Crypto Pulse Media

The CFTC is exploring a legal path for Hyperliquid as Trump pushes to bring the $200 billion-a-month on-chain venue into the US.
resident Donald Trump said Aug. 19 that CFTC Chair Michael Selig is working to bring Hyperliquid to the US in a fully compliant, legal way.
Hyperliquid's official interface currently keeps US persons off the platform, part of the regulatory geography that let crypto's largest perpetual futures venue grow up outside American oversight.
Hyperliquid processed over $114 billion of perpetual futures trading volume in August and carries open interest above $10 billion. It has crossed $5 trillion in cumulative perpetual volume and generates close to $50 million in protocol fees every month.
If regulators build a working crypto asset market category, the significance extends well past Hyperliquid gaining US access. Other offshore and on-chain perpetual venues would finally have a concrete checklist after years of regulatory guesswork.
Competition among them will become a question of who can satisfy the new US framework without abandoning the model that built their liquidity in the first place.
The SEC's Aug. 18 Regulation Crypto Assets proposal and the March SEC-CFTC harmonization framework both point toward keeping crypto activity inside US oversight. Hyperliquid is now the concrete market both agencies' efforts would have to work against.
A public registration application, a confirmed legal entity to operate a US business, a disclosed list of required protocol changes, a published KYC architecture, and a confirmed list of tradable products all remain outstanding.
The bull case is that the CFTC formalizes its crypto asset market category for both registrants and non-registrant crypto exchanges. Hyperliquid becomes the first major test case, and rival venues gain a genuine checklist to follow.
Offshore and on-chain perpetual markets are starting to compete for US liquidity under federal oversight.
The bear case has regulators concluding that meaningful US access still requires routing activity through a conventional designated contract market, clearing, and brokerage stack.
Trump gave regulators a name, and Selig gave them a possible structure. What still has to happen is the hardest part: building a category that can hold a $200 billion-a-month on-chain market without turning it into something it was never designed to be.
#Write2Earn
#Ripple
#YapayzekaAI
#TrendingTopic
#DOGE原型柴犬KABOSU去世

Bitcoin’s three-day surge has pushed a major market gauge bullish for the first time since October.
Bitcoin surged toward $80,000 on Friday, extending a three-day rally that has liquidated more than $4 billion in bearish bets and pushed the cryptocurrency to a three-month high.
The rally began Wednesday after the US Treasury said it would at least double liquidity-support buybacks for 10- to 30-year government debt, sending long-term yields lower and improving risk appetite.
Momentum accelerated as President Donald Trump hosted crypto executives at the White House and urged Congress to advance the CLARITY Act, while the SEC and CFTC moved ahead with additional industry-friendly proposals.
Institutional demand also strengthened. SoSoValue data shows spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds have attracted more than $1 billion since Wednesday, adding fresh buying as Bitcoin broke through resistance levels that had capped earlier recovery attempts.
Derivatives positioning then magnified the move. CoinGlass data shows more than $4 billion in Bitcoin shorts have been liquidated since Wednesday as the asset jumped from around $65,000 through $70,000 and then above $75,000.
According to him, ETF inflows and broader spot demand also supported the advance, helping Bitcoin reclaim its 20-week and 200-day moving averages and move above the estimated short-term holder cost basis near $68,700.
More than $4 billion in Bitcoin shorts have been liquidated since Wednesday, forcing bearish traders to buy back positions as prices rose. That added momentum to demand already coming from ETFs and other spot buyers.
The resulting shift in positioning is now creating a different risk. Søndergaard said momentum is stretched, funding has turned positive, and leveraged traders are increasingly crowded long.
While those conditions do not signal that the breakout is ending, they make continued spot demand more important as forced short covering becomes a smaller part of the move.
Lacie Zhang, research analyst at Bitget Wallet, told CryptoSlate that Bitcoin is beginning to trade with a US political premium as the Trump administration pushes to advance crypto legislation ahead of November's midterm elections.
Zhang said the timing could matter as much as the substance. The administration has an incentive to show progress on borrowing costs, financial markets and emerging industries before the midterms, while the crypto sector has reason to secure the CLARITY Act legislation before a change in the congressional balance makes further action harder.
That political premium could also become a vulnerability. Failure to advance the CLARITY Act, renewed disputes over the administration's crypto policies or a slowdown in regulatory momentum after the elections could quickly weaken part of the support now being priced into Bitcoin.
That leaves spot and ETF demand as the clearest test of what comes next. As the pool of vulnerable short positions shrinks, further gains will increasingly depend on investors continuing to buy Bitcoin at higher prices rather than on forced covering alone.
#Write2Earn
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI
#Uniswap’s
#Kriptocutrader

