币圈十二叔

Once this money gets thrown down, $ZHIPU can go pretty far.
I’ve always been impressed with this lab, especially Professor Tang Jie.
I guess most of this money went to buying Huawei hardware. As for electricity, China basically doesn’t worry about it—the government can cover it.
My funds will automatically flow from the weakening strategy to the strong modules: contract in a headwind, add aggressively in a tailwind, and the pullback guardrails are dynamic. There’s a live trading entry point on the homepage.

I can see that Mihoyo is pretty clear about this move: otome games basically don’t go head-to-head and grind it out themselves anymore. “Unsettled Case File” is currently in maintenance mode, and it’s not really in direct competition with Papergames.
But its playstyle is a bit like that used by $TENCENT —it doesn’t go on the stage itself to build, but instead invests in all kinds of games everywhere, including otome titles.
So far, it has already invested in two former NetEase employees: one who used to be an otome game production person, and another who used to be an SLG production person.
My funding will automatically shift from weaker strategy streams to stronger modules: contract in a headwind, scale up in a tailwind, and the drawdown guardrails are dynamic. There’s a live trading entry point on the home page.

2026—Walking to where we are now, my biggest takeaway can be summed up in one sentence: in a real bull market where you’re truly eating big meat, it basically won’t be a setup where you’re only betting on one single theme.
AI, storage, biotech, energy, infrastructure—I've seen money moving across all these lines.
On the storage front, $MU and $SNDK have recently shown clear follow-through, and $MRVL is also the direction I’ve been watching. Besides that, there are a few other stocks quietly strengthening in sync—I won’t point to them one by one.
In the end, whether you can actually make this money comes down to one thing: being able to see, one step earlier than most people, where the funds are rotating.
To put it bluntly, most people in the market lose to emotion. I use a replicable and verifiable quantitative system to turn human weaknesses into machine discipline. If you want to be lazy and just ride along, go to my homepage and tap the link.

$FIL / A layer of decent liquidity is sitting above the $USDT, and I think if the price moves up, it will most likely come up to test this level.
My “Dragon-Hunting” method is to chase shorts in the direction at high levels, while “Slaying the Dragon” is to harvest when things get overheated. The directional strategy is unified and driven by the scoring center. If you want to see how it runs, go to the homepage.

Account long/short ratio 0.66 for $BTW ; whale positions ratio 2.018 — on the same K line, retail is short while whales are buying. I’m on the whale side, but I won’t chase at the current price of 0.70; I’ll wait for a pullback to 0.62–0.65.

In this 36% move, the most expensive thing isn’t the price—it’s the funding/fee: +0.3334% over 24 hours. The longs pay out a protection fee every day that isn’t cheap, and they’re using that to bet on holding positions here. If whales are willing to pay, and retail is willing to short, whoever loosens first will have volatility amplified against their side.

4H EMA5 at 0.70, EMA25 at 0.60, EMA60 at 0.50; daily EMA5 at 0.62, EMA25 at 0.49. The long alignment hasn’t broken. But the daily RSI is 80.5, and the last three 4H candles have already pulled back 7.89%—sliding from 0.80 down to 0.70. The trend is still intact, but the position isn’t cheap.

When $BTW surged into the 36%, BTC only rose 1.24%, while the whole market is still at -2.99%. Independent strength means the buy side is paying out of its own pocket; when the tide goes out, there’s no big board propping it up, so the pullback is likely to be more direct than the push.

Twelve Uncle’s move is very clear: don’t touch above 0.70. If it pulls back to 0.62–0.65 and shows acceptance, then we enter again. I placed my order at the 0.62 level. If it breaks below 0.60, the structure is invalid. If it hits 0.585, I’ll admit defeat and leave.

This contract has only been live for 101 days, and there’s no spot—30% intraday volatility is normal. Don’t size your position using the same “old coin” ruler.

📊 Direction: wait for a pullback to go long
💰 Entry reference: 0.62 (pullback confirmation in the 0.62–0.65 range)
🛑 Stop loss: 0.585; if it breaks below 0.60 structure, exit immediately
🎯 Take profit 1: 0.70 (4H EMA5; reclaims = considered returning to strength)
🎯 Take profit 2: 0.80 (the previous highs in the 4H and daily ranges)

The longs are paying protection fees; I won’t buy this one on his behalf.

