| Analyst | Signals / Technical and Fundamental Analysis / I analyze trends, indicators, and important market news / Join for profitable market entries!
🚨 $12,400,000 FLEW AWAY IN SECONDS DUE TO A STUPID MISTAKE! 😱💀🔥
Imagine: you regularly send ETH to a verified address of Galaxy Digital. Everything is automated. You copy from the transaction history — and bam! 💥
4,556 ETH (~$12.4 million) went to the wrong place.
Why? Because the attacker created a poison address — almost identical to the legitimate one: the same first 4 and last 4 characters. They threw in a bunch of dust transactions to make the fake show up in your history. You copied the counterfeit instead of the real address — and hello, millions in someone else's wallet! 😤
This happened today (victim: 0xd674... — just 11 hours ago).
Here’s a screenshot from Lookonchain with the details Image: screenshot of the Lookonchain post with the victim's, Galaxy's, and poison address, plus an explanation of the attack]
LESSONS WORTH MILLIONS (literally): ✅ Never copy an address from the transaction history! 🚫 ✅ Check the first 6 + last 6 characters MANUALLY every time! 👀 ✅ Use a bookmark in your wallet or a QR code from an official source. ✅ Enable clipboard protection in Ledger/Trezor/MetaMask.
One click — and the stack disappeared.
Have you ever fallen into such a trap? Or is this your hard wake-up call? Drop in the comments and repost to save someone's portfolio! 💪🛡️ $ETH
Tokenization isn’t just moving an asset onto the blockchain.
The main question starts after issuance: who is responsible for compliance, trading, settlement, custody, and reporting?
That’s why the Dusk approach is interesting to me in the context of institutional assets of €300M+. An on-chain record can simplify reconciliations and audits, but by itself it doesn’t move the entire regulated process.
I think the real complexity of RWA is not only in the technology, but in coordinating all the participants and their responsibilities.
Tokenizing an asset is easier than tokenizing the infrastructure around it. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk Earlier I thought that the more public a blockchain is, the more trust it deserves: everyone sees the same data, can verify transactions, and therefore there is less room for opacity.
But Dusk made me look at privacy differently.
I’m drawn to the idea of selective disclosure: information doesn’t have to be open to everyone in order for the system to be verifiable. What matters is who has the right to access the data and under what conditions. Combined with zero-knowledge proofs and confidential transfers, it looks more like access control than total concealment.
This is especially important for regulated assets. Transactions involving securities don’t always need to be fully visible to the market, but regulators must have the ability to verify them when there are legitimate grounds.
So the question is no longer just about choosing between public and private. It’s much more interesting to consider who can see which data and under what circumstances.
That’s the approach that could make onchain infrastructure more suitable for the financial market.
Now it will be interesting to see how Dusk performs in real-world conditions: with many organizations, participants, and different assets.
Let’s look at the 4H and 1H. From August 19, the coin made a classic dump from ~131–133 down to the 92.12 minimum. After that: a clear rebound—volume on green candles noticeably increased, and the price returned above the middle Bollinger band (MB 99.83)
Supertrend (10,3) has turned around and is now below the price (95.60)
MACD: the histogram is already positive (0.29), DIF and DEA are converging
Entry points (zone): 99.70 – 100.60
Stop-loss: 96.50 – 96.80 (below the local low and the lower Bollinger band)
Take-profits: • TP1 — 104.50 (local high + upper Bollinger band) • TP2 — 108.00 – 109.50 • TP3 — 113.50 – 115.00 (the level of the previous consolidation)
I recommend partial profit-taking at TP1 (30–40%); then move the rest to break-even. The technical picture looks like a classic rebound after a panic sell-off, with large players building positions. As long as the price stays above 99.00–99.50, the structure is bullish. $UNITREE