Here’s an article about U.S. inflation and my take on the next FOMC.
The inflation data that made the market start repricing rate hikes in September was, for the most part, its phone bill. I'm not being ironic. The core of the U.S. CPI rose 0.29% in August. Mobile telephony and lodging accounted for 14 of those 29 basis points. All the rest of the American economy, taken together, came to about 15. Two of the noisiest categories in the index did half the work on their own. In the supercore it was worse. Up 0.51% over the month, with 29 basis points coming only from telephony. More than half of a single item.
The US CPI for August came out at 3.4% year-over-year over the past 12 months, in line with expectations and the same as the previous month. 🚨
Core CPI fell to 2.4%, also in line, down from 2.5%.
On the monthly change, headline CPI rose 0.4%. Biggest monthly increase since May 2026.
Note that the core trend is still DECELERATION.
Even with the doomers saying there would now be a new upswing in inflation. Always remember to understand the data, not just Twitter narratives.
Overall, the numbers are pretty neutral. It should increase the market’s uncertainty about interest rates, and the real effect will be the middle path.
In other words, rates unchanged. I’ll bring an analysis on this later. #CPIWatch
The PPI has three readings. The full PPI is the index of final demand, at 5.4% in the headlines. The core PPI excludes food and energy; it’s what appears on-screen as “Core PPI” and what the consensus is targeting. The core PPI ex margins excludes, in addition to food and energy, wholesale and retail margins; the official name is “final demand less foods, energy, and trade services”, and it’s the line the BLS highlights in the release, because trade margin is the most volatile component of the index. I will consider “core” to be the second one and “core ex margins” to be the third.
In August, core and core ex margins did not tell the same story. Core rose 0.16% versus 0.3% expected, the third month in a row of deceleration: 0.40 in June, 0.27 in July, and 0.16 now. Core ex margins rose 0.27%, in line with consensus of 0.3%, after 0.4% in July. The difference between the two lies in the trade margin, which fell 0.2% in the month and took about 0.04 of a point off core. The fuel retail margin collapsed 11.3%, and this is mechanical: when fuel rises at wholesale, retail takes time to pass it through, so the margin shrinks before it recomposes. Over twelve months, 4.6% in core, as expected, and 4.7% in core ex margins, unchanged from July. The 4.6% came from 4.3% due to base arithmetic: the −0.2% from August 2025 left the window and the +0.16% from August 2026 entered. The peak was 4.9% in April.
The same applies to the acceleration headline that the full PPI gained today. Over twelve months it went from 4.8% to 5.4%, but August 2025 had been −0.2% and August 2026 was +0.4%; swapping a negative month for a positive one accounts for the full 0.6 percentage points. The monthly pace of 0.4% was in line with/under the average monthly pace from the last year (0.44%).
In other words, today’s reading did not bring acceleration (only energy, for obvious reasons). Core has been decelerating for three months, core ex margins came in at consensus, and the full PPI’s 5.4% is a base swap: a −0.2 that exited and a +0.4 that entered.
And even so, there are still many investors looking only at the FED’s interest rate to understand the market.
They couldn’t be more out of touch. A tunnel vision, perhaps.
The name of the game now is duration.
The intervention Bessent is making on the long end happens precisely when central banks—like Japan—continue to be offloading treasuries.
The $4 BILLION that were announced are just the tip of the iceberg. Much more issuance of t-bills will be needed (maybe triple, quadruple?).
And when t-bills are issued to buy long-dated securities, that’s a duration swap in the collateral.
Mainly in MMFs and shadow banking, they’ll feel this effect. Assets that work "almost like money".
So you’re following an analyst trying to figure out only what the FED will do with rates at the next meeting? Then just know you’re looking at half the market.
Wall Street is still closing. On Binance, that no longer exists.
In 8 months, Perps and bStocks went from 1 ticker in January to covering more than half of the U.S. equity market.
Look at the excerpt of @Binance Research : • ~US$ 42T out of ~US$ 76T of the U.S. market cap is already covered • From 2% in Jan/26 to 55% now • Mega caps, financials, health, consumer, semiconductors, and the AI core of the cycle • A 24×7 market. No trading session wait.
The point almost nobody discusses: who’s getting into this isn’t the New York desk.
It’s a newer profile—emerging markets—accumulating exposure to U.S. stocks through Binance. A small slice. An access that a traditional broker never provided at this hour.
Tokenized stock holders doubled in August. BNB Chain is part of the mix that concentrates 95% of these holders, along with Solana and Robinhood Chain.
The thesis is simple. This isn’t “crypto vs. stock.” It’s U.S. equities running on the same track you already trade $BTC and $BNB
Anyone still waiting for the market to open at 10 a.m. is trading yesterday’s market. #bStocks
Short-term holders will realize about US$ 700 million in profit on the first leg of the rally.🚨
Weak hands leaving before the move has even had a chance to confirm on bitcoin.
This is the biggest realization peak since July 2025, and it showed up right at the start of the rally—not near the top.
The prior pattern shows the opposite: in January 2025 and July 2025, realization peaks came after months of accumulated gains, when the price was already stretched.
Anyone who bought near the July bottom is exiting with only a few percentage points in profit.
This is the classic behavior of people who entered without conviction and treat any rally as an opportunity to escape at emotionally flat “zero to zero.”
This exact structure creates the "rallies of disbelief" and keeps feeding further rallies. I’ll explain this in detail in today’s analyses.
The middle path is the most likely, and many people aren’t managing to understand that.
If the Fed raises interest rates in the US, it will further hit the real estate market, which is also currently seeing the lowest construction spending in the past 3 years.
The sector is already highly pressured.
Cutting rates further widens the gap versus yields on long-term bonds.
So keeping interest rates unchanged, or with no major change, is the path of least resistance.
What explains Bitcoin volatility the most isn’t market cap, leverage, or volume.
It’s who holds the coins.
A Glassnode study tested 13 variables against the 1-month realized volatility.
Long-term holders’ share of the supply explains about 19% of the variance—more than any other single factor. Illiquid supply and liveliness come right after.
Market cap, the most repeated argument for explaining low volatility, appears near the bottom of the list, at a little over 3%.
Practically tied with coin velocity, and even below the funding rate.
Want to truly understand how Bitcoin volatility works? Study on-chain.
We’re in a low-volatility regime that should persist for a few more cycles before a new expansion.
August payrolls came in at 162,000 jobs, nearly triple the consensus of 56,000.
The unemployment rate came in at 4.1%, in line with expectations. Labor force participation rose to 61.6%, reversing part of the decline seen since November.
The private sector added 127,000 jobs and the government, 35,000. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% on the month and 3.1% over the year.
Previous data were also revised higher: July moved from -23,000 to +21,000, and June to +31,000.
More support for a tighter liquidity thesis (some people will be reviving the hawkish thesis here, but you already know what I think about that)