BitJT
14 Posts
BitJT
1.专注交易执行与风控纠偏
2.不预测短期涨跌，聚焦盘前结构与交易纪律
3.减少乱做，优先提升执行一致性
Occasional Trader
8.3 Years
102 Following
121 Followers
14 Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
2017年年底进某交易所工作，算是正式进币圈。
之后一直没离开过这个圈子。
这期间经历过几轮行情，也看过很多人来来去去。
牛市里觉得自己懂了不难，熊市里还能留下来才难。
我自己的交易经历没什么好吹的。
赚过不少，也爆仓无数。
追高、扛单、上头、乱改止损、亏了想马上赚回来，这些坑基本都踩过。
以前总觉得是输给行情，后来才慢慢承认，很多时候是输给自己。
方向看对了，执行做错了，结果一样亏。
2024年开始正式全职交易。
到现在也谈不上“走出来”，但至少是在按职业交易员的方式去做：复盘、修正、控制错误、慢慢打磨执行。
后面会在这里记录自己的交易成长过程。
主要写给自己看，顺便留个痕迹。
之后一直没离开过这个圈子。
这期间经历过几轮行情，也看过很多人来来去去。
牛市里觉得自己懂了不难，熊市里还能留下来才难。
我自己的交易经历没什么好吹的。
赚过不少，也爆仓无数。
追高、扛单、上头、乱改止损、亏了想马上赚回来，这些坑基本都踩过。
以前总觉得是输给行情，后来才慢慢承认，很多时候是输给自己。
方向看对了，执行做错了，结果一样亏。
2024年开始正式全职交易。
到现在也谈不上“走出来”，但至少是在按职业交易员的方式去做：复盘、修正、控制错误、慢慢打磨执行。
后面会在这里记录自己的交易成长过程。
主要写给自己看，顺便留个痕迹。
最近在折腾一个交易系统。
这张 BTC 4H 图里的箱体，是系统自动画出来的。
上沿大概 64,105，下沿大概 61,855，现在价格已经破下沿了。
你们觉得这个箱体识别得怎么样？
我准备后面多发点不同周期的截图，边跑边调。
不构成交易建议。
这张 BTC 4H 图里的箱体，是系统自动画出来的。
上沿大概 64,105，下沿大概 61,855，现在价格已经破下沿了。
你们觉得这个箱体识别得怎么样？
我准备后面多发点不同周期的截图，边跑边调。
不构成交易建议。
Mark
GiGiZ 發財豬
·
--
黄金狂飙背后的惊天棋局：香港一纸公告，直接动了美元的奶酪？
朋友们，最近黄金市场可是扔出了一个重磅炸弹。
如果你手里有黄金，或者正想上车，今天的逻辑你一定要看懂。这关乎你在金价冲高后，是能稳坐钓鱼台，还是会被震下车。
事情的起因是香港财库局最近官宣：三年内要把黄金仓储能力做到2000吨以上。
很多人一看这数字，第一反应是倒吸一口凉气：香港这是要砸钱狂买2000吨黄金吗？
如果你也这么想，那就真跑偏了。 这2000吨根本不是买入量，而是承载量。
简单说，香港不是要当扫货的土豪，而是要当包租公，搭建一套能存得住、交割得了、清算得快的金融基础设施。
这事儿级别可比单纯买黄金高多了。
逻辑变了：从备胎转正
大家以前看黄金，逻辑很简单：世道乱了买黄金，世道好了卖黄金。在主流金融体系里，黄金一直像个边缘的避险备胎。
但现在不一样了，你看香港这套组合拳：建仓储、搞清算系统、把黄金纳入税收优惠。这分明是在做一件事，把黄金从边缘资产，扶正成制度核心资产。
这就能解释一个反常现象：为什么美元强势、利率高企，黄金还能一路狂奔？
因为买的人变了。这几年疯狂买金的根本不是散户，而是各国央行。他们不看价格，只管买入，这不是在做交易，而是在做储备体系的结构调整。美债虽有流动性，但有信用风险。黄金虽没利息，但它不欠任何人的债，也不看任何国家的脸色。
香港这次不是去抢伦敦的存量，而是给未来的增量修路。 谁修好了路，谁就掌握了未来黄金的话语权。
对我们意味着什么？如果你已经持有黄金：
别总用老眼光看恐高。如果这波上涨的推手是各国央行的长期配置，那它的逻辑就不是短期的情绪冲高。只要这个制度性买入的力量没变，每一次深调，可能都是给后来者留出的上车机会。
如果你想买黄金股：
记住一点，矿企最舒服的日子不是金价暴涨时，而是金价稳定在高位时。金价稳，现金流就稳。未来那些成本控制好、负债低的头部矿企，会越来越像那种分红稳定的现金奶牛，而不是以前那种大起大落的周期妖股。
如果你是美股投资者：
别看见黄金涨就去乱买那些高杠杆的小公司。在这个制度化阶段，市场奖励的是可持续性，而不是弹性。要选就选那些能把高金价变成真金白银分红的公司。
最后再说句心里话
很多人担心黄金涨多了要崩，其实是在用旧的尺子量新的布。
这轮变化，本质上是黄金正在被重新制度化。当一项资产开始被纳入税收优惠、被建立清算系统、被视为底仓配置时，它就很难再退回那个可有可无的备胎位置了。
