币圈导航0xnav

Regarding marketing, I only admire Pinduoduo’s merchants!!

$BNB

Just generated a short film with AI. So this is why long dramas can’t beat short dramas, isn’t it?

$BTC

This kind of theft method that modifies addresses via the clipboard is absolutely disgusting—worse than eating a fly.

The worst-hit areas mainly involve Windows systems + the TRON (TRX) blockchain. On Windows, the clipboard is global shared memory: without administrator permissions or authorization, it can be cleared at any time, overwriting and tampering with the entire contents of the clipboard.

On macOS, permissions and sandbox isolation are safer, but that doesn’t mean macOS is 100% secure. For sensitive data such as private keys and mnemonic phrases, it’s best not to rely on direct copy-paste. In daily use, try to download official software via the App Store whenever possible.

On Windows, as long as you ensure the current computer isn’t infected, you can greatly prevent clipboard hijacking malware by following these steps:

1. Press Win + i to open System Settings → System → Clipboard
2. Turn off: Clipboard history → the main toggle
3. Turn off: Cross-device clipboard syncing
4. Click “Clear clipboard data” → Clear to wipe all past records
5. Disable the remote clipboard feature: Settings → System → Remote Desktop → Advanced settings, turn off clipboard redirection to prevent remote connections from leaking clipboard contents.
6. Go to chrome://settings/content/clipboard and select “Don’t allow sites to view your clipboard text or images.”

As for why I say the TRON blockchain is easier than EVM to be tricked into generating fake addresses that mimic the beginning and ending, that involves too much specialized knowledge. If you’re interested, you can ask the AI yourself.

$BNB

Are you out here filming a blockbuster?
$BTC $ETH

A year later, a first-instance judgment has been handed down in the personality rights dispute case of “I heard it from the traffic police.”

In Suzhou, a young man riding a bicycle was hit by a woman who was driving in the wrong direction. Instead of doing so first, the woman took out her phone to collect evidence, and then went into a frenzy of questioning the boy: “You hit me and you still have the nerve to be right?” She tried to force the boy to admit that he had主动撞了她 by using video recording, loud yelling, an aggressive manner, and distorting the facts.

Every sentence she said dug a pit for the young man, and she deliberately used a sarcastic, mocking tone to try to provoke him.

For example, she said, “You really are something.”

If the boy were to lose control of his emotions, he might respond, “So what if I hit you?”

That would be enough to give her an opportunity to spread rumors and smear him.

As long as the boy said even one word that wasn’t right—no matter whether his attitude softened slightly, or whether a look on his face was a little off—she could spin it into a big story.

Faced with the woman’s questioning, the boy did not respond throughout the entire ordeal. He only repeated one sentence: “I’m acting on the traffic police’s instructions. Recording the video won’t help—you do what the traffic police tell you to do, that’s what I’ll do.”

After the police arrived, they determined the woman was entirely responsible. After struggling, she ran away, but she still posted that video online to attack the boy. By doing so, she infringed on the boy’s privacy and right of portrait, which led the boy into depression.

The court ruled that the woman must publicly apologize and make compensation for both economic losses and damages for mental distress, and that she must bear all litigation costs.

$BTC $ETH

Codex can directly operate Photoshop to achieve fully automated editing.
$BNB