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan says Wall Street’s crypto adoption now depends on fixing old trading rules and fragmented market infrastructure.
itwise CIO Matt Hougan doesn't think Washington's crypto-friendly turn is the moment that completely unlocks Wall Street.
In an interview with CryptoSlate, he described the real barrier as something far less dramatic than a single landmark bill. The “brutal real answer” is that it comes down to a million small steps, and some of them are deeply unsexy.
The SEC unveiled its Regulation Crypto Assets proposal on Aug. 18, describing a fit-for-purpose framework for certain crypto investment contracts with exemptions reaching up to $75 million over 12 months.
A day later, President Donald Trump used a White House crypto event to push the CLARITY Act. He said CFTC Chair Mike Selig was working to bring Hyperliquid into the U.S. in a fully compliant, legal way.
Hougan called this stretch a good week, pointing to the SEC proposal, the Hyperliquid comments, and a Financial Accounting Standards Board proposal. That FASB project could clarify whether certain stablecoins qualify as cash equivalents.
Trump's Hyperliquid comments fit into a bigger structural point Hougan makes about U.S. finance itself.
He said that the “U.S. financial market infrastructure is like a bunch of parallel chains for individual asset classes,” describing separate rails for stocks, bonds, commodities and derivatives that are difficult to move between by design.
In Hougan's view, tokenization and Hyperliquid-style infrastructure could eventually collapse those rails into financial super apps where multiple asset classes trade side by side.
The concept that could change market structure is cross-margining. Sharing collateral across stocks, bonds, derivatives, and crypto lets capital work more efficiently across a portfolio, instead of holding a separate pool for each product line.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins has independently voiced support for super apps that let a single license cover custody and trading across asset classes. The SEC-CFTC harmonization initiative also includes portfolio margining and cross-margining among its joint priorities.
Hougan's example of that pattern is stablecoins. The GENIUS Act became law in July 2025, but its core provisions still depend on implementing rules that federal regulators have not finished writing.
Hougan pointed to the FASB proposal covering how certain digital assets could qualify as cash equivalents as another small step in the same direction, the kind of update that shapes balance sheets more than headlines.
The FASB project remains under development, so he argued that institutions do not wait for every rule to be finished. They move once the regulatory direction looks durable enough to justify building, acquiring, and integrating, and that threshold keeps getting crossed one unsexy rule at a time.
The bull case has Rule 611's rescission, SEC-CFTC harmonization, and tokenized-stock standards advancing together over the next year, letting DeFi venues, brokerages, and stablecoin settlement rails begin interoperating in genuine practice.
In that scenario, tokenization keeps expanding in headline numbers while failing to deliver the unified liquidity Hougan says the market needs.
Hougan makes clear that the plumbing question, the one that decides whether Wall Street can use any of it, gets answered rule by unsexy rule.
#Write2Earn
#Notcoin👀🔥
#Kriptocutrader
#gaming
#DOGE原型柴犬KABOSU去世

XRP’s 22% rally puts $2.2 million in shorts at risk as price pushes toward $1.38 and the $1.40–$1.50 resistance zone.
RP jumped roughly 22% in 24 hours, trading near $1.26 and clearing the level CryptoSlate had flagged in July as the upside target of its breakout setup.
That July framework had put $1.18 as the breakout line, with open interest surging as traders positioned for the move.
Fresh Hyperliquid positioning data shows cumulative short liquidations around $607,000 at $1.28, climbing to about $1.4 million at $1.32, and reaching roughly $2.2 million at $1.38, about 9.5% above current spot.
A leveraged short position profits when price falls, so when exchanges forcibly close a short during a rally, the trader has to buy the asset back to exit. That buying happens whether the trader wants it or not, and it can add real demand to an already climbing move.
Hyperliquid's XRP open interest sits around $116.4 million, with total short-liquidation exposure across all price levels at $49.5 million. The $2.2 million exposed by $1.38 equals only about 4.4% of that total, large enough to influence near-term positioning without guaranteeing the rally continues.
Funding remained moderately positive at 0.0100% over eight hours, a bullish tilt that falls short of the kind of crowded, euphoric reading that usually precedes a sharp reversal.
The bull case has XRP clearing $1.38 and continuing to absorb supply into the $1.40 to $1.50 zone, converting the short squeeze into a break of XRP's larger resistance band.
Some traders have floated $1.60 to $1.73 as follow-on targets, though only if the structure confirms first. That confirmation still has to happen at $1.40 to $1.50 before those higher levels become relevant.
The bear case has XRP losing $1.28 to $1.32 and failing to hold the squeeze, sending price back toward $1.19 and then $1.13. Long liquidations take over from the short-liquidation ladder that pushed price up in the first place.
Dormant XRP reaching an exchange would compound that move, turning Santiment's watch-list wallet from a background risk into an active source of selling right as the market needs buyers.
XRP has already cleared the target that defined its last recovery. What happens between $1.26 and $1.50 now depends on whether forced short-covering can outlast the supply sitting one wallet transfer away from an exchange.
#Write2Earn
#Ripple
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI
#ETHETFsApproved

Researchers tied 63% of Ethereum's historical authorization transactions to attacker-linked contracts and measured $2.36 million in losses.
thereum's shortcut to smart wallet behavior arrived with a new trust problem: a wallet can make a regular address programmable without moving the user's assets, while the delegated code gains power to act with that account's authority.
A peer-reviewed study released for USENIX Security '26 found that attacker-linked contracts were associated with 2,322,548 of the 3,664,166 EIP-7702 authorization transactions it observed across seven chains through July 15, 2025. That is 63% of the historical transaction volume in the researchers' dataset.
The authors tied a relatively small set of malicious contracts to repeated authorizations and described some attacker-controlled activity as likely practice or proof-of-concept testing during an early, exploratory phase.
The address stays the same, the original private key retains control, and calls to the account can execute the delegated code in the account's context.
That design can give a conventional wallet features associated with smart accounts, including batched calls and sponsored transactions, without forcing the user to migrate to a new address. It also turns the delegation target into wallet infrastructure.
The wallet can then choose EIP-7702, ERC-4337, or another account system without asking the user to approve low-level delegation code selected by the application.
Current guidance recommends signing initialization parameters or restricting setup to the ERC-4337 EntryPoint, closing a front-running path in which an attacker substitutes their own values.
A benign current pointer cannot erase a malicious history, and a target with no code may acquire behavior later. Wallets need durable authorization records, clear alerts when the delegation changes, and a removal path that users can understand.
Making the EIP-7702 wallet programmability safe by default requires wallets to treat delegation as installation of the account's control plane: restrict who can request it, expose exactly what will control the account, verify how it initializes, and keep watching after the pointer changes.Siyam
#Write2Earn
#JBVIP🎯
#Kriptocutrader
#REZ
#Xrp🔥🔥

