Rahi Crypto Intel Pro
9.4k Posts
Rahi Crypto Intel Pro
Report
Block User
Spot Trader | Intraday • Swing • DCA 📊 Market insights, trade setups & Binance campaigns. Follow for clear crypto updates, research & opportunities.
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
5.4 Years
65 Following
1.6K+ Followers
11.2K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
See translation
Why Buying a Crypto Coin After a Big Pump Can Be Risky
Imagine you see a shop selling a product for $10. Suddenly, everyone starts talking about it, and the price jumps to $20. Would you buy it immediately just because everyone else is buying?
Crypto markets can work in a similar way.
When a coin rises sharply, beginners often fear missing out and buy without checking what caused the move. But a rising price does not guarantee that the rally will continue.
Here’s what to check before entering a trade:
The reason: Is there a real development behind the move, or is attention mainly driven by hype?
Trading volume: Is participation increasing, or is the price moving on relatively weak activity?
Price structure: Is the coin holding above a breakout level, or has it already started falling back?
A common beginner mistake
Buying simply because a coin is trending. By the time a coin gets widespread attention, much of its initial move may already have happened.
A practical takeaway: Before buying, write down why you want to enter, what would prove your idea wrong, and how much you can afford to lose. If you cannot explain the trade clearly, waiting is also a decision.
In crypto, learning when NOT to enter can be just as important as finding an entry.
Question: Do you usually research a coin before buying, or does a sudden price pump catch your attention first?
$SYN
{future}(SYNUSDT)
$PARTI
{future}(PARTIUSDT)
$ALICE
{future}(ALICEUSDT)
Why Buying a Crypto Coin After a Big Pump Can Be Risky
Imagine you see a shop selling a product for $10. Suddenly, everyone starts talking about it, and the price jumps to $20. Would you buy it immediately just because everyone else is buying?
Crypto markets can work in a similar way.
When a coin rises sharply, beginners often fear missing out and buy without checking what caused the move. But a rising price does not guarantee that the rally will continue.
Here’s what to check before entering a trade:
The reason: Is there a real development behind the move, or is attention mainly driven by hype?
Trading volume: Is participation increasing, or is the price moving on relatively weak activity?
Price structure: Is the coin holding above a breakout level, or has it already started falling back?
A common beginner mistake
Buying simply because a coin is trending. By the time a coin gets widespread attention, much of its initial move may already have happened.
A practical takeaway: Before buying, write down why you want to enter, what would prove your idea wrong, and how much you can afford to lose. If you cannot explain the trade clearly, waiting is also a decision.
In crypto, learning when NOT to enter can be just as important as finding an entry.
Question: Do you usually research a coin before buying, or does a sudden price pump catch your attention first?
$SYN
$PARTI
$ALICE
Imagine you see a shop selling a product for $10. Suddenly, everyone starts talking about it, and the price jumps to $20. Would you buy it immediately just because everyone else is buying?
Crypto markets can work in a similar way.
When a coin rises sharply, beginners often fear missing out and buy without checking what caused the move. But a rising price does not guarantee that the rally will continue.
Here’s what to check before entering a trade:
The reason: Is there a real development behind the move, or is attention mainly driven by hype?
Trading volume: Is participation increasing, or is the price moving on relatively weak activity?
Price structure: Is the coin holding above a breakout level, or has it already started falling back?
A common beginner mistake
Buying simply because a coin is trending. By the time a coin gets widespread attention, much of its initial move may already have happened.
A practical takeaway: Before buying, write down why you want to enter, what would prove your idea wrong, and how much you can afford to lose. If you cannot explain the trade clearly, waiting is also a decision.
In crypto, learning when NOT to enter can be just as important as finding an entry.
Question: Do you usually research a coin before buying, or does a sudden price pump catch your attention first?
$SYN
$PARTI
$ALICE
94
See translation
PEPE Faces Selling Pressure as Exchange Inflows Rise
PEPE’s recent recovery is facing a challenge as large amounts of tokens return to exchanges, raising attention around potential selling activity.
During the recent rally, approximately 2.11 trillion PEPE tokens flowed back to exchanges between October 19 and October 22. This reversed more than 40% of a large exchange outflow recorded earlier.
PEPE subsequently pulled back after approaching $0.00000510, with its price reported near $0.00000445 in the latest update on this development.
Exchange inflows do not automatically mean that tokens have been sold, but they can indicate that more supply is becoming available for potential trading.
The key development is whether PEPE can regain buying momentum while traders monitor exchange activity and selling pressure.
$PEPE
{spot}(PEPEUSDT)
PEPE Faces Selling Pressure as Exchange Inflows Rise
PEPE’s recent recovery is facing a challenge as large amounts of tokens return to exchanges, raising attention around potential selling activity.
During the recent rally, approximately 2.11 trillion PEPE tokens flowed back to exchanges between October 19 and October 22. This reversed more than 40% of a large exchange outflow recorded earlier.
PEPE subsequently pulled back after approaching $0.00000510, with its price reported near $0.00000445 in the latest update on this development.
Exchange inflows do not automatically mean that tokens have been sold, but they can indicate that more supply is becoming available for potential trading.
The key development is whether PEPE can regain buying momentum while traders monitor exchange activity and selling pressure.
$PEPE
PEPE’s recent recovery is facing a challenge as large amounts of tokens return to exchanges, raising attention around potential selling activity.
During the recent rally, approximately 2.11 trillion PEPE tokens flowed back to exchanges between October 19 and October 22. This reversed more than 40% of a large exchange outflow recorded earlier.
PEPE subsequently pulled back after approaching $0.00000510, with its price reported near $0.00000445 in the latest update on this development.
Exchange inflows do not automatically mean that tokens have been sold, but they can indicate that more supply is becoming available for potential trading.
The key development is whether PEPE can regain buying momentum while traders monitor exchange activity and selling pressure.
$PEPE
35
See translation
Cardano’s Scaling Plans Are Advancing — Can Leios Deliver?
Cardano’s scaling ambitions are getting a fresh development milestone, but the real test will be whether the network can turn technical progress into a better user experience.
The Leios scaling protocol has reportedly been merged into Cardano’s core code, with a potential throughput improvement of several times being discussed.
Why does this matter?
Higher transaction capacity could help Cardano support more applications and handle greater network demand without becoming congested as activity increases.
My opinion: This is encouraging for Cardano’s long-term development, but there is a major difference between progress in the codebase and proven performance on a live network. Testing, implementation, and real-world demand will determine how meaningful this becomes for ADA.
If Cardano achieves a major scaling improvement, what would matter more to you: more DeFi activity, lower transaction costs, or greater adoption by developers?
$ADA
{future}(ADAUSDT)
Cardano’s Scaling Plans Are Advancing — Can Leios Deliver?
Cardano’s scaling ambitions are getting a fresh development milestone, but the real test will be whether the network can turn technical progress into a better user experience.
The Leios scaling protocol has reportedly been merged into Cardano’s core code, with a potential throughput improvement of several times being discussed.
Why does this matter?
Higher transaction capacity could help Cardano support more applications and handle greater network demand without becoming congested as activity increases.
My opinion: This is encouraging for Cardano’s long-term development, but there is a major difference between progress in the codebase and proven performance on a live network. Testing, implementation, and real-world demand will determine how meaningful this becomes for ADA.
If Cardano achieves a major scaling improvement, what would matter more to you: more DeFi activity, lower transaction costs, or greater adoption by developers?
$ADA
Cardano’s scaling ambitions are getting a fresh development milestone, but the real test will be whether the network can turn technical progress into a better user experience.
The Leios scaling protocol has reportedly been merged into Cardano’s core code, with a potential throughput improvement of several times being discussed.
Why does this matter?
Higher transaction capacity could help Cardano support more applications and handle greater network demand without becoming congested as activity increases.
My opinion: This is encouraging for Cardano’s long-term development, but there is a major difference between progress in the codebase and proven performance on a live network. Testing, implementation, and real-world demand will determine how meaningful this becomes for ADA.
If Cardano achieves a major scaling improvement, what would matter more to you: more DeFi activity, lower transaction costs, or greater adoption by developers?
$ADA
46
See translation
Ethereum’s Next Upgrade Is Moving Forward — But There’s Still a Test Ahead
Ethereum’s next major upgrade is progressing, and the next challenge is making sure the improvements work reliably before reaching the main network.
The Glamsterdam upgrade has advanced through public testnet development, with another testing milestone on the Hoodi network. The goal is to improve Ethereum’s capacity and how blocks are processed.
Why does this matter?
If the upgrade delivers its intended improvements, Ethereum could become better equipped to handle growing activity across DeFi, stablecoins, and other blockchain applications.
