杰瑞钱多多

An on-chain transfer of 49,984,623.698518 USDC was recorded on Ethereum mainnet.

Block: 26412294; block time: 2026-11-14 09:22 UTC; event index: 2029. The record comes from a Transfer log in the USDC contract, and scans by two mainnet nodes agree.

Transaction details: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x475f9ed7f172c036ff24bdf9a3881ba328a155e3c7af1828591cb68c330fcccc

An on-chain transfer may be a movement between accounts, a contract operation, or something else. A transfer record alone cannot confirm who owns the addresses, whether funds flowed to an exchange, whether a buy or sale took place, or what effect it had on the price. A single transaction may contain multiple transfer events, and the amount cannot be directly equated with newly added funds. Block records may also change due to an extreme chain reorganization.

When you see a large transfer, do you first check who owns the addresses or look at the transaction’s other transfer records?

#链上数据 #USDC

Data collected: 2026-11-14 17:33 CST; source: dual-node Ethereum mainnet RPC.
Not investment advice.

$SOPH has fallen 26.6% from its high over the past 24 hours

Binance USDT perpetual rolling 24-hour market data: high 0.002159, low 0.001447, latest price 0.001584; the latest price is −26.6% from the high, while the 24-hour change is +7.2%.

These two percentages use different starting points: one is calculated from the high within the window, and the other from the price 24 hours ago. So the price can fall sharply from its high while still being up overall. This snapshot does not show whether the high or low came first.

A pullback from a high does not mean the price has peaked, nor does it mean it will rebound or keep falling. Markets move quickly, and market orders may incur slippage; pay attention to stop-losses and position size before opening a trade.

When you look at volatility, do you focus more on the pullback from the high or the 24-hour change?

#合约交易 #Market Volatility

Data collected: 2026-11-14 17:05 CST; source: Binance public market data.
Not investment advice.

An on-chain transfer of 12,479,999 USDC was recorded on the Ethereum mainnet.

Block: 26412008; block time: 2026-11-14 08:24 UTC; event index: 12. The record comes from the Transfer event log of the USDC contract. Scans by two mainnet nodes produced consistent results.

Transaction details: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xcca7f1d17321dd12168b2402a85a097c58e911f3d06393b2c2c9e126885c624c

On-chain transfers may be transfers between accounts, contract operations, or serve other purposes. A transfer record alone cannot confirm who owns an address, whether funds flowed to an exchange, whether a trade took place, or whether the transfer affected the price. A transaction may contain multiple transfer events, so the amount cannot be directly equated with newly added funds. Block records may also change due to extreme chain reorganizations.

When you see a large transfer, do you first verify address ownership or check the transaction's other transfer records?

#链上数据 #USDC

Data collected: 2026-11-14 16:34 CST; source: Ethereum mainnet dual-node RPC.
Not investment advice.

An on-chain transfer of 125,367,307.174404 USDC was recorded on the Ethereum mainnet.

Block: 26411874; block time: 2026-11-14 07:57 UTC; event index: 244. The record comes from the USDC contract’s Transfer logs, and scans by two mainnet nodes matched.

Transaction details: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x78335fa921c19bb42ec5ac85fa090d9187e41b7d9f7c204710fb8d2317318492

An on-chain transfer may be a movement between accounts, a contract operation, or serve another purpose. A transfer record alone cannot confirm address ownership, whether funds went to an exchange, whether a buy or sale took place, or the effect on price. One transaction may contain multiple transfer events, so the amount cannot be equated directly with newly added funds. Block records may also change in the event of an extreme chain reorganization.

When you see a large transfer, do you first check who owns the addresses or look at the transaction’s other transfer records?

#链上数据 #USDC

Data collected: 2026-11-14 16:03 CST; source: Ethereum mainnet dual-node RPC.
This is not investment advice.

