After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
In five years of trading, the thing that cost me the most in tuition:
It wasn’t getting the direction wrong. It wasn’t picking the wrong coin.
It was trading on emotion when I had no system.
When the market was doing well: I went all in and thought I was a genius. When the market turned: I kept switching directions, getting stopped out and then reversing, until I got hit from both sides.
Back then, I looked through my trading records— I always had a reason when I made money, and I always had a reason when I lost money.
The problem wasn’t whether my reasons were right. It was that I had no consistent framework to keep myself in check.
Later, I forced myself to trade systematically— no matter how strong my feelings were, I wouldn’t act without a signal.
It was painful for a while, but the results became consistent.
The difference between having a system and not having one, five years later, isn’t in the returns—it’s in your mindset.
Why do I trust a quantitative system instead of my “gut feeling”?
Because feelings can deceive you; data doesn't.
Looking back at my trading records over the past five years: · Two years of trading on gut feeling: huge swings in my account, and in my mood · Three years after adopting a systematic approach: much more stable, with losses still within expectations
Quantitative trading isn't万能, but it does one very important thing: It keeps “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
Act when a signal comes; wait when there isn't one. That's it.
Trading volume is the key factor today. Price is rising, but volume isn't following—that's a weak rally, so don't chase it. Wait for volume to pick up before deciding on a direction.
Today's strategy: Wait for volume confirmation → then decide on a direction No volume → stay on the sidelines; cash is a position too
Some people make 10 trades a day, exhausting themselves and ending up with negative returns. Others make 1 trade a week, waiting with ease and earning steady returns.
This isn’t about how hard you work. It’s about finding the right fit.
High-frequency strategies → require quick decisions and quick execution Low-frequency strategies → require patient waiting and patient position holding
You’re using a low-frequency strategy but operating at a high-frequency pace— watching the market every day and intervening frequently—
You’re not trading; you’re disrupting your own system.
First, figure out the pace of your system, then decide how to sit back and wait.
When I built my first quantitative trading system, I fell into three traps.
Trap 1: Overfitting The backtest looked unbelievably good, but the system fell apart as soon as it went live. The reason: I had tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Trap 2: Ignoring fees The backtest made $50 per trade, but after fees, only $15 was left in live trading. Returns were cut by 70% outright.
Trap 3: No stop-loss logic “The quantitative system won’t make reckless trades.” Then one market move wiped out 20%, and I learned that quantitative systems can blow up too.
The SYS series was gradually built after I learned these three lessons the hard way. No pitfalls, no system.
Just starting out: wishing you could double your money every day. After a year: beginning to learn to wait for signals. After three years: only then realizing that “not trading” is a skill.
The market isn’t going anywhere, and opportunities come every week. But one bad move could wipe out your capital.
Don’t use a “fast” pace to follow a “slow” strategy. Don’t “guess”—wait for the right trade.
Take it a little slower and steadier, and you’ll go further.
It wasn’t because I got the direction wrong. It was because I used leverage and didn’t set a stop-loss.
At the time, my thinking was: “I’ve analyzed this very carefully. It’s bound to bounce back.” But it just didn’t.
That one time cost me two years’ worth of savings.
Someone asked me how I faced my family back then. I said: “I didn’t tell them.”
I carried the burden alone for three months. I couldn’t sleep a single night during those three months, all I could think about was: How do I make the money back?
Later, instead of rushing to make it back, I spent six months rebuilding my system. And I became more consistent as a result.
Getting liquidated isn’t the end. It’s a way of forcing you to learn.