My take: This is an important development for Ethereum’s long-term competitiveness. However, successful testnet progress does not guarantee a smooth mainnet launch, and the benefits for ETH holders will depend on actual adoption and network usage.
Would you rather see Ethereum prioritize faster transactions or lower fees first?
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
Ethereum’s Next Upgrade Is Moving Forward — But There’s Still a Test Ahead
Ethereum’s next major upgrade is progressing, and the next challenge is making sure the improvements work reliably before reaching the main network.
The Glamsterdam upgrade has advanced through public testnet development, with another testing milestone on the Hoodi network. The goal is to improve Ethereum’s capacity and how blocks are processed.
Why does this matter?
If the upgrade delivers its intended improvements, Ethereum could become better equipped to handle growing activity across DeFi, stablecoins, and other blockchain applications.
My take: This is an important development for Ethereum’s long-term competitiveness. However, successful testnet progress does not guarantee a smooth mainnet launch, and the benefits for ETH holders will depend on actual adoption and network usage.
Would you rather see Ethereum prioritize faster transactions or lower fees first?
$ETH
Ethereum’s next major upgrade is progressing, and the next challenge is making sure the improvements work reliably before reaching the main network.
The Glamsterdam upgrade has advanced through public testnet development, with another testing milestone on the Hoodi network. The goal is to improve Ethereum’s capacity and how blocks are processed.
Why does this matter?
If the upgrade delivers its intended improvements, Ethereum could become better equipped to handle growing activity across DeFi, stablecoins, and other blockchain applications.
My take: This is an important development for Ethereum’s long-term competitiveness. However, successful testnet progress does not guarantee a smooth mainnet launch, and the benefits for ETH holders will depend on actual adoption and network usage.
Would you rather see Ethereum prioritize faster transactions or lower fees first?
$ETH
41
See translation
SUI Faces a Supply Test — Could Token Unlocks Affect Market Sentiment?
A token unlock can create a challenge for traders even when a project’s technology and ecosystem remain unchanged.
SUI is approaching a scheduled unlock of approximately 13.15 million tokens. The release represents around 0.32% of its circulating supply.
Why should traders pay attention?
Newly unlocked tokens may become available to their recipients, potentially increasing the amount of SUI that can be sold. But an unlock does not automatically mean those tokens will enter exchanges or be sold immediately.
My take: The key is not simply the number of tokens being released. It is how the market absorbs the additional supply. Strong demand could limit selling pressure, while weak demand may make the market more vulnerable.
I would watch trading volume, exchange inflows, and price action rather than assume the unlock guarantees a drop.
What do you think has the bigger influence on SUI’s price: token unlocks or actual ecosystem growth?
$SUI
{future}(SUIUSDT)
SUI Faces a Supply Test — Could Token Unlocks Affect Market Sentiment?
A token unlock can create a challenge for traders even when a project’s technology and ecosystem remain unchanged.
SUI is approaching a scheduled unlock of approximately 13.15 million tokens. The release represents around 0.32% of its circulating supply.
Why should traders pay attention?
Newly unlocked tokens may become available to their recipients, potentially increasing the amount of SUI that can be sold. But an unlock does not automatically mean those tokens will enter exchanges or be sold immediately.
My take: The key is not simply the number of tokens being released. It is how the market absorbs the additional supply. Strong demand could limit selling pressure, while weak demand may make the market more vulnerable.
I would watch trading volume, exchange inflows, and price action rather than assume the unlock guarantees a drop.
What do you think has the bigger influence on SUI’s price: token unlocks or actual ecosystem growth?
$SUI
A token unlock can create a challenge for traders even when a project’s technology and ecosystem remain unchanged.
SUI is approaching a scheduled unlock of approximately 13.15 million tokens. The release represents around 0.32% of its circulating supply.
Why should traders pay attention?
Newly unlocked tokens may become available to their recipients, potentially increasing the amount of SUI that can be sold. But an unlock does not automatically mean those tokens will enter exchanges or be sold immediately.
My take: The key is not simply the number of tokens being released. It is how the market absorbs the additional supply. Strong demand could limit selling pressure, while weak demand may make the market more vulnerable.
I would watch trading volume, exchange inflows, and price action rather than assume the unlock guarantees a drop.
What do you think has the bigger influence on SUI’s price: token unlocks or actual ecosystem growth?
$SUI
87
See translation
CZ at Nasdaq: A New Milestone for BNB?
Binance founder CZ’s reported appearance at the Nasdaq opening bell alongside BNB Standard ($BNC) highlights the growing connection between crypto and traditional finance.
In my opinion, corporate BNB treasury strategies could bring more attention to BNB and expand crypto adoption.
But industry recognition doesn’t guarantee price growth. Long-term success still depends on real demand and adoption.
Do you think corporate BNB treasuries could strengthen BNB’s future?
$LUMIA $SYN $PARTI
CZ at Nasdaq: A New Milestone for BNB?
Binance founder CZ’s reported appearance at the Nasdaq opening bell alongside BNB Standard ($BNC) highlights the growing connection between crypto and traditional finance.
In my opinion, corporate BNB treasury strategies could bring more attention to BNB and expand crypto adoption.
But industry recognition doesn’t guarantee price growth. Long-term success still depends on real demand and adoption.
Do you think corporate BNB treasuries could strengthen BNB’s future?
$LUMIA $SYN $PARTI
Binance founder CZ’s reported appearance at the Nasdaq opening bell alongside BNB Standard ($BNC) highlights the growing connection between crypto and traditional finance.
In my opinion, corporate BNB treasury strategies could bring more attention to BNB and expand crypto adoption.
But industry recognition doesn’t guarantee price growth. Long-term success still depends on real demand and adoption.
Do you think corporate BNB treasuries could strengthen BNB’s future?
$LUMIA $SYN $PARTI
1
193
See translation
#BinancePick
The biggest trading mistake? Entering a breakout before the market proves it is real.
A coin breaks above resistance, traders rush to buy, and suddenly the price falls back into its previous range. What looked like a breakout becomes a trap.
Here’s what to watch:
A bullish setup becomes more convincing when price breaks resistance, holds above it, and successfully retests that level as support.
A bearish setup becomes more likely when price loses support, fails to reclaim it, and sellers remain in control.
But confirmation matters. If price quickly returns below resistance after a breakout, the bullish idea weakens. If price reclaims broken support and holds above it, the bearish setup loses strength.
My trading lesson: Never confuse excitement with confirmation. Be patient, define your invalidation level, and protect your capital instead of chasing every move.
That’s the mindset behind #BinancePick: focus on the setup, manage the risk, and let price action provide the evidence.
What do you trust more when trading: the initial breakout or the retest confirmation?
$SYN
{future}(SYNUSDT)
$LUMIA
{future}(LUMIAUSDT)
$KAT
{future}(KATUSDT)
#BinancePick
The biggest trading mistake? Entering a breakout before the market proves it is real.
A coin breaks above resistance, traders rush to buy, and suddenly the price falls back into its previous range. What looked like a breakout becomes a trap.
Here’s what to watch:
A bullish setup becomes more convincing when price breaks resistance, holds above it, and successfully retests that level as support.
A bearish setup becomes more likely when price loses support, fails to reclaim it, and sellers remain in control.
But confirmation matters. If price quickly returns below resistance after a breakout, the bullish idea weakens. If price reclaims broken support and holds above it, the bearish setup loses strength.
My trading lesson: Never confuse excitement with confirmation. Be patient, define your invalidation level, and protect your capital instead of chasing every move.
That’s the mindset behind #BinancePick: focus on the setup, manage the risk, and let price action provide the evidence.
What do you trust more when trading: the initial breakout or the retest confirmation?
$SYN
$LUMIA
$KAT
The biggest trading mistake? Entering a breakout before the market proves it is real.
A coin breaks above resistance, traders rush to buy, and suddenly the price falls back into its previous range. What looked like a breakout becomes a trap.
Here’s what to watch:
A bullish setup becomes more convincing when price breaks resistance, holds above it, and successfully retests that level as support.
A bearish setup becomes more likely when price loses support, fails to reclaim it, and sellers remain in control.
But confirmation matters. If price quickly returns below resistance after a breakout, the bullish idea weakens. If price reclaims broken support and holds above it, the bearish setup loses strength.
My trading lesson: Never confuse excitement with confirmation. Be patient, define your invalidation level, and protect your capital instead of chasing every move.
That’s the mindset behind #BinancePick: focus on the setup, manage the risk, and let price action provide the evidence.
What do you trust more when trading: the initial breakout or the retest confirmation?
$SYN
$LUMIA
$KAT
1
417
See translation
#AnthropicS1ExpectedToday
Anthropic’s IPO Is Now Official — But Is the AI Boom Worth the Risk?
