XRP has performed well as a store of value. While other projects lost 90%, $XRP didn't drop below $1. But thinking it will reach $100? That sounds a bit like science fiction to me.
Node count alone doesn't mean much in #DePIN The real question I ask is: Who is actually paying for the data these nodes produce? #GEODNET stands out in this regard. With 22,000+ physical stations across 150+ countries, it provides centimeter-level positioning data. This data is used in #drones , #robotics , agriculture, and autonomous systems. More importantly, there's a real revenue model behind it. GEODNET uses 80% of its revenue for $GEOD buybacks and burns. The model is simple: Real-world usage → Real revenue → $GEOD buybacks → Token burns Market cap is around $140M. Annualized revenue is approximately $8.4M. But that's not the main thing I'm watching. Are token burns actually offsetting new token emissions? Because a project generating revenue doesn't automatically make its token a good investment. What matters is how that revenue flows back into the token's economics. That's why I'm looking into GEODNET.
After a brief chat with Claude, it listed coins for me that are traded on the Binance spot market and have broken above the 200-day moving average (200MA) on high volume, then saved the data to an Excel file. If you have even a little bit of programming know-how, you can achieve incredible results.
For instance, $UMA made it onto this list. Let's keep an eye on it and see what happens.