$IDOL has fallen 28.0% from its high over the past 24 hours

Binance USDT perpetual rolling 24-hour market data: high 0.029499, low 0.01291, latest price 0.021241; the latest price is −28.0% relative to the high, and the 24-hour change is −9.3%.

These two percentages use different starting points: one is calculated from the high within the window, and the other from the price 24 hours ago. So the price can fall sharply from its high while still being up over the period. This snapshot doesn’t show which came first, the high or the low.

A pullback from a high doesn’t mean the price has peaked, nor does it mean it will rebound or keep falling next. Market conditions can change quickly, and market orders may incur slippage; pay attention to stop-losses and position size before opening a trade.

When watching volatility, do you focus more on the pullback from the high or the 24-hour change?

#合约交易 #Market volatility

Data collected: 2026-11-14 15:31 CST; source: Binance public market data.
Not investment advice.

Media Report Alert｜CoinDesk

Original title: Satoshi-era wallet served in a $260 billion lawsuit moves 75 BTC it held since 2011

Published: 2026-11-14 04:30 UTC
Original link: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/11/13/satoshi-era-wallet-served-in-a-usd260-billion-lawsuit-moves-75-btc-it-held-since-2011

The above is an index of media reports; the title is retained in its original language. The content may quote third parties and may be updated after publication. For news involving regulation, attacks, or asset security, check the original report, statements from the parties involved, and subsequent developments. Do not judge the facts or trading direction based on the headline alone.

When you see this kind of news, would you first check statements from the parties involved or first look at when the event occurred?

#加密资讯 #Market Risk

Data collected: 2026-11-14 15:02 CST; Source: CoinDesk.
This does not constitute investment advice.

An on-chain transfer of 100,200,000 USDC was recorded on Ethereum mainnet.

Block: 26411186; block time: 2026-11-14 05:39 UTC; event index: 692. The record comes from the Transfer logs of the USDC contract, and scan results from two mainnet nodes match.

Transaction details: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x84831bbdcb455c158eae1b6f31d06ca5c345e71067fd3e756292bdfb0609d5fe

An on-chain transfer could be a transfer between accounts, a contract operation, or something else. A transfer record alone cannot confirm who owns an address, whether funds flowed into an exchange, whether a trade took place, or whether the transfer affected the price. A transaction may contain multiple transfer events, so the amount cannot be directly equated with new funds. Block records may also change due to an extreme chain reorganization.

When you see a large transfer, do you first check who owns the addresses or look at the transaction's other transfer records?

#链上数据 #USDC

Data collected: 2026-11-14 14:32 CST; source: Ethereum mainnet RPC across two nodes.
This is not investment advice.

Media Report Reminder｜The Block

Original headline: Meta tests prediction-market app, DOJ moves to seize $1.2 billion from Binance hack, and more

Published: 2026-11-14 05:40 UTC
Original link: https://www.theblock.co/newsletters/the-daily/2026-11-14-meta-prediction-market-app-doj-binance-hack-more-crypto-news-440304

The above is an index of media reports; the headline is preserved in its original form. The content may quote third parties and may be updated after publication. For news involving regulation, attacks, or asset security, please verify the original report, statements from the parties involved, and subsequent developments. Do not judge the facts or trading direction based on the headline alone.

When you see this kind of news, do you first check statements from the parties involved or look at when the event took place?

#加密资讯 #Market Risk

Data collected: 2026-11-14 14:01 CST; Source: The Block.
This is not investment advice.

An on-chain transfer of 138,026,508.645437 USDC was recorded on Ethereum mainnet.

Block: 26410998; block time: 2026-11-14 05:01 UTC; event index: 353. The record comes from the USDC contract’s Transfer log, and scans from two mainnet nodes agree.

Transaction details: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf85d2bee41a94c6c4c9e89e5d43f2f28887c5df1d13b79770fd9b0286cc231a1

On-chain transfers may be transfers between accounts, contract operations, or serve other purposes. A transfer record alone cannot confirm who owns an address, whether funds flowed to an exchange, whether a trade took place, or what effect it had on the price. A single transaction may contain multiple transfer events, and the amount cannot be directly equated with new funds. Block records may also change in the event of an extreme chain reorganization.