看黄金，别只盯着价格，要盯着规则
价格是结果，规则才是原因。只要规则还在往这个方向走，咱们做决策时，心里就该多几分底气。
如果你手里有黄金，或者正想上车，今天的逻辑你一定要看懂。这关乎你在金价冲高后，是能稳坐钓鱼台，还是会被震下车。
事情的起因是香港财库局最近官宣：三年内要把黄金仓储能力做到2000吨以上。
很多人一看这数字，第一反应是倒吸一口凉气：香港这是要砸钱狂买2000吨黄金吗？
如果你也这么想，那就真跑偏了。 这2000吨根本不是买入量，而是承载量。
简单说，香港不是要当扫货的土豪，而是要当包租公，搭建一套能存得住、交割得了、清算得快的金融基础设施。
这事儿级别可比单纯买黄金高多了。
逻辑变了：从备胎转正
大家以前看黄金，逻辑很简单：世道乱了买黄金，世道好了卖黄金。在主流金融体系里，黄金一直像个边缘的避险备胎。
但现在不一样了，你看香港这套组合拳：建仓储、搞清算系统、把黄金纳入税收优惠。这分明是在做一件事，把黄金从边缘资产，扶正成制度核心资产。
这就能解释一个反常现象：为什么美元强势、利率高企，黄金还能一路狂奔？
因为买的人变了。这几年疯狂买金的根本不是散户，而是各国央行。他们不看价格，只管买入，这不是在做交易，而是在做储备体系的结构调整。美债虽有流动性，但有信用风险。黄金虽没利息，但它不欠任何人的债，也不看任何国家的脸色。
香港这次不是去抢伦敦的存量，而是给未来的增量修路。 谁修好了路，谁就掌握了未来黄金的话语权。
对我们意味着什么？如果你已经持有黄金：
别总用老眼光看恐高。如果这波上涨的推手是各国央行的长期配置，那它的逻辑就不是短期的情绪冲高。只要这个制度性买入的力量没变，每一次深调，可能都是给后来者留出的上车机会。
如果你想买黄金股：
记住一点，矿企最舒服的日子不是金价暴涨时，而是金价稳定在高位时。金价稳，现金流就稳。未来那些成本控制好、负债低的头部矿企，会越来越像那种分红稳定的现金奶牛，而不是以前那种大起大落的周期妖股。
如果你是美股投资者：
别看见黄金涨就去乱买那些高杠杆的小公司。在这个制度化阶段，市场奖励的是可持续性，而不是弹性。要选就选那些能把高金价变成真金白银分红的公司。
最后再说句心里话
很多人担心黄金涨多了要崩，其实是在用旧的尺子量新的布。
这轮变化，本质上是黄金正在被重新制度化。当一项资产开始被纳入税收优惠、被建立清算系统、被视为底仓配置时，它就很难再退回那个可有可无的备胎位置了。
看黄金，别只盯着价格，要盯着规则
价格是结果，规则才是原因。只要规则还在往这个方向走，咱们做决策时，心里就该多几分底气。
Mark
TheStreet Roundtable
·
--
Billionaire Ray Dalio warns of major threat to investor wealth
Gold vs Bitcoin: Which one is a better store of value? (2:59)
If billionaire hedge fund manager Ray Dalio is right, the biggest risk for investors today is not volatility, but wealth destruction.
Dalio has been sharing chapters from his book "Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order" on X. The book was published right in the middle of the pandemic in 2021.
It was the time when the shock of the unknown had died, and people were learning to live with Covid-19.
Related: Crypto market sees $2B in liquidations — bigger than Covid and FTX crashes
Markets, governments and central banks were injecting trillions of dollars to ensure recovery from the crash of 2020.
While this led to an increase in retail participation and better risk appetite, volatility remained high and inflation fears loomed large.
