libra

Argentina Court Clears Milei in LIBRA Case - What This Means for Crypto

Federal Judge Marcelo Martínez de Giorgi dismissed the LIBRA case against President Javier Milei on Oct 23. Case closed.

What judge said:
No fraud proven from Milei's X post in Feb 2025
No evidence of abuse of office
Loss alone does not equal fraud in memecoins
11 people cleared

Why it matters:
LIBRA hit 4.5B market cap then crashed 95 percent, 40k wallets lost money. This ruling sets precedent that politician endorsement is not automatically fraud without proof of deception.

This is good for crypto freedom but bad for investor protection. Should there be rules for leaders promoting coins?

What do you think, fair ruling or not? 👇

#LIBRA #solana #CryptoNew
$SOL $AAPLB

#argentinecourtdismisseslibracaseagainstmilei #libra
🇦🇷 ARGENTINA’S LIBRA CASE TAKES ANOTHER TURN
A court has reportedly dismissed the LIBRA case against President Javier Milei again, reigniting debate over accountability and crypto investor protection.
⚠️ The dismissal doesn’t mean investors recovered their losses. Challenges to the proceedings may continue.
💬 Will this decision restore confidence in LIBRA or keep investors cautious?."CLICK ON THE BELOW YELLOW COIN TAG TO GO TO DESIRED TRADING PAGE TO GET BENEFIT TRADE"$NIL

【Market Flash】LIBRA case takes a dramatic turn: On October 23, an Argentine judge dismissed the criminal charges against Milei and 10 others, saying that promotion alone does not constitute fraud.
Prosecutors themselves requested that the case be dropped. The 60-page ruling said no punishable deceptive practices had been found; yet the token plunged 95% in just a few hours, and 8 associated wallets reportedly withdrew nearly $100 million.
The ruling was based on insufficient evidence—not on nobody losing money. Affected investors are seeking to overturn it. Which side are you on?
$LIBRA $SOL $BTC
#LIBRA #米莱 #Argentina
(Source: CoinTribune)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; proceed with caution.

🚨 $LIBRA LEGAL WIN LEAVES RETAIL IN THE DUST 🦈

The court dismissal wipes the institutional liability clean, effectively resetting the order block that anchored $LIBRA 's price. 🦈 The ruling acts as a liquidity vacuum, removing the last sell‑side pressure and leaving the market’s smart‑money footprint untouched. 📊

Retail investors, however, remain trapped in the aftermath of a 95% crash that erased $250 M of capital. The pattern mirrors a classic meme‑coin liquidity hunt—price spikes, massive sell‑off, then institutional exit. 💡 Is the next move a re‑accumulation phase or a prolonged bearish void? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #LIBRA #LegalSetup #RetailRisk #Crypto

🦈 ⚡

🚨 $LIBRA LEGAL WIN WHILE RETAIL SINKS 95% 🚀

📊 The Argentine court dismissed all criminal charges against President Milei and his sister, clearing the path for the $LIBRA team. 🦈 Smart‑money players watch the fallout, noting that institutional actors walked away untouched while the meme‑coin’s rally evaporated in minutes. 📈 Volume on the token collapsed, and the 95% plunge erased roughly $250 M of retail capital, a stark reminder that hype can turn into a liquidity vacuum in seconds. 💡 The broader signal? Regulators may tighten the net, but the market’s appetite for high‑risk memes remains feral.

💬 How will this verdict reshape retail appetite for meme projects? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #LIBRA #LegalNews #CryptoRegulation #RetailRisk

🔥 💎

#argentinecourtdismisseslibracaseagainstmilei
🚨 THE RUG PULL EQUATION: MILEI CLEARED IN $LIBRA SCANDAL 🚨

​A massive legal victory for Argentina's President, but a total wipeout for retail! Let’s break down the court ruling using pure math 🧮👇

​(Presidential Hype) + (95% Token Crash) = Zero Criminal Charges ⚖️

​Here is the exact formula behind the verdict:

​The Verdict Variable:

(Case Dismissed) = An Argentine federal judge has officially dropped the criminal fraud investigation against President Javier Milei and his sister regarding the infamous $LIBRA token. The court ruled that the events "did not constitute a criminal offense" and found no legal deception.

​The Market Variable:

(Retail Wrecked) = In February 2025, Milei promoted the Solana-based meme coin on X, sparking a massive rally before a brutal 95% crash that destroyed up to $250 million in investor wealth.

​The Breakdown:

The politicians and developers are officially walking away clean. Earlier this month, a US federal judge also dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the Libra project's organizers. The institutions navigated away unscathed, leaving only retail investors holding the bag.

​Is this proof that crypto needs stricter rules, or just a hard lesson in meme coin risk? Let's debate! 👇💬
$BTC
$CAP
$ERA

​#JavierMilei #LIBRA #CryptoNews #Regulation

I just came across this news and was stunned for a good while: LIBRA, the token Milei promoted in a tweet last February, crashed within hours. $250 million vanished, and wallets linked to its creators withdrew $99 million. Then, on October 23, an Argentine federal judge issued a 60-page ruling dismissing the case and clearing all 11 people involved, including Milei, his sister Karina, and operator Hayden Davis—though the ruling hasn’t taken final effect yet.

