A market commentator sold bitcoin due to the risks of quantum computing, bringing the “quantum threat” back into discussion. We need to break down the time scale: bitcoin’s existing signature scheme would indeed face cryptographic challenges if there were sufficiently powerful and usable quantum computing capabilities. But between conceptual risk and the ability to mount large-scale attacks against real on-chain assets, there are still multiple conditions—hardware capability, attack cost, and network upgrades. Treat it as an immediate price catalyst and it’s easy to confuse long-term technical risk with current market realities. Ignore it entirely and you miss the bigger question of how the protocol will evolve over time. A more valuable question is how the network forms migration consensus and deploys post-quantum solutions. The real ability to respond also depends on whether developers, nodes, wallets, and users can coordinate upgrades as the risk approaches—a far more complex issue than any single holder’s buy/sell decision. Do you think this is a trading variable in the present, or a long-term technical governance problem? $BTC