Binance Square
大叔的要饭之路
160 Posts

大叔的要饭之路

39 Following
17 Followers
26 Liked
Posts
·
--
See translation
$STEEM 今天一天就走完了 7 天涨幅的 138%。这种集中度我看着有点意外 —— 一天的行情占了整周。你们怎么看这种结构? 非投资建议 #单日 {future}(STEEMUSDT)
$STEEM 今天一天就走完了 7 天涨幅的 138%。这种集中度我看着有点意外 —— 一天的行情占了整周。你们怎么看这种结构?

非投资建议

#单日
I tracked the history of $LPT : after 13 days where the single-day gain exceeded 20%, the 7-day average was -17.1%, and the win rate was only 15%. The sample size isn’t large, but the results are pretty one-sided—I was a bit surprised when I saw it. Would anyone consider this as a reference? Not investment advice # Historical Statistics {future}(LPTUSDT)
I tracked the history of $LPT : after 13 days where the single-day gain exceeded 20%, the 7-day average was -17.1%, and the win rate was only 15%. The sample size isn’t large, but the results are pretty one-sided—I was a bit surprised when I saw it. Would anyone consider this as a reference?

Not investment advice

# Historical Statistics
$API3 The most ferocious hour's trading volume is 78 times the 24-hour average. I got a bit shocked when I saw this number in the rankings. Has anyone ever seen something even more extreme? I’d like to ask how to read it. Not investment advice #Pulse Volume {future}(API3USDT)
$API3 The most ferocious hour's trading volume is 78 times the 24-hour average. I got a bit shocked when I saw this number in the rankings. Has anyone ever seen something even more extreme? I’d like to ask how to read it.

Not investment advice

#Pulse Volume
See translation
$POWR 的资金费率是 -0.0616% —— 负的,空头在给多头付钱。这种结构我印象里不常见,看着有点不对劲。有没有人遇到过?想请教。 非投资建议 #费率 {future}(POWRUSDT)
$POWR 的资金费率是 -0.0616% —— 负的,空头在给多头付钱。这种结构我印象里不常见,看着有点不对劲。有没有人遇到过?想请教。

非投资建议

#费率
The historical stats of $KAIA are a bit interesting: after 6 times of single-day gains exceeding 20%, the 7-day average is -7.0% and the win rate is 50%. The sample size isn’t large, but the direction is opposite to most other assets—I find that quite strange. I’d like to ask what everyone thinks about this kind of conclusion from a small sample. Not investment advice #Historical Statistics {future}(KAIAUSDT)
The historical stats of $KAIA are a bit interesting: after 6 times of single-day gains exceeding 20%, the 7-day average is -7.0% and the win rate is 50%. The sample size isn’t large, but the direction is opposite to most other assets—I find that quite strange. I’d like to ask what everyone thinks about this kind of conclusion from a small sample.

Not investment advice

#Historical Statistics
$UNI Today成交額 271M, is tens of times larger than most of the listings on the board. This scale isn’t something retail investors can pile up. I was a bit surprised when I saw it. Is anyone watching it? Not investment advice #巨量 {future}(UNIUSDT)
$UNI Today成交額 271M, is tens of times larger than most of the listings on the board. This scale isn’t something retail investors can pile up. I was a bit surprised when I saw it. Is anyone watching it?

Not investment advice

#巨量
$PROM This number has me a bit puzzled: the 7-day cumulative is still -5.4%, yet today it has bounced up. What do you think about this kind of structure—“down over a week, up in a day”? Not investment advice #Reversal {future}(PROMUSDT)
$PROM This number has me a bit puzzled: the 7-day cumulative is still -5.4%, yet today it has bounced up. What do you think about this kind of structure—“down over a week, up in a day”?

Not investment advice

#Reversal
There’s a contrast: $COTI 7 days and it’s still been falling (-2.6%), yet today it turned positive. Has the trend changed or is it just a one-day spike? I can’t tell—I’m a bit confused. Is anyone able to explain? I’d like to ask. Not investment advice #Reversal {future}(COTIUSDT)
There’s a contrast: $COTI 7 days and it’s still been falling (-2.6%), yet today it turned positive. Has the trend changed or is it just a one-day spike? I can’t tell—I’m a bit confused. Is anyone able to explain? I’d like to ask.

Not investment advice

#Reversal
I worked it out: after the biggest surge in history of $LUNA , the follow-up was this—after 7 times of single-day gains exceeding 20%, the 7-day average was 8.4%, with a win rate of 57%. This win rate looks better than most assets—I’m a bit surprised. Has anyone verified similar statistics? Not investment advice #Historical statistics {future}(LUNAUSDT)
I worked it out: after the biggest surge in history of $LUNA , the follow-up was this—after 7 times of single-day gains exceeding 20%, the 7-day average was 8.4%, with a win rate of 57%. This win rate looks better than most assets—I’m a bit surprised. Has anyone verified similar statistics?

Not investment advice

#Historical statistics
The historical statistics for $ENS are kind of interesting: after 10 single-day jumps of over 20%, the 7-day average is 13.1% and the win rate is 70%. The sample size isn’t large, but the direction goes against most other assets, which I find quite strange. I’d like to ask everyone what they think about conclusions from such a small sample size. Not investment advice #Historical Statistics {future}(ENSUSDT)
The historical statistics for $ENS are kind of interesting: after 10 single-day jumps of over 20%, the 7-day average is 13.1% and the win rate is 70%. The sample size isn’t large, but the direction goes against most other assets, which I find quite strange. I’d like to ask everyone what they think about conclusions from such a small sample size.

