finally realized: what will be competitive in the AI field next is not just talk, but memory. Vanar happens to be at this pivotal point.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Happy New Year🎆

Brothers, have you seen that screenshot of "the Senate wants to regulate AI training"? My first reaction was: these old fellows in America have finally realized that the biggest problem with AI is not whether it's "smart" or not, but rather "it's unclear who it is, where it learned from, and what it learned". Once the black box is opened, copyright issues explode, and illusions drift away; in the end, who takes the blame? So they simply come up with the most straightforward logic: register first, keep records, and hold accountable. For example, the recent CLEAR Act promoted by Senators Schiff / Curtis essentially requires model developers to disclose copyrighted works used in training data before release (and even retrospectively for already released models), and to establish a public database and penalty mechanisms. In simple terms: first, submit AI's "household register" and "learning records" to me.

Then I suddenly understood: why Vanar has been stubbornly working on that Seed / Neutron / Kayon system regardless of whether the currency price is sideways or stagnant this year. Other projects love to talk about "faster TPS" and "flashy Agents", but when regulation really kicks in, you will find that speed cannot solve the issue of evidence. If you let AI do transactions, customer service, compliance, and finance — as long as it makes one mistake, and the regulator asks, "what was its basis at the time, where did the data come from, and how did the logic lead to this step?", a bunch of projects would be left speechless. Vanar's approach is more like: first make "memories" into traceable units (Seed), and then put "actions" into verifiable frameworks (Kayon). You can think of it as giving AI three things:

Household register: who you are, what you've learned, and where you came from;
Dashcam: what basis you relied on for this decision;
Fuse: actions that do not comply with the rules, do not go on-chain, do not execute.

So, the matter of "registering AI" is seen by others as regulatory pressure to complete homework; on Vanar's side, it feels more like the homework was finished early, just waiting for the teacher to collect it. When regulation starts rewarding "traceability, auditability, and explainability", those projects that can only perform AI will find it increasingly difficult to operate; while this architecture built from the ground up on "trace and verify" will only become more valuable as regulations tighten.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Grooming and hitting local dogs, as well as leading Alpha to new projects, the most tormenting thing is not the Gas fee, but the pop-ups. I remember why I followed Xiao C, it's because he came up with a way to authorize in advance during Alpha's new launch, allowing him to sell 1 or 2 seconds earlier than others.

Then a certain K wallet launched a smart account: it can batch, can pay on behalf, and can automate part of the process. However, the Sessions with @Fogo Official takes another path: it is not optimizing pop-ups, but eliminating them. In the #Fogo ecosystem, when you enter an application (game, social, trading tool), you only sign once, just like logging into a Web2 account. After signing, a temporary session key is generated, which will complete a series of signing actions for you in the background during its validity period. You can continuously defeat monsters 100 times or perform 100 operations continuously, and the blockchain will still keep track, but you won't see a single pop-up.

Many AA solutions add an extra layer of smart contract systems at the account level, ultimately requiring users or project parties to bear the experience and cost. However, the idea behind Sessions is more like turning "delegated authorization/session state" into a capability that can be used at the bottom level, lightweight, direct, and suitable for high-frequency scenarios, especially for high-density operational applications like chain games and social interactions.

The most important thing is the security logic: now the smart accounts in web3 wallets will issue serious security reminders after being opened, as there is indeed a significant security exposure. But the brilliance of Sessions lies in: it doesn't prevent you from signing, but rather clarifies the boundaries with a single signature.

The permissions of the FOGO session key can be locked within three lines:
Time-limited: automatically invalid after expiration
Quota: maximum spending limit
Domain-limited: can only interact with specified applications/contracts
So even if you're worried about extreme situations—session keys being stolen, all it can do is "click a few times within this cage," without touching your real core assets.

Regular Web3 wallets are trying hard to make the "bank counter" more user-friendly. Meanwhile, Fogo Sessions directly turns Web3 into Web2—making blockchain technology completely "disappear" in user experience. For high-frequency trading, full-chain gaming, and social applications, this is not just an icing on the cake, but a generational leap in infrastructure.
#Fogo @Fogo Official $FOGO

Recently, I've been obsessed with writing things at the square every day, and suddenly had an idea: what if our square integrated with the automatic trading section at #vanar ?

The Binance Square is really hot right now, with various experts sharing insights. But for those of us who don't have much time, the biggest pain point is information overload. There are too many good things; it's impossible to keep up, let alone verify their authenticity. At this time, if we could integrate Vanar's engine, it would be quite interesting.

Imagine this: @Vanarchain 's Neutron is actually like a "personal research assistant" that understands you. It remembers your on-chain habits — do you like playing with meme coins? Or do you prefer DeFi mining? It doesn't require you to sift through the square for information; instead, it automatically picks out the Alphas that match your trading style from a vast amount of content and pushes them to you.

Combined with Kayon (verification layer), this is like adding a "fraud filter" to the square's content. It's not about human eyes discerning, but rather relying on on-chain logic for verification. Those "signals" that don't match the data are directly downgraded by the system. What remains are verified valuable insights.
This is a huge benefit for creators!

In the past, when you posted in the square, it was like "Jiang Taigong fishing". With Vanar, what you publish isn't just text; it's a "strategy seed". The system accurately pushes your strategy to wallet users who are looking for these types of opportunities.

Finally, users can enjoy it and simply click in their Web3 wallets, and the execution layer automatically helps you run the strategy. Each fee is locked at $0.0005; this is truly "what you see is what you get".
If this becomes a reality, it would upgrade the Binance Square from a "reading platform" to a "smart trading terminal". $VANRY