Anthropic has officially filed its S-1 registration statement, taking a major step toward becoming a publicly traded AI company.
The company behind Claude plans to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT. Its share price, offering size, and final IPO valuation have not yet been confirmed.
My take: This could be a major milestone for the AI industry. Public investors may soon get a chance to invest directly in one of the leading AI developers. However, rapid revenue growth doesn’t automatically mean long-term profitability, and the costs of building advanced AI systems remain a serious risk.
The opportunity is exciting, but investors should look beyond the hype. Watch for the official IPO price range, financial disclosures, profitability outlook, and market demand.
Will Anthropic’s IPO strengthen confidence in the AI boom, or reveal how expensive the AI race really is?
$ENA
{future}(ENAUSDT)
$KAT
{future}(KATUSDT)
$SYN
{future}(SYNUSDT)
#AnthropicS1ExpectedToday
Anthropic’s IPO Is Now Official — But Is the AI Boom Worth the Risk?
Anthropic has officially filed its S-1 registration statement, taking a major step toward becoming a publicly traded AI company.
The company behind Claude plans to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT. Its share price, offering size, and final IPO valuation have not yet been confirmed.
My take: This could be a major milestone for the AI industry. Public investors may soon get a chance to invest directly in one of the leading AI developers. However, rapid revenue growth doesn’t automatically mean long-term profitability, and the costs of building advanced AI systems remain a serious risk.
The opportunity is exciting, but investors should look beyond the hype. Watch for the official IPO price range, financial disclosures, profitability outlook, and market demand.
Will Anthropic’s IPO strengthen confidence in the AI boom, or reveal how expensive the AI race really is?
$ENA
$KAT
$SYN
Anthropic’s IPO Is Now Official — But Is the AI Boom Worth the Risk?
Anthropic has officially filed its S-1 registration statement, taking a major step toward becoming a publicly traded AI company.
The company behind Claude plans to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT. Its share price, offering size, and final IPO valuation have not yet been confirmed.
My take: This could be a major milestone for the AI industry. Public investors may soon get a chance to invest directly in one of the leading AI developers. However, rapid revenue growth doesn’t automatically mean long-term profitability, and the costs of building advanced AI systems remain a serious risk.
The opportunity is exciting, but investors should look beyond the hype. Watch for the official IPO price range, financial disclosures, profitability outlook, and market demand.
Will Anthropic’s IPO strengthen confidence in the AI boom, or reveal how expensive the AI race really is?
$ENA
$KAT
$SYN
1
313
See translation
PEPE Coin: Is the Rally Losing Steam, or Could Buyers Return?
PEPE’s late-October rally is facing a serious test. After climbing to around $0.00000507 on October 23, the meme coin pulled back as selling pressure and exchange inflows became a concern.
As of October 26, CoinStats reported PEPE near $0.00000435, with approximately $286 million in 24-hour trading volume. These figures are snapshots and may change throughout the day.
Here’s what matters:
Exchange inflows: CoinMarketCap’s October 26 update reported that 2.11 trillion PEPE tokens returned to exchanges between October 19 and 22. This could increase potential selling pressure, but deposits alone do not confirm sales.
Whale activity: Lookonchain reported a whale purchase of 43.3 billion PEPE, worth approximately $195,000, on October 22. That is evidence of a purchase, not proof that other large holders are buying.
Bullish scenario: If buyers return, trading activity remains strong, and PEPE recovers its lost momentum, another attempt at resistance could develop.
Bearish scenario: Continued selling, weakening demand, or a broader meme coin market decline could push PEPE lower.
My opinion: PEPE still attracts significant trading activity, but I would not treat whale movements as a guaranteed bullish signal. The key is whether buying demand can absorb the available supply and sustain a recovery.
What do you think: can PEPE regain its momentum, or will selling pressure dominate in the coming days?
$PEPE
{spot}(PEPEUSDT)
PEPE Coin: Is the Rally Losing Steam, or Could Buyers Return?
PEPE’s late-October rally is facing a serious test. After climbing to around $0.00000507 on October 23, the meme coin pulled back as selling pressure and exchange inflows became a concern.
As of October 26, CoinStats reported PEPE near $0.00000435, with approximately $286 million in 24-hour trading volume. These figures are snapshots and may change throughout the day.
Here’s what matters:
Exchange inflows: CoinMarketCap’s October 26 update reported that 2.11 trillion PEPE tokens returned to exchanges between October 19 and 22. This could increase potential selling pressure, but deposits alone do not confirm sales.
Whale activity: Lookonchain reported a whale purchase of 43.3 billion PEPE, worth approximately $195,000, on October 22. That is evidence of a purchase, not proof that other large holders are buying.
Bullish scenario: If buyers return, trading activity remains strong, and PEPE recovers its lost momentum, another attempt at resistance could develop.
Bearish scenario: Continued selling, weakening demand, or a broader meme coin market decline could push PEPE lower.
My opinion: PEPE still attracts significant trading activity, but I would not treat whale movements as a guaranteed bullish signal. The key is whether buying demand can absorb the available supply and sustain a recovery.
What do you think: can PEPE regain its momentum, or will selling pressure dominate in the coming days?
$PEPE
PEPE’s late-October rally is facing a serious test. After climbing to around $0.00000507 on October 23, the meme coin pulled back as selling pressure and exchange inflows became a concern.
As of October 26, CoinStats reported PEPE near $0.00000435, with approximately $286 million in 24-hour trading volume. These figures are snapshots and may change throughout the day.
Here’s what matters:
Exchange inflows: CoinMarketCap’s October 26 update reported that 2.11 trillion PEPE tokens returned to exchanges between October 19 and 22. This could increase potential selling pressure, but deposits alone do not confirm sales.
Whale activity: Lookonchain reported a whale purchase of 43.3 billion PEPE, worth approximately $195,000, on October 22. That is evidence of a purchase, not proof that other large holders are buying.
Bullish scenario: If buyers return, trading activity remains strong, and PEPE recovers its lost momentum, another attempt at resistance could develop.
Bearish scenario: Continued selling, weakening demand, or a broader meme coin market decline could push PEPE lower.
My opinion: PEPE still attracts significant trading activity, but I would not treat whale movements as a guaranteed bullish signal. The key is whether buying demand can absorb the available supply and sustain a recovery.
What do you think: can PEPE regain its momentum, or will selling pressure dominate in the coming days?
$PEPE
1
63
See translation
#AnthropicTTMRevenueGrewAbout1200%
Anthropic’s Revenue Grew Around 1,200% — Is AI Just Getting Started?
The AI industry is growing fast, and Anthropic’s reported revenue surge shows how strong demand for AI services could become.
TTM revenue means the revenue a company earns over its latest 12 months. It helps measure business growth, but it does not tell us whether the company is profitable.
My opinion: This growth is a strong sign that businesses are taking AI seriously, especially for coding, automation, and productivity. However, high computing costs and fierce competition remain major risks.
What about crypto?
AI agents, decentralized computing, and blockchain-based AI infrastructure could gain attention as AI adoption expands. But Anthropic’s success does not automatically mean AI crypto tokens will rise. Projects still need real users, useful technology, and sustainable demand.
The bullish case is long-term AI adoption. The risk is that high costs and competition may slow future growth.
I’m optimistic about AI’s future, but I believe real utility matters more than hype.
Do you think AI will create lasting value for the crypto industry, or will most AI tokens struggle to deliver real results?
$AVAX
{future}(AVAXUSDT)
$ERA
{future}(ERAUSDT)
$CHIP
{future}(CHIPUSDT)
#AnthropicTTMRevenueGrewAbout1200%
Anthropic’s Revenue Grew Around 1,200% — Is AI Just Getting Started?
The AI industry is growing fast, and Anthropic’s reported revenue surge shows how strong demand for AI services could become.
TTM revenue means the revenue a company earns over its latest 12 months. It helps measure business growth, but it does not tell us whether the company is profitable.
My opinion: This growth is a strong sign that businesses are taking AI seriously, especially for coding, automation, and productivity. However, high computing costs and fierce competition remain major risks.
What about crypto?
AI agents, decentralized computing, and blockchain-based AI infrastructure could gain attention as AI adoption expands. But Anthropic’s success does not automatically mean AI crypto tokens will rise. Projects still need real users, useful technology, and sustainable demand.
The bullish case is long-term AI adoption. The risk is that high costs and competition may slow future growth.
I’m optimistic about AI’s future, but I believe real utility matters more than hype.
Do you think AI will create lasting value for the crypto industry, or will most AI tokens struggle to deliver real results?
$AVAX
$ERA
$CHIP
Anthropic’s Revenue Grew Around 1,200% — Is AI Just Getting Started?
