FARID PK
1.8k Posts
FARID PK
Report
Block User
آنسو کو لاکھ سمجھایا تنہائی میں آیا کروں یوں بھری محفل میں تماشہ نہ بنایا کروں فرید آنسو بھی تو پھر آنسو ہے تڑپ کر بولا تجھے بری محفل میں اکیلا پایا تو چلا آیا
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
2.3 Years
3.5K+ Following
13.5K+ Followers
3.4K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
·
--
Article
Anthropic Researcher Resigns, Warns AI Race Could Put Humanity at RiskI resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available.
I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on improving model capabilities.
If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” - or take this moment to call for different conditions?
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.$BULLA $OPENAI $BNB
{future}(OPENAIUSDT)
#Write2Earn
Anthropic Researcher Resigns, Warns AI Race Could Put Humanity at Risk
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available.
I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on improving model capabilities.
If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” - or take this moment to call for different conditions?
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.$BULLA $OPENAI $BNB
#Write2Earn
Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available.
I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on improving model capabilities.
If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” - or take this moment to call for different conditions?
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.$BULLA $OPENAI $BNB
#Write2Earn
130
·
--
Looking at the oil move, the tariff backdrop, and how sticky some of those producer costs still are… I’m going with 0.5% on the PPI.
Market is priced for 0.4%, but I think we get a slightly hotter print. Nothing crazy, just enough to keep the rate-hike talk alive.
My personal lean before the number hits.
Looking at the oil move, the tariff backdrop, and how sticky some of those producer costs still are… I’m going with 0.5% on the PPI.
Market is priced for 0.4%, but I think we get a slightly hotter print. Nothing crazy, just enough to keep the rate-hike talk alive.
My personal lean before the number hits.
Market is priced for 0.4%, but I think we get a slightly hotter print. Nothing crazy, just enough to keep the rate-hike talk alive.
My personal lean before the number hits.
136
·
--
AKE just made massive candles within 15 minutes.
As traders, what exactly are we supposed to predict here?
RSI? Moving averages? Volume? Market structure? Hidden data?
When a coin moves this aggressively in such a short period, normal technical analysis can become almost useless. You can draw every indicator on the chart, but that doesn't mean you can predict the next candle.
So what do you actually analyze here?
Is this a setup worth trading, or simply a move that is impossible to predict with any real confidence?
I’m a trader too, but honestly, I can’t make a reliable prediction on AKE from this kind of price action.
Sometimes the best analysis is admitting that the chart doesn't give you enough information to predict what comes next.$AKE #Write2Earn
AKE just made massive candles within 15 minutes.
As traders, what exactly are we supposed to predict here?
RSI? Moving averages? Volume? Market structure? Hidden data?
When a coin moves this aggressively in such a short period, normal technical analysis can become almost useless. You can draw every indicator on the chart, but that doesn't mean you can predict the next candle.
So what do you actually analyze here?
Is this a setup worth trading, or simply a move that is impossible to predict with any real confidence?
I’m a trader too, but honestly, I can’t make a reliable prediction on AKE from this kind of price action.
Sometimes the best analysis is admitting that the chart doesn't give you enough information to predict what comes next.$AKE #Write2Earn
As traders, what exactly are we supposed to predict here?
RSI? Moving averages? Volume? Market structure? Hidden data?
When a coin moves this aggressively in such a short period, normal technical analysis can become almost useless. You can draw every indicator on the chart, but that doesn't mean you can predict the next candle.
So what do you actually analyze here?
Is this a setup worth trading, or simply a move that is impossible to predict with any real confidence?
I’m a trader too, but honestly, I can’t make a reliable prediction on AKE from this kind of price action.
Sometimes the best analysis is admitting that the chart doesn't give you enough information to predict what comes next.$AKE #Write2Earn
575
·
--
Article
Bitcoin’s Biggest Contradiction: Freedom or State Control?If the whole world eventually accepts Bitcoin, where does Bitcoin’s promise of freedom go?
Bitcoin was built around a simple idea: money should move without asking a government, central bank, or financial institution for permission.
That was the attraction.
But imagine the opposite future.
Imagine governments around the world fully recognize Bitcoin. Exchanges become licensed. Users must verify their identity. Transactions are monitored. Taxes are collected. Suspicious transfers are reported. Banks connect Bitcoin to the traditional financial system. Governments build rules around who can buy it, sell it, move it, and convert it.
Bitcoin may still exist.
It may even become more valuable.