asdaq-listed Ethereum infrastructure company BTCS swapped ETH into USDT to pay down Aave loans in the second quarter and ended June 30 with $317,113 in cash and stablecoins.
It also held about $88.1 million in other current digital-asset categories, making the issue less a lack of assets than how much of the balance sheet was exposed to crypto markets and DeFi.
Comparing BTCS's first-quarter filing with its second-quarter filing shows about $8.27 million of the second-quarter ETH-to-USDT swaps for principal and $381,103 for accrued interest. BTCS described the move in its results announcement as an $8.2 million Aave repayment.
At quarter-end, BTCS reported $89.3 million in assets and $50.4 million in total liabilities, including $36.0 million in DeFi-protocol loans. Cash was $262,436 and stablecoins were $54,677, together equal to about 0.36% of assets.
Other current assets included treasury holdings, DeFi deployments, staked assets, liquidity-pool positions, and NFTs. They had balance-sheet value, but unlike idle cash, they remained subject to market moves, protocol risks, and collateral demands.
By Aug. 17, BTCS reported $43.0 million of DeFi borrowings, including accrued interest, backed by about 46,525 ETH worth $88.7 million at $1,905 per ETH.
Borrowings had risen from quarter-end while collateral units had fallen, although collateral value had recovered. BTCS said it had not experienced a full or partial liquidation through that date.
Ethereum was near $2,336 when checked on Aug. 20, above the valuation used three days earlier. That rebound says nothing about changes to BTCS's debt or collateral after Aug. 17, and the company did not provide a position-specific liquidation price.
The $34.9 million net loss for the second quarter also did not reflect cash burn. It included $21.4 million of unrealized digital-asset losses and $4.9 million of realized transaction losses. Net cash used in operating activities was $1.3 million for the entire first half, while many DeFi settlements were classified as non-cash.
Second-quarter gross profit nevertheless reached $1.5 million at a 61% margin, with DeFi revenue also at $1.5 million. Stronger margins improved the operating picture, but the earlier ETH swaps show that collateral management can still consume crypto assets when market values fall.
Without a newer debt, collateral, and health-factor snapshot, the Aug. 20 ETH rebound cannot determine whether another sale would be needed in the next decline.
#Write2Earn
#Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
#Uniswap’s
#LUNC✅
#Shibarium

The private placement gives Zcash miner Fortitude 9.4% at a 22% premium while HeartSciences’ vote date remains unset.
ortitude Mining, Digital Currency Group's Zcash-focused miner, bought a 9.4% stake in Nasdaq-listed HeartSciences for about $1 million, giving its proposed merger partner cash for operating expenses while shareholder approval remains pending.
The Aug. 12 private placement covered 411,522 HeartSciences common shares at $2.43 each. A beneficial ownership filing put Fortitude's exact cash outlay at $999,998.46 and its post-purchase stake at approximately 9.4%.
HeartSciences said the price represented a 22% premium to its closing share price on the purchase date. The target said it would use the net proceeds for operating expenses before the proposed combination closes, making the transaction a cash equity placement rather than a loan.
The investment does not change the exchange ratio, and Fortitude's equity holders will not receive additional closing shares for the $1 million injection, according to an SEC-filed company release.
Buying ordinary shares gives the Zcash miner a direct stake in HeartSciences before shareholders decide the corporate combination. Because the placement sits outside the exchange-ratio formula, the cash buys target-company equity without increasing the merger consideration payable to Fortitude's existing owners.
The proposed structure would give DCG about 95% of the combined company's voting interests, according to HeartSciences' preliminary proxy. Existing HeartSciences equityholders would retain about 5% of its voting and economic interests, subject to the final capitalization and exchange-ratio mechanics.
As of Aug. 20, the preliminary proxy still contained blank fields for the special meeting and record date, while later placement materials continued to list shareholder approval as outstanding. The companies expect the transaction to close in the second half of 2026, but that is a target window.
The proxy also warns that if the merger fails, HeartSciences may have limited ability to continue operating and could need another strategic transaction. If no viable alternative is available, the company may liquidate, with no assurance that cash would remain for shareholders.
Fortitude reported $8.5 million of adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, while its GAAP financials showed a $9.5 million net loss that included a $10.3 million mining-equipment impairment. Adjusted EBITDA excludes selected expenses that remain reflected in the accounting loss.
For HeartSciences shareholders, the next state-changing disclosure is a definitive proxy that sets the vote date. Until then, Fortitude's equity injection supports the target's operations but does not remove the deal's approval or execution risk.
#Write2Earn
#Kriptocutrader
#DOGE原型柴犬KABOSU去世
#meme板块关注热点
#XRPRealityCheck

