Contract Quant Brief #144|BEAMX volume 120M · OI +24% closer to MAs prioritized; BLESS day +28% OI only +2% de-prioritized
【Market snapshot】 Screening time 08:00 (+08), regime=continuation: the continuation is still there, and the funding/fee rate is generally controllable. The top three gain in the past three days are all in the 23%–28% range, but the quality and positioning differ a lot—don’t make a decision based on gain alone. Key facts: 1) $BEAMX Turnover is about 119 million, significantly higher than the rest of the group; OI in 1h is +23.8%, only about 2.8% away from the 20-MA; fee rate about 0.005% (very low). 2) $BLESS Daily gain about +27.7%, 6h +8.1%—moves more aggressively, but it is about 6.6% away from the 20-MA and about 15.3% away from the 50-MA. OI in 1h is only +2.4%, with volume about 0.37B. 3) $CLO Daily gain about +27.8%, but 1h has turned negative (about -0.17%); fee rate is about 0.035% and rather high—only as alternative watch.
Futures Quant Brief #143|FART: 120M volume; expect 1h to turn neutral main focus, PUMP: OI +26%, only consider if near MAs
【Market snapshot】Continuation remains relatively strong, but the front row has already shown “turning neutral 1 hour after a volume expansion,” so it’s not advisable to treat the breakout spike as the main strategy. Official Top picks: $FARTCOIN (36.96), $PUMPBTC (32.61); $MAGMA Daily gain over 40% and distance to MA20 about 13%—only for watchlist observation. Data anchor: - FARTCOIN: Day +16.6%, 6h +9.6%, 1h -0.14%. Trading volume about 117 million U. OI (1h) +12.7%. Distance to MA20 about 5.6%, to MA50 about 10.7%. Current price 0.2167. Funding rate near neutral. - PUMPBTC: Day +26.8%, 6h +1.6%, 1h -0.08%. Trading volume about 23 million U. OI (1h) +26.2%. Distance to MA20 about 3.8%, to MA50 about 11.6%. Current price 0.01317.
Contracts Quant Brief #142|BR pinned to the 20-day avg≈0% day +21% priority; TAC OI +46% vs 50-day avg at +17%—do not chase
【Market Facts|2026-08-26 08:00+08】 regime=continuation. The top three selected are all high-volatility contracts with daily gains of about 17%–21%. The funding rate is still within a controllable range overall (highest about 0.035%), and there is no sign of broadly crowded long positions. Structural differences matter more than “who is up more.” BR is almost pinned to the 20-day average (dist20≈-0.04%). TAC is still strong on the daily chart, but it has pulled about +17% above the 50-day average; additionally, 1h OI has been abnormally amplified by about +46%. ONG has the largest trading volume, but its volume has already retraced about -2.1% over the past 6h, so it is only a secondary observation option. Trade logic derived from the data: continue to prioritize assets in the market that meet all of the following—(1) the trend is not broken, (2) the price has returned near the moving average, and (3) OI/funding rate are not extremely stretched. For positions that have drifted far away from the mid-term moving averages and rely only on volume spikes at the “tip,” downgrade them by default and do not chase.
Contract Quant Brief #141 | PROM day +26% · OI 1h +48% prioritized for being near the MA; PORTAL with negative funding rate downgraded
[Market facts | wait-and-see] Top 3: PROM (35.4), PORTAL (32.3), ONG (32.3). The opportunity is still there, but the structure is diverging: PROM is up about +26% on the day, nearly flat over 1h, about -2% over 6h, and about -0.9% from the 20MA (sticking near the MA). OI in 1h is about +48%, volume about $330M (3.3e8 U), funding is near-neutral. PORTAL is up about +25% on the day, about +2.2% from the 20MA, up slightly over 6h, but funding is about -0.066% and OI in 1h only about +1.5%—volume expansion and position changes are out of sync. ONG is up about +17% on the day, about +8% over 6h, and about +8.3% from the 20MA; after stretching, just observe. Today’s playbook is inferred from the data: within the names that are rising, use differential logic—prioritize those that are near the MA and have real OI add-on. If funding is negative and positions can’t keep up, downgrade; don’t chase if it’s far from the 20MA.
