Market selling off on fake drama. OpenAI's revenue "miss" from $70B to $50B? Pure accounting noise, not a real slowdown.
The gap? Cloud partner revenue. Anthropic counts AWS/Google Cloud flow-through revenue, OpenAI doesn't. Investors adjusted OpenAI's number to match Anthropic's methodology โ that's where $70B came from.
So we're not talking about a $20B revenue collapse. We're talking about whether you count cloud partner pass-through or not. Apples vs oranges.
The fact that the market is treating this as some existential AI crisis is absurd. This is a comparability issue, not a business problem.
If you're selling $MSFT, $GOOGL, $NVDA, or AI-related names because of this headline, you're getting played by bad accounting comparisons and lazy narratives.
The gap? Cloud partner revenue. Anthropic counts AWS/Google Cloud flow-through revenue, OpenAI doesn't. Investors adjusted OpenAI's number to match Anthropic's methodology โ that's where $70B came from.
So we're not talking about a $20B revenue collapse. We're talking about whether you count cloud partner pass-through or not. Apples vs oranges.
The fact that the market is treating this as some existential AI crisis is absurd. This is a comparability issue, not a business problem.
If you're selling $MSFT, $GOOGL, $NVDA, or AI-related names because of this headline, you're getting played by bad accounting comparisons and lazy narratives.