The proposed BankWyse acquisition requires fresh closing finance while Datavault's going-concern warning remains unresolved.
atavault AI has agreed to acquire BankWyse, a Wyoming banking institution, while promising funding substantially larger than the cash it reported at the end of June.
The agreement disclosed on Aug. 19 values the initial consideration at approximately $22 million, comprising $14.66 million in Datavault stock and $7.34 million in cash. BankWyse’s sellers could receive up to another $10 million if they meet milestones, split evenly between cash and stock.
Separate from the purchase price, Datavault committed to provide BankWyse with $35 million for capitalization and operations. The funding schedule starts with $5 million at closing, followed by five $2.5 million installments between days 60 and 180 and a final $17.5 million payment by the eighth month.
Those conditions sit uneasily beside Datavault’s June 30 balance sheet. The company reported $1.4 million of cash and $49 million of Bitcoin, while using approximately $80 million of cash in operations during the first half.
Datavault’s filing summary names Sept. 30 as the termination date, and the signed agreement defines an outside date 30 days after signing, automatically extends it by 30 days if Wyoming approval remains pending, and allows further written extensions.
As of Aug. 20, Datavault’s public SEC submissions showed no later filing announcing a closing, regulatory approval, or deadline extension.
The filings establish that financing must be in place for closing, but they do not identify a dedicated source for the full BankWyse commitment. On the disclosed terms, bridging that gap without more debt, equity dilution, or uncertain asset monetization remains the deal’s central execution risk.
#Write2Earn
#ICP.
#Fatihcoşar
#Shibalnu
#Robert

HIVE must complete a massive Nvidia buildout before most of the contract can start generating revenue.
IVE Digital Technologies’ $350 million AI cloud contract depends on a $185 million GPU buildout that must be completed in the fourth quarter before most of the revenue can begin.
The five-year agreement, signed by HIVE’s BUZZ High Performance Computing unit with an unnamed investment-grade enterprise customer, is expected to generate about $70 million in annualized revenue once the infrastructure is deployed.
BUZZ plans to install 2,016 NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra GPUs in GB300 NVL72 systems at HIVE’s Bell AI Fabric facility in Merritt, British Columbia. HIVE expects the hardware, related equipment, and service warranties to cost about $185 million, with deployment targeted for calendar Q4 2026.
The customer has agreed to provide an upfront deposit equal to roughly 10% of the contract value, or about $35 million. HIVE has not disclosed whether it has already received that payment.
Another $145 million is contracted and expected to come online through the fourth quarter, meaning most of HIVE’s projected AI revenue still depends on hardware delivery, installation and commissioning.
HIVE defines ARR as annualized weekly, daily or quarterly revenue rather than reported revenue and warns that projected figures may not reflect future cancellations, discounts or service reductions.
The contract therefore gives HIVE a significant pipeline of committed AI demand, but the economics now depend on execution: securing the remaining financing, receiving and commissioning the GPUs on schedule, and converting contracted capacity into live revenue by year-end.
#Write2Earn
#Ripple
#icrypto
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI

AYAChain's attacker moved about $1.36 million in hard assets to external chains, while the estimated impact across the network's liquidity pools approached $11 million.
The $1.36 million figure tracks assets that left the system, including roughly 20.83 BTC. The larger estimate captures a cascade inside the pools: false accounting created a huge CACAO balance, that balance became withdrawable, and CACAO's subsequent collapse repriced the network's remaining liquidity.
Maya Protocol operates MAYAChain as a cross-chain liquidity network where users trade against pooled assets. Its CACAO token connects those markets, which allowed a failure that began in one pool to spread through the value recorded elsewhere.
Founder Aaluxx said on Aug. 18 that the team would fix the incident and “recover in full.” As of the Aug. 20 reporting cutoff, Maya's official channels had not yet published a confirmed swap restart, the patch deployed on mainnet, an asset-recovery total, a final loss allocation, or comprehensive compensation terms for liquidity providers.
Independent researcher Vini Barbosa traced most of the activity to one MsgDeposit transaction containing 23 messages. In his reconstruction, the final DONATE message overwrote earlier ObservedTxVoter state, including the outbound height used to match transactions.
That wrong height made MAYAChain classify legitimate outbound transfers as missing. The classification activated theft-detection logic designed to compensate a pool after a missing transfer.
The reserve lacked enough tokens to complete the module transfer, but the new pool state had already been committed. According to Barbosa, the handler continued after the failed transfer and left the inflated balance in place.
The attacker added a negligible amount of liquidity to the distorted pool and received about 99.93% of its ownership units, enabling a withdrawal of roughly 48.87 million CACAO.
A full recovery has at least three parts: returning or replacing hard assets, repairing pool balances, and defining how the remaining impact is allocated among liquidity providers and other participants.
Maya's network-halt documentation says HALTTRADING stops trading while MAYAChain can continue producing blocks. Chain liveness shows that consensus is running, but swap availability depends on the trading controls.
By Aug. 20, Maya's public channels had yet to supply the confirmed restart time, deployed patch version, recovered-asset total, final pool calculation, and liquidity-provider compensation scope needed to turn the recovery promise into a defined settlement.
MAYAChain's loss multiplier is as much an accounting and market structure story as a theft story. The attacker moved about $1.36 million in hard assets, but the false balance changed pool ownership and arrived alongside an 88.7% collapse in the token connecting the network's markets.
For liquidity providers, the decisive update will be Maya's definition of “full”: which assets return, how pool balances are rebuilt, and who absorbs the value changes and trades that recovery cannot simply rewind.
#Write2Earn
#YRIAUSDT
#HotTrends
#Launchpool