Are you going to stand at 0.62 for a pullback and support while the whales keep holding up? Or do you stand at 0.60 and break down, and retail flips to short? Pick one.

$BTW #技术分析 #Twelve Uncle
If you agree with this approach, brothers, come to my Binance copy-trading lead page—I'll call entries/exits there in real time.
Click my profile to copy trade immediately
https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/copy-trading/lead-details/5051200019981811968

You asked the wrong question.
What I’m concerned about is this: when index funds are forced to buy tens of billions of $MSTR , and $MSTR uses that leverage to scoop up more limited $BTC , what does the supply cap end up becoming?
That’s the feedback loop Wall Street can’t stop.
So are you waiting for that date, or moving ahead to get your position in before rebalancing?
In plain terms, most people in the market lose to emotion. I use a quant system that’s replicable and verifiable—turning human frailties into machine discipline. If you want to be lazy and just follow along, go to the homepage and tap one button.

Today the AI sector is getting quite lively.
$FIL directly surged 22%, and $IQ also rose by nearly 17%—these two are clearly the leaders.
There are also a bunch of AI-related shill coins following along; $IOTX is up more than 8%. In addition, a few smaller coins are moving in sync too, with gains ranging from teens of a percentage point down to a few points.
Overall, it looks like there’s money moving in this sector today. Whether it can keep running remains to be watched for another couple of days.
No single strategy can cover all market conditions—that’s the essence of the market. My multi-strategy matrix helps the right people win the right battles; having both offense and defense feels far more comfortable than going all-in. There’s an entry point on the homepage.

I pulled out the Top 15 growth stocks for 2026 and went through them one by one. The key support zones were all drawn using Fibonacci retracements.
$INTC I’m watching around 95 dollars; $PLTR 157 at 57 dollars; $HOOD 109 at 57 dollars—can these levels hold? It matters more than just talking about growth.
For the remaining ten or so, the prices range from a few dollars to over three hundred dollars, and basically they’re all near their respective Fibonacci support bands.
My view is simple: treat this list as a watchlist first, not a starter’s pistol. When it reaches the support zone, you still need to look at volume and follow-through/acceptance. Only after it holds steady should you talk about pushing.
Hearing the big-name accounts call trades and FOMO-buying is the worst way to get caught. I’ve fully systematized everything and backtested it. If you follow along, you can sync real-trade strategies with one click. Check the homepage.

$BR rebounded to $0.50—only then would I consider going short: RSI(7) has already surged to 96.3, the 24-hour funding rate is cumulative +0.2651%, and the longs are effectively paying for their positions.

The most dangerous part isn’t that it’s rising a lot—it’s that the price is already stretched far away from the 4-hour EMA5 at $0.429586. Over the last 3 waves, volatility has reached 17.32%. $0.54 is the high of this leg. If the rebound can’t quite reach it and prices face pressure around $0.50, the crowded long positions will let go first. The long/short account ratio is 0.9387, but the big traders’ positioning ratio is 1.9691—there’s a clear divergence in positioning. Whoever’s stop-loss triggers first will amplify the volatility.

The daily EMA5 is still at $0.35403 and EMA25 at $0.271433, so the uptrend hasn’t been directly broken. But RSI(14) has also climbed to 74.4. A strong trend doesn’t automatically mean today’s price is worth chasing. $BR is clearly stronger than BTC and the whole market—it’s independent strength. However, during a tide pullback, it lacks broader market support, so the retracement may be more direct.

I’m not shorting near $0.40108. I’ll wait for the rebound to around $0.50 and assess whether it faces pressure there. Once it breaks above $0.54, the short thesis fails—I’ll immediately concede and exit. First watch the 4-hour EMA5 below, then the EMA25. Don’t fantasize one pullback into a crash.

📊 Direction: Short
💰 Entry reference: rebound and face pressure near $0.50
🛑 Stop-loss: $0.54 — if it closes above, stop out immediately and exit
🎯 Take-profit 1: $0.429586 — pullback to the 4-hour EMA5
🎯 Take-profit 2: $0.320494 — pullback to the 4-hour EMA25

The faster it rises, the more you need to wait for positions to loosen first.
When you’re at $0.50: rebound facing pressure, or at $0.54: breakout continuation? Choose one.