The AI industry is growing fast, and Anthropic’s reported revenue surge shows how strong demand for AI services could become.
TTM revenue means the revenue a company earns over its latest 12 months. It helps measure business growth, but it does not tell us whether the company is profitable.
My opinion: This growth is a strong sign that businesses are taking AI seriously, especially for coding, automation, and productivity. However, high computing costs and fierce competition remain major risks.
What about crypto?
AI agents, decentralized computing, and blockchain-based AI infrastructure could gain attention as AI adoption expands. But Anthropic’s success does not automatically mean AI crypto tokens will rise. Projects still need real users, useful technology, and sustainable demand.
The bullish case is long-term AI adoption. The risk is that high costs and competition may slow future growth.
I’m optimistic about AI’s future, but I believe real utility matters more than hype.
Do you think AI will create lasting value for the crypto industry, or will most AI tokens struggle to deliver real results?
$AVAX
$ERA
$CHIP
2
357
See translation
Solana is seeing rapid growth in tokenized stock ownership, but there is an important detail behind the headline: adoption growth does not automatically mean the SOL token price will rise.
On October 26, reporting from crypto.news, citing Blockworks data and a post from Solana, highlighted a record of approximately 1.5 million holders of tokenized equities on the network — around five times the August figure.
Tokenized stocks are blockchain-based representations of traditional securities. They can make certain financial assets accessible through blockchain infrastructure, subject to the product’s rules and applicable regulations.
Why does this matter for Solana?
Real-world assets: Tokenized equities represent a growing use case beyond memecoins and ordinary crypto trading.
Network activity: More users and applications could support demand for Solana’s infrastructure.
Investor interest: Tokenization could attract financial platforms and users interested in connecting traditional markets with blockchain technology.
But there is a catch.
The reported figure refers to wallet addresses, not necessarily 1.5 million unique people. One person can control multiple wallets, and incentives can encourage additional activity.
There is also no guarantee that growth in tokenized stocks will translate directly into higher demand for SOL.
The bullish case is that sustained tokenization activity brings more useful applications and economic activity to Solana.
The bearish case is that wallet growth fails to translate into lasting usage, meaningful network revenue or stronger demand for SOL.
The next thing to watch is whether real usage and transaction activity continue growing after incentives are accounted for.
Adoption is worth watching — but the quality of that adoption matters more than the headline number.
Rahi Crypto Intel Pro
$SOL
{future}(SOLUSDT)
Solana is seeing rapid growth in tokenized stock ownership, but there is an important detail behind the headline: adoption growth does not automatically mean the SOL token price will rise.
On October 26, reporting from crypto.news, citing Blockworks data and a post from Solana, highlighted a record of approximately 1.5 million holders of tokenized equities on the network — around five times the August figure.
Tokenized stocks are blockchain-based representations of traditional securities. They can make certain financial assets accessible through blockchain infrastructure, subject to the product’s rules and applicable regulations.
Why does this matter for Solana?
Real-world assets: Tokenized equities represent a growing use case beyond memecoins and ordinary crypto trading.
Network activity: More users and applications could support demand for Solana’s infrastructure.
Investor interest: Tokenization could attract financial platforms and users interested in connecting traditional markets with blockchain technology.
But there is a catch.
The reported figure refers to wallet addresses, not necessarily 1.5 million unique people. One person can control multiple wallets, and incentives can encourage additional activity.
There is also no guarantee that growth in tokenized stocks will translate directly into higher demand for SOL.
The bullish case is that sustained tokenization activity brings more useful applications and economic activity to Solana.
The bearish case is that wallet growth fails to translate into lasting usage, meaningful network revenue or stronger demand for SOL.
The next thing to watch is whether real usage and transaction activity continue growing after incentives are accounted for.
Adoption is worth watching — but the quality of that adoption matters more than the headline number.
Rahi Crypto Intel Pro
$SOL
On October 26, reporting from crypto.news, citing Blockworks data and a post from Solana, highlighted a record of approximately 1.5 million holders of tokenized equities on the network — around five times the August figure.
Tokenized stocks are blockchain-based representations of traditional securities. They can make certain financial assets accessible through blockchain infrastructure, subject to the product’s rules and applicable regulations.
Why does this matter for Solana?
Real-world assets: Tokenized equities represent a growing use case beyond memecoins and ordinary crypto trading.
Network activity: More users and applications could support demand for Solana’s infrastructure.
Investor interest: Tokenization could attract financial platforms and users interested in connecting traditional markets with blockchain technology.
But there is a catch.
The reported figure refers to wallet addresses, not necessarily 1.5 million unique people. One person can control multiple wallets, and incentives can encourage additional activity.
There is also no guarantee that growth in tokenized stocks will translate directly into higher demand for SOL.
The bullish case is that sustained tokenization activity brings more useful applications and economic activity to Solana.
The bearish case is that wallet growth fails to translate into lasting usage, meaningful network revenue or stronger demand for SOL.
The next thing to watch is whether real usage and transaction activity continue growing after incentives are accounted for.
Adoption is worth watching — but the quality of that adoption matters more than the headline number.
Rahi Crypto Intel Pro
$SOL
85
Verified
See translation
Aviva Just Put a £22 Billion Fund on the XRP Ledger — But What Does It Mean for XRP?
Institutional adoption of blockchain is moving beyond experiments, and Ripple’s XRP Ledger has landed another notable development.
On October 26, 2026, Financial News London reported that Aviva Investors launched a tokenised share class of its £22 billion Sterling Liquidity Fund on the XRP Ledger.
The firm already launched a tokenised US liquidity fund in July. Across both tokenised share classes, it now has more than £86 million invested.
Why does this matter?
Tokenisation allows traditional financial assets to be represented digitally on a blockchain. For institutions, this could create new ways to manage, record and distribute fund investments.
The bullish case: More financial institutions using the XRP Ledger could strengthen its role in tokenised finance and expand its real-world use.
The bearish reality: This announcement does not mean £22 billion has flowed into XRP, nor does it guarantee that XRP's price will rise. Blockchain adoption and demand for the XRP token are not the same thing.
What should traders watch next?
Look for additional fund launches, evidence of real transaction activity and signs that institutional use is expanding beyond individual projects.
The bigger story is not an instant XRP price pump. It is whether traditional finance continues moving real financial assets onto blockchain networks.
Source: Financial News London, October 26, 2026.
$ERA
{future}(ERAUSDT)
$CHIP
{future}(CHIPUSDT)
$AVA
{future}(AVAUSDT)
Aviva Just Put a £22 Billion Fund on the XRP Ledger — But What Does It Mean for XRP?
Institutional adoption of blockchain is moving beyond experiments, and Ripple’s XRP Ledger has landed another notable development.
On October 26, 2026, Financial News London reported that Aviva Investors launched a tokenised share class of its £22 billion Sterling Liquidity Fund on the XRP Ledger.
The firm already launched a tokenised US liquidity fund in July. Across both tokenised share classes, it now has more than £86 million invested.
Why does this matter?
Tokenisation allows traditional financial assets to be represented digitally on a blockchain. For institutions, this could create new ways to manage, record and distribute fund investments.
The bullish case: More financial institutions using the XRP Ledger could strengthen its role in tokenised finance and expand its real-world use.
The bearish reality: This announcement does not mean £22 billion has flowed into XRP, nor does it guarantee that XRP's price will rise. Blockchain adoption and demand for the XRP token are not the same thing.
What should traders watch next?
Look for additional fund launches, evidence of real transaction activity and signs that institutional use is expanding beyond individual projects.
The bigger story is not an instant XRP price pump. It is whether traditional finance continues moving real financial assets onto blockchain networks.
Source: Financial News London, October 26, 2026.
$ERA
$CHIP
$AVA
Institutional adoption of blockchain is moving beyond experiments, and Ripple’s XRP Ledger has landed another notable development.
On October 26, 2026, Financial News London reported that Aviva Investors launched a tokenised share class of its £22 billion Sterling Liquidity Fund on the XRP Ledger.
The firm already launched a tokenised US liquidity fund in July. Across both tokenised share classes, it now has more than £86 million invested.
Why does this matter?
Tokenisation allows traditional financial assets to be represented digitally on a blockchain. For institutions, this could create new ways to manage, record and distribute fund investments.
The bullish case: More financial institutions using the XRP Ledger could strengthen its role in tokenised finance and expand its real-world use.
The bearish reality: This announcement does not mean £22 billion has flowed into XRP, nor does it guarantee that XRP's price will rise. Blockchain adoption and demand for the XRP token are not the same thing.
What should traders watch next?
Look for additional fund launches, evidence of real transaction activity and signs that institutional use is expanding beyond individual projects.
The bigger story is not an instant XRP price pump. It is whether traditional finance continues moving real financial assets onto blockchain networks.