Not investment advice

#Historical Statistics
I calculated the subsequent run after the $ENJ historical surge: after 7 single days with a rise of over 20%, the 7-day average was 39.1%, with a win rate of 71%. This win rate looks better than most other assets—I’m a bit surprised. Has anyone verified similar statistics? Not investment advice #Historical statistics {future}(ENJUSDT)
I calculated the subsequent run after the $ENJ historical surge: after 7 single days with a rise of over 20%, the 7-day average was 39.1%, with a win rate of 71%. This win rate looks better than most other assets—I’m a bit surprised. Has anyone verified similar statistics?

Not investment advice

#Historical statistics
$ZEC Today just set a new all-time high. The current price is only 3.76% away from the peak. Among a pile of assets that have fallen by 80%–90%, I find this one a bit shocking. With this kind of strength, would you dare to chase it? Not investment advice #new_high {future}(ZECUSDT)
$ZEC Today just set a new all-time high. The current price is only 3.76% away from the peak. Among a pile of assets that have fallen by 80%–90%, I find this one a bit shocking. With this kind of strength, would you dare to chase it?

Not investment advice

#new_high
$BAT active buy/sell ratio is 1.210, and active buys clearly outweigh sells. I’ve been seeing sell orders with an advantage for a while, so this figure surprises me a bit. Do you think active buy orders explain the situation better? Not investment advice #Buy Orders {future}(BATUSDT)
$BAT active buy/sell ratio is 1.210, and active buys clearly outweigh sells. I’ve been seeing sell orders with an advantage for a while, so this figure surprises me a bit. Do you think active buy orders explain the situation better? Not investment advice

#Buy Orders
The funding rate of $STG is +0.1094%, the highest in this batch — longs have to pay quite a bit every day to hold positions. Even stranger is that in the past 7 days it still went down. With such a high rate but the price not rising, I find it rather unusual. Has anyone analyzed it? Not investment advice #FundingRateAnomaly {future}(STGUSDT)
The funding rate of $STG is +0.1094%, the highest in this batch — longs have to pay quite a bit every day to hold positions. Even stranger is that in the past 7 days it still went down. With such a high rate but the price not rising, I find it rather unusual. Has anyone analyzed it? Not investment advice

#FundingRateAnomaly
$RSR 7 The surge is up 28%, but there’s still 94% left to the high. In the short term it’s very strong, but long term it’s in a pit—this combination makes me usually think one more layer, and it feels strange. Does anyone prefer this kind of setup? Not investment advice #rebound {future}(RSRUSDT)
$RSR 7 The surge is up 28%, but there’s still 94% left to the high. In the short term it’s very strong, but long term it’s in a pit—this combination makes me usually think one more layer, and it feels strange. Does anyone prefer this kind of setup? Not investment advice

#rebound
$SHELL rose 6.2%, with active buy/sell ratio of 0.696. The sell orders are higher than the buy orders, yet the price is still going up—this combination looks a bit off to me. Does anyone understand fund flow? I’d like to ask. Not investment advice # Price-Volume Divergence {future}(SHELLUSDT)
$SHELL rose 6.2%, with active buy/sell ratio of 0.696. The sell orders are higher than the buy orders, yet the price is still going up—this combination looks a bit off to me. Does anyone understand fund flow? I’d like to ask. Not investment advice

# Price-Volume Divergence
$DCR is among the few in this batch that has no contracts; we can only do spot. — I can’t fully check the rate, open interest, or the large-holder long/short ratio. Since an entire chunk of information is missing, I’m not confident in my assessment, and I’m quite curious how other people handle this. Is anyone specifically looking at this kind of situation? Not investment advice #Spot {future}(DCRUSDT)
$DCR is among the few in this batch that has no contracts; we can only do spot. — I can’t fully check the rate, open interest, or the large-holder long/short ratio. Since an entire chunk of information is missing, I’m not confident in my assessment, and I’m quite curious how other people handle this. Is anyone specifically looking at this kind of situation? Not investment advice

#Spot
$CYBER is still 98% away from the highest point. Up 6.7%—with this kind of background, I can’t tell whether it’s a rebound or just noise. It’s a bit confusing. Has anyone done deep-drop entries? I’d like to ask what the basis is. Not investment advice #Deep Drop {future}(CYBERUSDT)
$CYBER is still 98% away from the highest point. Up 6.7%—with this kind of background, I can’t tell whether it’s a rebound or just noise. It’s a bit confusing. Has anyone done deep-drop entries? I’d like to ask what the basis is. Not investment advice

#Deep Drop
$DUSK large-holder long/short ratio 5.03; long positions are five times short positions. This number is a bit more than I expected. When large holders are this consistent, do you think it’s a signal or a contrarian indicator? Not investment advice #Large-holder positions {future}(DUSKUSDT)
$DUSK large-holder long/short ratio 5.03; long positions are five times short positions. This number is a bit more than I expected. When large holders are this consistent, do you think it’s a signal or a contrarian indicator? Not investment advice

#Large-holder positions
There’s a number I find pretty strange: $GRT is up 6.7%, but the contract open interest hasn’t moved much in the past 24 hours. The price is rising while the position stays unchanged, which suggests this move wasn’t driven by leverage. I don’t see this kind of structure very often—it looks a bit odd. Has anyone run into this? Not investment advice #Open interest unchanged {future}(GRTUSDT)
There’s a number I find pretty strange: $GRT is up 6.7%, but the contract open interest hasn’t moved much in the past 24 hours. The price is rising while the position stays unchanged, which suggests this move wasn’t driven by leverage. I don’t see this kind of structure very often—it looks a bit odd. Has anyone run into this? Not investment advice

#Open interest unchanged
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs