R博士

$GIGGLE 20260205 Evening It seems that smart money has taken notice here and has continued to invest a little. I have created a model starting from 100, with an average daily transaction volume of 10 million across the network. The price drops by an average of 0.2% each day, and it will take about more than 3 years to consume 30% of the tokens. The price is expected to drop to around 8, but in the first two months, the price has fallen quickly, and the transaction volume hasn't decreased significantly, so the consumption of tokens is faster than expected, and the time to destroy 30% of the tokens is shortened!

Many people do not understand the implied economics of Giggle. The daily trading volume fees proportionally represent its net income, with zero costs, and the fixed use is to recycle tokens, with no other expenses. Unless Binance changes the rules, if it drops to a certain level, there may be quantity manipulation similar to alpha, with hundreds of millions or tens of billions traded in a day! In such a scenario of extreme token deflation, reaching sky-high prices is possible! But that's a discussion for later.

I believe that the destruction of 30% of the tokens is a turning point. Market makers need a certain amount, and platforms need to reserve a certain amount, along with token hoarders; by then, there won't be much in circulation!

I don't know what the future holds, but I will continue to use my 4:1 averaging method. I will create a contract every few dollars and my spot grid's maximum holding is about 4 times that of the contract, so big gains!

It is essential to trade spot; if busy, just grid trade spot! Purely holding contracts has no value! Holding spot can still allow for investment!

Of course, the biggest risk is that Binance changes the rules, although the likelihood is small, it cannot be ruled out!

$ZHIPU originally the response came out at 6 o’clock; it was brushed off with light wording and a reset of the quota for a week. No wonder some big-name customers don’t buy it—after all, it’s the shareholders’ money that’s being burned. And in today’s market, what people dislike most is its exaggerated burn rate.

But it’s true that the incident has been downgraded. For users, a weekly quota really is appealing.

Now all big-model companies use this kind of playbook: reset the quota at the drop of a hat, and use money to silence people. Whether you can keep users later or not—who cares? This isn’t unique to Zhipu; it won’t be the last time either.

Of course, this also proves that AI is still in its early stages—many things aren’t fully developed yet, whether it’s humans or even “AI” like RSI. There are still huge swaths of fields that need to be filled in and improved.

People in the crypto circle should especially understand that!

$ZHIPU continue rolling the position; remember to set a stop-loss. I think this drop isn’t enough yet. The most conservative would be 93, 5 percentage points; the initial estimate is 88, and if it gets worse it may break the new low.

Recently it’s right in the spotlight! With this kind of windfall for the shorts, why aren’t they smashing it properly?

Set a stop-loss—for one, it’s discipline; and two, I’m afraid the company’s PR will be handled properly!

As for it—I think this is the real deal!

$ZHIPU How should this be viewed? It looks like a good opportunity to short. Go on—do it. It hasn't really retraced much yet. Set a stop loss and steal a quick profit.

$ZHIPU slightly avoids some risks; it really is serious this time. Let’s see how this public relations situation plays out this round.

But $ANTHROPIC has had similar things before too—tracking codes, mandatory data retention policies, and so on. However, I feel like Zhipu has gone a bit too far this time.

$UNI $HYPE SEC approval to conduct limited trading of tokenized stocks on-chain

This was already raised during the Clear Bill, but after the bill was not passed, it was still brought out anyway—some issues that hadn’t been resolved still remain like this.

However, in terms of implementation, it still provided clear guidance, which represents a fundamental long-term change for Uni. Of course, it’s also the case for DeFi.

But I think it may not necessarily be good news for big BTC and smaller BTC, because previously they served as the underlying base for the on-chain ecosystem. As tokenized stocks gradually go deeper into the liquidity layer, what may be eroded is their foundation. This is a long-term matter. It’s also not out of the question that, under AI-driven strategy setups, allocating to big BTC could be more attractive than allocating to gold.

$ZEC should have trapped a lot of people—from big holders to small retail traders. Don’t listen to any narrative it sells you; it’s purely the trading behavior after chips are locked. As long as your position control is even slightly careless, you’ll get devoured. Be especially cautious if you see it confidently liquidate at a break price of 2000 or above. Because it quietly changes the risk-reward ratio of your trade at the time. Back then, if you hadn’t cut losses, just imagine what today’s scenario would look like.

