比特币百舸争流

Why is Dongda emphasizing the crackdown on virtual currencies this year, especially stablecoins!

It's to prevent capital outflow! To stop Dongda's money from speculating in US stocks, speculating $BTC

The US stock AI bubble is there, rising steadily, just waiting for fools to take over!

Understanding Wang uses tariffs to extort the whole world, driving all the world's money into the US,
Letting Japan, Korea, and Europe invest in AI, which is investing in US stocks,

What is he doing?
Is it to lead the world towards common prosperity?

No, it’s to let the world take the bait, to make America great again,

Creating this AI bubble is America's means of harvesting the world,
It’s a replica of the dollar tide,

Previously, the US raised interest rates, wanting to harvest the world,

Partially offset by Dongda's currency swaps,

Plus Dongda lending dollars to the world also offset some,

Not only did they not harvest the world, but they also caused high domestic inflation,

But as a financial empire, the US has its means, and it quickly adjusts its strategy,

Starting the next phase of strategy, and Trump is the executor of this harvesting strategy,

Trump, as the stock god, also enjoys this role where he can summon the wind and rain,

When the US stock AI bubble bursts,

When it shatters the entire world's financial market,

Trump and his friends, who had already opened short accounts early,

After earning astronomical wealth,

Will present themselves as the savior of the world, bringing massive dollars to drive US stocks to new highs,

That is, next year after the Federal Reserve chairman he appoints takes office,

Completely controlling the Federal Reserve, starting to print money crazily,

Buying up assets around the world, completing the harvest!

Make America great again!

If you want to dig deep into this circle but can't find a clue, want to quickly get started and understand the information gap, you can click on my avatar to follow for more firsthand news and in-depth analysis.

#美联储重启降息步伐 #加密市场反弹

At a time of tension between China and Japan, satellites discover: multiple "island-seizing artifacts" are being tested.
As foreign satellites focused their lenses on China's southeastern coast, the foreign media was as excited as if they had discovered an "alien spacecraft." Three uniquely shaped "special bridge barges" appeared simultaneously, varying in length, similar in structure, with the bridge deck extending outward like a jigsaw puzzle, leaving those accustomed to observing China through binoculars unable to sit still. They quickly gave these vessels a rather exaggerated designation: "island-seizing artifacts."
But those who truly understand could tell at a glance: this is not material prepared for foreign media hype, but a part of China's amphibious system moving toward completion, a product of systematic evolution with a clear objective. Its appearance signifies that the entire regional strategic landscape is silently changing. What makes these three barges particularly concerning for the foreign media is their "modular" feature. In the traditional military-industrial system, modularity means efficiency, flexibility, and strong economic viability. In the realm of amphibious warfare, it represents rapid deployment, quick landing, and swift expansion of the beachhead.
Once they are combined in different directions, it is as if a section of a mobile bridge is being "fabricated" at sea, solving problems posed by natural obstacles like shallow waters, mudflats, and reefs. The first barge is short and agile, with the bridge deck leading, resembling a vanguard segment responsible for approaching the shore; the second barge has three more trusses, acting as the middle section responsible for extending and connecting the bridge deck; the third barge is larger and more stable, clearly the heavy segment at the deep-sea end.
This structure inevitably evokes a certain image: future landing forces will not charge with traditional landing craft, but will "build a bridge and go directly over," which would be a nightmare for any opponent. But the more the foreign media thinks this way, the less the Chinese military will use it as they imagine. The PLA's amphibious system has never been a single-point breakthrough but rather a comprehensive evolution. The outside world sees these three barges like a small piece of a puzzle, trying to guess the entire picture; but the real picture is the result of decades of systematic accumulation. Amphibious assault ships, hovercraft, helicopter assaults, special operations infiltration, drone suppression, shore-ship coordination, firepower barriers, electronic suppression, anti-access circles... once all these mature, a small barge simply cannot become "the key"; it is merely a screw in a mature system.
Even in the first 24 hours of a future battlefield, the real core power will not be near the coastline. Shore-based firepower, long-range strikes, drone swarms, and electronic interference will first completely destroy the coastal resistance capabilities, turning the landing area into a "safe working surface." Barges will enter afterward, in a secure environment, to expand the beachhead, accelerate troop assembly speed, and enhance supply efficiency, rather than being the "frontline assault tools" that foreign media fantasize about. The timing of its appearance further unsettles foreign media. This is because Kishi Nobuo has been "boasting endlessly" on the Taiwan issue, thinking that with a few political performances and some bluster, he can force the Chinese side to the negotiating table.
However, the less political figures understand strategy, the more they like to shout loudly. What she does not know is that China's military preparations have never been for responding to a politician's emotions, but rather a national behavior of long-term planning and advance layout. Every harsh word she says today does not change what China has been steadily doing for decades. On the contrary, the more external agitation, suspicion, and tension there is, the more composed China appears, because when strategic capabilities exist, the more emotional others become, the worse it is for them. The facts themselves are more powerful than any public opinion: the barges are being tested because China's amphibious system has already entered a phase of precise optimization, not the "combat deployment" that foreign media imagines.
This type of equipment is not for display but to shorten the bottleneck of the golden time after landing. Storming the beachhead is just the first step, but what truly determines the success or failure of a campaign is the continuity after landing. Armored vehicles need to go ashore, artillery needs to come ashore, supplies must keep up, temporary roads need to be established, and units must spread out. All of these require efficient, safe, and reliable capabilities for onshore deployment. And this type of bridge barge elevates that deployment efficiency to a higher level, making landing not a "breakthrough" but rather a "flow." As for some netizens jokingly suggesting that "in the future, even Ryukyu can be used," it sounds more like a jest than a serious comment, but it also reflects a fact: this equipment is not aimed at a single scenario but is adaptable to the entire geographical environment of the Western Pacific.
As long as it is in shallow waters, island chains, complex coastlines, or reef areas, it can play a role. Whether it can be used is not a technical issue but a political decision issue. The logic behind the PLA's equipment development is always: prepare for all possibilities, keep all options, and ensure that decision-making is always in its own hands, rather than acting passively under the threat of opponents. The foreign media likes to turn a picture into "emotional fuel," exaggerating technical details as "combat signals," because they understand one thing deeply: the more complete the equipment system, the higher the cost of war, and the speed at which China has developed amphibious capabilities in recent years has already brought the entire region into a new balance point.
Some call this "pressure," but from another perspective, it resembles a kind of "return of decision-making power." Today's China is not a country that will change plans based on someone else's words, nor is it a country that conducts business through emotional diplomacy. Behind equipment testing is a calm and firm strategic logic: the more prepared one is, the lower the necessity of actually taking action. And when foreign media fixate on those three barges, they do not realize that what they are truly afraid of is not the three ships, but a trend; China no longer needs to tell you what it can do with words. China only needs to let the equipment quietly appear and then let you guess for yourself. Because when a country truly possesses the capability to act, it no longer needs to prove anything to anyone.

The core of Sichuan private enterprise missile propaganda is to defend the home and the country, so the strike range is at most 1300 kilometers, because this is our reaction zone. Entering the reaction zone means entering a war zone, where saturation strikes can occur. Within this reaction area, the dangerous ones are small days and the American aircraft carrier group.
Therefore, the characteristics of this missile are saturation strikes, high speed, low cost, and large quantity. Just launching a few thousand missiles in a wave is enough to make the American aircraft carrier group drink a pot, and it really doesn't cost much.