Source: Financial News London, October 26, 2026.
$ERA
$CHIP
$AVA
2
582
See translation
#ArgentineCourtDismissesLIBRACaseAgainstMilei
Argentina Dismisses Milei’s LIBRA Case — But What Does It Mean?
On October 23, an Argentine judge dismissed the criminal case involving President Javier Milei and others over the LIBRA memecoin controversy.
The case followed Milei’s February 2025 post promoting the token, which later collapsed and left investors facing losses.
However, dismissing this criminal case does not automatically mean every legal dispute is over or that all criticism was false.
The key lesson for crypto investors: never rely on a public figure’s endorsement alone. Research the project, understand the risks, and avoid investing based on hype.
Should public figures face stricter rules when promoting cryptocurrencies?
$ERA
{future}(ERAUSDT)
$DUSK
{future}(DUSKUSDT)
$QNT
{future}(QNTUSDT)
#ArgentineCourtDismissesLIBRACaseAgainstMilei
Argentina Dismisses Milei’s LIBRA Case — But What Does It Mean?
On October 23, an Argentine judge dismissed the criminal case involving President Javier Milei and others over the LIBRA memecoin controversy.
The case followed Milei’s February 2025 post promoting the token, which later collapsed and left investors facing losses.
However, dismissing this criminal case does not automatically mean every legal dispute is over or that all criticism was false.
The key lesson for crypto investors: never rely on a public figure’s endorsement alone. Research the project, understand the risks, and avoid investing based on hype.
Should public figures face stricter rules when promoting cryptocurrencies?
$ERA
$DUSK
$QNT
Argentina Dismisses Milei’s LIBRA Case — But What Does It Mean?
On October 23, an Argentine judge dismissed the criminal case involving President Javier Milei and others over the LIBRA memecoin controversy.
The case followed Milei’s February 2025 post promoting the token, which later collapsed and left investors facing losses.
However, dismissing this criminal case does not automatically mean every legal dispute is over or that all criticism was false.
The key lesson for crypto investors: never rely on a public figure’s endorsement alone. Research the project, understand the risks, and avoid investing based on hype.
Should public figures face stricter rules when promoting cryptocurrencies?
$ERA
$DUSK
$QNT
399
See translation
The biggest trading mistake isn’t missing a breakout. It’s entering before the market confirms it.
Bitcoin can break above resistance and attract excited buyers, only to fall back below the level. It can also sweep below support, trigger stop-losses, and then recover.
Both situations teach the same lesson: price movement alone is not confirmation.
A bullish setup becomes more convincing when price breaks resistance, holds above it, and successfully retests the level.
A bearish setup gains strength when price loses support and fails to reclaim it.
But neither scenario is guaranteed. The market can change direction at any time.
My trading rule: Wait for confirmation, define your invalidation level, and decide your risk before entering a trade. Protecting capital matters more than catching every move.
Patience is a trading skill, not a missed opportunity.
What do you trust more when trading Bitcoin: the breakout itself or the retest afterward?
#BinancePick #Bitcoin #CryptoTrading #RiskManagement
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
The biggest trading mistake isn’t missing a breakout. It’s entering before the market confirms it.
Bitcoin can break above resistance and attract excited buyers, only to fall back below the level. It can also sweep below support, trigger stop-losses, and then recover.
Both situations teach the same lesson: price movement alone is not confirmation.
A bullish setup becomes more convincing when price breaks resistance, holds above it, and successfully retests the level.
A bearish setup gains strength when price loses support and fails to reclaim it.
But neither scenario is guaranteed. The market can change direction at any time.
My trading rule: Wait for confirmation, define your invalidation level, and decide your risk before entering a trade. Protecting capital matters more than catching every move.
Patience is a trading skill, not a missed opportunity.
What do you trust more when trading Bitcoin: the breakout itself or the retest afterward?
#BinancePick #Bitcoin #CryptoTrading #RiskManagement
$BTC
Bitcoin can break above resistance and attract excited buyers, only to fall back below the level. It can also sweep below support, trigger stop-losses, and then recover.
Both situations teach the same lesson: price movement alone is not confirmation.
A bullish setup becomes more convincing when price breaks resistance, holds above it, and successfully retests the level.
A bearish setup gains strength when price loses support and fails to reclaim it.
But neither scenario is guaranteed. The market can change direction at any time.
My trading rule: Wait for confirmation, define your invalidation level, and decide your risk before entering a trade. Protecting capital matters more than catching every move.
Patience is a trading skill, not a missed opportunity.
What do you trust more when trading Bitcoin: the breakout itself or the retest afterward?
#BinancePick #Bitcoin #CryptoTrading #RiskManagement
$BTC
25
See translation
The debate over crypto regulation is about more than deciding which agency oversees digital assets. It is also about how crypto projects can raise money while protecting investors.
Senator Cynthia Lummis has criticized lawmakers over the Senate’s failed attempt to advance the CLARITY Act, pointing to proposed limits on crypto fundraising under a provision known as “Regulation Crypto.”
The proposal includes two important limits:
- An annual fundraising allowance of $50 million, subject to the provision’s specific conditions.
- A $200 million maximum in total gross proceeds under the exemption.
These limits are intended to create a defined route for certain crypto projects to raise capital while meeting disclosure requirements, rather than relying on the full securities registration process.
But there is an important distinction between the legislative record and the political argument surrounding it.
On September 15, 2026, the Senate voted 49–50 on a procedural motion to advance the CLARITY Act. The motion failed to secure the three-fifths majority required for cloture. The official record also shows that Senator Thom Tillis voted against the motion with the stated intention of seeking reconsideration.
Lummis argues that Democrats opposed protections and fundraising restrictions they had previously sought. However, that is her characterization of the negotiations and vote—not a conclusion established by the vote tally alone.
Why does this matter?
For crypto businesses, fundraising limits can affect how much capital eligible projects can raise through a regulatory exemption. For investors, disclosure requirements may improve access to information, although they cannot eliminate the risks of investing in crypto assets.
The next key question is whether lawmakers can reach an agreement that clarifies crypto oversight while balancing capital formation and investor protection.
The Senate vote is confirmed. The political dispute over who bears responsibility for the setback requires more context than a single social media statement.
$ENA
The debate over crypto regulation is about more than deciding which agency oversees digital assets. It is also about how crypto projects can raise money while protecting investors.
Senator Cynthia Lummis has criticized lawmakers over the Senate’s failed attempt to advance the CLARITY Act, pointing to proposed limits on crypto fundraising under a provision known as “Regulation Crypto.”
The proposal includes two important limits:
- An annual fundraising allowance of $50 million, subject to the provision’s specific conditions.
- A $200 million maximum in total gross proceeds under the exemption.
These limits are intended to create a defined route for certain crypto projects to raise capital while meeting disclosure requirements, rather than relying on the full securities registration process.
But there is an important distinction between the legislative record and the political argument surrounding it.
On September 15, 2026, the Senate voted 49–50 on a procedural motion to advance the CLARITY Act. The motion failed to secure the three-fifths majority required for cloture. The official record also shows that Senator Thom Tillis voted against the motion with the stated intention of seeking reconsideration.
Lummis argues that Democrats opposed protections and fundraising restrictions they had previously sought. However, that is her characterization of the negotiations and vote—not a conclusion established by the vote tally alone.
Why does this matter?
For crypto businesses, fundraising limits can affect how much capital eligible projects can raise through a regulatory exemption. For investors, disclosure requirements may improve access to information, although they cannot eliminate the risks of investing in crypto assets.
The next key question is whether lawmakers can reach an agreement that clarifies crypto oversight while balancing capital formation and investor protection.
The Senate vote is confirmed. The political dispute over who bears responsibility for the setback requires more context than a single social media statement.
$ENA
Senator Cynthia Lummis has criticized lawmakers over the Senate’s failed attempt to advance the CLARITY Act, pointing to proposed limits on crypto fundraising under a provision known as “Regulation Crypto.”
The proposal includes two important limits:
- An annual fundraising allowance of $50 million, subject to the provision’s specific conditions.
- A $200 million maximum in total gross proceeds under the exemption.
These limits are intended to create a defined route for certain crypto projects to raise capital while meeting disclosure requirements, rather than relying on the full securities registration process.
But there is an important distinction between the legislative record and the political argument surrounding it.
On September 15, 2026, the Senate voted 49–50 on a procedural motion to advance the CLARITY Act. The motion failed to secure the three-fifths majority required for cloture. The official record also shows that Senator Thom Tillis voted against the motion with the stated intention of seeking reconsideration.
Lummis argues that Democrats opposed protections and fundraising restrictions they had previously sought. However, that is her characterization of the negotiations and vote—not a conclusion established by the vote tally alone.
