$TRX Let me share a secure way to cash out, which is to create an overseas Visa credit card using roogoo: https://wap.roogoo.shop/register?inviteCode=mu7a4n
After staking with roogoo, you can use it with zero fees, and it can be linked to WeChat and Alipay, making daily transactions super convenient.
$ASTER This is the dumbest coin I've ever seen, with a low annual yield and constant sell pressure. Other coins at least use high returns to attract buyers, but you just dropped the act and are acting like a big shot.
$TRX is basically a gift to Binance. How is it that some people don't even know who just shorted them? For example, I can clearly see Binance's actual payout on my TRON wallet from a simple withdrawal. It's hilarious that they don't even know who's really taking their profits.
$TRX Although it is not as exaggerated as mentioned in the comments, the energy income this month is about 3000 yuan, which is little but enough to relax. If you are an early investor, TRX has not let anyone down.
$TRX Some people really have serious biases Quantum is not the key issue; the key verification method is that using the NP algorithm makes it difficult to turn NP problems into P problems with limited computational power. Therefore, resisting quantum computers is of great practical significance. Also, don’t just casually mention Sun Ge's operations; the Byzantine problem's 1/3 fault tolerance is there, and Sun Ge needs to control 1/3 of the SR positions, which means opposing centralized SRs like Binance, Google Cloud, OKX, Huobi, etc. Centralization is too severe; the difference with publicly traded stocks is just that there is national regulation, and it's just a matter of pricing power, but it has long been controlled by multiple parties in SR. Saying it’s entirely Sun Ge’s standalone coin shows a lack of understanding of DPOS + Byzantine fault tolerance algorithms. You may not understand, but market institutions will, and nine years of growth still won’t change your bias. Don’t miss your opportunities; even if you try shorting it, see if it goes to 0.4😂😂
$TRX I have always been optimistic about centralization rather than decentralized governance.
In terms of cryptography, mutual trust is absolutely not allowed. In cases of asymmetric information, the minimum limit of information entropy sharing should be preserved.
Based on this, having trusted nodes to rely on is very important; at least history has shown this, whether it's BTC or various exchanges. The lesson from history is that decentralization is actually detrimental to construction.
If you don't understand the above, let me give another example to explain. For instance, if humanity were in a completely free situation, it would certainly tend to be lazy or degenerate, which is a natural law. The profound truth that with a population over ten thousand, intelligence is halved is understood by anyone who has worked at the grassroots level. This is the weakness of human nature, the innate fear of humanity, and the 14-day unlocking can effectively avoid fear.
$TRX dpos+27 nodes of Byzantine fault tolerance, centralization is almost the strongest among all virtual currencies. Suddenly feel that the decentralized approach is likely to be unable to compete with centralization, which is a problem based on the trust gap.
As rumored, if Sun has more than 60% of the tokens, then he can easily control the consistency of TRX, but currently there is no evidence in the SR that more than 1/3 of the SR is actually controlled by Sun. If he wants to completely control TRX, according to the Byzantine problem, he must control at least 2/3 of the SR, but in fact, he is unlikely to achieve that. The SR is currently controlled by multiple parties. (For example, Binance and Google)
Binance's ambition may be the largest, with so many SRs distributing 99% and 100%, Binance only taking 70%, and each time the community governance does not vote (this should be considered half a malicious node in the Byzantine problem). Binance likely knows that once there are more malicious nodes, TRX will collapse, but unfortunately, capital seems to really give TRX opportunities.
Current real data of AINFT (latest as of April 2026) Number of users: Justin Sun officially announced that as of March 18, it has exceeded 601,000 users (mainly attracted by 1 million free points for new user registrations/trials). However, actual on-chain activity is bleak: the NFT trading market is poor—total trading volume in the last 7 days was only about 1255 TRX (approximately $350-400), with only 3 active collections, which can be basically ignored. The official promotion of the "largest NFT trading platform on TRON" currently resembles more of a "hollow showroom". Bank of AI (the financial layer prepared for AI Agents) only went live in mid-February and is still in the early promotion stage, with many advanced features (Agent Nova, Agent Framework, AI trading framework, etc.) not fully implemented or showing significant trading volume yet.
This infrastructure cannot compete with the first-mover advantage of free transfer stations; everyone is accustomed to using free services and will not spend TRX on fees. It’s not that Bank of AI is wrong; it’s just that the first-mover advantage has already been snatched by transfer stations. It’s unfortunate that if this kind of API payment had been implemented two years earlier, the price of TRX would be at $1 right now.
Cost and convenience: Now in the AI Agent development phase, what everyone cares about is "quick trial and error, low-cost model invocation". Building a transfer station (or community-shared free agents) has almost zero cost, and it can poll multiple models (OpenAI, Claude, DeepSeek, etc.), making debugging much simpler than on-chain.
First-mover advantage: These transfer station ecosystems (especially in the Chinese community) have matured long ago, and by 2024-2025 there will be a plethora of open-source tools that everyone has gotten used to. AINFT does offer free points, but going on-chain still requires staking TRX for Energy and paying Gas (even though TRON is very cheap), adding another layer of friction.
Time window issue: The first-mover advantage being seized is quite real. The "infrastructure war" of AI Agents has indeed begun, with centralized/partially centralized agents first locking down developers. Justin positions AINFT as the infrastructure for "decentralized AI payment + Agent ownership"; the idea is good, but the implementation pace has lagged a step, and it is still in the "building road" phase while others are already "racing".
What was said earlier makes sense, but what was said later simply made me laugh to death
First of all, you don’t understand the concept of a public key, which is the means of decryption. Without a public key, how can you crack the nuclear bomb password? 😂😂
It is impossible to establish from the channels, okay?
Also, the bank has made two preparations—offline accounting plus online. At worst, they can go offline in an instant and find a better means.
As for the sanctions against Google, that’s also laughable. As long as the algorithm is public, anyone can operate it. By then, you, who don’t understand cryptographic algorithms, will get nothing. 😂😂
This must be accepted, the housing market is ultimately a bubble, it's just that it hasn't collapsed completely yet. In ten years, the population will be even smaller, and the package will collapse.