Binance Square
#feedback

feedback

22,525 views
83 Discussing
Harri_son07
ยท
--
Bullish
$BITCOIN {alpha}(10x72e4f9f808c49a2a61de9c5896298920dc4eeea9) COIN โ€“ SPRING LOADED ๐Ÿšจ BTC/USDT: $77,065 โšก ๐Ÿ”บ **Break $77,250** โ†’ TARGET $78,500 ๐Ÿ”ป **Lose $76,400** โ†’ TARGET $75,200 ๐Ÿ“Š Supertrent resistance at $77,224 ๐Ÿง  Tightest range in weeks โ€“ big move incoming ๐Ÿ’ฐ Long above 77.2k | Short below 76.4k Fortune favors the brave โ€“ and the prepared. #crypto #Binance #bitcoin #viralpost #FEEDBACK
$BITCOIN
COIN โ€“ SPRING LOADED ๐Ÿšจ

BTC/USDT: $77,065 โšก

๐Ÿ”บ **Break $77,250** โ†’ TARGET $78,500
๐Ÿ”ป **Lose $76,400** โ†’ TARGET $75,200

๐Ÿ“Š Supertrent resistance at $77,224
๐Ÿง  Tightest range in weeks โ€“ big move incoming

๐Ÿ’ฐ Long above 77.2k | Short below 76.4k

Fortune favors the brave โ€“ and the prepared.
#crypto
#Binance
#bitcoin
#viralpost
#FEEDBACK
ยท
--
Bearish
$BTC FLASH ZONE โ€“ GET READY ๐Ÿšจ Current Price: $76,855 **Supertrend Resistance:** $77,632 โš ๏ธ 24H Low: $76,735 โ€“ holding by a THREAD. ๐Ÿ“‰ Short signal TRIGGER if price rejects $77,030 โ€“ target $76,500 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Long scalp only IF $76,735 holds + volume spikes back above $77,200 ๐Ÿฉธ ATR widening + red volume = breakdown loading. ๐Ÿ’€ Losing $76,700 = fast drop to $76,000. Trade tight. One wrong move = rekt. #crypto #Binance #viralpost #FEEDBACK
$BTC FLASH ZONE โ€“ GET READY ๐Ÿšจ

Current Price: $76,855
**Supertrend Resistance:** $77,632 โš ๏ธ
24H Low: $76,735 โ€“ holding by a THREAD.

๐Ÿ“‰ Short signal TRIGGER if price rejects $77,030 โ€“ target $76,500
๐Ÿ“ˆ Long scalp only IF $76,735 holds + volume spikes back above $77,200

๐Ÿฉธ ATR widening + red volume = breakdown loading.
๐Ÿ’€ Losing $76,700 = fast drop to $76,000.

Trade tight. One wrong move = rekt.
#crypto
#Binance
#viralpost
#FEEDBACK
ยท
--
Bullish
$LUNC {spot}(LUNCUSDT) COILING TO STRIKE โšก Price: 0.00008011 Trading BELOW SUPERTREND resistance at 0.00008220 โ€” but AVL support firm at 0.00007997 ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ“‰ Short signal if 0.00007997 loses โ†’ quick flush to 0.00007784 low ๐Ÿ“ˆ Long trigger above 0.00008220 โ†’ breakout toward 0.00008715 high ๐Ÿ”ฅ Wild stats: +82% (30D) | +136% (90D) | +154% (180D) ๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ But today -1.4% & 7D -15% โ€” momentum cooling or just shaking weak hands? โฐ 4H decision incoming. One level breaks. You ready? #crypto #bitcoin #viralpost #FEEDBACK
$LUNC
COILING TO STRIKE โšก

Price: 0.00008011
Trading BELOW SUPERTREND resistance at 0.00008220 โ€” but AVL support firm at 0.00007997 ๐Ÿ

๐Ÿ“‰ Short signal if 0.00007997 loses โ†’ quick flush to 0.00007784 low
๐Ÿ“ˆ Long trigger above 0.00008220 โ†’ breakout toward 0.00008715 high

๐Ÿ”ฅ Wild stats:
+82% (30D) | +136% (90D) | +154% (180D)

๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ But today -1.4% & 7D -15% โ€” momentum cooling or just shaking weak hands?