Cosmos Health’s financing deal required 72.5% of note proceeds to go into crypto as losses, cash burn and dilution mounted.
osmos Health’s crypto treasury was down about 46% at the end of June as the Nasdaq-listed company warned that recurring losses and reliance on outside financing raised substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern over the next 12 months.
The company held 474.85 ETH and 15.66 BTC worth a combined $1.66 million against a $3.1 million cost basis, leaving about $1.44 million in unrealized losses. Ethereum accounted for $1.25 million, or 87%, of the shortfall.
The holdings stem from an August 2025 financing agreement with ATW Digital Asset Opportunities VII that allowed Cosmos to issue up to $300 million of senior secured convertible notes.
Cosmos initially issued an $8 million note carrying a $720,000 original-issue discount and 9% annual interest. It also recorded $736,250 of direct issuance costs and fees.
Under the August 2025 financing agreement, Cosmos was required to direct 72.5% of net note proceeds into crypto, with the remainder available for working capital and general corporate purposes.
As of June 30, another $644,219 remained restricted for future crypto purchases. The assets bought with note proceeds are also subject to collateral and custody arrangements securing the financing.
The losses come as Cosmos’s underlying business continues to consume cash. It reported an $8.89 million net loss and used $2.79 million in operating cash during the first half.
The company ended June with $1.80 million of unrestricted cash and said revenue remained insufficient to fund operating expenses and meet debt obligations as they come due.
Cosmos issued 22.9 million shares during the first half through conversions of the August note, settling about $4.52 million of principal and interest. After the quarter, another 20.48 million shares were issued to satisfy $3.69 million of obligations, leaving just $82,500 of principal outstanding.
Cosmos’s outstanding share count rose from 41.07 million at the end of 2025 to roughly 100.6 million by Aug. 18.
The result is a financing structure that directed capital into a crypto treasury now deeply underwater, while the company continues to depend on external funding and shareholders absorb substantial dilution.
#gonnarich
#Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
#Ripple
#Kriptocutrader
#PEPE‏

SEC faces Aug. 20 deadline to unlock $123 million recovery fund for Terra investors
The money has already been collected from Jump Crypto subsidiary Tai Mo Shan, but the regulator still has to decide who qualifies.
he US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) faces an Aug. 20 deadline to submit a plan for distributing a $123.1 million fund paid by Jump Crypto subsidiary Tai Mo Shan to investors harmed by Terra's 2022 collapse.
The proposal is expected to determine who qualifies for compensation, how losses will be calculated, whether investors must submit claims, and how eventual payments will be made.
An SEC order issued in February gave staff until Aug. 20 to submit the proposed distribution plan after granting additional time to develop the methodology and coordinate with recoveries stemming from separate Terraform Labs litigation.
Tai Mo Shan has already paid the full $123.1 million ordered by the SEC, including $73.45 million in disgorgement, $12.92 million in prejudgment interest and a $36.73 million civil penalty.
The SEC created the fund after finding that Tai Mo Shan negligently misled investors during TerraUSD's May 2022 depeg and acted as a statutory underwriter for certain Terra LUNA sales. Tai Mo Shan settled without admitting or denying the findings.
Meanwhile, determining how to distribute the money has been complicated by a separate recovery process involving Terraform Labs.
When the financial regulator extended the deadline in February, it said its staff needed additional time to develop the distribution methodology and, where appropriate, coordinate with anticipated distributions from the Terraform litigation.
Terraform creditors are pursuing recoveries through the company's bankruptcy proceedings, where a separate claims process governs losses tied to the collapse.
A claim in that process does not automatically establish eligibility for the Tai Mo Shan fund, leaving the SEC to determine how the two recovery tracks interact and how eligible losses should be calculated.
The distribution plan expected Thursday should provide the first detailed framework for resolving those questions and moving the $123.1 million fund closer to investors.
#Write2Earn
#tobechukwu
#shiba⚡
#JohnCarl
#Kriptocutrader

FBI gets alleged $165 million crypto Ponzi scheme mastermind back after year-long Fiji escape
Prosecutors say Edward Zimbardi diverted investor funds into forex bets, luxury vehicles and payments to earlier investors.
A federal grand jury in Georgia indicted Zimbardi on July 8 on 12 counts of wire fraud, 12 counts of money laundering, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, the US Attorney’s Office
Prosecutors allege Zimbardi operated The Crypto Program from June 2022 through August 2023, selling advertising packages that promised investors guaranteed monthly returns of 25%.
Rather than using the money as advertised, Zimbardi allegedly directed more than $34 million into high-risk foreign currency trading, used funds from newer investors to pay earlier participants, and spent at least $10 million on personal expenses.
The payment structure forms the basis of the government’s Ponzi scheme allegation, with prosecutors claiming returns paid to earlier participants were funded by money from later investors rather than profits generated by the business.
The Justice Department said Zimbardi fled to Fiji in July 2025 after learning that the FBI was investigating him. Fijian authorities deported him to the US on Aug. 14, 2026, in coordination with the FBI and State Department.
Zimbardi was scheduled to appear before a federal magistrate judge in Los Angeles on Aug. 17, with prosecutors seeking to keep him detained pending further proceedings. The Justice Department had not disclosed the outcome of that hearing in its latest statement.
#Write2Earn
#UFO
#TrendingTopic
#ICP.
#Ripple