$BR #技术分析 #十二叔
I’ve entered this move myself too. If you want to follow, come to my Binance copy-trading leader page. Remember to start with small size and take it slowly.
Click my profile to copy trade instantly
https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/copy-trading/lead-details/5051200019981811968

I’m watching $MRVL : it ranks 31st in the electronic semiconductor fabless sector.
The stock price has pulled back 51% from its recent historical high; it held at the July 29 low, and then has been consolidating and building a base for two months.
Next, the key is whether it can break above the historical high’s AVWAP—if it does, it’s worth keeping a close eye 👀
The market is always switching; trends come with chop, one-sided moves, and black swans in rotation. A multi-strategy matrix ensures there’s a corresponding play for each type of market environment. Watch the live trades on the homepage while following along.

I haven't seen $FIL rise to $100 within a few days.
The “leading-stock strategy” means you only go long when the potential is greater than 95 to launch; “slaying the dragon” means if the heat is already exhausted, you short. Everything follows a clear set of rules—no guesswork. If you want to follow along, go to my profile.

我觉得，马斯克、奥尔特曼和阿莫代伊突然推动 AI“降速”，最值得关注的意外影响之一，可能就是内存价格。
三星、SK 海力士、$SKHY 和 $MU 已经因涉嫌 DRAM 价格操纵及协调减产遭到起诉。
手动交易管不住手是常态。我系统信号触发才动、止损止盈自动执行，不被情绪带偏。想跟同步的看我主页。

我看 $MU 目前正在回踩突破位，理想情况下这里应该会出现反弹。
但如果反弹失败并跌破925，走势可能会明显转弱，进一步下探800附近，因为那将意味着斜向支撑被跌破，突破回踩也宣告失败。
龙头战法是潜力分>95 才启动做多，屠龙是热度透支就做空，一套规则清清楚楚，不靠拍脑袋。想跟的去我主页。

$AVAAI This move is clearly not the tail of $BTC : it’s up 11.86% in the past 24 hours, while $BTC is only up 1.60%, and the whole market is down 2.22% as well. Independent strength could still be possible, but right now the long-side momentum is already starting to get overstretched. I choose to wait for a rebound to go short—I’m not chasing this emotional candle.

Funding rate: +0.2113% accumulated over 24 hours. Long/short ratio: 2.3322. Large-holder position ratio: 1.5801. Direction is the same, but longs are clearly crowded. OI is already close to 70% of market cap, and leverage participation is heavy. If price can’t hold, letting go will happen faster than the pump. Without spot support, futures volatility is even easier to amplify.

Technically: on the 4H chart, price is still above EMA5 (0.009608) and EMA25 (0.008928), so the trend hasn’t broken yet. However, RSI7 is already 88.5 and RSI14 is 77.4. On the daily chart, EMA5 (0.00918) is still below EMA25 (0.00956), which suggests the short-term rally has been very strong, but the daily pullback/repair hasn’t been fully confirmed. Around the current price, it’s not worth hard chasing. Wait for a rebound and resistance near 0.01000 to enter. If it gathers volume and holds above 0.01000 and continues pushing higher, the short thesis fails—then I’ll admit it and back off.

📊 Direction: Short
💰 Entry reference: Enter short near 0.01000 after it meets resistance
🛑 Stop-loss: 0.01020; once triggered, exit
🎯 Take-profit 1: 0.00918, looking back at daily EMA5
🎯 Take-profit 2: 0.008928, looking back at 4H EMA25

Before chasing, think clearly: is this truly an opportunity, or is FOMO driving you?
Will you loosen your grip on the longs from the high ground, or keep breaking out above 0.01000? Pick one.

$AVAAI #技术分析 #十二叔
If you want to watch the market with me and trade together, just go to the Binance homepage to see my live trading ideas
Click my homepage to start copying trades immediately
https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/copy-trading/lead-details/5051200019981811968

I saw $TCEHY (Tencent Holdings) use a strategy for 11 years and grow 3.3x, but along the way it also experienced a 74% drawdown.
No single strategy can take all bets across every market condition—that’s the essence of the market. My multi-strategy matrix lets the right people win the right battles, balancing offense and defense, which is more comfortable than going all-in in one shot. There’s a link on the homepage.