When you see a large transfer, do you first check who owns the addresses or look at the transaction’s other transfer records?

#链上数据 #USDC

Data collected: 2026-11-14 13:33 CST; source: dual-node RPC on Ethereum mainnet.
This is not investment advice.

$TAC rose 31.5% over the past 24 hours. Chase it or short it? Let’s look at the historical data first.

I analyzed Binance USDT perpetual contract daily data since 2022 (920 contracts, including traditional finance contracts and 164 delisted ones): there were 2,378 instances of a single-day gain of ≥30%. Measured from the next day’s open:
- After 1 day: median −5.0%, up 36% of the time
- After 3 days: median −9.0%, up 34% of the time
- After 7 days: median −14.1%, up 32% of the time
- 7-day return distribution: 10th percentile −43.1%, 90th percentile +41.3%

In the historical sample, prices were below the next day’s open about 68% of the time a week later. But shorting the reversal could also hurt: 13% of the time, prices were more than 30% above the next day’s open after 7 days—enough to wipe out a highly leveraged short.

Now let’s look at the cost of holding the position: $TAC ’s current funding rate is −0.2269% / 4 hours (shorts pay longs). If the rate and settlement interval stay the same, the estimated funding cost for holding a short position for one day is about 1.36% of the notional position.

A few notes: Many coins often surge or plunge together on the same day, so these events are not independent; fees and funding costs are not included; returns are calculated from daily close to close, which differs slightly from the 24-hour rolling return measure; past performance does not predict future results.

How do you usually handle a coin that surges like this: stay away, chase with a small position, or wait for a pullback?

#合约交易 #Altcoins

Data collected: 2026-11-14 13:00 CST; source: Binance public market data.
Not investment advice.

😭 They actually banned my account, and appealing didn’t help!!!! Claude, I don’t love you anymore—I’m running into GPT’s arms~~$ANTHROPIC

An on-chain transfer of 132,857,023.135287 USDC was recorded on the Ethereum mainnet.

Block: 26410822; block time: 2026-11-14 04:26 UTC; event index: 1473. The record comes from the Transfer log of the USDC contract, and scan results from two mainnet nodes match.

Transaction details: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa689ff461961329cfb6e2803996c83e1b1fa7c2dd9e0a4cacfb42012e77595e6

On-chain transfers may be transfers between accounts, contract operations, or have other purposes. A transfer record alone cannot confirm address ownership, whether funds flowed to an exchange, whether a buy or sale took place, or the effect on price. A transaction may contain multiple transfer events, so the amount cannot be directly equated with newly added funds. Block records may also change due to an extreme chain reorganization.

When you see a large transfer, do you first check address ownership or other transfer records in the transaction?

#链上数据 #USDC

Data collected: 2026-11-14 12:32 CST; source: dual-node RPC on the Ethereum mainnet.
Not investment advice.

$INIT Funding rate −0.2933% / 1 hour: If the rate stays unchanged, a 1000U notional short position would pay about 70.39U per day.

- Direction: shorts pay longs
- Assuming the rate and interval stay unchanged, a 1000U notional position would pay about 2.93U per settlement, or an estimated 70.39U (7.04%) per day
- Actual cumulative total over the past 7 days: −39.98% (105 settlements; positive values mean longs pay)

At 10x leverage, the same fees would amount to 70.4% of the margin per day. This estimate assumes the rate stays unchanged; actual payments depend on positions and the rate at settlement.

Funding rates reflect the pricing relationship and settlement mechanism between perpetual contracts and spot markets. They cannot, by themselves, prove which side has more traders or indicate where the price will go next. Payments occur only if you hold a position at settlement; future rates are determined at the time of settlement.

Do you check the funding rate before opening a position?

