I joined Binance Square in November last year. Back then, I saw Yingge promoting the Creator Platform, so I hopped on.
I have to say, Yingge is kind of my benefactor. I should say she’s a benefactor for a lot of small retail investors. Everyone who knows her knows she’s very capable and also easygoing (and the key is, she’s also beautiful).
The deepest impression I have is when I ran into some small problems and went to ask Yingge for advice—I was afraid I wouldn’t do it well. Yingge told me: Just be yourself.
After that, I met Cy, who also gave me a lot of help and guidance.
I didn’t think too much. I just adjusted the content I usually posted to align more with the task direction.
Bit by bit, I managed to get a few first-place rankings; in total, I think it added up to nearly $10,000.
To be honest, that number isn’t that big, but the advantage is the low barrier to entry. You don’t need 100,000 followers. You don’t need to grind data every day. If your writing is good, you still have a chance to get on the leaderboard.
Even now, I still update posts every day. Occasionally, when I see creator tasks that fit, I’ll join in.
Not grinding, but it’s pretty interesting.
Compared to writing on X for half a day just to get a few likes, Square at least gives you positive feedback—you write something and you can actually earn money.
Before that, it had been churning in the 3.4 to 3.9 range for several days with not much movement.
Then on September 2nd, it suddenly saw a big volume spike—jumping in one move from around 4 to 5.2 and 5.3. Today it even briefly touched as high as 5.5.
Over the past two days, it’s been more active on the gainers list than SUI.
Now the price is fluctuating around 5.2. Looking downward, 4.8 to 5.0 is the first support. Below that, the next levels are 4.5 and 4.0. If it can break above 5.5, the next target is likely around 5.8 to 6.0.
In the short term, it has reclaimed several moving averages, and momentum looks relatively strong.
But with a move this big in a single day, the probability of a pullback isn’t small either. Chasing in like this could easily mean getting caught in the retracement. If you wait, you might also worry it will keep running.
My habit is: I don’t chase these sharply-rising ones. I wait for a pullback, then check for confirmation of support. If 4.8 to 5.0 can hold, it means the buying is real. If it can’t hold, then I keep waiting.
Volatility is high—don’t over-allocate, and don’t let emotions drive you.
The moment the CPI was released yesterday, QQQ took a direct dive of nearly 1% within 15 minutes.
For me, this kind of data-driven short-term fluctuation has always been the most uncomfortable.
You get the direction right, but you didn’t manage to place a trade in time—either because you missed the entry, or your position was too small—so you just watched the price move past.
On Binance Wallet, the prediction market offers a game that fits this scenario pretty well: 15-minute Up & Down trading for SPY and QQQ.
The logic is simple: You decide whether SPY or QQQ will rise or fall over the next 15 minutes—choose Up or Down. You don’t need to analyze individual stocks; you just make a call based on the short-term direction of the market index.
CPI data, Non-Farm Payrolls, FOMC statements Whenever major data comes out, the market’s short-term reaction is often easier to predict than its long-term impact.
When the macro direction is clear, this kind of tool is actually much less stressful than perpetual futures.
👉 Binance Wallet → Up & Down → SPY / QQQ
For reference only, not investment advice. DYOR $QQQ @Binance Wallet
UNI has been pretty strong these past couple of days.
The price moved from a little over 5 to around 6. In 24 hours it’s up roughly 10%, and over the week it’s up more than 30%. You can see it on both Binance and OKX’s trending search lists.
The catalysts aren’t complicated either.
On Robinhood Chain, trading volume has surged—daily DEX volume has pushed past $1 billion. Uniswap is the biggest DEX there, and its fees have also risen along with it.
Then there’s the UNIfication mechanism, which takes protocol revenue to buy back and burn UNI. The higher the trading volume, the more gets burned, meaning less supply. The logic is pretty straightforward.
On top of that, with RWA, tokenized assets’ trading volume is also growing, and Uniswap has a solid share in this segment.