Contract Quant Brief #140|MORPHO +26% on the day · OI +27% · 10% away from MA — pull back to 2.63 is what we do
【Market】continuation is mildly bullish, but the top shortlist has already clearly moved away from the moving averages: MORPHO is up about +25.6% on the day, around +10.3% above the 20-day MA; GRASS is up about +23.2% on the day, around +10.0% above the 20-day MA. Both still show +8% to +9% momentum over 6h, but the 1h has turned flat to a slight pullback (-0.1% to -0.3%), indicating the odds of blindly chasing tops are getting worse. More importantly, the position structure: MORPHO’s OI is +26.7% over 1h, with成交 amount around the 0.86 hundred-million USDT scale; capital is still adding, but it’s “adding at high levels.” GRASS’s OI is +17.5% over 1h, yet the funding rate is about 0.0194% (higher than MORPHO’s 0.005%), meaning higher friction cost even though both are strong.
Contract Quant Brief #139|PUMP main line with +22% daily · OI +13%, ENA OI falls—only watch
【Market view】 regime=continuation: Continuation is still intact, and funding rates overall are not extreme. The top two on the short list are $PUMP , $STX where "price up + OI 1h double-digit uplift" appears in sync. For #3 $ENA , while it is closer to the 20-MA and has a larger traded amount, OI 1h is falling, so the structure is one tier weaker and it is not a formal candidate. Key comparison (from real-time screening): - PUMP: up about +22.5% daily, about +3.5% over 6h, nearly flat over 1h (+0.3%); quote volume about 684 million; funding rate about +0.005%; about +4.8% from the 20-MA and +12.8% from the 50-MA; OI 1h about +12.8%; current price 0.00498, ATR about 0.000217.
Contract quant summary #138|ENA close to the 20-MA by 1.3% · Volume 1.3B priority, WIF OI1h-5.5% downgraded
[Market facts] regime=continuation:short-term continuation is still present, and the overall funding/fee rate is controllable. Three of the top picks are strong contracts with daily gains roughly 20–22%, but the structures differ—volume, distance to the 20-MA, and changes in OI 1h pull the priority apart. Key comparison (only using the current selection): • $ENA :Day +22.0%, current price 0.1424, distance to 20-MA only about 1.3%, distance to 50-MA about 14.5%; traded value about 1.35B U; fee rate about 0.0136%; OI 1h +15.2%. Largest volume, closest to the 20-MA, and OI still adding over the past 1 hour. • $WIF :Day +21.5%, current price 0.1995, distance to 20-MA about 6.3%, distance to 50-MA about 15.1%; traded value about 67M U; fee rate about 0.005%; 6h +8.5%, but OI 1h −5.5%. The upside pace isn’t weak, but both volume magnitude and closeness-to-MA conditions are clearly weaker than ENA. In the last 1 hour, positions are being reduced.
Contract Quant Brief #137|BOME 3% from the 20-MA, 500M volume prioritized; SANTOS 6h +15% downgraded
[Market] Continuation is relatively bullish. The front-runners aren’t “just going up”—it’s the combination of volume and positions being lifted together: SANTOS and BOME both have OI 1h in the +58% range, suggesting longs are still adding, not just a needle move. But the structure differs a lot—BOME is up about +34% daily and only about 3.4% from the 20-MA, with 6h at just +2.4%; it looks more like a sideways consolidation at high levels after a big move. SANTOS is up about +18% daily, 6h still +14.8%, about 7.5% from the 20-MA—its short-term stretch is deeper. Fees on both sides are close to neutral (around 0.005%), so it isn’t an extremely crowded fee-market. The core contradiction is simply: which is more expensive and which is closer to the moving average.