The book made sense for investors at that time who were trying to navigate the landscape in unpredictable scenarios.
But Dalio is revisiting one of the concepts he mentioned in the book called "Big Cycle." And market conditions today indicate that we might see history repeat itself.
Related: Ray Dalio issues stark warning on the global order
The threat Dalio sees
"Big Cycle" is a long-term pattern that often lasts for decades. This is where countries rise and decline economically, politically, and financially.
The most dangerous part of this cycle is its late stage. Dalio warns that this is the stage when fortunes are wiped out, currencies are devalued, and traditional portfolios fail to protect capital.
As per Dalio, markets are primarily driven by four forces, which are growth, inflation, risk premiums, and discount rates. Governments influence all four through fiscal and monetary policy. When debt builds to unsustainable levels, policymakers typically respond by printing money, suppressing interest rates, and restructuring obligations.
The result? Financial assets like stocks, bonds, and cash can lose real value.
In his latest chapters, Dalio argues that credit-fueled financial promises now exceed real tangible assets, an indicator of late-cycle conditions.
Dalio cautions investors against studying only the post-1950 U.S. boom, which he describes as an unusually stable and prosperous period. He directs investors to look at the 1900s when seven of the 10 leading global powers experienced near-total wealth destruction due to wars, defaults, or internal upheaval. In many cases, investors saw their savings confiscated, markets shut down, or currencies collapse.
"If I hadn’t looked at these returns in the period before the new world order began in 1945, I wouldn’t have seen these periods of destruction. And had I not looked back 500 years around the world, I wouldn’t have seen that this has happened repeatedly almost everywhere."
Dalio points out similar market situations and suggests investors build “all-weather” portfolios that are diversified. Blend equities for growth, gold and commodities for protection, and be cautious on long-term bonds, especially in environments where inflation and currency risk remain elevated.
Popular on TheStreet Roundtable:
Trump imposes major global tariffs after Supreme Court's decision
Rich Dad Poor Dad buys Bitcoin again
Viral AI agent bans ‘Bitcoin,' ‘crypto’ mentions
Can Bitcoin enter the conversation?
Bitcoin (BTC) was not around during past Big Cycles. But its core design directly addresses several of the risks Dalio outlines.
Unlike bonds or fiat currencies, Bitcoin is not a promise to pay. It is not backed by a government balance sheet. Its supply is capped at 21 million coins, making it resistant to monetary expansion.
In late-cycle environments where central banks print to relieve debt burdens, scarce assets tend to outperform cash and long-duration bonds. Gold has traditionally played that role.
Many Bitcoin proponents argue that its digital scarcity could serve a similar function, particularly for younger investors who are more comfortable with digital infrastructure.
That does not mean Bitcoin is immune to liquidity cycles. In fact, crypto markets remain highly sensitive to changes in interest rates and global risk appetite. When discount rates rise and liquidity tightens, speculative assets often suffer.
Related: Bitcoin as a Hedge Against Government Money Printing
Beyond the 60/40 portfolio
At the core of Dalio’s research is diversification beyond traditional stocks and bonds. While it can extend to Bitcoin, we need to remember that it is still young.
It has not been tested through a full geopolitical restructuring cycle like the early 20th century. It remains volatile, politically debated, and regulatory-sensitive.
In fact, even comparatively milder political turmoils like the U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to increase tariffs on Chinese goods, the Greenland debate, and others have affected Bitcoin's price.
At press time, Bitcoin had dropped 25.4% in the past 30 days, trading at $64,476.82.
Yet if Dalio’s late-cycle thesis holds, then assets outside the traditional financial promise system may gain strategic importance.
The key takeaway from Dalio is to not panic but be prepared to save one's purchasing power.
Related: Billionaire Ray Dalio encourages investors to embrace bitcoin over debt assets
If billionaire hedge fund manager Ray Dalio is right, the biggest risk for investors today is not volatility, but wealth destruction.
Dalio has been sharing chapters from his book "Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order" on X. The book was published right in the middle of the pandemic in 2021.
It was the time when the shock of the unknown had died, and people were learning to live with Covid-19.
Related: Crypto market sees $2B in liquidations — bigger than Covid and FTX crashes
Markets, governments and central banks were injecting trillions of dollars to ensure recovery from the crash of 2020.
While this led to an increase in retail participation and better risk appetite, volatility remained high and inflation fears loomed large.
The book made sense for investors at that time who were trying to navigate the landscape in unpredictable scenarios.