With several lines of momentum pushing at the same time, it’s been moving fairly strongly.
//
FIL is moving too.
It jumped from around 0.77 to above 0.80. Over the past 24 hours it’s up about 10% to 16%. Trading volume has clearly expanded, and open interest on the derivatives side is also rising.
But this FIL move doesn’t have any particularly explosive headline news. It feels more like when the broader market is weak, capital is rotating to find places to move—FIL just happened to break through a resistance zone it had been stuck at for a while. Technical rebound plus incoming funds is what lifted it.
The Filecoin Onchain Cloud narrative is still there, but it isn’t the direct reason for this pump.
Looking at the two together, both are doing relatively well in this round of DeFi plus infrastructure.
Volatility is pretty high for both—don’t chase. Manage take-profit and stop-loss.
SKR recently surged to second place on CoinGecko search trends.
In the past 24 hours, the price increase is often 130%–180%, and at some points the trading volume exceeded $200 million.
It’s the native token for Seeker, Solana’s second-generation Web3 phone.
Seeker is the follow-up model to Saga, with a hardware-level Seed Vault wallet, a standalone dApp Store, device verification, and an economic model all integrated together.
SKR is the governance and incentive token for this whole ecosystem.
Staking to Guardian nodes earns inflation rewards (0% commission in the early launch period, paid out every 48 hours), participating in governance, incentives for the dApp store, and reward allocations for users and developers.
Total supply is about 10 billion tokens. When it launched in January this year, nearly 2 billion tokens were airdropped to Seeker phone users and Season 1 developers.
A recent catalyst is the wrap-up of the Seeker Summer event, along with reward distributions.
My view on this kind of token has always been very straightforward: the ceiling for a mobile-ecosystem token depends on how many phones get sold and whether there are things people actually use in the dApp Store.
Solana’s phone line has indeed iterated from Saga to Seeker, but up to now, no Web3 phone has really broken out a killer use case.
The “hardware-locked-to-a-token” model sounds like a neat closed loop, but in reality, most users buy the phone mainly for the airdrops.
Once the airdrop is done and the event ends, the moment of verification arrives.
Will people stay using the phone—or sell their tokens.
Mid- and small-cap tokens are extremely volatile. The above is market observation, not investment advice.
CoinGecko’s search interest ranks #1 over the past 3 hours; it’s doubled over 24 hours, nearly 6x over 7 days, with a new price high and market cap reaching $200 million
It’s a token launch platform on the Robinhood Chain
Users can create a fixed-supply token in one click using their own wallet, while also deploying a liquidity pool with locked liquidity. The platform doesn’t touch your funds
What I find interesting is the deflationary design A portion of the trading fees goes back to the protocol, and most of it is used for automatic buybacks and to burn PONS. So far, it has burned nearly 30% of the total supply
The platform has launched hundreds of thousands of tokens in total, and trading volume is also not small This indicates that usage is real It’s not inflated by airdrops; there are actual people creating tokens there and trading them
But I’ll say this: the deflation mechanism looks good only if trading volume can hold up. Right now, hype is at the top—fees are high, burns are fast, the price is rising, and hype is even higher That’s a positive feedback loop. The problem is that when things go the other way, it’s just as fast. Once trading volume drops, the burn rate slows, and the narrative won’t stand
The window for meme token launch platforms is always short Pumpfun got popular; now PONS is taking the baton. Whether it can retain users depends on whether the platform has anything left once the hype fades
Crypto markets are extremely volatile. The above is market observation, not investment advice. $PUMP
Kanye released a coin called YZY on Solana in August last year. The branding was Yeezy-branded payments ecosystem—paired with Ye Pay and the YZY Card.
On the day it launched, it surged to a valuation of several billion dollars, and then it collapsed all the way down. By the end of the year, the price was only around $0.0008.
Then, in 2026, it rebounded.