Contract Quant Brief #136 | Prefer ETH OI -2% to wait for a pullback; HYPE +19% daily but 8% from MAs—don’t chase
Market facts: the continuation is in effect—activity remains—but the front two are not “clean.” $ETH The daily rise is about 17.6%, 6h about +7.8%. Current price is 2253.63; it is about 7.7% away from the 20-day MA and about 12.6% away from the 50-day MA. The 1h chart is nearly flat, with OI 1h around -2.1%; the bid-chasing momentum from longs is ebbing. $HYPE The daily rise is about 19.4%, 6h about +12.3%. Current price is 69.885; it is about 8.3% away from the 20-day MA and about 13.2% away from the 50-day MA. OI 1h is about +9.4%, and the funding rate is slightly higher than ETH. The conclusion is straightforward: both are stretched above the moving averages, and the “breakout chase” has poor cost-effectiveness. In the same tier, it’s more likely to wait for ETH with OI cooling off, instead of catching HYPE’s 6h acceleration spike.
Contract Quant Brief #135|PRL sticks to MA 0.8%·OI+23% priority; TRIA stretching 8%—don’t chase
【Market View】 Filter mark for continuation: continuation is still present, and the funding rate overall is not extreme. Among the top three, the structure differences are very clear—$PRL distance to 20-day MA is only about 0.8%, and 1h/6h are still slightly positive returns, more like “the trend hasn’t broken and the position is usable”; $TRIA day change about +18%, 6h about +9%, but distance to the 20-day MA is already about 8.2%, and OI 1h is about +41%, more like an acceleration phase; $PUMP largest trading volume, but 1h is flat and distance to 20-day MA is about 7%, so it’s only an optional watch. Today’s differentiation is simple: prioritize $PRL that is sticking to the moving average; $TRIA while other strong ones are in the same camp, don’t chase at the current price—only reassess when it returns near the moving average; the 3rd-ranked one does not enter the main line.
Contract Quant Brief #134|GPS daily +52%·OI 1h +122%, TUT is 7% away from the 20-MA so down-weighted
【Market View】 When filtering, the continuity is still there and the funding rate overall is not extremely extreme. The top two in the shortlist are high-volatility daily-risers: GPS has a daily rise of about 52% with traded value around 640 million U; TUT has a daily rise of about 35% with traded value around 390 million U. The difference is not simply “which is stronger,” but the structure: GPS is only about 3.1% away from the 20-MA; the 1h shows a slight pullback of about -0.7%; but OI in the 1h jumps about +122%. TUT is about 6.9% away from the 20-MA; OI in the 1h barely moves (about +0.1%), more like price moved first while positions did not synchronize. Funding rates are slightly negative for GPS and slightly positive for TUT; long crowding for both is not out of control.
Contract Quant Brief #133|VELVET +24% on the day · 6h turns negative, downgraded; main focus on PRL near the moving average
【Market overview】 In a wait-and-see filter. The top two on the shortlist are still in relatively strong zones on the daily chart, but the structure is no longer “accelerating together”: VELVET is up about 24% on the day, yet its 1h/6h trend has flattened into a slight pullback; PRL is up about 12% on the day, with 6h also showing weakness, but its 1h OI increased by about 11.5%, which is cleaner than VELVET’s roughly 5% OI increase. Both are only about 1% away from the 20-day level, suggesting this is not chasing breakouts from mid-air, but rather making a choice while staying near the short moving averages—this is the position that most fears mistaking “sticking to the moving average” for “you can blindly buy.” Today’s selection is straightforward: downgrade VELVET first, since it has the larger daily gain and higher funding rate; take PRL as the primary watch item because it has a lower funding rate and clearer OI inflow for a pullback. The 3rd pick, ONG, has a surge in 1h OI of about 75% and an abnormal volatility pattern—treat it only as a backup to observe, not a formal entry.
Contract Quant Brief #132 | Strong overall—strong bias too, I only wait for a pullback at stretched levels
The order book is relatively strong, and the continuation is still there. However, several coins have already pulled their bodies far apart. At times like this, I don’t really want to catch the knife at the top; I’d rather wait for a clean pullback and then talk. If I really need to prioritize, I’ll put $AIO first, and $H second. $COW has pretty explosive volume and changes in open interest, but it feels more like the emotional end segment—use it as a backup to observe for now; no chasing. —— $AIO —— Current price is about 0.0627. The daily gain has already exceeded 20%. In the past 6 hours it’s still pushing higher, and the 1-hour position is also being increased. It’s roughly one-tenth away from the 20-day average—its placement isn’t very comfortable, but the structure is cleaner than a pure emotional breakout.
