Trader Institutional, Entrepreneuer & Analyst since 2018 · Binance KOL & BNBChain Martian. Building at Web3 and Sovereign Infrastructure. X/Twitter: @mektrader_
Bitcoin could gain privacy and quantum resistance without changing a single line of the protocol. 🚨
That’s the proposal from researchers at Imperial College London and Orbs.
The main problem today is that migrating a blockchain to post-quantum cryptography makes signatures and proofs much heavier, bloating the network.
Their solution is to take all of that off the network.
The proofs and signatures stay with the user (so-called client-side validation), and only the bare minimum goes on the network: three hashes per transaction.
A new mechanism called the “degrifer” ensures ownership and prevents double spending, using only hash commitments.
On-chain signatures would no longer exist.
For now, it’s just a paper, not working code.
But the debate about quantum computing and Bitcoin has always stumbled over the idea that defense would require a soft fork.
Even with the expected sweep of the $80–81k range, flagged on the 8th, this region has not been fully liquidated.
The entry of long positions during the price rebound over the weekend, especially yesterday, added more capital to this same region.
Now that the price is beginning to slow down its rebound, we could see a move into this zone simply due to low liquidity.
In that case, watching the price reaction around $80k will be very important, as absorption in this zone will determine whether the $75k range is in play.
Between these two zones lies a liquidity gap in futures, so the answer will come from the spot market.
I would be cautious about taking short positions below $80k.
On the contrary, this could be a major opportunity for longs, but we’ll only get better confirmation once we’re there.
As expected, short-term investors are starting to realize losses on-chain. ✅
After entering local euphoria above $85K, these investors are beginning to show signs of local capitulation, which generally supports interesting short-term price floors.
This drop hasn’t yet generated a major spike in realized losses, so if there’s no spot buying re-entry and increase in demand, it could persist for a few more days.
Maybe now you understand why I posted earlier about being cautious of FOMO.
It’s rare, but it happens in every microstructure.
Retail traders follow trends late because they trade on news and narratives, not data.
They’re late to buy upward moves and leave far too late during price corrections.
Then they blame “the market.” They blame “whales manipulating the market.”
We’re forming an interesting re-entry pattern, with SOPR falling below 1.
In the coming days, we may hear “analysts” saying the bear market is back, and that they’re going to sell so they can buy below $60K at the “real bottom.”
That will be the time to get optimistic again.
Buy the blood
Were you paying attention?
Mek
·
--
STH profit expenses start to decline in Bitcoin. 🚨
This pattern of reduced local profitability among short-term participants usually marks an exhaustion point in the microstructure.
That’s why, over the past few days, I’ve been talking about caution regarding FOMO.
Many "analysts" who left their followers with +40% gains have started capitulating, saying they "were wrong."
Retail that follows narratives and news probably boosted this last push higher quite a bit.
Possibly entering late into the trend and buying the move already at exhaustion.
It wouldn’t be surprising to see Bitcoin weaken for a few days/weeks, even though it could still give one last gasp in the short term.
It’s generally in this kind of weakness that inexperienced retail that followed the narrative tends to sell in panic.
And at that time, the structure resets. Because these same guys will think, "it’ll go back to 62k, so I’ll sell to buy back below."
They never get the perfect entry—they sell at the bottom, then come back buying for a higher price.
🇧🇷 While the world debates the Strait of Hormuz, Brazil has set a RECORD for OIL production.
4.62 million barrels per day in August.
Up 18% in twelve months.
That’s about 700,000 barrels per day of new supply in one year. More than several OPEC members produce in total.
Now put that next to the other figure.
Flows through the Strait of Hormuz are around 6 million barrels per day, close to 30% of pre-conflict levels.
In other words, in twelve months Brazil alone added more than 10% of everything that can still pass through the planet’s most heavily constrained strait.
And then there’s the geography, which almost no one talks about.
This oil comes from deepwater pre-salt fields and is shipped across the Atlantic.
No chokepoint, no mandatory passage, no Iran in the way.
The Gulf is bottlenecked as it tries to get oil out. The Atlantic just keeps adding supply.
That changes what a Brazilian barrel is worth. It’s not just greater volume—it’s a barrel with a logistics reliability premium at a time when reliability is the scarcest asset in the energy market.
Brazil is becoming a strategic energy supplier at the worst geopolitical moment in decades.
That’s 4,632 BTC, about US$ 384,5 million, plus US$ 119 million in USDT and 750 WBTC.
Yesterday, it was 834 BTC.
Today, it’s five times as much, headed to the same destination: deposits into Coinbase Prime.
The coins are coming from wallets linked to the Bitfinex and FTX seizures, passing through intermediary addresses in batches of 2,818 and 1,418 BTC, and then being deposited into the exchange’s institutional service.
Will the Trump administration break its promise not to sell any more bitcoin?
Mek
·
--
U.S. government SELLING Bitcoin? 👀
The U.S. government moved another 834 BTC today, worth around US$ 71,56 million, to Coinbase Prime.
Alongside that, 40,285 BNB were moved, worth another US$ 31,63 million.
The funds in these wallets come from seizures linked to FTX, Alameda, and Bitfinex.