#合约交易 #FundingRate

Data collected: 2026-11-14 12:02 CST; source: Binance public market data.
Not investment advice.

$BERA Funding rate −1.2744% / 4 hours: If the rate remains unchanged, a 1000U notional short position would pay approximately 76.47U per day.

- Direction: shorts pay longs
- Assuming the rate and interval remain unchanged, a 1000U notional position would pay approximately 12.74U per settlement, or an estimated 76.47U (7.65%) per day
- Actual cumulative total over the past 7 days: −0.21% (42 settlements; positive numbers mean longs pay)

At 10x leverage, the same fees would amount to 76.5% of the margin per day. This estimate assumes the rate remains unchanged; actual payments depend on positions and rates at settlement.

Funding rates reflect the pricing relationship and settlement mechanism between perpetual contracts and spot markets. They cannot, on their own, prove which side has more participants or indicate where prices will go next. Payments are made only if you hold a position at settlement; future rates are determined at the time of settlement.

Do you check funding rates before opening a position?

#合约交易 #FundingRate

Data collected: 2026-11-14 11:34 CST; source: Binance public market data.
Not investment advice.

Binance Official Announcement Reminder: Notice on Share Count Basis of USDⓈ-Margined ANTHROPICUSDT Pre-IPO Perp

Official announcement time: 2026-11-13 11:30 UTC.

Original announcement: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/d5d3474a9b054f23a1867aff5cdece3f

The title is the original official English title. The specific assets, products, scope of application, and effective time are subject to the announcement body and subsequent updates. Delisting trading pairs, delisting tokens, and adjusting contract rules are different matters; do not judge based on the title alone.

If you hold the relevant assets or contracts, would you first check the timing of trading, deposits and withdrawals, or contract settlement?

#币安公告 #TradingRisk

Data collected: 2026-11-14 11:01 CST; source: Binance official announcement.
This does not constitute investment advice.

$SHELL rose 75.6% over the past 24 hours. Chase the rally or go short? Let’s look at the historical data first.

I analyzed Binance USDT perpetual contract daily candles since 2022 (920 contracts, including traditional finance contracts and 164 delisted ones): a daily gain of ≥50% occurred 793 times in total. From the next day’s open:
- After 1 day: median −7.3%; 35% were up
- After 3 days: median −14.3%; 32% were up
- After 7 days: median −21.4%; 27% were up
- 7-day return distribution: 10th percentile −53.6%; 90th percentile +43.5%

In the historical sample, about 73% of cases were below the next day’s opening price a week later. But shorting wasn’t easy either: in 14% of cases, the price was more than 30% above the next day’s open after 7 days—a move that highly leveraged shorts might not survive.

Now for the cost of holding: $SHELL ’s current funding rate is 0.0028% / 4 hours (longs pay shorts). If the rate and settlement interval remain unchanged, the estimated funding cost for holding a notional long position for one day is about 0.02%.

A few notes: many coins often surge or crash together on the same day, so these events are not independent; the calculations exclude trading fees and funding fees; returns are calculated from daily close to close, which differs slightly from the basis used for rolling 24-hour returns; past performance does not predict future results.

How do you usually handle coins that surge like this: avoid them, chase with a small position, or wait for a pullback?

#合约交易 #Altcoins

Data collected: 2026-11-14 10:34 CST; source: Binance public market data.
This is not investment advice.

The funding rate for $BTW is currently −1.2091% / 4 hours. If you have a 1000U short position, how much would you pay in a day?

- Direction: shorts pay longs
- Assuming the rate and interval remain unchanged, a 1000U notional position would pay about 12.09U per settlement, or an estimated 72.55U (7.25%) per day
- Actual cumulative rate over the past 7 days: −7.55% (42 settlements; a positive number means longs paid)

At 10x leverage, the same fees would amount to 72.5% of your margin in a day. This estimate assumes the rate stays unchanged; actual payments depend on the positions held and the rate at settlement.