I’ve been seeing a few influencers who are still struggling in the airdrop space these days, and I really admire them. As for me, in the past few months I’ve basically paused; nowadays, besides continuing to optimize my Polymarket strategy, it’s just about finding a place to park stablecoins.
My current strategy is: play it safe with CEX, chase higher APY with DEX. If you control the proportions well, it’s really quite great. At least the Bend HONEY vaults on the Bear Chain are perfect for just lying back. Even now, the annualized return is still solidly holding above 10%, with withdrawals anytime you want—basically no need to touch anything. The whole idea is truly worry-free financial management. 😋
For questions about operations, you can check out my practical videos on my 推.
From cross-chain → swap to HONEY → deposit into the Vault → claim rewards—just follow along step by step and you can finish it all😉
Contract Quant Brief #131|The divergence is still there; I won’t chase the spike—I’ll just wait for a clean pullback
Quick look at the board: it’s not that there are no opportunities—it's that the structure is scattered. Some coins can still pull up another leg within 6 hours, while others have already surged to a double intraday, yet positions are dropping rapidly. When things look like this, chasing the tip often isn’t losing on direction—it’s losing on your entry position.
I’ll slow the pace: I’ll prioritize waiting for the pullback to hold, or a reconfirmation after a breakout on volume. I’ll watch the first two first, and treat the third only as a backup.
【CAP】Current price ~ 0.0643 I’d rather watch it because it’s not far from the short moving average (within roughly 2%). The 6-hour momentum is still there, funding is slightly negative, and when shorts are crowded, pullbacks often present better setups. Observation zone: 0.0615–0.0630 for pullback and support Trigger: after the pullback, if it doesn’t break 0.0610, then reclaims the market with renewed volume above 0.0645; or after consolidation, breaks the intraday high and holds Invalidation: a valid drop below 0.0600, or the pullback turns into a slow grind down with volume not following through I prefer to wait for it to offer you the position rather than chasing at the current price.
【AKE】Current price ~ 0.01063 The intraday gain is already large, and it’s far from the medium-term moving average. What stands out even more is that in the last ~1 hour, open interest has dropped sharply—looks like de-leveraging after a spike. The direction can still be watched, but I don’t want to go in aggressively at this location. Observation zone: the pullback area 0.0094–0.0100 Trigger: after the pullback, it reclaims and holds above 0.0103, and volume stops shrinking Invalidation: breaks below 0.0092, or fails to rebound to the prior high while open interest continues collapsing I’d rather treat this level as a pullback confirmation setup, not an emotional “chase-the-top” one.
Backup to watch: VELVET has decent heat and open interest is rising too, but it has already run for a while. I won’t chase it now—just add it to my watchlist and assess the pullback quality.
Risk warning: - In divergent markets, there are many fake breakouts: if the trigger doesn’t get filled,撤 (exit)—don’t argue with emotions - High-volatility small caps have big slippage: keep position size light; don’t add beyond the plan - When funding and open-interest suddenly change, lower expectations first, then talk about direction - The above is only market observation after quantitative screening, not investment advice
One sentence: Today’s opportunities are in waiting for confirmation—not in grabbing the first bite.
Contract Quant Brief #130|The trend continues and hasn’t broken apart, but I won’t chase the tip—I'll wait for a pullback for a better entry
First, let’s clarify the tape: what the script calls for is continuation. The overall funding/fee rate is controllable, the strong momentum is still there, and within the past hour several coins are basically moving sideways and catching their breath. In this phase, the easiest mistake is to treat “it’s still going up” as “I can chase it right now.” I’d rather judge who can run farther and who is still nearer to the moving average.
【AVNT】I’ll watch this first Current price is about 0.108, up around 19% today; about +2.7% over 6 hours; nearly flat over the last hour. It’s roughly 2.7% below the 20 MA. Funding/fee is slightly negative, but the 1-hour open interest jumped by about 46%. Volume is coming in, while price pauses first—compared to something that’s been pulled straight upward all the way, this one looks more orderly. Observation zone: pull back to 0.104–0.106 Trigger condition: after the pullback, it regains and holds above 0.108, or it pushes higher with volume and stays above the lifted swing low Invalidation condition: a confirmed drop below 0.102–0.103 (about one volatility “step” lost) I don’t want to chase the spike above 0.11.