Today tech stocks are not moving in lockstep up or down; funds are clearly choosing the directions they prefer.
$BE is up 6.62%, and $MRVL is also up 4.09%, with several other tech stocks strengthening at the same time;
but on the other hand, there are also a few names down by nearly 4%, while multiple others are only slightly up or down.
The market is quite split, and I’m also thinking about who can break out to the next +6% tomorrow.
Betting everything on one direction is too dependent on luck. My U.S. stock strategy uses tools like SQQQ with a low position size to absorb volatility; when it should be short, I short—these strategies don’t interfere with my crypto strategy. There’s a live-trading entry on the homepage.

I saw $KOMA meet strong resistance around $0.0245 after a big surge. It’s currently starting to show signs of weakening and a potential pullback; buyer momentum is fading. In the short term, it looks more like a potential shorting opportunity—consider 3–5x leverage.
For long-term holding at lower levels, keep BTC/ETH/SOL as your core position. Use “Slayer Dragon / Hunter Dragon” to harvest in more volatile coins, so the portfolio can capture Beta over the long run while controlling drawdowns. The live trading entry is on my homepage.

BTC only rose 1.55%, while the whole market is still down 2.21%. Yet $T surged to +25.64%. I’m waiting for a pullback to go long, and I won’t chase at the current price of $0.00466. Independent strength is true, but the overall market isn’t propping it up—pullbacks could hit even more directly.

4H EMA5=$0.004846, EMA25=$0.004456, EMA60=$0.004369. On the daily chart, it also keeps a bullish alignment, and the trend hasn’t broken. The issue is RSI7=94.5 and RSI14=87.9—short-term conditions are already too hot. You can’t use emotion as an entry reason.

24H funding rate is -6.8567%. Shorts are paying, and the squeeze-fuel is still there. But the long/short ratio on the account is 1.1084, and big-holders’ positioning is 1.271—both are leaning long. OI has reached about 19% of market cap, so the position isn’t light. If the pullback holds, the squeeze may continue; if support fails, crowded longs will drop their hands first.

The contract has been live for 1321 days. This isn’t an early-stage new-coin liquidity story. In the recent 4 hours, total trading volume is about $27.12 million—this only indicates active trading, not a substitute for confirming your position. I’m not taking risk at $0.00466; I’ll wait to get filled around $0.00448. $0.00436 is below EMA60—if it breaks, the logic fails. First target is EMA5 overhead; the second target is derived from the daily chart’s recent 3 swings of 10.75% volatility.

📊 Direction: Go long
💰 Entry reference: Pull back and hold near $0.00448
🛑 Stop loss: $0.00436. If it breaks, admit defeat and exit
🎯 Take profit 1: $0.004846, reclaim the 4H EMA5
🎯 Take profit 2: $0.00496, based on the daily chart’s recent 3 swings (10.75% volatility)

Negative funding provides the fuel; moving averages provide the position.

When price comes back to $0.00448, will you buy and absorb? Or after it loses $0.004369, will you let longs off the handle? Pick one.

$T #技术分析 #十二叔
I’ve already posted this trade thesis in the Binance copy-trading page. If you agree with the logic, come in and track along with the operations.
Click my profile to copy-trade now.
https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/copy-trading/lead-details/5051200019981811968

Today I saw that the bulk of the capital is concentrated in semiconductors, volatility, and commodity assets.
On the gainers list, $SKDD led the way with an increase of 8.5%, $SOXSB rose 4.5%, and there was also a volatility-related asset that climbed 3.0%.
Among the most actively traded instruments, $SKHYNIX had a trading value of about $32.22 million, and another instrument reached a trading value of $51.22 million.
My shorting is based on a multi-factor scoring system from an RSI-threshold dynamic engine—not on guesswork or feel-based calls. How the live trading runs can be viewed directly on the homepage.

如果我真的极度担心 AI 给人类带来的生存或灭绝风险，最直接的做法就是先把这轮全面泡沫捅破。
$SPY 、$QQQ 、$BTC 以及其他多只科技股一起抛售，形成的传染效应，最终可能把那些前沿 AI 实验室也一并拖下水。
散户亏钱大多不是看不准，是管不住手。我这套回测过、止损全自动的系统 7×24 盯盘不漏单，想跟同步的去看我主页。