As the coin price rises, shorts become even rarer. When the main players push the price up, it’s because they spend their own money rather than using short-sale fuel, which can easily lead to situations where everyone ends up killing everyone. Only then is it appropriate to enter and short—on the condition that you don’t buy into this bunch of nonsense stories it’s selling.

~~

The rebound in Zhipu and other AI-related stocks has pulled up follower/duplicate-trading accounts as well; it’s just that the people are long gone. I’ve said this many times, but it still can’t change this situation. Many people just can’t stomach these kinds of larger drawdowns, and that’s definitely understandable.

But in my way of thinking, if you want to make money from investing, you always need to achieve a jump in account performance through big profits from big positions. That big position can be a single asset, or multiple assets within a sector, or even an index. No matter when it is, small-position scattered trades are suitable for quantitative trading—winning relies on volume. The approach is completely different.

For now, that’s it.

$ZHIPU This plunge by Zhipu is a bit troublesome—the trouble is that for the $3.0 billion convertible bonds, the company is definitely hoping for full conversion and not repayment. Most likely, the money has already been spent.

Next year, those bonds will mature in September. Here, they will require the company’s stock price to return to 825 or 1130 before maturity. That is 130% of the stock price. Once it hits that level, the company has the right to redeem the bonds in full, effectively forcing conversion!

So, starting from today’s stock price, how much does it need to rise?

It’s essentially betting all its chips on its next-generation model—burning money and betting on commercialization, and whether it successfully raises a new Series A round.

Let’s see how the market reacts. Refinancing with new debt to pay off old debt is also an option, but that brings us back to the old problem: how the market will price the dilution of a large-model company’s equity.

My core reason for being long is that the business model of a large-model company is workable, and I do recognize Zhipu’s marketing. But the money burning is also the most severe. I also didn’t expect them to do a share placement so quickly.

Until there’s no result yet, there’s also no reason to give up and stop-loss just based on the current stock price. Let’s wait and see over the next one or two quarters.

As for adding more or averaging down, I don’t really recommend it at this stage.

1 0-Year Treasury yields break 5, and the toughest head-to-head logic has arrived—so is AI stronger, or are U.S. Treasuries stronger?

No matter how you try to push it down, you just can’t. And indeed, nowadays, besides AI, what else can you buy?

Risk assets turn into cash-flow-generating assets—the most certain kind!

The original conclusion was that a 10-year U.S. Treasury yield breaking 5 was only a matter of time, and once it breaks 5, tech stocks would inevitably fall.

But right now, it feels like AI is still strong tonight.

Keep observing for now—no rush to reach a conclusion.

The longer the 10-year Treasury yield stays around 5, the higher it will rise; tech stocks will still face pressure. This is the bears’ biggest weapon.

If it pulls back—if there aren’t as many rate hikes—if tensions in the Middle East ease—if these “ifs” happen, then which ones do you think would have to occur for tech stocks to rebound?

$SOXL This pullback can’t be avoided anymore—we’re just going to tough it out. Let’s see when things finally stabilize. I just realized I was down that much.

I didn’t add to my position; I only added a tiny bit and set a Dell short-term hedge. I’ll wait and see once this week’s situation becomes clear.

Recently, the hard-core events have been one after another—share allotment $ZHIPU . The Middle East situation is also stuck, and over the weekend another AI slowdown came out.

I don’t really have any better办法.

There’s no real reason to stop-loss, so I can only hold on. Honestly, at least for now, I think AI is still relatively resilient—I just don’t know if there will be any more events that continue to pressure it downward.

The new narrative has begun—are we ready to enter the sovereign AI moment?
This weekend has been packed with information.
~~
A long piece by Amodei traces OpenAI’s pause of its IPO, and it all points to one core issue: RSI and alignment problems. AI development is starting to feel uncontrollable.
~~
In specific terms: “By the end of this decade, there’s a 10% chance of killing all of humanity,” and “Within 6 to 12 months, this group of AI agents may be able to take control of the entire internet through a continuously running zombie network, causing losses of hundreds of billions of dollars—and then the scale of losses would keep growing.”
~~
Now, this narrative seems to be gaining some new traction—sovereign AI and safety AI.
~~

The market may first focus on the most directly reflected issues, such as how the slowdown affects AI hardware—e.g., reduced training has a greater impact on Nvidia. Sovereign AI also implies that pricing won’t be governed entirely by market behavior.
Second, OpenAI’s IPO delay: the market doesn’t fully buy its official, well-rehearsed explanations. The fact that large models aren’t worth that much money is also part of it. This is also a reflection of the market’s reaction to large-model valuations.
~~

I’ve been watching how smoothly AI stocks fall and adjust—there’s still a bit of resistance to the downside. Typically, markets move in the direction with the least resistance. If AI overall faces resistance as it moves down, will it break into new momentum driven by the new narrative? That’s something worth observing and hoping for!