But Dalio is revisiting one of the concepts he mentioned in the book called "Big Cycle." And market conditions today indicate that we might see history repeat itself.
Related: Ray Dalio issues stark warning on the global order
The threat Dalio sees
"Big Cycle" is a long-term pattern that often lasts for decades. This is where countries rise and decline economically, politically, and financially.
The most dangerous part of this cycle is its late stage. Dalio warns that this is the stage when fortunes are wiped out, currencies are devalued, and traditional portfolios fail to protect capital.
As per Dalio, markets are primarily driven by four forces, which are growth, inflation, risk premiums, and discount rates. Governments influence all four through fiscal and monetary policy. When debt builds to unsustainable levels, policymakers typically respond by printing money, suppressing interest rates, and restructuring obligations.
The result? Financial assets like stocks, bonds, and cash can lose real value.
In his latest chapters, Dalio argues that credit-fueled financial promises now exceed real tangible assets, an indicator of late-cycle conditions.
Dalio cautions investors against studying only the post-1950 U.S. boom, which he describes as an unusually stable and prosperous period. He directs investors to look at the 1900s when seven of the 10 leading global powers experienced near-total wealth destruction due to wars, defaults, or internal upheaval. In many cases, investors saw their savings confiscated, markets shut down, or currencies collapse.
"If I hadn’t looked at these returns in the period before the new world order began in 1945, I wouldn’t have seen these periods of destruction. And had I not looked back 500 years around the world, I wouldn’t have seen that this has happened repeatedly almost everywhere."
Dalio points out similar market situations and suggests investors build “all-weather” portfolios that are diversified. Blend equities for growth, gold and commodities for protection, and be cautious on long-term bonds, especially in environments where inflation and currency risk remain elevated.
Popular on TheStreet Roundtable:
Trump imposes major global tariffs after Supreme Court's decision
Rich Dad Poor Dad buys Bitcoin again
Viral AI agent bans ‘Bitcoin,' ‘crypto’ mentions
Can Bitcoin enter the conversation?
Bitcoin (BTC) was not around during past Big Cycles. But its core design directly addresses several of the risks Dalio outlines.
Unlike bonds or fiat currencies, Bitcoin is not a promise to pay. It is not backed by a government balance sheet. Its supply is capped at 21 million coins, making it resistant to monetary expansion.
In late-cycle environments where central banks print to relieve debt burdens, scarce assets tend to outperform cash and long-duration bonds. Gold has traditionally played that role.
Many Bitcoin proponents argue that its digital scarcity could serve a similar function, particularly for younger investors who are more comfortable with digital infrastructure.
That does not mean Bitcoin is immune to liquidity cycles. In fact, crypto markets remain highly sensitive to changes in interest rates and global risk appetite. When discount rates rise and liquidity tightens, speculative assets often suffer.
Related: Bitcoin as a Hedge Against Government Money Printing
Beyond the 60/40 portfolio
At the core of Dalio’s research is diversification beyond traditional stocks and bonds. While it can extend to Bitcoin, we need to remember that it is still young.
It has not been tested through a full geopolitical restructuring cycle like the early 20th century. It remains volatile, politically debated, and regulatory-sensitive.
In fact, even comparatively milder political turmoils like the U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to increase tariffs on Chinese goods, the Greenland debate, and others have affected Bitcoin's price.
At press time, Bitcoin had dropped 25.4% in the past 30 days, trading at $64,476.82.
Yet if Dalio’s late-cycle thesis holds, then assets outside the traditional financial promise system may gain strategic importance.
The key takeaway from Dalio is to not panic but be prepared to save one's purchasing power.
