After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Before going to bed tonight, I thought of something.
The market is always there, and opportunities come every week. But your mindset is your most important asset.
When your mindset is thrown off—everything you see looks like an opportunity, and the results are traps. When your mindset is steady—when opportunities arrive, you can see clearly.
Now BTC suddenly jumps 5%. What’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately, don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. Check volume/market activity first, then decide D. Do nothing, wait for system signals
There’s no right or wrong answer, but your answer will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Someone said: “I’m always getting liquidated—or on my way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.”
These words made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that road too. I know that feeling of hitting zero over and over, and each time telling yourself, “Next time for sure.”
But what he said—“I’m not that greedy; I just want to learn”— in a market full of leverage dreams, the person who can say that has already won half the battle in mindset.
The ones who truly manage to stay alive in the market, never are the smartest or the most daring gamblers.
It’s the most low-key one—the person who’s most willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the way, leave a comment and tell me which step you’re stuck at.
Many people ask me: Quant trading or manual trading— which is better?
My answer: It depends on what kind of person you are.
If you can do: ✓ Strictly follow stop-losses ✓ Not let emotions affect your decisions ✓ Maintain discipline over the long term
→ Then manual trading can also be done well.
But if you find that you: ✗ Often “wait a little longer” before cutting losses ✗ Add to your position when you’re winning, and try to win it back when you’re losing ✗ Chase after others’ profits
→ Then you need a system to help keep you in check.
Quant trading isn’t smarter—it’s more disciplined.
Several Key Levels of BTC Worth Watching Today 09/18
Current price: $76,406
Resistance level: In the 1–2% range above (with previous heavy trading volume) Support level: Around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → confirm the direction, and you can follow If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
Now BTC suddenly jumped 5%. What’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First check the volume/liquidity, then decide D. Do nothing, wait for system signals
There’s no standard answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Some people do 10 trades a day, exhausting themselves to death, and their returns are negative. Some people do 1 trade a week, easily waiting, and their returns are stable.
This isn’t a question of diligence or not—it’s a matter of fit.
When I built the first quantitative trading system, I stepped into three traps.
Trap One: Overfitting The backtest results looked ridiculously good, but the live trading collapsed as soon as I went live. Reason: I tuned the parameters too precisely to match historical data.
Trap Two: Ignoring trading fees Each trade looked like it made $50 in the backtest, but after fees in live trading, it only netted $15. The return was cut by 70% straight away.
Trap Three: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t do anything crazy.” Until one time the market moved and wiped out 20% in a single swing, and then I realized quant strategies can still blow up.
That’s why the SYS series was built gradually—after stepping into these three traps. No traps, no system.
Resistance level: within the upper 1–2% range (there is heavy prior trading there) Support level: around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks through resistance with increased volume → direction confirmed, you can follow If it rises on decreasing volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
Even days without trading are also a trading decision.
The market is always there, and opportunities come every week. But your mindset is your most important asset.
When your mindset is thrown off—everything looks like an opportunity, and the results are traps. When your mindset is steady—when opportunities arrive, you’ll be able to see clearly.
Just entered: I’d be desperate to double every day. After a year: I start learning to wait for signals. After three years: I understand that “not doing” is a kind of ability.
The market won’t disappear; opportunities come every week. But your principal—one mistake can wipe it out.
Don’t use a “fast” tempo; use a “slow” strategy. Don’t trade by “guessing”; trade by “waiting.”
Go a little slower, be a bit steadier—then you can go farther.
During the time when I was working as a KOL, honestly, I wasn’t happy.
Every day I had to produce “professional-looking” content. And when I spoke the truth—sometimes the direction wasn’t even that certain, but the platform needed you to provide an “explicit point of view.”
After a while, you wouldn’t know whether you were actually analyzing, or just performing analysis.
Later, I stepped back and returned to independent trading.
At first my income was lower, but I could finally sleep.
Now, every post I share on the plaza is my real observations and operation records.
Whatever I make or lose—I put it all out there.
Not many people do things this way, but I think this is the right way.