From an early, almost barbaric style of development to a “big alliance” model of more standardized, regulated growth, I think this is the only path forward. In that process, there will definitely be battles over who gets to set the standards. But moving toward compliance and safety is never a decisive blow meant to destroy the other side—it’s instead something that enables broader, more confident adoption.

~~
Next, the two sides—AO—should keep pushing industry consensus. I’ll keep tracking their progress and how corresponding AI stocks perform.
~~
Also, another flag worth watching is PLTR. I haven’t done detailed research yet—I’ll just mention it for now. You can pay a little attention.
~

It’s still not clear to what extent this can be achieved. Once the focus shifts from competing on technological advancement to a broader dimension, things may become clearer.
~~
$ZHIPU Zhipu’s decline is more than expected—just follow along and do a bit along the way; nothing else much.

$ZHIPU It looks like the news about the rights offering should have come out earlier—the stock was run ahead of it, so the sell-off started early. It’s not because of DeepSeek, and it’s not because of the technical issues related to $ANTHROPIC .

Technical patterns will tell us about unknown information. For retail investors, this is a very useful reference indicator.

Glioseep’s big drop isn’t because it wants to raise funds through a rights offering and bond issuance—everyone knows that at this stage, large models rely on financing. The key point is that it needs to raise a large amount of funds again within just two months.

So is this about listing and printing money through stock offerings, or is it about steadily doing real business?!

Given the ongoing uncertainty from dilution, expecting the stock price to rebound is a rather troublesome scenario. I also honestly didn’t factor this situation in—but it’s something that’s bound to happen sooner or later.

Of course, it’s also possible that this is a business competition strategy. Whether it’s useful or not, prepare provisions for winter: at the same time, skim off the money in the market. For other competitors—especially those not yet listed—to raise funds or get listed, they’ll find that the water in the pool has already been drained out by a large amount, which is the advantage of listing early.

However, I think it’s more likely they should speak with one voice. Work together to achieve technical breakthroughs, make the cake bigger, and get the operating model running smoothly!

~~
Back to the stock price: I think if it rebounds, we should watch how much resistance it faces when it gets back above the rights offering price of 714—because shares from the rights offering can be sold anytime, unlike A-shares where placements are locked up.

If it falls, at what point will it stop declining? This could be the psychological price level for long-term investors in large models (and this level may also partially include the equity dilution from another potential rights offering!!)

These are price-side disturbances. On the value side, I currently don’t see much impact!

~~
DeepSeek’s new technology reduces reliance on HBM and NAND, and it has knocked down the share price of SanDisk a bit too. This doesn’t prove much. The market’s willingness to take on supply is still there, but the valuation is indeed high. Market participants generally don’t have especially strong conviction in holding the stock; once there’s a slight gust of wind, they think “the wolves are coming,” and money runs for the exits.

This creates a rather stuck, stalemated situation. My suggestion is to keep a low allocation for storage.

~~
Overall, there’s no need to make any special response yet. The logic analysis has already been covered in the earlier articles. But if you’re not personally in the situation, I also suggest waiting until the situation becomes clearer, then moving slowly.
~~
That’s it.

$ZEC Honestly, there’s no point to it. Even the only one shorting target has had its formula unchanged. It’s not that I don’t want to play with coins—it's that once they start cutting, they don’t distinguish between big holders and small shareholders; they might even cut their own people.

My short price is much higher than theirs, and they still can’t stand it.

It’s truly impossible to hedge effectively!

I’ll wait and then never touch any non-DEFI tokens again. If you can’t be bothered to mess with me, at least you won’t get to cut me—I'm not going to make money off you, and you don’t get to cut me either!

$DELL slaps your face, I really underestimated you. Tell me one thing—bulls rely on faith