Cathy姐玩游戏's Profile

·

--

Today is Day 4 of Loopit, an AI game development platform test. I’ve already been talked out of it. Since yesterday, after I changed my racing game gameplay to include racing and turning the car head in new directions, the optimizations to the game from the prompt inputs from the previous few days are 80% gone. The durian obstacle has lost size-and-shape differences and the durian model as well. Even when I rewrite the prompts to modify it again, I still can’t fix it. The ice cream that adds health to the car is completely gone. Even when I add those prompts back in again, it still won’t add it. The skyline background at the end of the track has been changed four times, but it still can’t be fixed. No matter what I enter as prompts, Loopit’s AI no longer makes any modifications. The game has been trash from Day 1 to now—4 days of changes—and there’s no way to optimize it further anymore. Recently I tried two AI game development platforms, Rosebud AI and Loopit, and I’m disappointed. The bottleneck comes too early, and there’s no way to retain new users like me. Rosebud AI’s bottleneck is that the very first generated game is too bad, so there’s no desire to modify it. When I was about to start modifying it, it only allowed me to modify once and then burned through 8,000 free credits. To continue, I had to recharge—and I was talked out of it on the first day. Loopit, despite offering infinite tokens, had me hooked for two days. I stayed up day and night modifying the game. But starting yesterday and continuing to today, the bottleneck where it’s no longer possible to keep modifying has made it unplayable. On the fourth day, I was talked out of it. AI game development platforms—if they want to become large-scale consumer (C-end) applications, there’s still a long way to go. And that road can’t be accelerated by Loopit and Rosebud AI relying only on their own teams. Ultimately, it still comes down to the capabilities of the large language models they integrate. Keep going back to buy large-model stocks—buy chip stocks, buy storage stocks. In the community, some people directly use Codex to make apps; others in a China (Mainland) group say Taptap Maker is pretty good. But it mainly targets professional developers, and it probably isn’t suitable for novice players who don’t have product development experience. I plan to keep testing, and keep observing. Feel free to comment and share your experiences and viewpoints with friends who are researching AI game development! Keep it up @Kimi_Moonshot @deepseek_ai , we’ll see how it goes! {future}(GLMUSDT) {future}(NVDAUSDT) {future}(MUUSDT)

Today is Day 4 of Loopit, an AI game development platform test. I’ve already been talked out of it.

Since yesterday, after I changed my racing game gameplay to include racing and turning the car head in new directions, the optimizations to the game from the prompt inputs from the previous few days are 80% gone.

The durian obstacle has lost size-and-shape differences and the durian model as well. Even when I rewrite the prompts to modify it again, I still can’t fix it.

The ice cream that adds health to the car is completely gone. Even when I add those prompts back in again, it still won’t add it.

The skyline background at the end of the track has been changed four times, but it still can’t be fixed.

No matter what I enter as prompts, Loopit’s AI no longer makes any modifications. The game has been trash from Day 1 to now—4 days of changes—and there’s no way to optimize it further anymore.

Recently I tried two AI game development platforms, Rosebud AI and Loopit, and I’m disappointed.

The bottleneck comes too early, and there’s no way to retain new users like me.

Rosebud AI’s bottleneck is that the very first generated game is too bad, so there’s no desire to modify it. When I was about to start modifying it, it only allowed me to modify once and then burned through 8,000 free credits. To continue, I had to recharge—and I was talked out of it on the first day.

Loopit, despite offering infinite tokens, had me hooked for two days. I stayed up day and night modifying the game. But starting yesterday and continuing to today, the bottleneck where it’s no longer possible to keep modifying has made it unplayable. On the fourth day, I was talked out of it.

AI game development platforms—if they want to become large-scale consumer (C-end) applications, there’s still a long way to go. And that road can’t be accelerated by Loopit and Rosebud AI relying only on their own teams. Ultimately, it still comes down to the capabilities of the large language models they integrate.

Keep going back to buy large-model stocks—buy chip stocks, buy storage stocks.

In the community, some people directly use Codex to make apps; others in a China (Mainland) group say Taptap Maker is pretty good. But it mainly targets professional developers, and it probably isn’t suitable for novice players who don’t have product development experience.

I plan to keep testing, and keep observing. Feel free to comment and share your experiences and viewpoints with friends who are researching AI game development!

Keep it up @Kimi_Moonshot @deepseek_ai , we’ll see how it goes!

Cathy姐玩游戏

Looking back at the Philippine crypto market and chain games through the former Binance CFO’s feud with Binance

Trending Topics