【BR】Second priority, more room to stretch Current price about 0.264, up about 16% today; roughly +6% over 6 hours; about 6.6% below the 20 MA. 1-hour open interest is about +22%, and funding/fee is slightly positive. Since the rhythm is steeper than AVNT, I’m putting it behind. Observation zone: 0.250–0.255 Trigger condition: after it pulls back to that area and stabilizes, then it turns up again Invalidation condition: drops below around 0.245 Before the pullback is cleanly done, I’d rather move less.
Alternative watch: AVAAI is up around 30% today and is farther from the moving average—I'll note it for now, no chase, no elaboration.
Risk warning: these “alt” coins are volatile; after positions stack up in the short term, they can easily get trampled. Use strict stop-losses and manage leverage. Filtering is for timing reference, not a guaranteed “will go up.”
One-sentence wrap-up: continuation is still intact, but I’m on the side of “waiting for confirmation”—AVNT’s pullback first, BR second; the ones accelerating from high levels, I’ll skip for now.
Contract Quant Report #129|The divergence shows on the face, opportunities are still there—but I only confirm, not chase the highs
The market isn’t without activity; it’s that the structure is splitting: some coins are still “breathing” in mid-air, while others have already pulled their position back toward the moving average. This is the stage where it’s easiest to misread—top gainers are lively, but the spot you can actually act on is surprisingly limited. My stance is very clear: wait for a clean pullback and/or a breakout confirmation; any “hard buy in mid-air” should be closed.
【I’d rather first look at: PROM】 Current price is about 2.714, up around 46% today. Yet it’s still roughly 3% below the 20-period moving average. Over the last 6 hours it’s only modestly lifting, the funding rate is slightly negative, but open interest for the past 1 hour has surged by about 75%. This kind of structure—after running up once, price comes back near the moving average, and supply/chips are still being added—looks far better than an already “straightened out” target. Key observation zone: 2.65–2.80 (near the moving average; shallow pullback without breaking) Trigger: once it holds in that range, it turns back up Invalidation: a sustained break down near 2.50; shallow pullback turns into a breakdown—withdraw first For this spot, I’d rather wait for confirmation. I don’t want to chase at the peak of sentiment.
【Second candidate, but more selective: CYS】 Momentum isn’t weak: about +52% on the day, around +5% over 6 hours, and volume is thick. The issue is also straightforward: it’s about 7% above the 20-period moving average; the 1-hour chart has already pulled back about 1.3%, and open interest over the past 1 hour is still decreasing. That signals distribution at higher levels—it isn’t a comfortable place to chase. Key observation zone: wait for a pullback to 1.52–1.58 (near the moving-average area) Trigger: after the pullback, it holds and then turns back up Invalidation: an effective breakdown below around 1.48, or the pullback turns into an accelerated sell-off—give up For this high-level segment, I’d rather pause and let it clean up its position on its own.
Alternative to watch: AVAAI is also not weak intraday, but the volume is a bit thin and the position is relatively high. I won’t chase—just treat it as background noise.
Risk warning: in a divergent market, false breakouts are common. Keep single-trade position sizing under control. Data is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice. Once the pullback is confirmed, later there may be only chasing—but until confirmation happens, I’d rather not do it.
Contract Quant Brief #128|Strong but not scattered; the highs are already stretched—I’m only waiting for a pullback to confirm
First, let’s make the tape clear: the overall trend still leans bullish. Money and positions are still squeezing into popular names. But several have already pumped in a rather ugly way over the past few days—if you chase hard again near the front end, the cost-performance is very poor. I’ll condense my action into one sentence: only trade after confirmation from a pullback; no “midair relaying.”