Related: Billionaire Ray Dalio encourages investors to embrace bitcoin over debt assets
2026/2/25 盘前（BTC/ETH）
今天先定调：不是顺风盘。
DXY偏强，10Y还在4%上面，这种环境我不太想一上来就激进。
所以今天还是老样子：右侧确认优先，不抢跑。
尤其是反抽盘，最容易看着很强，追上去刚好吃回落。
我今天只看两个开关：
1.$BTC ：66,200–66,700 这段怎么走
1）这段如果能站稳，说明修复有机会升级
2）如果冲上去站不稳，那就是我更想看的“回抽失败”结构
2.$ETH
：1900附近回踩能不能守住
1）守住并且再转强，才考虑跟
2）守不住，就按反抽看，不脑补反转
盘面感觉（目前）
1）市场是修复没错，但更像主流币在带
2）情绪还在恐惧区，说明反抽可以快，但持续性不一定好
3）山寨我今天不会撒网，只挑结构清楚的看
观察标的（今天）
A：BTC/ ETH（主看）
B：SOL（波动大，只做右侧，不抄底）
B：BNB（偏跟随，看1H结构再说）
执行提醒（写给自己）
1）反抽不等于反转
2）没确认不出手
3）单笔风险照旧 0.5%–1%
4）别在BTC/ETH/SOL同向叠太多仓位
就盯这两个开关，别看太多。
今天做的是“确认后的那一段”，不是去猜最低点最高点。
仅作个人盘前记录，不构成投资建议。
今天先定调：不是顺风盘。
DXY偏强，10Y还在4%上面，这种环境我不太想一上来就激进。
所以今天还是老样子：右侧确认优先，不抢跑。
尤其是反抽盘，最容易看着很强，追上去刚好吃回落。
我今天只看两个开关：
1.$BTC ：66,200–66,700 这段怎么走
1）这段如果能站稳，说明修复有机会升级
2）如果冲上去站不稳，那就是我更想看的“回抽失败”结构
2.$ETH
：1900附近回踩能不能守住
1）守住并且再转强，才考虑跟
2）守不住，就按反抽看，不脑补反转
盘面感觉（目前）
1）市场是修复没错，但更像主流币在带
2）情绪还在恐惧区，说明反抽可以快，但持续性不一定好
3）山寨我今天不会撒网，只挑结构清楚的看
观察标的（今天）
A：BTC/ ETH（主看）
B：SOL（波动大，只做右侧，不抄底）
B：BNB（偏跟随，看1H结构再说）
执行提醒（写给自己）
1）反抽不等于反转
2）没确认不出手
3）单笔风险照旧 0.5%–1%
4）别在BTC/ETH/SOL同向叠太多仓位
就盯这两个开关，别看太多。
今天做的是“确认后的那一段”，不是去猜最低点最高点。
仅作个人盘前记录，不构成投资建议。
交易里很多人亏钱，不是因为看错方向，
而是把“现象”当成“结论”。
分享10条我自己很认同的交易认知：
1、涨得猛，跌得慢，往往不是见顶，可能是强势换手。
别急着看空，先看回调有没有失守关键位。
2、跌得急，反弹弱，先别抄底。
拉不起来的反弹，多半不是机会，是陷阱。
3、高位放量，不一定见顶；放量后走不动，才危险。
真正要警惕的，是冲高后承接消失。
4、底部一次放量，未必是真底；持续承接，才更可信。
真底不是一根K线喊出来的，是市场慢慢确认出来的。
5、炒币炒到最后，拼的不是指标，是对情绪的理解。
量能，是市场人心最直接的反映。
6、会交易的人，不是每次都出手的人。
能空仓，才有资格等大机会。
7、不怕错，怕的是错了还硬扛。
交易里最贵的不是止损，是执念。
8、先判断今天适不适合做，再判断做多还是做空。
结构不清时，方向判断的意义很低。
9、你以为自己输在技术，很多时候其实输在动作变形。
追单、赌气单、计划外加仓，才是回撤放大器。
10、高手不是看得更准，而是错了退得更快。
长期活下来，靠的不是神单，是风控一致性。
交易不是比谁更敢，
而是比谁更稳。
先活下来，才有下一波。
而是把“现象”当成“结论”。
分享10条我自己很认同的交易认知：
1、涨得猛，跌得慢，往往不是见顶，可能是强势换手。
别急着看空，先看回调有没有失守关键位。
2、跌得急，反弹弱，先别抄底。
拉不起来的反弹，多半不是机会，是陷阱。
3、高位放量，不一定见顶；放量后走不动，才危险。
真正要警惕的，是冲高后承接消失。
4、底部一次放量，未必是真底；持续承接，才更可信。
真底不是一根K线喊出来的，是市场慢慢确认出来的。
5、炒币炒到最后，拼的不是指标，是对情绪的理解。
量能，是市场人心最直接的反映。
6、会交易的人，不是每次都出手的人。
能空仓，才有资格等大机会。
7、不怕错，怕的是错了还硬扛。
交易里最贵的不是止损，是执念。
8、先判断今天适不适合做，再判断做多还是做空。
结构不清时，方向判断的意义很低。
9、你以为自己输在技术，很多时候其实输在动作变形。
追单、赌气单、计划外加仓，才是回撤放大器。
10、高手不是看得更准，而是错了退得更快。
长期活下来，靠的不是神单，是风控一致性。
交易不是比谁更敢，
而是比谁更稳。
先活下来，才有下一波。
Log in to explore more content