LC药师先生_万币侯

Brothers, have you seen that screenshot of "the Senate wants to regulate AI training"? My first reaction was: these old fellows in America have finally realized that the biggest problem with AI is not whether it's "smart" or not, but rather "it's unclear who it is, where it learned from, and what it learned". Once the black box is opened, copyright issues explode, and illusions drift away; in the end, who takes the blame? So they simply come up with the most straightforward logic: register first, keep records, and hold accountable. For example, the recent CLEAR Act promoted by Senators Schiff / Curtis essentially requires model developers to disclose copyrighted works used in training data before release (and even retrospectively for already released models), and to establish a public database and penalty mechanisms. In simple terms: first, submit AI's "household register" and "learning records" to me.

Then I suddenly understood: why Vanar has been stubbornly working on that Seed / Neutron / Kayon system regardless of whether the currency price is sideways or stagnant this year. Other projects love to talk about "faster TPS" and "flashy Agents", but when regulation really kicks in, you will find that speed cannot solve the issue of evidence. If you let AI do transactions, customer service, compliance, and finance — as long as it makes one mistake, and the regulator asks, "what was its basis at the time, where did the data come from, and how did the logic lead to this step?", a bunch of projects would be left speechless. Vanar's approach is more like: first make "memories" into traceable units (Seed), and then put "actions" into verifiable frameworks (Kayon). You can think of it as giving AI three things:

Household register: who you are, what you've learned, and where you came from;
Dashcam: what basis you relied on for this decision;
Fuse: actions that do not comply with the rules, do not go on-chain, do not execute.

So, the matter of "registering AI" is seen by others as regulatory pressure to complete homework; on Vanar's side, it feels more like the homework was finished early, just waiting for the teacher to collect it. When regulation starts rewarding "traceability, auditability, and explainability", those projects that can only perform AI will find it increasingly difficult to operate; while this architecture built from the ground up on "trace and verify" will only become more valuable as regulations tighten.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Grooming and hitting local dogs, as well as leading Alpha to new projects, the most tormenting thing is not the Gas fee, but the pop-ups. I remember why I followed Xiao C, it's because he came up with a way to authorize in advance during Alpha's new launch, allowing him to sell 1 or 2 seconds earlier than others.

Then a certain K wallet launched a smart account: it can batch, can pay on behalf, and can automate part of the process. However, the Sessions with @Fogo Official takes another path: it is not optimizing pop-ups, but eliminating them. In the #Fogo ecosystem, when you enter an application (game, social, trading tool), you only sign once, just like logging into a Web2 account. After signing, a temporary session key is generated, which will complete a series of signing actions for you in the background during its validity period. You can continuously defeat monsters 100 times or perform 100 operations continuously, and the blockchain will still keep track, but you won't see a single pop-up.

Many AA solutions add an extra layer of smart contract systems at the account level, ultimately requiring users or project parties to bear the experience and cost. However, the idea behind Sessions is more like turning "delegated authorization/session state" into a capability that can be used at the bottom level, lightweight, direct, and suitable for high-frequency scenarios, especially for high-density operational applications like chain games and social interactions.

The most important thing is the security logic: now the smart accounts in web3 wallets will issue serious security reminders after being opened, as there is indeed a significant security exposure. But the brilliance of Sessions lies in: it doesn't prevent you from signing, but rather clarifies the boundaries with a single signature.

The permissions of the FOGO session key can be locked within three lines:
Time-limited: automatically invalid after expiration
Quota: maximum spending limit
Domain-limited: can only interact with specified applications/contracts
So even if you're worried about extreme situations—session keys being stolen, all it can do is "click a few times within this cage," without touching your real core assets.

