Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
7.7 Years
100 Following
23.3K+ Followers
12.4K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Plasma's potential ranks in the top 10 chains for stablecoin balance
@Plasma is a high-performance Layer 1, EVM-compatible. If ranking stablecoin balance, and wondering where Plasma stands, with stablecoins, the determining factor for ranking is not TPS, but where people leave their money when they don't have to think about it.
Plasma, in my opinion, has a clear advantage as it was designed around stablecoins from the beginning.
Blockspace, fee mechanism, and experience all serve to hold and transfer stable value. This helps Plasma attract capital flows during high payment demand periods, especially with USDT.
However, holding money is harder than attracting it. Stablecoin balance is only sustainable when users believe they can withdraw at any time, with predictable costs and time.
Plasma needs to prove this not only when the network is calm, but also when the system is under pressure.
From my perspective, the potential is there, but whether Plasma can consistently replicate usage habits to turn that potential into a stable position is something we will have to wait for in the future, my friends.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
@Plasma is a high-performance Layer 1, EVM-compatible. If ranking stablecoin balance, and wondering where Plasma stands, with stablecoins, the determining factor for ranking is not TPS, but where people leave their money when they don't have to think about it.
Plasma, in my opinion, has a clear advantage as it was designed around stablecoins from the beginning.
Blockspace, fee mechanism, and experience all serve to hold and transfer stable value. This helps Plasma attract capital flows during high payment demand periods, especially with USDT.
However, holding money is harder than attracting it. Stablecoin balance is only sustainable when users believe they can withdraw at any time, with predictable costs and time.
Plasma needs to prove this not only when the network is calm, but also when the system is under pressure.
From my perspective, the potential is there, but whether Plasma can consistently replicate usage habits to turn that potential into a stable position is something we will have to wait for in the future, my friends.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Bitcoin is again rejected at 90,000 USD: Waiting for a breakthrough at 93,000 USD
I see Bitcoin being rejected at the 90,000 USD mark, and this time it feels not because the market is 'afraid' but because the push isn't clean enough to break through the technical and psychological barriers.
The recovery momentum before the FOMC meeting on Wednesday stalled quite predictably: it hit a strong resistance area, ETFs haven't pumped in new demand, so the price was pulled back to the accumulation area.
Since January 20, $BTC has been almost stuck in the 86,000–90,000 USD range. I've noticed that the 86,000–87,000 USD area is where prices have returned to test multiple times, and a notable point lies around the 100-week moving average of about 87,500 USD.
The recovery momentum before the FOMC meeting on Wednesday stalled quite predictably: it hit a strong resistance area, ETFs haven't pumped in new demand, so the price was pulled back to the accumulation area.
Since January 20, $BTC has been almost stuck in the 86,000–90,000 USD range. I've noticed that the 86,000–87,000 USD area is where prices have returned to test multiple times, and a notable point lies around the 100-week moving average of about 87,500 USD.
Institutional cash is leaving, how is Bitcoin reacting?
I am looking at Bitcoin through the lens of ETF cash flow, and this signal is quite interesting, even though it is not loud.
In the past 7 days, Bitcoin ETF funds recorded a net outflow of about 1.86 billion USD, while the price continues to adjust. If we only look at the number, it is very easy to conclude that institutions are selling.
But what catches my attention more is how the price reacts: it decreases, but does not break; the volatility is controlled; there are no signs of widespread panic.
In the past 7 days, Bitcoin ETF funds recorded a net outflow of about 1.86 billion USD, while the price continues to adjust. If we only look at the number, it is very easy to conclude that institutions are selling.
But what catches my attention more is how the price reacts: it decreases, but does not break; the volatility is controlled; there are no signs of widespread panic.
Why Bitcoin Could Rise Faster than Gold, Even Though Its Scale Is Still Small?
Bitcoin is often called 'digital gold', but upon closer inspection, these two operate very differently, and it is precisely these differences that sometimes create room for $BTC to accelerate more strongly (in percentage terms), even though its current scale is still much smaller than gold.
In the past 12 months, $BTC has been significantly outperformed by gold in terms of performance (according to data cited in the article): Bitcoin dropped about 13.25% while gold increased nearly 100%. The question is: if gold has already run ahead, does BTC have a chance to 'catch up'?
In the past 12 months, $BTC has been significantly outperformed by gold in terms of performance (according to data cited in the article): Bitcoin dropped about 13.25% while gold increased nearly 100%. The question is: if gold has already run ahead, does BTC have a chance to 'catch up'?