AI infrastructure leasing supplied nearly all of Ionic Digital's Q2 revenue, while a $28.2 million Bitcoin valuation loss weighed on earnings.
onic Digital, a Bitcoin miner repositioning its power sites for AI infrastructure, generated 90% of its second-quarter revenue from leasing. Its Q2 accounts show an uneven transition: operating revenue has shifted away from mining faster than reported earnings have shifted away from Bitcoin.
The Ward County lease with AI infrastructure provider Nscale produced $43.8 million of Ionic's $48.6 million in Q2 revenue, while mining contributed $4.8 million, according to the company's second-quarter filing. Ionic recognized that lease revenue on a straight-line basis even though recurring base rent began after the quarter, making cash collection the next measure of the shift.
However, Bitcoin still shaped the entire quarter. Ionic recorded a $28.2 million noncash fair value loss on its Bitcoin holdings, contributing to a GAAP net loss of $35.3 million. The charge reflected remeasurement of its holdings. Ionic reported no realized gain or loss from crypto sales and held 2,882 BTC valued at $168.7 million on June 30.
Adjusted EBITDA reached $37.6 million after Ionic's reconciliation added back the crypto mark, a $27.2 million tax provision, depreciation, stock compensation, and other costs. The company also changed the non-GAAP measure this quarter to exclude realized and unrealized crypto gains and losses and recast prior periods. The measure reflects management's view of operating performance, while GAAP earnings remain sensitive to Bitcoin prices
Ionic's registration statement says the Ward County operating lease began Dec. 19, 2025, with revenue recognized on a straight-line basis. Nscale paid a $45.6 million advance payment in November 2025, while scheduled base rent began Aug. 1, after Q2 ended. The advance payment and later rent schedule mean Q2 lease revenue does not directly correspond with cash collected during the quarter.
The lease contract sets monthly payments for the existing 234 megawatts at $3.25 million in August and September, $6.5 million in October and November, and $9.75 million in December and January before reaching the full required-capacity rate. A separate 89-megawatt expansion remained unavailable in Q2; its additional $5.8 million monthly rent begins when Ionic provides that capacity.
The filings show the timing difference without detailing the full Q2 cash-revenue reconciliation. Deferred digital infrastructure leasing revenue fell by $39.8 million during the first half, while current other receivables reached $49.0 million at the end of June without a category breakdown.
Financing accounted for most of Ionic's increase in cash. The company started the year with $43.5 million, received $400 million in financing proceeds, used $25.9 million in operations and $1.8 million in investing, and ended June with $415.7 million in cash and no outstanding borrowings.
The distinction is important as miners turn power-rich sites into AI infrastructure. Recent miner lease agreements show why reported revenue should be assessed alongside financing and delivery schedules.
Ionic's operating revenue now depends far less on mining. Its 2,882-BTC treasury keeps reported earnings sensitive to Bitcoin prices, while recurring cash payments from the Ward County lease began after the quarter closed.
#Write2Earn
#YapayzekaAI
#Ripple
#TrendingTopic
#UNIUSDT

Nearly 1 in 5 crypto spot trades now happen on DEXs as centralized exchange volume collapses
DEXs captured a record 19.5% of crypto spot volume in July, pushing onchain liquidity closer to the center of price discovery.
entralized crypto exchanges lost 31.2% of their spot crypto trading volume in July, falling to $727 billion and marking the lowest monthly total since October 2023. Decentralized exchanges also lost volume, but only 9.82%, settling at $176 billion.
BlockBeats' July crypto trading-platform ranking shows spot volume on major CEXs fell 35.5% month over month, while perpetual futures volume fell a smaller 19.6%.
The gap suggests spot was the weakest part of centralized crypto trading, while demand for leveraged trading proved relatively more resilient. The same dataset showed major CEX website traffic rose 3.0% even as app downloads slipped 2.1%, pointing to caution.
That evidence is consistent with retail weakness, but three complications sit underneath a potential retail exodus from centralized venues.
By chain, Solana led July's on-chain activity with roughly $49.5 billion, above BNB Chain, Ethereum and Base. Stablecoin pairs alone accounted for about $31.5 billion, close to 30% of the month's total DEX volume.
Whether any of this changes which venue sets prices depends heavily on the asset. Research comparing Binance and Uniswap has generally found centralized exchanges still lead Ethereum's price discovery, particularly through 2024's most volatile stretches.
Separate 2026 research published in Management Science found that DEX execution grows comparatively more competitive as trade size increases, since gas costs weigh far more heavily on small trades than large ones. That produces a genuinely segmented market.
Execution desks moving large orders may route on-chain more often as gas costs get diluted across bigger trade sizes. Arbitrageurs bridging the two venues face a more valuable opportunity as CEX spot thins, though the searcher data points to those profits concentrating quickly among a handful of integrated players.
The bull case has aggregators, Solana, Base, and larger-trade execution continuing to improve, pushing DEX share toward 22% to 25% of combined spot volume.The record DEX share confirms centralized crypto spot trading shrank faster than on-chain trading in July, a narrower fact than proving where the market's price gets made. That answer looks different for Bitcoin, for Ethereum, and for the long-tail tokens that already trade on-chain before they trade anywhere else.The bull case has aggregators, Solana, Base, and larger-trade execution continuing to improve, pushing DEX share toward 22% to 25% of combined spot volume.
Under that path, DEX share could fall back toward 14% to 16% even without DEX volume itself collapsing, and July starts looking like a temporary denominator effect that a single strong month erased.
The record DEX share confirms centralized crypto spot trading shrank faster than on-chain trading in July, a narrower fact than proving where the market's price gets made.
#Write2Earn
#TrendingTopic
#Robertkiyosaki
#Kriptocutrader
#ONDO‬⁩