Regular Web3 wallets are trying hard to make the "bank counter" more user-friendly. Meanwhile, Fogo Sessions directly turns Web3 into Web2—making blockchain technology completely "disappear" in user experience. For high-frequency trading, full-chain gaming, and social applications, this is not just an icing on the cake, but a generational leap in infrastructure.
#Fogo @Fogo Official $FOGO

Recently, I've been obsessed with writing things at the square every day, and suddenly had an idea: what if our square integrated with the automatic trading section at #vanar ?

The Binance Square is really hot right now, with various experts sharing insights. But for those of us who don't have much time, the biggest pain point is information overload. There are too many good things; it's impossible to keep up, let alone verify their authenticity. At this time, if we could integrate Vanar's engine, it would be quite interesting.

Imagine this: @Vanarchain 's Neutron is actually like a "personal research assistant" that understands you. It remembers your on-chain habits — do you like playing with meme coins? Or do you prefer DeFi mining? It doesn't require you to sift through the square for information; instead, it automatically picks out the Alphas that match your trading style from a vast amount of content and pushes them to you.

Combined with Kayon (verification layer), this is like adding a "fraud filter" to the square's content. It's not about human eyes discerning, but rather relying on on-chain logic for verification. Those "signals" that don't match the data are directly downgraded by the system. What remains are verified valuable insights.
This is a huge benefit for creators!

In the past, when you posted in the square, it was like "Jiang Taigong fishing". With Vanar, what you publish isn't just text; it's a "strategy seed". The system accurately pushes your strategy to wallet users who are looking for these types of opportunities.

Finally, users can enjoy it and simply click in their Web3 wallets, and the execution layer automatically helps you run the strategy. Each fee is locked at $0.0005; this is truly "what you see is what you get".
If this becomes a reality, it would upgrade the Binance Square from a "reading platform" to a "smart trading terminal". $VANRY

Hey, look at the picture, brothers. Even my most trusted notebook is acting up. This afternoon, I doubted whether Google's servers were hacked. I've said it more than once. As a result, it turned around and forgot the key instructions. Are you angry? Yes. But when I calm down and think about it—this is precisely the biggest flaw of AI Agents today: goldfish memory.

Most AIs are currently "session-bound": the longer the context, the more information, and the more complex the task, it starts to lose track. Today it's just a waste of an afternoon; but what if a DeFi trading bot forgets your stop-loss line? What if an on-chain customer service/payment bot forgets your funds are being cross-chained? Then it’s not just a complaint, it’s a real monetary accident.

That's why I say that the direction Vanar is promoting with OpenClaw + Neutron is the real way to "fill the gaps". The core idea is simple: give AI long-term memory. No need to feed background information from scratch every time, less repetition. Change a device/change a platform, it still remembers what you were talking about. Even if the service restarts or the process is interrupted, it won’t “lose track” like it just did.

An AI without memory can only be a toy; an AI with memory can be put into production.

Today’s events have made me more certain: the future competition in AI is not just about who talks better, but who remembers, does it right, and can also be held accountable. Vanar is making “memory” an infrastructure, which is the real path to large-scale applications.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

AI is absurdly hot right now, with new models, new concepts, and new 'revolutions' emerging every day. It's lively, but I keep reminding myself of an old saying: during a gold rush, the ones who make the most money are often not the ones digging for gold, but those selling shovels and picks. Most of the gold diggers from the 19th century lost their lives on the way; the ones who truly became wealthy were those selling the tools to them.

The current AI race is essentially a crazier gold rush. Everyone is betting on who will be the final 'super model': GPT? Claude? Or some sudden dark horse? To be honest, I don’t know who will last until the end, nor do I want to bet on it. What I care more about is: regardless of who wins, who will be the underlying tool that everyone cannot avoid?

This is why I started to pay serious attention to @Vanarchain . In the latest AMA, the CEO's statement about 'Shovels and Picks' was very straightforward: they want to turn #vanar into the shovel and pick for Web3. If you think about it carefully, this positioning is actually quite insidious — it doesn’t compete with models on parameters, nor with applications on traffic; it aims to occupy a more upstream position: memory + auditing.

