Icpfans
2k Posts
Icpfans
ICP生态深入参与者，ICP信仰者，发布ICP生态教程和分享ICP生态
7 Following
1.2K+ Followers
2.6K+ Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
PINNED
The AI programming platform on ICP, caffeine ai, is truly impressive. You can directly input your requirements, and the AI will deploy it on the ICP blockchain, then return the corresponding APP link to you. The key point is that you can also keep the data to continuously update and iterate the app. Currently, the daily active users are around a few hundred. If you think I'm bragging, you can try it yourself to find out (both Chinese and English are acceptable).
→ https://caffeine.ai/
→ https://caffeine.ai/
PINNED
This morning at 07:28:48 UTC, 156,744.1998 ICP moved into a single account. That is exactly twice 78,372.0999, an amount that arrived at the same account four separate times in August: on the 16th, the 22nd, the 23rd and the 29th. Each came from a different sending address, used
I compared YTD financials for $ICP against 10 other chains. Full breakdown goes live today on my second channel: A few things worth keeping in mind: 1) Every chain on this list posted a loss this year 2) These ratios can look better than they really
ICP supply check, Sep 4 (UTC): Minted: 2,936 ICP Burned: 848 ICP Net: +2,088 ICP Yesterday the day closed 20.6 ICP short of deflationary, and we said that was not a trend, it was two independent series crossing. Today shows why. Minting barely moved. 2,893 yesterday, 2,936
internet-computer:native is 6.45% up in the last 24 hours. However, Overleveraged Longs were liquidated 10X more than shorts. Make it make sense.... My theory did not change (and is backed by a lot of data points). I will share more info in my next video. In the
Market makers are back in the game. Over-leveraged internet-computer:native longs just got flushed, and MMs pulled more than $450K off those positions.
Whos Behind This Orchestrated Attack on internet-computer:native?
Network activity, Sep 3 (UTC): 403.2M messages executed, 4,753 per second against a 30 day average of 4,526. Five percent above the norm. That looks like the story. It is not. Cycles burned came in at 4,731 TC. Divide one by the other and an average message cost about 11.7
Partly True
ICP supply check, Sep 3 (UTC): Minted: 2,893 ICP Burned: 2,873 ICP Net: +20.6 ICP Yesterday the day closed 1,678 ICP short of deflationary. Today it closed 20.6 short. That is 0.7% of what was minted. Minting came down again, to 2,893, below the 3,651 and 3,676 of last week's
Before you ape into any DeFi protocol, one question worth a million dollars: how many people does it take to move your money? If the answer is one (a single key, not a multisig), you didnt trust the code. You trusted one person. Check that first. #DeFi #CryptoSecurity #DYOR
ICP supply check, Sep 2 (UTC): Minted: 4,181 ICP Burned: 2,503 ICP Net: +1,678 ICP Yesterday we said one day is not a wave and that we would not call it one until it was. It was not. Minting came in at 4,181, back in line with the 3,651 and 3,676 of the two days before the
A named neuron on the NNS does not need ICP to steer votes. There are 51 you can follow. The median one holds 61 ICP. Eleven of them hold under 10. The clearest case is the DFINITY Foundation's own neuron. It holds 10 ICP. Its on-chain description explains why that is fine: the
August marked ICPs second-best month for earnings since Genesis. Like roughly 99% of blockchains, internet-computer:native is not yet profitable. The difference is that expenses have been falling quickly thanks to M70. Last months loss came in at $3.9 million. For context:
Something that did not move on Sep 1. Minting was more than seven times the day before. The network's compute load barely noticed. Messages executed: 399.2M 4,641 per second, against a 30 day average of 4,510. Up 2.9%. Supply events and compute load are two different systems
Partly True
ICP supply check, Sep 1 (UTC): Minted: 26,692 ICP Burned: 3,720 ICP Net: +22,972 ICP Minting came back. The two days before this were 3,651 and 3,676. Sep 1 came in at 26,692, more than seven times that. Disbursements are set in motion seven days ahead, so this was decided
Partly True
Not only hackers failed to hack internet-computer:native for the second time in a row, but they ended up burning cycles as a result and paying for it (again!) Hackers spent thousands of dollars on ICP tokens in the course of their attack, but only
And this is exactly the reason why hackers are trying to hack internet-computer:native (and yet, they miserably fail). ICP is about to go mainstream. There are a lot of institutions/market makers, that do not want that! ICP will win! ICP = World Computer
Log in to explore more content