As of August 29, YTD gains are roughly 42,730%. CoinLore ranks YZY #1 for 2026 performance. The current price is between $0.29 and $0.35, and the circulating market cap is roughly between $90 million and just over $100 million.
The numbers are terrifying. But I need to explain how this surge actually happened.
From $0.0008 to $0.3—the percentage is obviously outrageous—but the starting point was a price that was almost zero. A low-base rebound and ongoing fundamental growth are two different things.
A few facts: total supply is 1 billion coins, circulating supply is about 300 million, and the remaining ~70% is still locked in Yeezy Investments LLC’s vesting/entitlement plan.
On August 16, about 120 million coins were just unlocked—that’s 12% of the total supply.
The pattern for meme “starnames” never really changes: when it’s rising, it makes you feel like a genius; when it’s falling, it makes you question your life. YZY already played this out on its very first day after launch.
NVIDIA Q2 Revenue Reaches 96.2 Billion, Up More Than 100% Year Over Year Guidance Is Even More Aggressive
For FY2028, growth of 70%—before Wall Street would only dare to project 45%
The stock surged 8.74% on the day; single-day market cap added $442 billion
My take: The most important part of this earnings report isn’t the numbers themselves—it answers a question that’s been hanging for two months: Has AI compute demand already peaked?
The answer is no. And it’s accelerating.
The market was briefly led astray by DeepSeek—after reasoning efficiency improves, training demand would supposedly collapse.
But the 70% guidance tells you one thing: Big tech is still feverishly stockpiling GPUs, and order visibility is far higher than what Wall Street models assumed. Efficiency gains haven’t reduced demand; instead, they make more scenarios cost-effective. Demand is being unlocked—not replaced.
My own positioning logic hasn’t changed: NVIDIA isn’t cheap, but it’s the toll gate across the entire AI infrastructure pipeline.
As long as downstream players keep expanding capacity, it keeps collecting tolls. The thing that has truly made me hesitate has never been valuation—it’s only been the day when the customer starts cutting capex. This earnings report tells me that day hasn’t arrived yet.
Take one step further: If NVIDIA says 70%, should upstream HBM, CoWoS packaging, and power infrastructure growth expectations also be revised upward? Those have not yet been priced in sufficiently.
The above is for personal information breakdown only and does not constitute any investment advice. DYOR $NVDA
It went from a market cap of a few thousand dollars all the way up to a few tens of millions. It got cut roughly in half several times in the middle, then rallied back again. Recently, from the lows it rebounded again with increased volume; the current price is about $0.058, up over 40% in 24h, and the market cap is back around 58 million
The previous high was about $0.077 (market cap close to 80 million). It’s still ranging within this box. Trading is active, with about 48,000 holder addresses
The attention brought by the film going viral is still there. But fundamentally, it’s a sentiment-driven market—up and down like this is normal. Don’t chase the price. $牛来
USD1 is anchored to Canton, cutting into the institutional multi-trillion settlement corridor
On Canton Network, you can now directly mint and settle USD1 This was officially announced on August 25 Not bridged over—it's natively issued USD1 is minted, circulates, and settles directly on Canton, without routing through other chains Why is this action worth singling out? Because Canton is not a typical public blockchain // Canton Network is a public blockchain built by Digital Asset specifically for institutions Its participant roster looks like this: DTCC, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, BNP Paribas, HSBC, BNY Mellon, Broadridge, Euroclear, Tradeweb More than 600 institutions are connected
I always felt that the way bStocks used to be played was too monotonous: you buy, wait for it to rise, and then sell. That’s pretty much no different from buying tokenized stocks directly on a normal exchange.
The composability that on-chain assets should have hasn’t really been used—this time, with the @Binance Wallet launch of the bStocks DeFi Center, the gap has finally been filled.
First: provide liquidity, earn trading fees Put bStocks into the liquidity pool. When others buy and sell, the trading fees generated are shared with you.