Why does this matter?
For crypto businesses, fundraising limits can affect how much capital eligible projects can raise through a regulatory exemption. For investors, disclosure requirements may improve access to information, although they cannot eliminate the risks of investing in crypto assets.
The next key question is whether lawmakers can reach an agreement that clarifies crypto oversight while balancing capital formation and investor protection.
The Senate vote is confirmed. The political dispute over who bears responsibility for the setback requires more context than a single social media statement.
$ENA
1
108
See translation
#USQ3GDPAndSeptemberPCEDueNextWeek
Bitcoin traders have two important US economic reports to watch next week. The key question is whether the data will give the Federal Reserve more room to ease interest rates or keep inflation concerns alive.
On October 29, the US will release its third-quarter GDP advance estimate and September PCE inflation data.
Why do these reports matter for crypto?
GDP measures the growth of the US economy. Stronger-than-expected growth can signal economic strength, while weaker growth may raise concerns about an economic slowdown.
PCE measures changes in prices paid for goods and services. The Federal Reserve closely watches PCE inflation when assessing price pressures and making monetary policy decisions.
Here are three possible scenarios:
• Strong GDP + cooler inflation: This could support market confidence while keeping the door open to easier monetary policy if inflation continues to cool.
• Strong GDP + hotter inflation: Interest rates could stay higher for longer, potentially putting pressure on risk assets such as Bitcoin.
• Weak GDP + cooler inflation: Markets may anticipate more room for rate cuts, although recession concerns could still weigh on sentiment.
These are possible reactions, not guaranteed outcomes. The actual impact will depend on the data compared with expectations, the details behind the numbers, and the Fed’s policy outlook.
One important detail: both reports are scheduled for Thursday, October 29, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.
For crypto traders, the goal is not to guess the numbers. It is to understand how the results could change interest-rate expectations and market sentiment.
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
$SOL
{future}(SOLUSDT)
#USQ3GDPAndSeptemberPCEDueNextWeek
Bitcoin traders have two important US economic reports to watch next week. The key question is whether the data will give the Federal Reserve more room to ease interest rates or keep inflation concerns alive.
On October 29, the US will release its third-quarter GDP advance estimate and September PCE inflation data.
Why do these reports matter for crypto?
GDP measures the growth of the US economy. Stronger-than-expected growth can signal economic strength, while weaker growth may raise concerns about an economic slowdown.
PCE measures changes in prices paid for goods and services. The Federal Reserve closely watches PCE inflation when assessing price pressures and making monetary policy decisions.
Here are three possible scenarios:
• Strong GDP + cooler inflation: This could support market confidence while keeping the door open to easier monetary policy if inflation continues to cool.
• Strong GDP + hotter inflation: Interest rates could stay higher for longer, potentially putting pressure on risk assets such as Bitcoin.
• Weak GDP + cooler inflation: Markets may anticipate more room for rate cuts, although recession concerns could still weigh on sentiment.
These are possible reactions, not guaranteed outcomes. The actual impact will depend on the data compared with expectations, the details behind the numbers, and the Fed’s policy outlook.
One important detail: both reports are scheduled for Thursday, October 29, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.
For crypto traders, the goal is not to guess the numbers. It is to understand how the results could change interest-rate expectations and market sentiment.
$BTC
$ETH
$SOL
Bitcoin traders have two important US economic reports to watch next week. The key question is whether the data will give the Federal Reserve more room to ease interest rates or keep inflation concerns alive.
On October 29, the US will release its third-quarter GDP advance estimate and September PCE inflation data.
Why do these reports matter for crypto?
GDP measures the growth of the US economy. Stronger-than-expected growth can signal economic strength, while weaker growth may raise concerns about an economic slowdown.
PCE measures changes in prices paid for goods and services. The Federal Reserve closely watches PCE inflation when assessing price pressures and making monetary policy decisions.
Here are three possible scenarios:
• Strong GDP + cooler inflation: This could support market confidence while keeping the door open to easier monetary policy if inflation continues to cool.
• Strong GDP + hotter inflation: Interest rates could stay higher for longer, potentially putting pressure on risk assets such as Bitcoin.
• Weak GDP + cooler inflation: Markets may anticipate more room for rate cuts, although recession concerns could still weigh on sentiment.
These are possible reactions, not guaranteed outcomes. The actual impact will depend on the data compared with expectations, the details behind the numbers, and the Fed’s policy outlook.
One important detail: both reports are scheduled for Thursday, October 29, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.
For crypto traders, the goal is not to guess the numbers. It is to understand how the results could change interest-rate expectations and market sentiment.
$BTC
$ETH
$SOL
55
Article
See translation
Crypto Weekly Recap: Bitcoin Near $80K, Ethereum Under Pressure — What’s Next?Crypto Weekly Recap: October 19–25, 2026 — Bitcoin Holds Near $80K as Ethereum Faces Pressure
This week reminded crypto traders that positive headlines do not always translate into rising prices.
Bitcoin attempted a recovery, institutional fund flows turned volatile, and Ethereum faced fresh uncertainty. Here’s what mattered.
Bitcoin ($BTC): Recovery Meets Selling Pressure
Bitcoin traded around the low-$80,000 range, briefly approaching $85,000 before losing momentum.
Available seven-day market data showed BTC down approximately 2.3%, with its price near $80,269 in the latest snapshot.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded strong inflows early in the week, including $526.7 million on October 19 and $524.8 million on October 21. However, October 22 brought $635.6 million in net outflows.
The takeaway: institutional demand appeared, but it was not consistent enough to prevent renewed selling pressure.
Ethereum ($ETH): More Challenges
Ethereum underperformed Bitcoin, falling approximately 4.1% over the seven-day period in the same market snapshot.
ETH also faced pressure from institutional fund flows. U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded approximately $225.1 million in net outflows from October 19–22.
Another concern was Ethereum’s delayed Glamsterdam testnet upgrade following security concerns. Development delays do not automatically mean the network is failing, but they can affect market confidence and expectations.
Three Other Developments Worth Watching
1. Traditional finance enters crypto
BlackRock filed for a proposed Bitcoin ETF designed to provide limited downside protection through an options strategy. The proposed structure would involve trade-offs, including capped upside; protection would not be guaranteed.
2. Stablecoins expand into payments
HSBC introduced its Hong Kong dollar stablecoin, RedCoin, for PayMe users. This highlights how established financial institutions are exploring blockchain-based payments beyond crypto trading.
3. Macro uncertainty remains important
Technology stocks weakened amid concerns about AI investment costs and financing. With the Federal Reserve meeting scheduled for October 27–28, interest-rate expectations and broader risk sentiment could influence crypto volatility.
Three Things to Watch Next Week
- Bitcoin: Can BTC reclaim and hold higher levels, or will selling pressure return near resistance?
- Ethereum: Will ETF outflows ease, and will developers provide clarity on the delayed testnet upgrade?
- Macro and institutional flows: Watch the Federal Reserve’s October 27–28 meeting, fresh ETF flow data, and broader stock-market sentiment.
The Bigger Picture
Crypto sentiment remained cautious. Bitcoin showed relative resilience, but Ethereum and several altcoins struggled. ETF flows demonstrated that institutional demand can change quickly, while regulatory and technology developments continued to shape the market narrative.
One useful takeaway: Don’t judge the market by headlines alone. Combine price action, confirmed fund-flow data, macro conditions, and risk management before drawing conclusions.
Sources: Solidus Capital’s Week 43 market commentary; InflowScan’s October 24 ETF recap; TLT’s October 19–25 market summary; Reuters’ October 23 market report; CoinCentral’s October 24 weekly recap.
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
Crypto Weekly Recap: Bitcoin Near $80K, Ethereum Under Pressure — What’s Next?
Crypto Weekly Recap: October 19–25, 2026 — Bitcoin Holds Near $80K as Ethereum Faces Pressure
This week reminded crypto traders that positive headlines do not always translate into rising prices.
Bitcoin attempted a recovery, institutional fund flows turned volatile, and Ethereum faced fresh uncertainty. Here’s what mattered.
Bitcoin ($BTC ): Recovery Meets Selling Pressure
Bitcoin traded around the low-$80,000 range, briefly approaching $85,000 before losing momentum.
Available seven-day market data showed BTC down approximately 2.3%, with its price near $80,269 in the latest snapshot.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded strong inflows early in the week, including $526.7 million on October 19 and $524.8 million on October 21. However, October 22 brought $635.6 million in net outflows.
The takeaway: institutional demand appeared, but it was not consistent enough to prevent renewed selling pressure.
Ethereum ($ETH ): More Challenges
Ethereum underperformed Bitcoin, falling approximately 4.1% over the seven-day period in the same market snapshot.