The judge’s reasoning stings: a president’s post can certainly double a project’s influence, but having influence doesn’t automatically mean fraud; losing money doesn’t, by itself, mean you were scammed—you need concrete evidence of deception. There was also no evidence that Karina took money to broker a connection, or that public funds ended up in anyone’s pocket. Even the prosecution asked to close the case.

Milei is already popping champagne, calling it a political media campaign targeting the presidency; the opposition, meanwhile, says the judiciary has been captured by those in power.

So, is a president promoting something in a post really the same as an ordinary KOL hyping a coin? Pick a side in the comments: A. A celebrity endorsement is a signal—if you jump in and lose, own it; B. A president’s tweet carries the credibility of the state, so the two aren’t remotely comparable.

$BTC $ETH $SOL #米莱 #LIBRA #Argentina

#libra 👀 The legal drama surrounding the LIBRA memecoin and Argentine President Javier Milei has officially come to a close.
A federal judge found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by Milei, his sister, or the other people involved. A reminder: in February 2025, the president promoted the LIBRA token, after which it plunged by more than 90%. 📉
In my view, this is a telling example of how politics and memes can create an explosive mix for the market. The influence of media personalities is enormous, but the ultimate risk always rests with the investors themselves. 🤷‍♂️

【Market Update】After all charges in the LIBRA case were dropped, Milei went on the offensive: he is demanding damages for defamation, saying he endured 1 year, 8 months, and 9 days of lies and insults. He also accused some media outlets of using the case to blackmail the government into granting them tax breaks.
Milei singled out major media outlets such as La Nación, calling this a political campaign to damage the office of the president. His critic, Ferraro, questioned why no one had been summoned in the investigation and why the promoter’s meeting had not been explained.
Will the public relations battle after the legal victory finally put this case behind us? What do you think?
$BTC $SOL $LIBRA
#LIBRA #阿根廷 #米莱
(Source: Bitcoin.com)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution when entering the market.

$BTC 🇦🇷 Milei not charged in case over token collapse #LIBRA

Argentina has concluded its investigation into President Javier Milei and his sister over the scandal involving the $LIBRA memecoin.

After the head of state posted about it in February 2025, the token surged, but then lost more than 90% of its value, and investors suffered losses of hundreds of millions of dollars.

$ETH #Cryptonews

🚨💥 The LIBRA case is back in the spotlight… Has the case really been closed, or are there still surprises to come?!
A new development in one of Argentina’s most controversial crypto stories! 🇦🇷👀
⚖️ An Argentine federal judge has decided to dismiss the criminal case involving the LIBRA token against President Javier Milei and 10 others, ruling that the facts do not constitute fraud of criminal significance.
But the story is more complicated than simply closing a case! 👇
💣 Remember the scale of what happened:
📈 The token’s market capitalization briefly exceeded $4.5 billion.
📉 Then it crashed by around 95% within hours!
💰 On-chain analysts said that eight wallets linked to the project team withdrew around $107 million.
⚠️ The ruling doesn’t mean all parties are convinced the case is over; an opposition lawmaker described it as a judicial cover-up, while prosecutors who were excluded from the proceedings asked to be reinstated before the Federal Court of Cassation—a move that could pave the way for an appeal.
🔥 And here’s the question worth discussing:
Does this ruling put an end to the debate over LIBRA, or could the case see a new chapter?
More importantly for us as traders: if a token of this size can crash within hours, do you trust political endorsements of any crypto project before checking its liquidity and wallet distribution? 🧐
👇 Share your thoughts: Is the case closed, or is the story not over yet?
#libra #CryptoNews #BinanceSquareFamily

🚨 A PRESIDENT PROMOTED A CRYPTO TOKEN. IT CRASHED. NOW THE CRIMINAL CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED!

🇦🇷 Argentina’s $LIBRA memecoin controversy has taken a major legal turn!

Here’s what happened. 👇

📅 FEBRUARY 2025

Argentina’s President Javier Milei shared a social media post about LIBRA, a cryptocurrency project presented as supporting Argentine businesses.

The token surged before crashing dramatically, leaving many investors facing losses.

⚖️ OCTOBER 2026 — MAJOR LEGAL DEVELOPMENT

An Argentine judge dismissed a criminal investigation related to the LIBRA controversy, citing insufficient evidence to establish criminal fraud.

But here’s the important part. 👇

⚠️ A DISMISSED CASE DOESN’T MEAN INVESTORS GOT THEIR MONEY BACK!

The legal decision doesn’t erase financial losses or necessarily end every possible legal challenge.

💡 THE BIG LESSON

Never invest in a cryptocurrency simply because a celebrity, influencer or politician promotes it.

Before buying any token, investigate:

✅ Token ownership and distribution
✅ Liquidity and trading volume
✅ Project transparency
✅ Real utility and potential risks

Whether you’re following $BTC, $SOL or trending memecoins, always do your own research.

💬 BIG QUESTION:

Should politicians and celebrities face stricter disclosure requirements when promoting crypto projects?