Traditional LP operations require you to prepare the corresponding assets in advance and manually set the ratios; concentrated liquidity pools also need you to adjust the asset proportions based on price ranges, which is a hassle. Now, with the V3 pools that support Zap, it’s much easier: you can deposit single-coin or any ratio of bStocks + stablecoins, and the system automatically sets the proportions. If you want to exit, you can even withdraw only one type of coin.
Honestly, I really like this design. Before, holding bStocks meant you could do almost nothing besides wait for it to go up. Now, at least during a sideways market, you’re still getting fees.
Second: collateralized lending Hold NVDAB (Nvidia bStocks) and SPCXB (SpaceX bStocks). If you don’t want to sell but need USDT to do something else, you can now pledge bStocks and borrow against it.
When the stock goes up, you still earn—while you also have an additional amount of usable funds in hand.
This logic is called stock collateralization in traditional stock markets. Back then, you had to go through procedures with a broker. Now you can do it directly in your wallet, which is the efficiency improvement that— in my view—on-chain truly brings.
The lending list will show the collateral, borrowable assets, protocol, borrow interest rate, and total borrowed amount. It supports quick viewing of borrowable assets and which bStocks can be used as collateral.
My real take: between these two features, I’m more bullish on the lending side.
The reason is: with liquidity provision, there’s the issue of impermanent loss.
If your bStocks price is volatile, when you withdraw it, you might end up with less than if you had just held directly. For people holding high-volatility assets like Nvidia and SpaceX, the returns might not be worth it.
The lending side is more straightforward.
You maintain your exposure to the stocks while freeing up a portion of liquidity. If you’re right, you benefit on both sides.
Of course, the risk is here too: if bStocks drops below the liquidation threshold, the system will forcibly sell to repay the debt.
This isn’t a small matter—before borrowing, think carefully about how much drawdown your position can withstand. DYOR. #BStocks
On August 19, Moderna’s stock surged 177% in a single day. From $63 straight up to $174. Its market value grew by nearly $45 billion in one day. On the day, the shorts had a paper loss of $5.5 billion.
A vaccine stock— not AI, not chips, but a cancer vaccine. —— Moderna and Merck collaborated on a personalized skin cancer vaccine, and the Phase 3 clinical trial succeeded. In plain language: after cutting out the tumor, this vaccine significantly lowers the chances of cancer coming back and spreading. Over the past two or three years, the market felt the mRNA pandemic dividend was over—Moderna was basically being treated like a forgotten corpse. Then, one round of cancer data directly slapped that narrative in the face. · · · · The next day it gave back more than 20%; the profit-taking crowd ran. But on August 25, Barclays raised its target price, and it jumped another 14%, closing around 158. It’s not a one-day drop and you’re dead. Someone is seriously re-pricing the story. —— My take: The AI narrative is too crowded. The market is extremely hungry for a “real breakthrough that isn’t AI.” Anything that can prove “technology can still truly save lives” will be priced insanely. I won’t chase it just because it spiked one day, and I won’t dismiss it just because it pulled back the next day. The scientific progress is real, but the pricing may be running ahead of commercialization. $MRNA
The hardest part isn’t finding trading opportunities.
It’s holding on when nobody around agrees with you and the charts have been dead for weeks. @osf_rekt said it perfectly.
I’ve been through it. I buy what I believe is undervalued, watch the timeline rotate through five different narratives, and my position just sits there, flat and lifeless.
Every day you doubt yourself. Whenever something else pumps, it feels like proof that you were wrong.
But that’s exactly the filtering mechanism. Most people can’t stand boredom. They need action. They need the screen to move.
So they sell too early, chase the next thing—over and over again.
Belief-based trading isn’t glamorous. There’s no screenshot of “I caught a 5-minute candlestick.” There are only weeks of silence, and then one day the thesis comes true—you realize the edge was never about the entry.
It was about the patience afterward.
“Find what you’re good at, and do as much of it as possible—not chase what you’re not good at.”