【I’d rather first watch】HOLO Current price ~0.0816, up about +18% today. In the past hour it has slightly cooled, but over 6 hours it’s still bullish. The funding rate is negative, so long costs aren’t outrageous—but positions in the past hour have surged by over 70%. That suggests the money came in fast; don’t treat it like a “casual poke and it’ll be fine.” Observation zone: 0.0775–0.0790 (pullback area near the near-term moving averages) Trigger: if the pullback holds this zone without breaking, and then you see a dead-stop/stop-candle recovery with volume following through, consider confirming and going along with the strong direction Invalidation: a valid breakdown below 0.0755, or after a pullback it repeatedly spikes higher but can’t hold—if the structure weakens, exit Preference: within the same bullish environment, I’d rather wait for it to cleanly complete the pullback than buy while it’s still trading at the current price.
【I don’t want to chase hard from this level】VELVET Current price ~0.626. Today it has already surged at a +44% level. It’s more than 5% above the near-term moving average; over 6 hours it’s actually already going sideways and a bit weak. But in the past hour it’s been lifted again by incoming funds. Positions in the past hour have exploded by nearly 70%—a classic case of “hot, urgent, and expensive.” Observation zone: 0.590–0.605 Trigger: after it returns to this band, it stops falling and then reclaims the ~0.610 area—only then does continuation make sense Invalidation: breakdown below 0.575, or a spike that can’t beat the prior high followed by a quick drop on expanding volume Trade-off: at this spot, I’d rather miss it than use it as a trend-catcher with a flying knife.
Alternative watch: LUNA2 is also heating up, with even more aggressive position growth—but I’ll keep it as a backup watch only. No expansion, no chasing for now.
Risk warning: 1)High-volatility altcoin contracts—set stop-losses in advance; don’t over-allocate per single trade. 2)After positions surge in the short term, once sentiment turns, drawdowns may happen faster than they appear. 3)The above is only my market observations after quantitative screening and does not constitute investment advice; triggers and invalidation are up to your own execution discipline.
One sentence: A bullish market can be traded—but today’s key is “wait for pullback confirmation,” not “see it’s hot and jump in.”
Contract Quant Brief #127|The continuation hasn’t faded, but the SQD capital inflow is too aggressive—I’d rather wait for CAP to pull back and cleanly trade it
First, let’s clarify the tape: the script is for continuation. The overall funding rate isn’t exaggerated, and the trend hasn’t turned bad yet. But this kind of “continuation” doesn’t mean you can chase just because someone else is pumping. Some have already blown their hourly positions out; others are just pressing back near the moving average. The feel is completely different.
I’ll first look at who CAP. Up about 16% on the day. In the past hour it’s actually pulled back, and price is slightly below the 20 MA. The funding rate is mildly negative, and positions are cooling down. This looks more like “after the rally, take a breather first,” which is easier to wait for than a product that just pushes straight up. Current price is about 0.0459. Observation zone: 0.0448–0.0455 Trigger: reclaim and hold around 0.0464 (near the 20 MA). If the pullback doesn’t break the prior low, then consider following. Invalidation: a valid drop below 0.0440—if the pullback turns into a breakdown, I’ll give up. I don’t want to hard-pick falling candles here. I’d rather wait for it to prove it’s still alive on its own.
SQD is also on the board, but I’ll be more restrained. Up nearly 24% on the day; it’s already pulled away from the 50 MA by a noticeable margin. More striking is that positions surged about 79% in the past hour—capital is coming in too fast, which can burn through short-term sentiment quickly. The funding rate is okay, but it doesn’t mean you can blindly close your eyes just because it’s high. Current price is about 0.0451. Observation zone: pull back to 0.0438–0.0443 (near the 20 MA) Trigger: after that range stops dipping, look for it to turn up again—and don’t see any more position “pulse-style” explosive surges. Invalidation: drop below 0.0420, which means the acceleration structure broke first. If it doesn’t pull back, I’d rather watch the feel than chase in mid-air.
Alternative to observe / Not chasing for now: Lobster. Up over 30% on the day; it’s already deviated too far from the 20 MA. Better to note in your notebook than reach for it now.
Risk warning Alt coins can be highly volatile. The frameworks above are for observation only—not a call to trade. Control position size and leverage strictly; don’t board early if the trigger hasn’t appeared. If it fails, cut decisively and exit. Data is up to the script time; intraday structure can change rapidly.
One sentence: Continuation is still there, but today I only want to do “pullback confirmation,” not “high-level relay chasing.”