Binance Square
#dvp

dvp

931 views
6 Discussing
链上霸主
·
--
Solana 基金会于 10 月 6 日推出了开源机构结算标准 Solana DvP,采用券款对付(delivery-versus-payment)模式。每笔交易的现金与资产两端必须全额预存到位后才能执行,双方代币先各自放入独立托管,再同时完成划转。原子交易机制可防止付了钱拿不到资产的情况,但该标准本身不提供现金或融资。$SOL #Solana #DvP #机构结算 (来源:X)
Solana 基金会于 10 月 6 日推出了开源机构结算标准 Solana DvP,采用券款对付(delivery-versus-payment)模式。每笔交易的现金与资产两端必须全额预存到位后才能执行,双方代币先各自放入独立托管,再同时完成划转。原子交易机制可防止付了钱拿不到资产的情况,但该标准本身不提供现金或融资。$SOL #Solana #DvP #机构结算 (来源:X)
Solana DvP: activo y pago en una sola liquidación El 6 de octubre, Solana Foundation anunció Solana DvP, un programa abierto para que instituciones intercambien activos tokenizados mediante entrega contra pago. El comunicado se publicó ese mismo día. La idea: las dos transferencias de tokens en Solana se ejecutan juntas en una transacción, o ninguna. Esto reduce el riesgo de entregar el activo sin recibir la contraprestación; no incorpora automáticamente un pago bancario externo. El código tiene licencia MIT. J.P. Morgan aportó conocimiento sobre prácticas de liquidación: eso no significa que el banco opere, avale o garantice el programa. La Fundación informó auditorías externas, aunque también convocó participantes antes de la versión de producción. El anuncio no demuestra adopción bancaria generalizada. Persisten riesgos de código, liquidez y emisor. Las facultades de congelación o pausa de ciertos tokens pueden impedir liquidaciones o reembolsos. La atomicidad tampoco garantiza el valor ni el canje del activo. Lectura de mercado: Binance (7 de octubre, 14:37–14:38 UTC) mostraba SOL en 115,87 USDT (−4,38% en 24h), BTC −3,59% y ETH −5,52%. La utilidad dependerá del uso efectivo; el anuncio no explica por sí solo estas caídas ni garantiza una subida. $SOL $BTC $ETH Contenido Educativo. No asesoramiento financiero. #Solana #DvP #Tokenizacion #Liquidacion #BinanceSquare
Solana DvP: activo y pago en una sola liquidación

El 6 de octubre, Solana Foundation anunció Solana DvP, un programa abierto para que instituciones intercambien activos tokenizados mediante entrega contra pago. El comunicado se publicó ese mismo día.

La idea: las dos transferencias de tokens en Solana se ejecutan juntas en una transacción, o ninguna. Esto reduce el riesgo de entregar el activo sin recibir la contraprestación; no incorpora automáticamente un pago bancario externo.

El código tiene licencia MIT. J.P. Morgan aportó conocimiento sobre prácticas de liquidación: eso no significa que el banco opere, avale o garantice el programa.

La Fundación informó auditorías externas, aunque también convocó participantes antes de la versión de producción. El anuncio no demuestra adopción bancaria generalizada.

Persisten riesgos de código, liquidez y emisor. Las facultades de congelación o pausa de ciertos tokens pueden impedir liquidaciones o reembolsos. La atomicidad tampoco garantiza el valor ni el canje del activo.

Lectura de mercado: Binance (7 de octubre, 14:37–14:38 UTC) mostraba SOL en 115,87 USDT (−4,38% en 24h), BTC −3,59% y ETH −5,52%. La utilidad dependerá del uso efectivo; el anuncio no explica por sí solo estas caídas ni garantiza una subida.

$SOL $BTC $ETH

Contenido Educativo. No asesoramiento financiero.

#Solana #DvP #Tokenizacion #Liquidacion #BinanceSquare
·
--
Bullish
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation Yesterday, I met an old classmate for the first time in a year. We started talking about his job, and one thing he told me made me think about how easily a financial transaction can look “done” before the actual exchange is complete. I started looking at tokenized markets through that lens. A token can be issued. A trade can be agreed. But neither necessarily means the financial exchange has settled. What I find important here is that two things still have to happen: The buyer receives the asset. The seller receives the payment. The critical question is whether those two events can be coordinated so that one side does not complete while the other remains pending. That is the logic behind delivery-versus-payment. If the asset moves first, the seller carries payment risk. If payment moves first, the buyer carries delivery risk. If both depend on separate systems and intermediaries, the transaction is only as synchronized as those systems allow. This is where I think atomic execution becomes important. The goal is not simply to record that a trade happened. It is to make the exchange itself capable of reaching a clearly defined final state: asset delivered + payment delivered. The more I looked at Dusk in the context of regulated financial markets, the more this distinction stood out to me. Putting an asset on-chain is only the beginning. The real financial utility appears when the infrastructure can coordinate the exchange around that asset with less dependence on fragmented settlement processes. That is why I keep coming back to one question: Can the financial exchange around that token reach final settlement as one coordinated event? ⚖️ Tokenization creates the representation. Settlement creates the completed transaction. #Settlement #DvP #DigitalAssets #Blockchain
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk Yesterday, I met an old classmate for the first time in a year.

We started talking about his job, and one thing he told me made me think about how easily a financial transaction can look “done” before the actual exchange is complete.

I started looking at tokenized markets through that lens.

A token can be issued.

A trade can be agreed.

But neither necessarily means the financial exchange has settled.

What I find important here is that two things still have to happen:

The buyer receives the asset.
The seller receives the payment.

The critical question is whether those two events can be coordinated so that one side does not complete while the other remains pending.

That is the logic behind delivery-versus-payment.

If the asset moves first, the seller carries payment risk.

If payment moves first, the buyer carries delivery risk.

If both depend on separate systems and intermediaries, the transaction is only as synchronized as those systems allow.

This is where I think atomic execution becomes important.

The goal is not simply to record that a trade happened.

It is to make the exchange itself capable of reaching a clearly defined final state:

asset delivered + payment delivered.

The more I looked at Dusk in the context of regulated financial markets, the more this distinction stood out to me.

Putting an asset on-chain is only the beginning.

The real financial utility appears when the infrastructure can coordinate the exchange around that asset with less dependence on fragmented settlement processes.

That is why I keep coming back to one question:

Can the financial exchange around that
token reach final settlement as one
coordinated event? ⚖️

Tokenization creates the representation.

Settlement creates the completed transaction.

#Settlement #DvP #DigitalAssets #Blockchain
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number