But then comes the contradiction:
How can Bitcoin remain a truly independent financial system if almost every practical door to Bitcoin is controlled by the state?
And that leads to the second question.
Today, Bitcoin can operate relatively freely in many parts of the world. Some countries welcome it, some regulate it, and others restrict it. But can governments really accept a future in which a decentralized asset becomes powerful enough to influence national currencies, capital flows, taxation, and the financial behavior of millions of citizens?
That is where I see the real tension.
Governments do not necessarily need to destroy Bitcoin.
They can regulate it.
They can license the exchanges.
They can track the money entering and leaving the system.
They can collect taxes.
They can enforce anti-money-laundering rules.
They can control the legal points where Bitcoin meets the banking system.
And if that happens globally, Bitcoin may face its biggest paradox:
The more successful it becomes, the more government attention it receives. And the more government attention it receives, the more its original promise of financial freedom may be reduced.
So perhaps the biggest question about Bitcoin is not:
“Can Bitcoin survive?”
Maybe it is:
“Can Bitcoin become globally accepted without becoming globally controlled?”
Because if the answer is no, then Bitcoin may win the adoption battle while losing the very idea that made it revolutionary.
That, to me, is a much more serious question than whether Bitcoin can reach $500,000, $1 million, or even $2 million.$BTC
$TRUMP
{future}(TRUMPUSDT)
#Write2Earn
Bitcoin’s Biggest Contradiction: Freedom or State Control?
If the whole world eventually accepts Bitcoin, where does Bitcoin’s promise of freedom go?
Bitcoin was built around a simple idea: money should move without asking a government, central bank, or financial institution for permission.
That was the attraction.
But imagine the opposite future.
Imagine governments around the world fully recognize Bitcoin. Exchanges become licensed. Users must verify their identity. Transactions are monitored. Taxes are collected. Suspicious transfers are reported. Banks connect Bitcoin to the traditional financial system. Governments build rules around who can buy it, sell it, move it, and convert it.
Bitcoin may still exist.
It may even become more valuable.
But then comes the contradiction:
How can Bitcoin remain a truly independent financial system if almost every practical door to Bitcoin is controlled by the state?
And that leads to the second question.
Today, Bitcoin can operate relatively freely in many parts of the world. Some countries welcome it, some regulate it, and others restrict it. But can governments really accept a future in which a decentralized asset becomes powerful enough to influence national currencies, capital flows, taxation, and the financial behavior of millions of citizens?
That is where I see the real tension.
Governments do not necessarily need to destroy Bitcoin.
They can regulate it.
They can license the exchanges.
They can track the money entering and leaving the system.
They can collect taxes.
They can enforce anti-money-laundering rules.
They can control the legal points where Bitcoin meets the banking system.
And if that happens globally, Bitcoin may face its biggest paradox:
The more successful it becomes, the more government attention it receives. And the more government attention it receives, the more its original promise of financial freedom may be reduced.
So perhaps the biggest question about Bitcoin is not:
“Can Bitcoin survive?”
Maybe it is:
“Can Bitcoin become globally accepted without becoming globally controlled?”
Because if the answer is no, then Bitcoin may win the adoption battle while losing the very idea that made it revolutionary.
That, to me, is a much more serious question than whether Bitcoin can reach $500,000, $1 million, or even $2 million.$BTC
$TRUMP
#Write2Earn
Bitcoin was built around a simple idea: money should move without asking a government, central bank, or financial institution for permission.
That was the attraction.
But imagine the opposite future.
Imagine governments around the world fully recognize Bitcoin. Exchanges become licensed. Users must verify their identity. Transactions are monitored. Taxes are collected. Suspicious transfers are reported. Banks connect Bitcoin to the traditional financial system. Governments build rules around who can buy it, sell it, move it, and convert it.
Bitcoin may still exist.
It may even become more valuable.
But then comes the contradiction:
How can Bitcoin remain a truly independent financial system if almost every practical door to Bitcoin is controlled by the state?
And that leads to the second question.
Today, Bitcoin can operate relatively freely in many parts of the world. Some countries welcome it, some regulate it, and others restrict it. But can governments really accept a future in which a decentralized asset becomes powerful enough to influence national currencies, capital flows, taxation, and the financial behavior of millions of citizens?
That is where I see the real tension.
Governments do not necessarily need to destroy Bitcoin.
They can regulate it.
They can license the exchanges.
They can track the money entering and leaving the system.
They can collect taxes.
They can enforce anti-money-laundering rules.