Funding rates reflect the pricing relationship and settlement mechanism between perpetual contracts and spot markets. They cannot, on their own, prove which side has more traders or indicate where the price will go next. Payments are made only if you hold a position at settlement, and future rates are determined at the time of settlement.

Do you check the funding rate before opening a position?

#合约交易 #FundingRate

Data collected: 2026-11-14 08:01 CST; Source: Binance public market data.
This is not investment advice.

$SOXL ranks among the top by trading volume today. If I open a 10,000 U position with a market order, how much extra would I actually pay?

I estimated it using the order book depth at that moment (average of buys and sells, relative to the mid-price):
- Market order: 1,000 U: about 0.90 bps (same amount in BTC: 0.01 bps)
- Market order: 10,000 U: about 0.90 bps (same amount in BTC: 0.01 bps)
- Market order: 100,000 U: about 1.7 bps (same amount in BTC: 0.01 bps)
- Best bid-ask spread: 1.8 bps

1 bps = 0.01%. This is for opening the position only; closing it costs the same again, and stop-loss orders are usually worse in fast-moving markets.

Do you usually use market or limit orders?

#合约交易 #TradingCosts

Data collected: 2026-11-14 01:04 CST; source: Binance public market data.
This is not investment advice.

$JCT fell 30.4% over the past 24 hours. Buy the dip or keep shorting? Let’s look at the historical data first.

I analyzed daily data for Binance USDT perpetual contracts since 2022 (920 contracts, including traditional financial contracts and 164 delisted ones): there were 1,483 instances of a single-day drop of ≥25%. Measured from the next day’s open:
- After 1 day: median −1.0%; 45% were up
- After 3 days: median +3.3%; 55% were up
- After 7 days: median −2.1%; 44% were up
- 7-day return distribution: 10th percentile −39.8%; 90th percentile +33.3%

In other words, in the historical sample, about 44% were up after 7 days, but 17% were also more than 30% below the next day’s open after 7 days. The historical distribution does not prove that either direction has an advantage in the current market.

Now let’s look at the cost of holding a position: $JCT ’s current funding rate is 0.0050% / 4 hours (longs pay shorts). If the rate and settlement interval remain unchanged, the estimated funding cost for holding a long position for one day is about 0.03% of the notional position.

A few notes: many coins often surge or crash together on the same day, so these events are not independent; the statistics exclude trading fees and funding costs; calculations use daily close-to-close returns, which differ slightly from rolling 24-hour returns; past performance does not predict future results.

When a coin has a sharp crash like this, what do you usually do: stay away, buy the dip in batches, or short with the trend?

#合约交易 #Altcoins

Data collected: 2026-11-14 00:02 CST; source: publicly available Binance market data.
This is not investment advice.

$NVDA Open interest increased 12.7% in one hour

Binance USDT perpetual contract NVDAUSDT: Comparing two consecutive 1-hour snapshots as of 2026-11-13 15:00 UTC, open interest measured by contract quantity changed by +12.7%. Price changes over the same period are not included in this data; the 24-hour rolling price change was +0.8%.

Open interest is the number of contracts that have not been closed out, with both long and short positions represented. A change in open interest alone does not prove that either longs or shorts are dominant, nor can it directly indicate whether prices will rise or fall next. The statistical windows for price and open interest changes differ, so they should not be treated as a cause-and-effect relationship within the same hour.

An increase or decrease in open interest can correspond to various opening and closing activities. These data alone cannot confirm the reason or indicate the direction of future volatility. Monitoring position size, leverage, and predefined risk limits is more practical than guessing the intent behind each position.

Do you check open interest and funding rates before opening a position?

Data: Binance public historical contract open interest and 24-hour market data; data is based on snapshots and may change at any time.

#合约交易 #OpenInterest

Data collected: 2026-11-13 23:04 CST; Source: Binance public market data.
Not investment advice.