The potential of RWA + AI on Vanar: Market predictions for 2026
If you ask me, 'What will RWA + AI on
look like in 2026?', I think the answer does not lie in a price spike or a new narrative being pumped up, but in how the market begins to use blockchain as a serious infrastructure layer for real assets.
RWA is not like early-stage DeFi, where everything could be permissionless and flexible to the point of chaos. When real-world assets enter on-chain, everything must be tied to data, compliance, and responsibility. And this is the context in which Vanar is trying to position itself.
Plasma in the increasingly centralized context of L2
If you look at the current L2 landscape of Ethereum, I think there is a quite clear feeling but rarely expressed directly: L2 is becoming more centralized, not less. Centralized sequencer, centralized governance, centralized upgrade roadmap, even many operational decisions leaning more towards 'off-chain trust' than 'on-chain guarantee'.
This is not necessarily bad, but it raises an important question: in that context, where does Plasma stand, and why is it being mentioned again?
This is not necessarily bad, but it raises an important question: in that context, where does Plasma stand, and why is it being mentioned again?
BTC Dominance touches long-term resistance: Is the altcoin season about to return?
I am paying attention to the story of 'BTC.D being rejected' because this is often a quite early signal for the money flow that may shift to altcoins.
Currently, Bitcoin's dominance ratio is approaching the long-term resistance trendline — if pushed down in this area, altcoins often have more 'stage' in the short term.
In 2021, I remember BTC.D also touched the trendline and then turned strongly, and shortly after that was an explosive altcoin season: many coins rose quickly and outperformed compared to $BTC .
Currently, Bitcoin's dominance ratio is approaching the long-term resistance trendline — if pushed down in this area, altcoins often have more 'stage' in the short term.
In 2021, I remember BTC.D also touched the trendline and then turned strongly, and shortly after that was an explosive altcoin season: many coins rose quickly and outperformed compared to $BTC .
@Vanarchain The initial Chain was not created with the ambition of becoming an AI-powered blockchain. Previously, it was known as Virtua, a project focused on the metaverse, NFTs, and digital content.
At that stage, Virtua addressed the problem of IP ownership and digital experiences but was still limited by the narrative of content: growth depended on market tastes and attention cycles.
The turning point occurred when the team realized that the core issue was not in creating more content but in the underlying infrastructure. Virtua gradually restructured into Vanar $VANRY , shifting its focus to data processing capabilities, low costs, and an almost imperceptible blockchain experience.
The integration of AI is not aimed at telling new stories but to optimize content distribution, personalize experiences, and automate operational flows on-chain.
In my view, Vanar is not pursuing the AI trend, but because they want to become the foundational layer for entertainment and data applications in the future.
When AI needs a transparent environment to record ownership and distribute value, blockchain is no longer a plus but a prerequisite. Vanar is positioning itself right at that intersection.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
At that stage, Virtua addressed the problem of IP ownership and digital experiences but was still limited by the narrative of content: growth depended on market tastes and attention cycles.
The turning point occurred when the team realized that the core issue was not in creating more content but in the underlying infrastructure. Virtua gradually restructured into Vanar $VANRY , shifting its focus to data processing capabilities, low costs, and an almost imperceptible blockchain experience.
The integration of AI is not aimed at telling new stories but to optimize content distribution, personalize experiences, and automate operational flows on-chain.
In my view, Vanar is not pursuing the AI trend, but because they want to become the foundational layer for entertainment and data applications in the future.
When AI needs a transparent environment to record ownership and distribute value, blockchain is no longer a plus but a prerequisite. Vanar is positioning itself right at that intersection.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
If Ethereum is congested, how does Plasma respond?
Crypto enthusiasts are certainly familiar with the scene of Ethereum congestion. I often use @Plasma because the fees are cheap, transferring money is also simple, and there is no need to prepare native tokens to pay fees like on the main chain.
But to be honest, whenever the network gets busy, the downsides become clear: long wait times and high fees to push through. There have been times when I needed to withdraw quickly, and the congestion made it frustrating and anxious.
Therefore, if you often trade on DeFi, I think it's better to use both networks in parallel to avoid congestion. Usually, transactions run smoothly on Plasma $XPL , but when you need to secure a transaction or handle something important, switching back to Ethereum when the network is less busy will be easier.
As for my personal experience, Plasma is quite stable: it runs smoothly and is less congested even with many users. I'm not making any guarantees, but during this cycle, Plasma is a choice worth trying for you, at least to avoid the frustration of congestion and high fees during peak hours.
