$ZRO (LayerZero) is a cross-chain infrastructure project. Its core goal is to enable different blockchains to interoperate in messages, assets, and applications. LayerZero has already covered many chains and applications, and it is one of the more important infrastructure projects in the cross-chain space.
I think ZRO has a bit of similarity to QNT $QNT : What they truly want to do isn’t a single blockchain—they both aim to become a “connection layer” between different blockchains.
QNT achieves multi-chain interoperability through Overledger, while LayerZero connects different networks via cross-chain message protocols. Their technical approaches differ, but the underlying logic is quite similar:
Whichever can become an irreplaceable piece of infrastructure between different chains has the opportunity to capture long-term value.
ZRO’s all-time high was around $7.47, but it has since experienced a very deep pullback.
$ICP (Internet Computer) is a blockchain project focused on decentralized cloud computing and on-chain applications, with the goal of enabling applications, data, and computation to run directly on the blockchain.
ICP’s all-time high once came close to $700, but the price has since undergone a very deep pullback.
I’m bullish on it mainly for three reasons:
① Valuation and sentiment are both at low levels The market is extremely pessimistic; the downside space for further declines and the upside elasticity are starting to become asymmetrical.
② Real usage—not just telling stories ICP has real applications, developers, and on-chain computation demand. The Cycles mechanism also gives ICP practical consumption scenarios.
③ This is a “nobody’s paying attention” phase I prefer to accumulate positions before the market reaches a consensus, rather than researching only after it has already risen several multiples.
Don’t try to guess the absolute low; scale in gradually.
Truly big opportunities often don’t show up when it’s loud and crowded.
$QNT On September 24, 2024, The Clearing House officially confirmed its selection of Quant to provide interoperability, orchestration, and transaction management technology for its On-Chain Money Initiative, connecting RTP and CHIPS. The network plans to open to participating institutions in the first half of 2027. The Clearing House handles U.S. payment volumes of more than $2 trillion every day, which makes this a highly significant institutional adoption validation for Quant to date.
And the next catalyst window is already very close: Quant will attend Sibos 2026 Miami from September 28 to October 1, and on September 28 it will showcase programmable settlement for tokenized assets with Murex.
This could possibly be hyped into a Zec-type coin—how much can you buy to start building a position?
Character has serious issues, and is likely to suddenly disappear or have an accident one day....
Van社长
·
--
The recent post by Aoying is really a bit thoughtless, more than half of the comments are criticisms... To clarify, I also consider myself a fan of Aoying and have always admired his contract trading skills.
Let's first go through the flow of events: 1️⃣ On August 9, Aoying started shorting around 4180 with his trading account $ETH , at that time his account had a margin of 250,000 USDT and a follow-up amount of 1.8 million USDT; 2️⃣ Between August 10-13, ETH kept rising, but Aoying continued to add to his short position at 4200-4300-4500, and at the peak when ETH reached 4700+, Aoying's entire position was down 65%; 3️⃣ On August 13, Aoying closed his short position on ETH, and closed the follow-up; at this point, Aoying had 80,000 USDT left in margin, and the overall loss for fans following him was 1.2 million USDT; 4️⃣ On August 14, Aoying used his account with a balance of 70,000 USDT to short ETH at 4700. Due to the sudden plunge + pullback + continued drop in the afternoon, Aoying executed a 'legendary' operation, making a profit of 700,000 USDT in three trades over 8 hours, and then began to share profits on X. 5️⃣ In the early hours of August 15, Aoying published a 'Macau article' about himself on X, which generally stated that a friend took him to the casino to play, losing money every day, and on the last day, the friend didn’t take him, but he made money playing alone, using this to educate fans that those who follow should bear their own profits and losses; 5️⃣ On August 15, in Chinese, Aoying continued to share profits on X, and at this point, his small account balance had exceeded 1 million USDT.
There are actually quite a few conspiracy theories about the whole thing, with some saying that while Aoying was shorting with his trading account, his small account was hedging long, actually not losing money. Others say that Aoying intentionally shorted to force fans to liquidate, to profit from their losses.
Rationally analyzing this, these conspiracy theories are not very realistic. Aoying is someone who made tens of millions in real trading; he has no need to fabricate losses on the more than 100,000 margin of the follow-up account or from fans' losses. According to what he said, it’s not even enough to cover his trading fees for half a month.
The whole matter does not actually revolve around him losing more than 1 million USDT for fans in the follow-up (no one is guaranteed to win), nor about him making back more than 1 million USDT with his small account (although this does seem a bit shady).
I think the main reason fans are angry is that he not only profits and wildly shares on X but also posts to educate fans that they should bear their own profits and losses when following, and that trading should be done by oneself. To be honest, if that’s really the case, it’s better not to lead trades at all.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.