By looking at the old metrics, the share buyback of $STRC dilutes the shareholders of $MSTR ; But under the CEBE framework, the buyback actually thickens earnings. Which algorithm is more accurate? My “Hunting the Dragon” strategy is to chase short positions when they go with the trend from high levels. “Slaying the Dragon” is to harvest when things get overheated. The directional strategy is unified and driven by the scoring center. Want to see how it’s run? Go to the homepage.
Chasing the highs feels great for a moment, but when you fall, it’s a cremation site. $Niūlái is up 65.43% in 24 hours—I'm not chasing longs at $0.13466. When the bounce approaches $0.145, I'll look for shorts.
First, look at volume and volatility: the most recent 4-hour contract traded about $128 million, and the volatility of the last 3 candles is 20.08%. On the daily timeframe, the last 3 candles’ volatility is even as high as 54.69%. Trading is definitely active, but this sharp rally after a new contract launch—only 11 days in—means the volatility is amplified too, so long take-profit will happen faster.
On 4H, price is still above EMA5 $0.119046 and EMA25 $0.100165, and RSI7 is also at 69.8—trend isn’t broken. But the current price is too close to the 4H high at $0.15; the risk-reward for chasing longs isn’t worth it anymore. Funding rate: +0.0559% over the last 24 hours. OI is $57M, about 47% of market cap—longs are paying to hold positions. The big holders’ long/short ratio is 1.8441, and the overcrowded direction is very obvious. If the bounce can’t push through $0.15, the ones who let go first are likely the higher-cost longs.
$Niūlái is clearly stronger than BTC and the whole market—this is independent strength, so a short squeeze can continue. But during the drawdown, it lacks big-market support, so pullbacks will be more direct. My plan is to wait for the bounce near $0.145 to meet resistance and then short; if it breaks and holds above $0.15 and keeps going hard, there’s no need to insist—$0.151 is the only “wrong” level.
📊 Direction: Short 💰 Entry reference: $0.145 🛑 Stop loss: $0.151—after triggered, exit 🎯 Take profit 1: $0.119046, 4H EMA5 🎯 Take profit 2: $0.100165, 4H EMA25
It’s not hard to judge the direction at the high—what’s hard is waiting for the longs to let go first. When you’re near $0.15, will you see the bounce meet resistance, or will you see the breakout and squeeze continuation? Pick one.
$Niūlái #技术分析 #Uncle Twelve If you want to watch the charts with me and follow along, just go to my Binance public domain copy-trading page. Enter via my profile to copy trade immediately. https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/copy-trading/lead-details/5051200019981811968
I’m looking at the mNAV of $MSTR —essentially, it’s measuring investor sentiment. If $BTC rises far more sharply than the market expected, then the mNAV of $MSTR will surge along with it, and it usually amplifies quite a bit. In plain terms, most people in the market lose to emotion. I use a replicable, verifiable quantitative system to turn human weaknesses into machine discipline. If you want to take the easy way and just follow the ride, tap the link on the homepage.
I see $MSTR meeting selling pressure right around this downward trend line—pretty much as expected. To reverse this downtrend, you first need a valid breakout above this resistance line. Going all-in on a single direction is too much luck. My US stock strategy uses tools like SQQQ to absorb volatility with a low position size—if it’s bearish, I’ll short; if not, I won’t. It doesn’t interfere with my crypto strategies. There’s a live trading entry on the homepage.
In the past 24 hours, the market chart is largely red—$BTC retraced to around the $76,000 level. Rarely, a few shanzhai coins are still drifting higher against the trend; $ETHFI is up 7.5% as well. However, selling pressure is also not light—several coins have seen clear drawdowns. Overall, $ETH is still under pressure as well. The core of my U.S. stock strategy isn’t directional bets; it’s turning volatility itself into cash flow, as a low-correlation complement to crypto strategies. If you’re interested, check the profile for live trading.
I feel the more it drops, the more you add—provided you bet correctly that this move is only a pullback, not a trend reversal point. $MSTR is essentially $BTC with leverage. If a true bear market comes, it often falls harder than the underlying crypto. If you fire your ammo too early, you’ll very easily get trapped somewhere around mid-slope. Going all-in on a direction is too dependent on luck. My US stock strategy uses tools like SQQQ to absorb volatility with low position size—short when it should be short. It doesn’t interfere with my crypto strategy at all. There’s a live-trading entry on the homepage.
I saw this $SKHYNIX move—it's definitely strong. On Thursday, to rebalance the portfolio, they dumped 1.4 million shares. Using the Korean market’s closing auction rules for the last 10 minutes, everything got filled right at the end of the session. The result? The closing price was actually identical to Wednesday. With this kind of follow-through sitting right here, it’s hard for me not to keep looking long. My short is based on an RSI-threshold dynamic engine with a multi-factor scoring system, not on feel or hype. In real trading, you can directly see how it runs on the homepage.
$Lobster RSI7 is only 42.7, and the daily is even lower at 38.2. The rebound looks fierce, but I’m still going to short from the sidelines: this isn’t the momentum you’d expect from a real bullish breakout—it’s more like an emotional pullback within high volatility.
In the past 3 four-hour candles, volatility is 10.32%, and the single-contract traded value is $5.96 million. The market activity is strong; but price still has to face the prior high at 0.1. RSI isn’t keeping up, so the odds for chasing longs aren’t great. Over the last 3 daily candles, it’s down 11.91%. The short-term jump hasn’t managed to reverse the weaker structure on the larger timeframe.