The White House can expand how crypto enters federal custody, but a multibillion-dollar buying program still needs lawmakers to unlock funding or purchase authority.
resident Donald Trump said on Aug. 20 that the US is considering accumulating sizable amounts of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Current law gives his administration several ways to increase federal crypto holdings, though no public authority gives Treasury a funded program for multibillion-dollar open-market purchases.
For Bitcoin, Trump's 2025 executive order already directs Treasury and Commerce to develop budget-neutral acquisition strategies. For non-Bitcoin assets, the same order limits additional acquisitions to forfeiture and civil-money-penalty channels unless further executive or legislative action occurs.
A second executive order could remove that restriction for assets such as Ethereum, XRP, and Solana. Congress would still control federal appropriations and any investment powers that existing statutes reserve to lawmakers.
The 2025 order also requires implementation to comply with applicable law and the availability of appropriations, language that sets the boundary around Trump's options. A budget-neutral strategy still needs a lawful source of assets or funds, plus authority for Treasury to use them.
Victim restitution, law-enforcement obligations, and forfeiture statutes can also reduce the amount Treasury retains. Trump cannot turn forfeiture into a scheduled acquisition program with a target purchase size.
Section 321(d) of Title 31 gives the Treasury secretary authority to accept, hold, and administer gifts of real or personal property when they aid Treasury's work.
Bitcoin qualifies as personal property for federal tax purposes. Treasury now administers the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, giving the department a plausible statutory basis to accept donated BTC into the federal framework.
Federal taxpayers currently pay in dollars, and the IRS does not accept digital assets. Treasury could explore regulations that permit Bitcoin payments under Section 6311. The department would also need to determine whether it could keep received BTC in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
Trump's proposed sovereign wealth fund also lacks a funded general investment mandate. His February 2025 order instructed Treasury and Commerce to design a plan covering funding, governance and investment strategy. The order made implementation subject to applicable law and appropriations.The bull case requires lawmakers to turn one of these concepts into explicit purchase authority. A BITCOIN Act-style program could create scheduled acquisitions, identify a financing mechanism, and give Treasury clear statutory authority.Federal taxpayers currently pay in dollars, and the IRS does not accept digital assets. Treasury could explore regulations that permit Bitcoin payments under Section 6311. The department would also need to determine whether it could keep received BTC in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
That framework would give markets a federal buyer whose scale and cadence investors could model. Extending the program to other crypto would require additional rules covering eligible assets and funding.
The bear case leaves the federal government accumulating crypto through irregular channels. Forfeitures would continue adding assets when cases conclude, gifts could expand holdings if Treasury formally adopts that route, and tax-payment rules could remain under study.
Under that outcome, Trump's latest comments would produce no scheduled federal purchase program. Treasury holdings could still increase, but their size would depend on assets received through specific legal channels.
Trump has room to broaden how crypto enters federal custody. A recurring multibillion-dollar buying program would require Congress to provide the authority, funding mechanism, or both.
#Write2Earn
#JBVIP🎯
#Kriptocutrader
#DOGE冲冲冲
#xmucan

Gnosis Chain’s overhaul will retire its validator system and release about 350,000 staked GNO back into liquid markets.
nosisDAO has approved a plan to retire Gnosis Chain’s standalone Layer 1, a shift that will unlock roughly 350,000 staked GNO.
Under GIP-153, Gnosis Chain will become a zero-knowledge-proven Ethereum Economic Zone rollup that settles directly to Ethereum every block. The network will eventually retire its independent validator set and inherit security from Ethereum validators instead.
That change would unlock about 350,000 GNO currently committed to staking, equivalent to roughly 27% of the token’s circulating supply. The tokens are already counted as circulating supply, but ending staking would make them liquid again and remove their current role in securing Gnosis Chain.
GNO rallied 10% to as high as about $136 around the governance decision, its highest level since May, CryptoSlate data showed. The move came despite the prospect of a sizable increase in liquid GNO and reflected investor attention on Gnosis’ deeper integration with Ethereum.
The approval is a direction-level mandate rather than a final launch decision. GnosisDAO did not approve funding or a completed technical design, and the first EEZ version is targeted for around December 2026 or January 2027, depending on required infrastructure being ready.
Gnosis currently pays validator rewards from its treasury because network fees cover only a fraction of its security costs. GIP-153 estimates that model dilutes non-stakers by about 2.3% annually. Once the validator set is retired, the staking subsidy would end and Gnosis intends to link GNO instead to revenue generated by the rollup.
The exact mechanism remains unresolved. Gnosis is considering options including fee sharing or GNO buybacks tied to network revenue, with a separate governance proposal expected after the economics of operating the rollup become clearer.
Notably, several DeFi projects, including Aave, Spark, Fluid, CoW Swap, Safe, Centrifuge and other projects have committed to building consumer-focused products in the environment.
The transition comes with a decentralization trade-off. Gnosis Ltd. is expected to operate the sequencer that initially orders transactions and produces blocks, while proofs and settlement move to Ethereum. GIP-153 explicitly describes the move toward a less decentralized execution layer as deliberate.
#Write2Earn
#ETHETFS
#TrendingTopic
#Ripple
#LUNC✅