They can control the legal points where Bitcoin meets the banking system.
And if that happens globally, Bitcoin may face its biggest paradox:
The more successful it becomes, the more government attention it receives. And the more government attention it receives, the more its original promise of financial freedom may be reduced.
So perhaps the biggest question about Bitcoin is not:
“Can Bitcoin survive?”
Maybe it is:
“Can Bitcoin become globally accepted without becoming globally controlled?”
Because if the answer is no, then Bitcoin may win the adoption battle while losing the very idea that made it revolutionary.
That, to me, is a much more serious question than whether Bitcoin can reach $500,000, $1 million, or even $2 million.$BTC
$TRUMP
#Write2Earn
288
·
--
DUSK and the privacy problem
I’ve looked at DUSK more than once, but the part that keeps pulling me back is its approach to privacy.
In most blockchains, privacy sounds like “hide everything.” Dusk takes a different route. It tries to let the network keep needed information private while still allowing authorized parties to prove what they need to prove. That feels much closer to how real finance works.
Take a simple example. Imagine a company tokenizing shares on Dusk. A buyer may not want everyone watching their wallet, holdings, or every move they make. At the same time, the company and regulators still need proof that the trade follows the rules. Dusk’s confidential security token design is built around this kind of use.
This is the point where I started looking at DUSK differently. I’m not only asking, “Can this token pump?” I’m asking, “Can this network solve a problem businesses actually have?”
There is still a lot to prove, especially real adoption. But that question alone makes Dusk worth watching for me.@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk
DUSK and the privacy problem
I’ve looked at DUSK more than once, but the part that keeps pulling me back is its approach to privacy.
In most blockchains, privacy sounds like “hide everything.” Dusk takes a different route. It tries to let the network keep needed information private while still allowing authorized parties to prove what they need to prove. That feels much closer to how real finance works.
Take a simple example. Imagine a company tokenizing shares on Dusk. A buyer may not want everyone watching their wallet, holdings, or every move they make. At the same time, the company and regulators still need proof that the trade follows the rules. Dusk’s confidential security token design is built around this kind of use.
This is the point where I started looking at DUSK differently. I’m not only asking, “Can this token pump?” I’m asking, “Can this network solve a problem businesses actually have?”
There is still a lot to prove, especially real adoption. But that question alone makes Dusk worth watching for me.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
I’ve looked at DUSK more than once, but the part that keeps pulling me back is its approach to privacy.
In most blockchains, privacy sounds like “hide everything.” Dusk takes a different route. It tries to let the network keep needed information private while still allowing authorized parties to prove what they need to prove. That feels much closer to how real finance works.
Take a simple example. Imagine a company tokenizing shares on Dusk. A buyer may not want everyone watching their wallet, holdings, or every move they make. At the same time, the company and regulators still need proof that the trade follows the rules. Dusk’s confidential security token design is built around this kind of use.
This is the point where I started looking at DUSK differently. I’m not only asking, “Can this token pump?” I’m asking, “Can this network solve a problem businesses actually have?”
There is still a lot to prove, especially real adoption. But that question alone makes Dusk worth watching for me.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
1
1
77
·
--
DUSK Made Me Rethink What Private” Means
At first, DUSK looked like another privacy-focused blockchain to me. Then I noticed the bigger idea.
The goal isn’t simply to hide transactions.
It’s to make financial information selectively visible.
That sounds like a small difference, but in regulated markets, it can be everything. A company may need to prove ownership, identity, or compliance without putting its entire financial history on a public ledger.
That’s where DUSK gets interesting.
Its network combines privacy technology with regulated asset infrastructure, giving institutions a way to use blockchain without treating transparency as an all-or-nothing decision.
Personally, that is the part I find worth watching.
Crypto spent years asking, “How open can finance become?”
DUSK seems to be asking a different question:
“How much should actually be visible in the first place?”
And honestly, that question may become more important than speed.@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk
DUSK Made Me Rethink What Private” Means
At first, DUSK looked like another privacy-focused blockchain to me. Then I noticed the bigger idea.
The goal isn’t simply to hide transactions.
It’s to make financial information selectively visible.
That sounds like a small difference, but in regulated markets, it can be everything. A company may need to prove ownership, identity, or compliance without putting its entire financial history on a public ledger.
That’s where DUSK gets interesting.
Its network combines privacy technology with regulated asset infrastructure, giving institutions a way to use blockchain without treating transparency as an all-or-nothing decision.
Personally, that is the part I find worth watching.