👇 Share your opinion in the comments!

#CryptoNews #LIBRA #Argentina #CryptoRegulation #Bitcoin

An Argentine judge has dismissed the criminal investigation into President Milei, his sister, and LIBRA advisers, finding that their promotion of the token did not constitute fraud. LIBRA surged before plunging by more than 90%, while linked wallets withdrew large sums. The shift in regulatory stance has once again drawn attention to the legal boundaries of meme coin risks. #阿根廷 #米莱 #LIBRA #Meme coin

The legal outcomes following celebrity endorsements often arrive later than the price movements—and are more easily mistaken for a «final verdict».

According to reports, Argentine federal judge Marcelo Martinez de Giorgi dismissed the criminal investigation into President Milei, his sister Karina Milei, and others, finding that the conduct in question did not constitute a statutory offense. In the United States, a judge also dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the organizers of LIBRA. After being promoted in February 2025, LIBRA surged and then crashed, leaving investors with losses estimated at around $251 million.

How to read this: dismissing an investigation does not mean the project posed no risks, nor does it mean investors will recover their losses. It primarily answers the question of whether the conduct amounts to fraud under that country’s criminal law. For observers, the more important things to watch are the reach of political endorsements, the on-chain withdrawal of funds, and the depth of buyers in the secondary market—not to mistake one legal proceeding for the final chapter in the token’s price narrative.

#LIBRA #米莱 #监管 #CryptoMarket

The president’s crypto-token case is over: no crime was committed. On October 23, Argentine federal judge Marcelo Martínez de Giorgi dismissed the criminal case over LIBRA against President Javier Milei, his sister Karina Milei and nine others, after prosecutors themselves requested its dismissal. The judge’s reasoning was straightforward: the president’s post did amplify the project’s reach, but price swings and investor losses alone do not amount to fraud; nor was there evidence that state resources were used or that money was paid in exchange for access. Remember how wild this case was: the token launched on February 14, 2025, and took just 66 minutes to climb from its initial minting to around $4.55. Two wallets made about $5.4 million in just 43 minutes, while investors on the other side lost more than $251 million. The criminal case is closed, but the money hasn’t come back—and the ruling is not yet final. The civil claims and efforts to recover the funds are still another matter.#LIBRA #Argentina

Argentina court rules on LIBRA case: President Milei not found guilty of criminal fraud!

- An Argentine court issued a 60-page ruling clearing President Javier Milei and 10 others.
- The president’s promotion of the LIBRA token does not automatically constitute criminal fraud.
- The ruling sets a new legal precedent for promoting crypto on social media.
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #LIBRA #Argentina

$libra

#vlikevn Titanbot

Source: The Block

$LIBRA crashed. Argentina’s criminal probe into President Milei has now been dropped. 😳

The judge found that Javier Milei’s promotion of the memecoin did not constitute fraud, despite the attention his support drew to the token.

What sticks with me is the distinction: a court’s finding on fraud isn’t the same question as whether promoting a memecoin was responsible. ⚖️

Where do you draw the line—should public officials promote memecoins at all?

#LIBRA #Memecoins

The judge’s point was straightforward: retail investors losing money and a coin’s price soaring and crashing aren’t, by themselves, proof of fraud.

In Argentina’s LIBRA case, on Friday (10/23) local time, federal judge Martínez de Giorgi dropped the criminal investigation into Milei, his sister Karina, and nine others, including Hayden Davis. The request to drop the case came from prosecutors themselves.

A quick recap: On February 14, 2025, Milei promoted LIBRA on X. Its price surged and then crashed within hours, and the post was later deleted. Davis, who called himself an “issuance adviser,” later admitted that he held nearly $100 million after the coin collapsed. He denied any wrongdoing.

Several points in the ruling are worth a closer look:
· The president’s status made the post “more influential,” but that doesn’t amount to a scheme to defraud;
· The post wasn’t accompanied by any administrative action or use of state resources, so it didn’t constitute abuse of office;
· Helping arrange meetings, in itself, doesn’t constitute influence peddling.

In crypto-speak: A big shot’s post may well be just a post in the eyes of the law. At least on the criminal-law front in Argentina, there’s no one to bail out those who were lured in and lost money.

The ruling can still be appealed before it takes effect, so the matter may not be entirely over. But the signal is already clear enough: when a big shot talks up a coin, you’re buying their reach—not their guarantee.

$ORDER

[Poll] Milei cleared of criminal charges—can LIBRA victims still recover their losses?
Background: An Argentine judge ruled that the LIBRA case does not constitute a crime, clearing Milei of criminal charges. The recovery options for victims who saw 94% of their funds vanish in 11 hours have suddenly narrowed.
Do you think victims can still recover their losses?
A Yes: Civil suits and cross-border recovery are still possible
B Unlikely: The not-guilty ruling has shut the door on recovery
C Wait and see: It depends on whether regulators and exchanges step in
Vote in the comments and tell us why—which side are you on?
$LIBRA $SOL $BTC
#LIBRA #阿根廷 #Cryptocurrency
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; exercise caution when entering the market.