DYOR, everyone
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Crypto enthusiasts are certainly familiar with the scene of Ethereum congestion. I often use @Plasma because the fees are cheap, transferring money is also simple, and there is no need to prepare native tokens to pay fees like on the main chain.
But to be honest, whenever the network gets busy, the downsides become clear: long wait times and high fees to push through. There have been times when I needed to withdraw quickly, and the congestion made it frustrating and anxious.
Therefore, if you often trade on DeFi, I think it's better to use both networks in parallel to avoid congestion. Usually, transactions run smoothly on Plasma $XPL , but when you need to secure a transaction or handle something important, switching back to Ethereum when the network is less busy will be easier.
As for my personal experience, Plasma is quite stable: it runs smoothly and is less congested even with many users. I'm not making any guarantees, but during this cycle, Plasma is a choice worth trying for you, at least to avoid the frustration of congestion and high fees during peak hours.
DYOR, everyone
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Price $XAU has increased to 5k6 this morning creating ATH, silver also rose sharply alongside gold.
At this level, we are just waiting for $BTC digital gold to pump, truly every season the flow of money is different.
At this point, holding altcoin waiting for a pump is really hard while the market volume is mostly focused on silver, hopefully there will soon be a BTC wave for us.
$XAU
At this level, we are just waiting for $BTC digital gold to pump, truly every season the flow of money is different.
At this point, holding altcoin waiting for a pump is really hard while the market volume is mostly focused on silver, hopefully there will soon be a BTC wave for us.
$XAU
Gold Sets New Highs, Bitcoin Goes Sideways: Historical Data Suggests an Upcoming Turning Point
There is a noteworthy development happening between gold and Bitcoin, but not everyone is paying attention to it.
The majority of the market is focused on Bitcoin trading in a sideways state, while gold prices continue to set new highs. From a surface perspective, this can easily create a feeling that tangible assets are outperforming, while cryptocurrencies are temporarily lagging behind.
However, I am seeing another pattern worth watching when comparing historical data. In many previous cycles, Bitcoin has tended to react later than gold, with a delay of about 6 months. In other words, significant movements in gold are often 'mimicked' by Bitcoin afterward.
The majority of the market is focused on Bitcoin trading in a sideways state, while gold prices continue to set new highs. From a surface perspective, this can easily create a feeling that tangible assets are outperforming, while cryptocurrencies are temporarily lagging behind.
However, I am seeing another pattern worth watching when comparing historical data. In many previous cycles, Bitcoin has tended to react later than gold, with a delay of about 6 months. In other words, significant movements in gold are often 'mimicked' by Bitcoin afterward.
WILL ETH CREATE ATH IN THIS CYCLE?
Look at the chart
at this moment, I see the shadow of "history" repeating itself. About 8 years ago, Ethereum also had a price compression just like this before making a leap from 56 USD to over 1,100 USD.
However, the current context has many important differences. The current accumulation process is taking place over a longer period, reflecting the participation of large capital flows and a cautious trend.
at this moment, I see the shadow of "history" repeating itself. About 8 years ago, Ethereum also had a price compression just like this before making a leap from 56 USD to over 1,100 USD.
However, the current context has many important differences. The current accumulation process is taking place over a longer period, reflecting the participation of large capital flows and a cautious trend.
Gold Approaches Cycle Peak, Bitcoin Prepares for New Growth Phase?
Gold is often considered a less attractive asset in terms of yield compared to Bitcoin. However, historical data shows a more intriguing relationship.
During the periods of 2016 and 2021, gold prices recorded significant increases while Bitcoin entered a prolonged correction phase. Notably, after gold formed a peak, Bitcoin entered subsequent strong growth phases.
Whether one calls this a rotation of capital or merely a coincidence according to macro cycles, the reality is that these two assets often take turns leading profit expectations. When one side peaks and begins to weaken, the other side often becomes the new focal point of the market.
During the periods of 2016 and 2021, gold prices recorded significant increases while Bitcoin entered a prolonged correction phase. Notably, after gold formed a peak, Bitcoin entered subsequent strong growth phases.
Whether one calls this a rotation of capital or merely a coincidence according to macro cycles, the reality is that these two assets often take turns leading profit expectations. When one side peaks and begins to weaken, the other side often becomes the new focal point of the market.
Ethereum Mainnet Signals Recovery as Transaction Fees Hit Historical Lows
Ethereum is showing notable signals of the Mainnet's return to a central role.