More importantly, the long side is already paying a 0.1808% 24-hour funding rate. OI is $34 million—against a $44 million market cap, that’s not light. The long/short account ratio is 0.7027, slightly bearish; yet the large holders’ positioning ratio is 1.4053, slightly bullish. Positions are at odds with each other. If it can’t break above 0.1, the high-cost longs will let go first—and the pullback may come faster.
$Lobster is also clearly stronger than BTC and the whole market; an independent rebound could continue. But if the broader market doesn’t hold up and the prior high is under pressure, don’t use faith as a stop-loss for a buy order. Uncle Twelve will look to participate around the current price level with resistance; only if it breaks above 0.1 will I admit defeat.
📊 Direction: Short 💰 Entry reference: Short near 0.084669 after resistance 🛑 Stop loss: 0.1; if it breaks the prior high, stop out immediately 🎯 Take profit 1: 0.066484, 4-hour EMA60 🎯 Take profit 2: 0.051982, 4-hour EMA25
High funding-rate longs can’t push through the prior high—odds improve on the retracement. If it breaks 0.1 and keeps running, will you keep buying and paying the funding premium long, or will the longs let go first? It’s one of the two.
$Lobster #技术分析 #Uncle Twelve On this move for Lobster, I’ll keep watching it. If you want to be worry-free and follow the rhythm, you can come check my copy trading on Binance. Click my profile to copy trade now https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/copy-trading/lead-details/5051200019981811968
The semiconductor leverage has basically collapsed across the board today. $MUU is down 9.32%, and this move has been brutal. $SOXL is also down more than 8%. The tech leverage is generally under pressure, and even BTC-related leveraged products couldn’t hold up. On the other hand, $SPCH is slightly in the green, and it’s one of the few still holding on. The quantitative answer is simple: disciplined execution + backtest validation + controllable risk. I don’t rely on luck—my system keeps watch. If you want, go to my profile and tap to view the live trading.
I opened the position and sold the put I bought earlier at $MSTR 139. Next, I’m planning to hold cash and watch from the sidelines. My view is that as $BTC surged from 60k to 80k, it was mainly driven by expectations tied to the Treasury Department’s bond buybacks and the Clarity Act. Right now, the buyback plan barely meets expectations, and the good news from the Clarity Act has basically already been priced in. Meanwhile, both the PPI and CPI data came in with upside surprises. As a result, the $BTC pullback has only taken it back to 77k—this kind of strength really shouldn’t be underestimated. I’m shorting based on a multi-factor score from the RSI threshold dynamic engine, not on a gut feeling or live-stream calls. How it runs in real trading is directly visible on the homepage.
I’m watching several key pullback levels: $NBIS 200, $PLTR 140, $SKHY 150. It may not necessarily drop to those points, but if it does reach these levels, I think it’s a relatively fair and acceptable price for buyers. As for the other picks, the logic is the same—wait for the pullback to the right area, then reassess; don’t chase it aggressively. My capital will automatically flow from the weakening strategy to the strong-momentum module. The “risk-off” protection barriers are dynamic: tighten when conditions are unfavorable, add when conditions are favorable. There’s a live-trading entry on the homepage.
I look at this chart pattern and it’s textbook: a sharp surge, followed by consolidation, then the trading volume gradually shrinks, and after that a breakout—followed by a pullback to confirm. If you don’t watch it early and wait until $MU all rush to an outrageous level before asking, “Why didn’t I get on board back then,” then it’ll be too late. I’m mainly watching $MU , $SNDK , $SKHY . This DRAM theme line hasn’t finished running yet. Chasing and killing on spikes, or following the news and getting carried away, is too easy to be used as liquidity. I only trade when my quant system signals trigger—not FOMO. If you want to sync with my live trading, go to my profile.
I currently hold $SNDK , $SNXX , and also have a small position. The $SPCX has already been stopped out. The price action is too ugly. When it pulls back to the stop-loss level, you should decisively exit. Recent breakouts haven’t shown much follow-through—this is the market environment right now. I’ll move forward with a small position size first, slowly. I’m not in a rush to open a new position. My approach isn’t a single-strategy hard play: short to harvest when we “slay the dragon” after it gets overheated, go long on the leader to catch the subsequent rotation, use the U.S. stock market to trade volatility, and hold BTC/ETH/SOL as long-term core positions. When the market regime switches, the capital automatically rebalances. Just follow along from the homepage.
Everyone is complaining about Binance’s continuous coin listings, even the big-shot bull market leader has posted a message urging Binance not to do this. But I thought about it a bit: Binance’s strategy might actually be the optimal solution. Listing continuously does indeed lower the ceiling for any single Meme, and it also makes slippage and “overwatering” more likely—but that’s also a good way to attract traffic. Only when new projects keep launching will capital be willing to keep coming in to play; if it only happens once every ten days or half a month, everyone would’ve gotten numb already. The core of my U.S. stock strategy isn’t directional bets—it’s turning volatility itself into cash flow, which complements crypto strategies because it has low correlation. If you’re interested, check the homepage for live trades.
I've always felt that whether the iPhones of $AAPL sell well or not isn't just about Apple alone—behind it, the entire supply chain is affected. Like $TSM and $QCOM in these key links, changes in demand strength will ripple through to stock prices. Tracking iPhone sales is, in fact, looking at the business outlook of a whole set of related companies. The quantified answer is simple: disciplined execution + backtest validation + controllable risk. I don't rely on luck—my system checks it for me. And to see it in the real market, visit my profile and tap once.