โฐ 4H decision incoming.
One level breaks. You ready?
#crypto #bitcoin #viralpost #FEEDBACK
$Jager AI is a powerful tool, but it isn't always right. The AI repeatedly flags concentration risk based on top holder percentages, but does not appear to distinguish between infrastructure wallets (burn wallets, liquidity pools, exchange/router wallets) and privately controlled wallets. This can lead to misleading conclusions about actual holder concentration and market risk. Consider adding wallet classification before generating concentration risk assessments. #BinanceAlpha #BinanceSquare #BinanceAI #BNBChain #Feedback @BinanceAlpha
$Jager AI is a powerful tool, but it isn't always right.

The AI repeatedly flags concentration risk based on top holder percentages, but does not appear to distinguish between infrastructure wallets (burn wallets, liquidity pools, exchange/router wallets) and privately controlled wallets.

This can lead to misleading conclusions about actual holder concentration and market risk.

Consider adding wallet classification before generating concentration risk assessments.

#BinanceAlpha #BinanceSquare #BinanceAI #BNBChain #Feedback

@BinanceAlpha
ยท
--
Bullish
Jager โ€” this is a clear example of the issue Iโ€™ve been noticing. $Jager {alpha}(560x74836cc0e821a6be18e407e6388e430b689c66e9) The AI keeps flagging โ€œhigh concentration riskโ€ based purely on top holder percentages, without properly separating infrastructure wallets (burn addresses, liquidity pools, exchange wallets, routers) from genuinely privately controlled wallets. $BNB {spot}(BNBUSDT) That distinction matters a lot, and ignoring it can seriously distort the real picture of holder distribution and market risk. Before generating concentration risk insights, wallet classification should be a required step. Otherwise, the analysis can end up misleading instead of informative. #BinanceAlpha #BinanceSquare #BinanceAI #BNBChain #Feedback
Jager โ€” this is a clear example of the issue Iโ€™ve been noticing.
$Jager

The AI keeps flagging โ€œhigh concentration riskโ€ based purely on top holder percentages, without properly separating infrastructure wallets (burn addresses, liquidity pools, exchange wallets, routers) from genuinely privately controlled wallets.
$BNB

That distinction matters a lot, and ignoring it can seriously distort the real picture of holder distribution and market risk.

Before generating concentration risk insights, wallet classification should be a required step.

Otherwise, the analysis can end up misleading instead of informative.

#BinanceAlpha #BinanceSquare #BinanceAI #BNBChain #Feedback
ยท
--
Dear Binance Square Team, I have an important request for the CreatorPad Leaderboard Campaign. Please clearly define and fix the engagement points like: โ€ข 1K views = 5 points โ€ข There should be a proper ratio for likes, comments, and shares; points for engagements should outweigh those for content. Currently, the lack of clarity is preventing genuine creators from having a fair advantage. Additionally: โ€ข Detect fake likes and spam comments and exclude them from the leaderboard. โ€ข Real engagement and quality content should be prioritized. This will increase transparency on the platform and motivate creators to produce better content ๐Ÿš€ Hope you consider this feedback ๐Ÿ™Œ #BinanceSquare #CreatorPad #Feedback #ContentCreators #FairPlay @CZ @richardteng
Dear Binance Square Team,

I have an important request for the CreatorPad Leaderboard Campaign.

Please clearly define and fix the engagement points like: โ€ข 1K views = 5 points
โ€ข There should be a proper ratio for likes, comments, and shares; points for engagements should outweigh those for content.
Currently, the lack of clarity is preventing genuine creators from having a fair advantage.

Additionally: โ€ข Detect fake likes and spam comments and exclude them from the leaderboard.
โ€ข Real engagement and quality content should be prioritized.

This will increase transparency on the platform and motivate creators to produce better content ๐Ÿš€

Hope you consider this feedback ๐Ÿ™Œ

#BinanceSquare #CreatorPad #Feedback #ContentCreators #FairPlay
@CZ @Richard Teng
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
โšก๏ธ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Trusted by the worldโ€™s largest crypto exchange.
๐Ÿ‘ Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number