XRP just poked the top around 1.55 on the 15-minute chart, and now it’s pulling back to 1.4587, down 2.6%
Looking at this volume spike, to be honest, I’m a bit uneasy The short-term moving averages are pressing down hard, the sell pressure is still there, and a reversal isn’t that easy
Worst of all is that Charles message—he somehow again brought up the CLAIMIT bill, planning to re-label XRP as a security With this double squeeze from both geopolitics and regulation, market sentiment is stretched so tight it feels like a string
First, let’s see whether the 1.45 support level can hold If it can’t, then in the short term it will most likely still need to go lower to find a bottom
But if you’re holding spot and don’t feel like selling right away, you can open the Prediction section in the Binance Web3 Wallet—since the market is currently choppy, you might as well use these swings to hedge a bit within the ecosystem
What everyone’s playing with—predicting predicted market trends—is itself a kind of defensive strategy, and you can even earn some WLFI rewards along the way.
Right now the market is basically a game of who can be more cautious—don’t open high-leverage positions while everything is just swinging wildly; otherwise you’ll end up taking the loss. Let’s see if 1.45 support proves itself—hold steady and we’ll talk again. $XRP
Last week, U.S. Treasury yields suddenly spiked, startling the whole market
This week (Aug 24–28) is even more intense With AI earnings reports and the Fed’s stance—both laid bare in the same week
I’ll go over a few key points
//
On Wednesday night, Nvidia (NVDA) releases its earnings report after the close
This is the single most important event of the week—no question
Wall Street expected revenue: $91–95 billion, nearly doubling year over year
But the numbers themselves aren’t the main point
What everyone is really nervous about are three things:
➢ How smooth the chip transition is—Blackwell moving to the next generation, Vera Rubin ➢ Whether data-center orders are still booming ➢ Whether gross margin can keep holding around 75% (Explanation: gross margin is how much gross profit you have left out of every 100 dollars in sales. 75% is already extremely high—the market worries it could drop.)
If Nvidia’s guidance for the next quarter beats expectations → people will feel that the AI investment cycle isn’t anywhere near over, and they’ll keep buying
If the guidance is conservative—even a little → highly valued tech stocks could all fall together
On the same day, Salesforce and CrowdStrike also report results
In other words, the entire AI software sector is being tested at once: Are you making real money with AI or not?
//
Macroeconomic data is also packed into this week Core PCE and GDP revisions come out back-to-back
You can think of PCE as the inflation gauge the Fed cares about most
If this number comes in too high → it suggests inflation hasn’t cooled enough, interest rates may stay elevated for longer, and the stock market will face pressure
If it unexpectedly falls → tech stocks may finally catch their breath
//
On Thursday: the Jackson Hole annual symposium
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh is scheduled to speak
This event happens once a year. Global central bank governors all attend, and it’s one of the most important occasions when the Fed signals its intentions
With the 30-year Treasury yield just brushing the highest levels in nearly 20 years, the market really wants to know: What does the Fed think about this yield spike? Will it take action?
Every word Warsh says will be parsed line by line
//
In between, there are also consumer confidence, new home sales, and earnings from several retailers
These are more like background indicators But they answer one question: Are ordinary people still spending?
//
So the core conflict this week is:
> In AI: the story is still accelerating, and Nvidia is the proving ground
> In interest rates: persistently high yields are compressing valuations
> For tech stocks this time, they have to answer two questions at once—whether growth is still there, and whether the cost of that growth gets eaten away by higher rates
A dog sticking a pipe pops up on the Robinhood Chain. pipedog ( $PIPEDOG ) Official quote: “this pipedog / he has pipe / he has question” Pure Meme, community-consensus driven, no complex storyline.
//
Total supply is about 12.34 billion coins, fully circulating, with no unlock pressure. Launched on July 28. The next day it touched an ATH above 0.005, then it later dropped by more than 60%. It’s now around 0.0022, with a market cap of about $27 million.