Crypto spent years asking, “How open can finance become?”
DUSK seems to be asking a different question:
“How much should actually be visible in the first place?”
And honestly, that question may become more important than speed.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
At first, DUSK looked like another privacy-focused blockchain to me. Then I noticed the bigger idea.
The goal isn’t simply to hide transactions.
It’s to make financial information selectively visible.
That sounds like a small difference, but in regulated markets, it can be everything. A company may need to prove ownership, identity, or compliance without putting its entire financial history on a public ledger.
That’s where DUSK gets interesting.
Its network combines privacy technology with regulated asset infrastructure, giving institutions a way to use blockchain without treating transparency as an all-or-nothing decision.
Personally, that is the part I find worth watching.
Crypto spent years asking, “How open can finance become?”
DUSK seems to be asking a different question:
“How much should actually be visible in the first place?”
And honestly, that question may become more important than speed.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
211
·
--
I almost deleted the link without opening it.
Last month I put some USDT into a popular lending protocol. The rate looked decent when I deposited. Three days later it had already dropped. By the end of the week it was lower still. I kept refreshing the page, annoyed that I couldn’t plan anything.
That’s when someone sent me TermMax.
I didn’t expect much. Most “fixed-rate” claims still feel slippery. But I tried a small position anyway. The rate locked the moment I confirmed. No daily changes. No sudden drops. Just the same number sitting there until the term ends.
It felt strangely quiet after months of watching rates move against me.
I’m not saying every variable-rate protocol is bad. They have their place. But for the first time I could leave money and actually stop checking. That small difference changed how the whole thing felt.
I still don’t know what the token will do after launch. I only know that right now the product does one simple thing better than most: it keeps its word on the rate.
Sometimes that’s the only twist that matters.@termmax $GPS $AKE $TUT #termmax
I almost deleted the link without opening it.
Last month I put some USDT into a popular lending protocol. The rate looked decent when I deposited. Three days later it had already dropped. By the end of the week it was lower still. I kept refreshing the page, annoyed that I couldn’t plan anything.
That’s when someone sent me TermMax.
I didn’t expect much. Most “fixed-rate” claims still feel slippery. But I tried a small position anyway. The rate locked the moment I confirmed. No daily changes. No sudden drops. Just the same number sitting there until the term ends.
It felt strangely quiet after months of watching rates move against me.
I’m not saying every variable-rate protocol is bad. They have their place. But for the first time I could leave money and actually stop checking. That small difference changed how the whole thing felt.
I still don’t know what the token will do after launch. I only know that right now the product does one simple thing better than most: it keeps its word on the rate.
Sometimes that’s the only twist that matters.@TermMax $GPS $AKE $TUT #termmax
Last month I put some USDT into a popular lending protocol. The rate looked decent when I deposited. Three days later it had already dropped. By the end of the week it was lower still. I kept refreshing the page, annoyed that I couldn’t plan anything.
That’s when someone sent me TermMax.
I didn’t expect much. Most “fixed-rate” claims still feel slippery. But I tried a small position anyway. The rate locked the moment I confirmed. No daily changes. No sudden drops. Just the same number sitting there until the term ends.
It felt strangely quiet after months of watching rates move against me.
I’m not saying every variable-rate protocol is bad. They have their place. But for the first time I could leave money and actually stop checking. That small difference changed how the whole thing felt.
I still don’t know what the token will do after launch. I only know that right now the product does one simple thing better than most: it keeps its word on the rate.
Sometimes that’s the only twist that matters.@TermMax $GPS $AKE $TUT #termmax
7
1
4
328
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
USAugustPPIRisesLessThanExpected
50,510 views
813 Discussing
🚨 US AUG PPI: Rises LESS Than Expected! Bullish for Crypto? 🚀
PPI +0.4% MoM as expected, but CORE PPI only +0.2% vs +0.3% expected - cooling!
What it means:
• Wholesale inflation softer than feared
• Fed rate hike chance now 62% - but dovish signals coming
• Core PCE revisions expected downward - bullish
• BTC usually pumps on softer PPI
Fed meeting Sep 15-16 - Market now expects pause, not hike?
Is this the green light for Q4 rally?
#Bitcoin #PPI #Fed #CryptoNews #BTC#usaugustppiriseslessthanexpected
True News
·1 Likes
·1.4k views
SECApprovesNasdaqTexasCommodityTrustRule
27,718 views
593 Discussing
ECBRaisesRatesSecondTimeTo2.5%
25,370 views
427 Discussing