ETH also faced pressure from institutional fund flows. U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded approximately $225.1 million in net outflows from October 19–22.
Another concern was Ethereum’s delayed Glamsterdam testnet upgrade following security concerns. Development delays do not automatically mean the network is failing, but they can affect market confidence and expectations.
Three Other Developments Worth Watching
1. Traditional finance enters crypto
BlackRock filed for a proposed Bitcoin ETF designed to provide limited downside protection through an options strategy. The proposed structure would involve trade-offs, including capped upside; protection would not be guaranteed.
2. Stablecoins expand into payments
HSBC introduced its Hong Kong dollar stablecoin, RedCoin, for PayMe users. This highlights how established financial institutions are exploring blockchain-based payments beyond crypto trading.
3. Macro uncertainty remains important
Technology stocks weakened amid concerns about AI investment costs and financing. With the Federal Reserve meeting scheduled for October 27–28, interest-rate expectations and broader risk sentiment could influence crypto volatility.
Three Things to Watch Next Week
- Bitcoin: Can BTC reclaim and hold higher levels, or will selling pressure return near resistance?
- Ethereum: Will ETF outflows ease, and will developers provide clarity on the delayed testnet upgrade?
- Macro and institutional flows: Watch the Federal Reserve’s October 27–28 meeting, fresh ETF flow data, and broader stock-market sentiment.
The Bigger Picture
Crypto sentiment remained cautious. Bitcoin showed relative resilience, but Ethereum and several altcoins struggled. ETF flows demonstrated that institutional demand can change quickly, while regulatory and technology developments continued to shape the market narrative.
One useful takeaway: Don’t judge the market by headlines alone. Combine price action, confirmed fund-flow data, macro conditions, and risk management before drawing conclusions.
Sources: Solidus Capital’s Week 43 market commentary; InflowScan’s October 24 ETF recap; TLT’s October 19–25 market summary; Reuters’ October 23 market report; CoinCentral’s October 24 weekly recap.
$BTC
$ETH
This week reminded crypto traders that positive headlines do not always translate into rising prices.
Bitcoin attempted a recovery, institutional fund flows turned volatile, and Ethereum faced fresh uncertainty. Here’s what mattered.
Bitcoin ($BTC ): Recovery Meets Selling Pressure
Bitcoin traded around the low-$80,000 range, briefly approaching $85,000 before losing momentum.
Available seven-day market data showed BTC down approximately 2.3%, with its price near $80,269 in the latest snapshot.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded strong inflows early in the week, including $526.7 million on October 19 and $524.8 million on October 21. However, October 22 brought $635.6 million in net outflows.
The takeaway: institutional demand appeared, but it was not consistent enough to prevent renewed selling pressure.
Ethereum ($ETH ): More Challenges
Ethereum underperformed Bitcoin, falling approximately 4.1% over the seven-day period in the same market snapshot.
ETH also faced pressure from institutional fund flows. U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded approximately $225.1 million in net outflows from October 19–22.
Another concern was Ethereum’s delayed Glamsterdam testnet upgrade following security concerns. Development delays do not automatically mean the network is failing, but they can affect market confidence and expectations.
Three Other Developments Worth Watching
1. Traditional finance enters crypto
BlackRock filed for a proposed Bitcoin ETF designed to provide limited downside protection through an options strategy. The proposed structure would involve trade-offs, including capped upside; protection would not be guaranteed.
2. Stablecoins expand into payments
HSBC introduced its Hong Kong dollar stablecoin, RedCoin, for PayMe users. This highlights how established financial institutions are exploring blockchain-based payments beyond crypto trading.
3. Macro uncertainty remains important
Technology stocks weakened amid concerns about AI investment costs and financing. With the Federal Reserve meeting scheduled for October 27–28, interest-rate expectations and broader risk sentiment could influence crypto volatility.
Three Things to Watch Next Week
- Bitcoin: Can BTC reclaim and hold higher levels, or will selling pressure return near resistance?
- Ethereum: Will ETF outflows ease, and will developers provide clarity on the delayed testnet upgrade?
- Macro and institutional flows: Watch the Federal Reserve’s October 27–28 meeting, fresh ETF flow data, and broader stock-market sentiment.
The Bigger Picture
Crypto sentiment remained cautious. Bitcoin showed relative resilience, but Ethereum and several altcoins struggled. ETF flows demonstrated that institutional demand can change quickly, while regulatory and technology developments continued to shape the market narrative.
One useful takeaway: Don’t judge the market by headlines alone. Combine price action, confirmed fund-flow data, macro conditions, and risk management before drawing conclusions.
Sources: Solidus Capital’s Week 43 market commentary; InflowScan’s October 24 ETF recap; TLT’s October 19–25 market summary; Reuters’ October 23 market report; CoinCentral’s October 24 weekly recap.
$BTC
$ETH
32
See translation
Nillion Covenants: Privacy Is What Could Make Web3 More Useful
In my opinion, privacy should not be an afterthought in Web3. It should be part of how applications are designed from the beginning.
What interests me most about Nillion Covenants is the potential to build applications that can work with sensitive information while giving users more control over their data.
I believe this matters because people and businesses need more than decentralization. They also need ways to protect information they don't want to expose publicly.
For me, the real value of privacy technology will depend on practical use cases, developer adoption, and how easily people can use it.
I'm interested to see how Nillion Covenants develops and whether it can help make privacy-focused applications more practical.
My take: privacy infrastructure becomes truly valuable when it solves real problems, not just when it sounds innovative.
What do you think is the biggest challenge for privacy-focused Web3 projects: adoption, usability, or real-world utility?
$NIL #NIL @nillionnetwork
{future}(NILUSDT)
Nillion Covenants: Privacy Is What Could Make Web3 More Useful
In my opinion, privacy should not be an afterthought in Web3. It should be part of how applications are designed from the beginning.
What interests me most about Nillion Covenants is the potential to build applications that can work with sensitive information while giving users more control over their data.
I believe this matters because people and businesses need more than decentralization. They also need ways to protect information they don't want to expose publicly.
For me, the real value of privacy technology will depend on practical use cases, developer adoption, and how easily people can use it.
I'm interested to see how Nillion Covenants develops and whether it can help make privacy-focused applications more practical.
My take: privacy infrastructure becomes truly valuable when it solves real problems, not just when it sounds innovative.
What do you think is the biggest challenge for privacy-focused Web3 projects: adoption, usability, or real-world utility?
$NIL #NIL @Nillion
In my opinion, privacy should not be an afterthought in Web3. It should be part of how applications are designed from the beginning.
What interests me most about Nillion Covenants is the potential to build applications that can work with sensitive information while giving users more control over their data.
I believe this matters because people and businesses need more than decentralization. They also need ways to protect information they don't want to expose publicly.
For me, the real value of privacy technology will depend on practical use cases, developer adoption, and how easily people can use it.
I'm interested to see how Nillion Covenants develops and whether it can help make privacy-focused applications more practical.
My take: privacy infrastructure becomes truly valuable when it solves real problems, not just when it sounds innovative.
What do you think is the biggest challenge for privacy-focused Web3 projects: adoption, usability, or real-world utility?
$NIL #NIL @Nillion
118
See translation
Binance Raised SHIB's Collateral Ratio to 60% — What Traders Need to Know
Binance has increased the collateral ratio for Shiba Inu, Polygon Ecosystem Token, and Stellar in its Cross Margin and Portfolio Margin systems.
According to Binance's official announcement, the changes took effect on October 23, 2026.
Here's what changed:
- SHIB: 50% to 60%
- POL: 50% to 60%
- XLM: 50% to 60%
Binance also increased the collateral ratios for COW, NEXO, RVN, and SAND from 10% to 30% in the relevant margin systems.
So, what does the SHIB update actually mean?
Collateral ratios help determine how much borrowing capacity an asset can support within applicable margin accounts.
A higher ratio can allow an eligible asset to contribute more collateral value under the relevant rules. However, the effect depends on the account type, applicable limits, and other margin requirements.
There is one important distinction: this is a margin-system adjustment, not a promise that SHIB's market price will rise.
It does not confirm new partnerships, increased demand, or an upcoming rally.
Binance also warns that collateral ratios and leverage affect portfolio margin risk calculations. Traders should monitor their margin requirements carefully because liquidation and losses remain possible.
For SHIB holders, the key takeaway is simple: understand what changed inside Binance's margin system before interpreting it as a market signal.
Rahi Crypto Intel — Separate exchange updates from price speculation.