Transaction fees on Ethereum L1 are currently very low compared to historical averages, creating a rare favorable environment for deployment and experimentation. Notably, this trend does not reflect a decrease in demand; on the contrary: the number of smart contracts deployed on the Mainnet is reaching an all-time high.
Transaction fees on Ethereum L1 are currently very low compared to historical averages, creating a rare favorable environment for deployment and experimentation. Notably, this trend does not reflect a decrease in demand; on the contrary: the number of smart contracts deployed on the Mainnet is reaching an all-time high.
Will Vanar in two years be like infrastructure or a content platform?
When looking at @Vanarchain today, the question I often ask myself — and also often ask you — is not 'where will the price go', but: in two years, will Vanar be seen by the market as infrastructure or just as a content platform labeled blockchain.
These two positioning strategies sound close, but the implications for valuation, cash flow, and durability are completely different.
In crypto, everyone has seen it, many projects start with content.
These two positioning strategies sound close, but the implications for valuation, cash flow, and durability are completely different.
In crypto, everyone has seen it, many projects start with content.
Gold reaches historical peak, Bitcoin becomes the focal point of capital flows
The gold price has just reached a new historical peak around 5,247 dollars, while Bitcoin has yet to respond accordingly. For me, this gap is not small at all and is not coincidental.
In many previous cycles, I always see gold as an asset that reacts early to macro instability: prolonged inflation, geopolitical risks, or simply a loss of faith in fiat currency.
When gold has spoken and begins to hesitate around the peak region, capital flows often do not stand still — it seeks the next place to go.
In many previous cycles, I always see gold as an asset that reacts early to macro instability: prolonged inflation, geopolitical risks, or simply a loss of faith in fiat currency.
When gold has spoken and begins to hesitate around the peak region, capital flows often do not stand still — it seeks the next place to go.
Plasma under the pressure of unlocking: the supply problem in 2026
Yesterday, Plasma was unlocked and brought to market, 88.9 million.
(~11 million USD) For me, this is a detail that cannot be overlooked if holding XPL, because of the unlock schedule ahead.
Plasma is positioned as an L1 specialized for stablecoin payments: completing transactions in ~1 second, security based on Bitcoin, transferring USDT with no fees, EVM compatible and backed by Tether, Bitfinex.
The initial phase of the project attracted strong attention: raising 50 million USD at a valuation of 500 million, 1 billion.
Long-term money turns back to accumulation Bitcoin supply starts to tighten again
I am seeing a very clear pivot from long-term holders.
Data shows that the behavior of LTH has turned sharply – and this is something I always pay attention to whenever the market is about to enter a new phase.
After nearly a year dominated by distribution, with more than 674,000
sold, that state has ended. Instead, there is a fairly 'clean' accumulation wave: more than 191,000
has been drawn back into cold storage.
Data shows that the behavior of LTH has turned sharply – and this is something I always pay attention to whenever the market is about to enter a new phase.
After nearly a year dominated by distribution, with more than 674,000
sold, that state has ended. Instead, there is a fairly 'clean' accumulation wave: more than 191,000
has been drawn back into cold storage.
What problem does Vanar Chain solve that the current EVM is overlooking?
As you can see, the current EVM handles logic and composability very well, but it overlooks something quite basic: the continuous interaction rhythm of users.
Everything on the EVM assumes that transactions are rare, intentional events, and accepts delays and cost fluctuations.
In my view, Vanar Chain approaches the problem from a different angle. It is built for applications where users interact frequently: games, entertainment, real-time experiences.
Vanar $VANRY accepts data separation, keeping on-chain what is necessary for integrity, and pushing the heavy, constantly changing parts off-chain. This doesn't make EVM stronger, but makes the experience more seamless.
The project does not replace EVM. It fills the gap that EVM has yet to prioritize: the experience before discussing composability.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
As you can see, the current EVM handles logic and composability very well, but it overlooks something quite basic: the continuous interaction rhythm of users.
Everything on the EVM assumes that transactions are rare, intentional events, and accepts delays and cost fluctuations.
In my view, Vanar Chain approaches the problem from a different angle. It is built for applications where users interact frequently: games, entertainment, real-time experiences.
Vanar $VANRY accepts data separation, keeping on-chain what is necessary for integrity, and pushing the heavy, constantly changing parts off-chain. This doesn't make EVM stronger, but makes the experience more seamless.
The project does not replace EVM. It fills the gap that EVM has yet to prioritize: the experience before discussing composability.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Login to explore more contents