VanEck says Bitcoin may be entering the later stages of its bear market, yet options traders are paying near-record premiums for downside insurance.
itcoin is showing some of the strongest capitulation signals of the current downturn, suggesting the selloff may be entering a later stage even as the market offers little evidence of an imminent rebound.
Eight of the 12 indicators tracked by VanEck are currently flashing capitulation, while all 12 reached extreme levels at some point during the past three months.
The measures are designed to capture unusually severe market stress and selling pressure, conditions that have often clustered around the later stages of previous Bitcoin bear markets.
That reluctance to abandon downside protection comes as Bitcoin attempts to form a floor against conditions VanEck described as unusually challenging.
The 30-year US Treasury yield has climbed above 5.3%, reaching its highest level since 2007, while the conflict between the US and Iran has stretched into a fifth month. Strategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, has also sold Bitcoin this year to help fund dividends on its preferred stock.
Data from CoinGlass shows that the flagship digital asset has risen nearly 3% this month, even as spot trading activity weakened considerably. The 30-day spot volume fell 27%, which is near levels last seen during the 2023 bear market.
The apparent stabilization has also come despite renewed distribution from longer-term holders. Coins held for more than one year fell by roughly 356,000 BTC over the previous 30 days, while the share of supply held by those investors slipped below 60%.
The renewed ETP inflows have provided a source of demand even as broader spot activity remains unusually thin and longer-term holders continue to distribute coins.The renewed ETP inflows have provided a source of demand even as broader spot activity remains unusually thin and longer-term holders continue to distribute coins.
Bitcoin's ability to remain above its June low through those competing pressures gives the market the appearance of an asset trying to establish a floor, but the options market shows traders remain unwilling to assume that floor will hold without another test.
#Write2Earn
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI
#icrypto
#ETHETFS

The August repayment ended the immediate collateral risk while the company’s going-concern warning and Michigan financing need persisted.
n August 2026, Hyperscale Data sold approximately 686 Bitcoin for about $43.4 million, then used part of the proceeds to repay all of its Bitcoin-backed loans on Morpho, a decentralized lending protocol, according to its quarterly filing.
The repayment released the pledged collateral and left the company with no outstanding Morpho borrowings, removing the immediate loan-related collateral exposure.
The result resolves one source of financing pressure, but leaves a larger problem flagged by the company. Hyperscale said its available liquidity is not expected to cover operating requirements, obligations, and planned capital expenditures for the next 12 months, raising doubts about its ability to continue as a going concern.
As of June 30, Hyperscale had roughly $16 million of Morpho borrowings secured by cbBTC with a carrying value of about $25.4 million. After the quarter ended, it received another $31.6 million in aggregate net proceeds from additional Bitcoin-backed borrowing through Morpho.
The completed repayment is the key change from Aug. 6, when an earlier 150.5-Bitcoin sale happened. The filing says Hyperscale received the additional borrowing after June 30, before eliminating the DeFi debt altogether in August.
Management expects the roughly 20-megawatt deployment at its Michigan AI data center to require more than $100 million of investment over time. The timing and amount depend partly on financing availability, meaning the Morpho repayment removed a near-term collateral obligation without resolving how the build will be funded.
Hyperscale resolved its Morpho exposure, but the company must still raise or generate enough capital to meet its obligations and complete the Michigan deployment while operating under a going-concern warning.
#Write2Earn
#jasmyustd
#TrendingTopic
#devcripto
#ETHETFsApproved

Securitize’s $4.3 billion tokenized assets base and $5.3 billion of activity are still producing little recurring transaction revenue.
ecuritize closed its first quarter as a public company with average tokenized assets under management hitting a record $4.3 billion, up 16% year over year, while transaction volume on the platform jumped 147% to $5.3 billion.
Total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million, tokenization revenue dropped about 12% to $7.8 million, and adjusted EBITDA swung to a $5.5 million loss.
The company put more assets on-chain and processed far more activity than a year earlier, and earned less money doing it.
He added that most tokenization revenue still traces back to network expansion through new protocol integrations.
Recurring asset-servicing revenue, the fees tied to administering funds already on the platform, held up far better, climbing 3% to $6.6 million. Flores described transaction monetization as a medium- to long-term opportunity, one the current business model does not yet capture.
Securitize's pre-listing materials projected $110 million of 2026 revenue and $32 million of EBITDA. Management described $85 million of that figure as contracted, recurring, or supported by existing AUM and relationships, enough to call the forecast strong visibility.
Management now guides to $70 million to $80 million for the full year, and Securitize produced $33.9 million of revenue in the first half. The second half needs to bring in roughly $18 million a quarter to hit the low end of guidance and closer to $23 million a quarter to reach the top.
The bull case is that Securitize's push into tokenized public equities will eventually create the higher-velocity activity that transaction fees can capture through issuer-sponsored tokenized shares, broker-dealer capabilities, and atomic settlement.
Management has described that path as more transaction-driven than tokenized Treasuries or credit. It remains a medium- to long-term move in the business mix, one that plays out well beyond this year's guidance cycle.
Full-year revenue near or above $80 million would require roughly $23 million a quarter for the rest of the year, a real acceleration from second quarter's pace.
The bear case has AUM and transaction volume continuing to climb while the underlying model stays tied to project-based integrations, keeping tokenization revenue volatile and asset-servicing growth too slow to offset it.
Full-year revenue near the guidance floor of $70 million would require only about $18 million a quarter, barely above what Securitize produced in the second quarter. Adjusted EBITDA could stay negative even as the headline adoption numbers keep setting records.
The next test for tokenization is whether another billion dollars of AUM or another billion dollars of transaction volume turns into revenue that repeats on its own.
#Write2Earn
#Notcoin👀🔥
#Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
#DOGE原型柴犬KABOSU去世
#meme板块关注热点