$SHIB
{spot}(SHIBUSDT)
$POL
{future}(POLUSDT)
$XLM
{future}(XLMUSDT)
Binance Raised SHIB's Collateral Ratio to 60% — What Traders Need to Know
Binance has increased the collateral ratio for Shiba Inu, Polygon Ecosystem Token, and Stellar in its Cross Margin and Portfolio Margin systems.
According to Binance's official announcement, the changes took effect on October 23, 2026.
Here's what changed:
- SHIB: 50% to 60%
- POL: 50% to 60%
- XLM: 50% to 60%
Binance also increased the collateral ratios for COW, NEXO, RVN, and SAND from 10% to 30% in the relevant margin systems.
So, what does the SHIB update actually mean?
Collateral ratios help determine how much borrowing capacity an asset can support within applicable margin accounts.
A higher ratio can allow an eligible asset to contribute more collateral value under the relevant rules. However, the effect depends on the account type, applicable limits, and other margin requirements.
There is one important distinction: this is a margin-system adjustment, not a promise that SHIB's market price will rise.
It does not confirm new partnerships, increased demand, or an upcoming rally.
Binance also warns that collateral ratios and leverage affect portfolio margin risk calculations. Traders should monitor their margin requirements carefully because liquidation and losses remain possible.
For SHIB holders, the key takeaway is simple: understand what changed inside Binance's margin system before interpreting it as a market signal.
Rahi Crypto Intel — Separate exchange updates from price speculation.
$SHIB
$POL
$XLM
Binance has increased the collateral ratio for Shiba Inu, Polygon Ecosystem Token, and Stellar in its Cross Margin and Portfolio Margin systems.
According to Binance's official announcement, the changes took effect on October 23, 2026.
Here's what changed:
- SHIB: 50% to 60%
- POL: 50% to 60%
- XLM: 50% to 60%
Binance also increased the collateral ratios for COW, NEXO, RVN, and SAND from 10% to 30% in the relevant margin systems.
So, what does the SHIB update actually mean?
Collateral ratios help determine how much borrowing capacity an asset can support within applicable margin accounts.
A higher ratio can allow an eligible asset to contribute more collateral value under the relevant rules. However, the effect depends on the account type, applicable limits, and other margin requirements.
There is one important distinction: this is a margin-system adjustment, not a promise that SHIB's market price will rise.
It does not confirm new partnerships, increased demand, or an upcoming rally.
Binance also warns that collateral ratios and leverage affect portfolio margin risk calculations. Traders should monitor their margin requirements carefully because liquidation and losses remain possible.
For SHIB holders, the key takeaway is simple: understand what changed inside Binance's margin system before interpreting it as a market signal.
Rahi Crypto Intel — Separate exchange updates from price speculation.
$SHIB
$POL
$XLM
165
Article
See translation
Cardano’s $5M Copper Proposal: Can a Real-World Asset Investment Justify 22 Million ADA?Cardano’s treasury is facing an unusual investment proposal: use 22 million ADA to purchase physical copper and bring it on-chain.
Submitted by Toto Finance on October 15, the Cardano Strategic Copper Reserve proposal seeks approximately $5 million in treasury funding to buy verified copper and represent it through CuTT tokens on Cardano.
But the financial breakdown deserves a closer look.
📊 Where would the funding go?
According to the published governance proposal:
• 22 million ADA: Total treasury request, valued at approximately $5 million in the reported estimate.
• 14.72 million ADA (66.93%): Allocated to physical copper purchases.
• Remaining 33.07%: Covers technology and project management, external operations, insurance, storage, independent oversight, execution and other costs.
The proposal envisions holding the copper for 18–24 months, then selling it over time and returning net proceeds and unused funds to the treasury by month 36.
Here’s the critical question: Can the investment recover its cost?
The proposal’s financial assumptions put copper’s purchase price at approximately $6.73 per pound and its illustrative break-even sale price at around $10.06. That implies a roughly 49.4% increase in copper prices under the stated scenario.
Toto’s founder has also discussed a bullish scenario involving approximately 69% copper appreciation over two years. However, that is a projection—not a guaranteed outcome or an independently established forecast.
The proposal also includes potential payments to Toto and other project-related costs. Meanwhile, copper prices, ADA’s dollar value, custody arrangements, token security and resale liquidity could all affect the final result.
For Cardano, this could create an opportunity to develop real-world asset infrastructure. But ecosystem innovation alone does not guarantee a profitable treasury investment.
Governance update: The proposal remains listed as active and under voting, with November 15, 2026, shown as its expiration date. It has not been approved simply because it is being discussed.
Should Cardano use treasury funds for a physical commodity reserve, or should those funds prioritize core ecosystem development?
Share your reasoning below.
#Cardano #ADA #RWA
$ADA
{future}(ADAUSDT)
$XAU
{future}(XAUUSDT)
Cardano’s $5M Copper Proposal: Can a Real-World Asset Investment Justify 22 Million ADA?
Cardano’s treasury is facing an unusual investment proposal: use 22 million ADA to purchase physical copper and bring it on-chain.
Submitted by Toto Finance on October 15, the Cardano Strategic Copper Reserve proposal seeks approximately $5 million in treasury funding to buy verified copper and represent it through CuTT tokens on Cardano.
But the financial breakdown deserves a closer look.
📊 Where would the funding go?
According to the published governance proposal:
• 22 million ADA: Total treasury request, valued at approximately $5 million in the reported estimate.
• 14.72 million ADA (66.93%): Allocated to physical copper purchases.
• Remaining 33.07%: Covers technology and project management, external operations, insurance, storage, independent oversight, execution and other costs.
The proposal envisions holding the copper for 18–24 months, then selling it over time and returning net proceeds and unused funds to the treasury by month 36.
Here’s the critical question: Can the investment recover its cost?
The proposal’s financial assumptions put copper’s purchase price at approximately $6.73 per pound and its illustrative break-even sale price at around $10.06. That implies a roughly 49.4% increase in copper prices under the stated scenario.
Toto’s founder has also discussed a bullish scenario involving approximately 69% copper appreciation over two years. However, that is a projection—not a guaranteed outcome or an independently established forecast.
The proposal also includes potential payments to Toto and other project-related costs. Meanwhile, copper prices, ADA’s dollar value, custody arrangements, token security and resale liquidity could all affect the final result.
For Cardano, this could create an opportunity to develop real-world asset infrastructure. But ecosystem innovation alone does not guarantee a profitable treasury investment.
Governance update: The proposal remains listed as active and under voting, with November 15, 2026, shown as its expiration date. It has not been approved simply because it is being discussed.
Should Cardano use treasury funds for a physical commodity reserve, or should those funds prioritize core ecosystem development?
Share your reasoning below.
#Cardano #ADA #RWA
$ADA
$XAU
Submitted by Toto Finance on October 15, the Cardano Strategic Copper Reserve proposal seeks approximately $5 million in treasury funding to buy verified copper and represent it through CuTT tokens on Cardano.
But the financial breakdown deserves a closer look.
📊 Where would the funding go?
According to the published governance proposal:
• 22 million ADA: Total treasury request, valued at approximately $5 million in the reported estimate.
• 14.72 million ADA (66.93%): Allocated to physical copper purchases.
• Remaining 33.07%: Covers technology and project management, external operations, insurance, storage, independent oversight, execution and other costs.
The proposal envisions holding the copper for 18–24 months, then selling it over time and returning net proceeds and unused funds to the treasury by month 36.
Here’s the critical question: Can the investment recover its cost?
The proposal’s financial assumptions put copper’s purchase price at approximately $6.73 per pound and its illustrative break-even sale price at around $10.06. That implies a roughly 49.4% increase in copper prices under the stated scenario.
Toto’s founder has also discussed a bullish scenario involving approximately 69% copper appreciation over two years. However, that is a projection—not a guaranteed outcome or an independently established forecast.
The proposal also includes potential payments to Toto and other project-related costs. Meanwhile, copper prices, ADA’s dollar value, custody arrangements, token security and resale liquidity could all affect the final result.
For Cardano, this could create an opportunity to develop real-world asset infrastructure. But ecosystem innovation alone does not guarantee a profitable treasury investment.
Governance update: The proposal remains listed as active and under voting, with November 15, 2026, shown as its expiration date. It has not been approved simply because it is being discussed.
Should Cardano use treasury funds for a physical commodity reserve, or should those funds prioritize core ecosystem development?
Share your reasoning below.
#Cardano #ADA #RWA
$ADA
$XAU
134
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BinancePick
3.3M views
161,850 Discussing
Join #EarningsSeason: Predict Earnings on Binance Pick, Share Your Take on Binance Square!
Binance Square Official
·417 Likes
·344.6k views
EarningsSeason
5.4M views
26,572 Discussing
StrategySkipsBitcoinPurchasesSpends$205MOnSTRCBuybacks
86 views
6 Discussing