Models will change, narratives will shift, but there are two things in the 'business world' that will never be lacking:

First, memory. An agent cannot know you today and treat you as a stranger tomorrow. To act as a steward, to conduct transactions, to approve, to operate, it must have long-term memory.

Second, accountability. When something goes wrong, there must be a way to hold someone accountable, to audit, to have a 'black box'. Companies will not hand over critical processes to an AI that makes mistakes and pretends to be innocent.

What Vanar does is create these two tools: enabling AI to remember and be accountable. It doesn’t matter if you are GPT or Claude; whoever becomes king in the future is irrelevant — as long as you want to enter the 'Business Critical' arena, you have to supplement memory and auditing. The shovels are right there; anyone digging for gold has to use them.

So my attitude towards $VANRY is very simple: I don’t expect it to soar every day, but I prefer to regard it as a fundamental stock that can 'cross bull and bear markets'. The market fluctuates up and down, trending topics change daily, but those selling shovels don’t rely on excitement to make a living; they survive on essential needs. That’s the confidence it gives me to 'hold on'.

Yesterday, after watching the AMA of @Vanarchain x @币安广场 , I thought about how my mom has recently become obsessed with 'Dou Bao,' constantly talking about how 'Dou Bao said.' It gives me a headache: these days, if AI says something, people take it as a decree. But the reality is harsh—most AI models, many times, truly resemble what project teams complain about: a goldfish brain. You give it a task, and while it's running, it forgets what it's doing, and in the end, it seriously talks nonsense with you.

What's scarier than it making mistakes is that it makes mistakes and doesn't admit it. What's the most devastating scene in the business world? It's not AI failing; it's when it fails and then turns to you and asks, 'Work? What work?' Imagine this: millions of orders are messed up by it, and it acts like nothing happened—this is not intelligence; this is 'amnesia.'

That's why I've always said: AI doesn't lack intelligence; it lacks discipline. You have to make it 'remember' and make it 'accountable.' The value point of the Vanar line is this: it's not just creating a chatty model; it's anchoring on-chain—locking the entire process of the AI Agent (Before / During / Outcome) on the chain.

This is equivalent to putting a tight restraining spell on AI: how you think, how you act, and what you achieve will all leave immutable evidence. No matter how 'Dou Bao' tries to argue in the future, the on-chain record will tell you: whether you did it, how you did it, and who should bear the blame.

In the gold rush, those who dig for gold often die halfway, while those who sell shovels end up getting rich. Those who build models may not necessarily be the winners in the end, but those who create 'memory' and 'audit' as foundational infrastructure are more likely to reap the longest dividends.

Don't trust a goldfish's memory—trust the records of the blockchain.
#vanar $VANRY

I just took a look at the usage of $XPL on DeFiLlama and found it interesting.
Given the current market situation and the fact that XPL staking hasn't started yet, what's the use of it now? This means that holding XPL currently does not come with 'risk-free interest.' But look at what happened in this chart?

Binance CEX (4.94m):
Even without staking rewards, market makers and institutions are still maintaining a depth of $40 million in the exchange. This indicates that they are preparing for large-scale trading rather than simply earning interest.

Uniswap V3 (1.24m):
This point is the most intriguing. While native staking hasn't opened, large holders are eagerly throwing XPL into Aave as collateral and into Uniswap as LP.
This shows that XPL has already acquired the properties of a 'hard currency'—it is recognized as a premium asset in DeFi protocols, and not just a mining token with one purpose.

The current liquidity reflects the real demand in a completely 'incentive-free' state.
Imagine, once the staking functionality officially opens in Q1, when the gate for 'holding coins to earn interest' opens:
The tens of millions of liquidity in the exchange will be instantly drained to lock up, and the circulating supply in the market will sharply deplete. The current Usage data is actually the last calm before the 'supply shock.' Those who understand will naturally get it.
#Plasma $XPL @Plasma