//
What Meme coins are betting on is whether attention—and whether the chain itself—can bring traffic over. I don’t hold any position; I’m just observing. Stuff like this can rise by a few multiples, or fall to zero—there’s no in-between. If you want to play—use spare money, keep a small position, and don’t get carried away. Data as of August 23, 2026; refer to live market quotes for the latest.
Shielded pool usage is rising. The network has just completed the Ironwood upgrade, and with the AI era, people are becoming increasingly sensitive to data privacy.
With these factors stacking together, sentiment turned bullish.
Winklevoss’s side has laid out Zcash mining capacity through a Cypherpunk strategy. They hold a significant share, and the supply side is also tightening.
//
My take:
The direction is correct.
The privacy-coin track has been dormant for too long. In this sector, ZEC’s technical maturity really is the highest, and the institutional signals are also the most concentrated.
But in a 24-hour window, the swing exceeds 40%. Futures trading volume has reached the multi-billion-dollar range, with a very high level of leverage participation.
With this kind of move, the risk of chasing is something I don’t need to spell out. Next, what needs watching is whether the ETF can truly get finalized, and whether regulators’ stance toward privacy coins will shift.
The current price is roughly fluctuating in the 800–820 range. Market cap has risen to around $13–14 billion, putting it among the leaders in the crypto market.$ZEC
The past few days’ performance of mRNA has been quite interesting
On August 19, Moderna and Merck (MSD) released interim Phase 3 results for their mRNA cancer vaccine
With a personalized vaccine plus Keytruda, it significantly outperformed Keytruda alone in melanoma
The trial enrolled 1,137 participants, and both the primary and secondary endpoints were met
Previous Phase 2b five-year data: recurrence risk reduced by 49%, and risk of distant metastasis reduced by 59%
On the day, the stock price jumped from 63 to 174, up 177% The next day it fell 23%, closing at 133
// Scientifically, this is a real breakthrough For the first time, mRNA has proven itself in a large-scale Phase 3 cancer trial It’s no longer just a COVID vaccine But on the trading side, I won’t chase after it has already run up; even so, after the drop, MRNA is still 63% above the average analyst target price of 82.62
In the last quarter, the company had a net loss of 782 million, with revenue of 145 million Personalized manufacturing, costs, approvals—every step takes time Out of the 177% surge, how much was driven by sentiment and short-covering? The 23% drop the next day already provides part of the answer
//
Moderna indeed has an additional new story supported by data But the current price has already priced in a lot of the optimism in advance Don’t chase, and don’t deny it either Wait for the full data—no rush The above is purely my personal observations and not any investment advice. Dyor $MRNA.US
SEC this week released a new rule proposal specifically targeting a registration exemption for crypto investment contracts.
Two paths:
The first is a one-time exemption, allowing issuances of up to $5 million within four years. The second allows issuances of up to $75 million every 12 months.
Both require the issuer to make principle-based, narrative disclosures to investors. The second threshold is higher—you must provide financial statements and continue with ongoing reporting.
In plain terms: the SEC is no longer blanketly saying “all token offerings are illegal,” but instead has provided a compliance pathway. You can issue—but you have to disclose, be transparent, and follow the rules.
//
0xSammy mentioned that this couldn’t have better timing for $UMIA. I looked into the logic:
What UMiA is doing is capital formation for token-native projects plus a governance technology stack.
Simply put, they help projects issue tokens and raise funds in a compliant way, and build governance. They’ve already submitted Blockworks B1 transparency disclosures.
If these SEC exemption rules really take effect, then for infrastructure like Umia—“helping projects go through compliant issuance processes”—demand would ramp up directly.
Before there was a compliance channel, everyone could only operate in grey areas.
Now that there are clear rules, projects that want to do things the right way will need tools and services to help them meet disclosure requirements.
A few elements are indeed aligned: regulators are opening a window + the infrastructure is already being built + the token has visibly bounced today. Whether it’s worth following, you decide. Early-stage projects + policy still in the proposal stage means there are plenty of uncertainties. DYOR. #SEC
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.