Traders杨

$NOM Yang believes it is not dead; the secrets are hidden in liquidity. The bottom liquidity support band has not broken; on the contrary, it is still very solid. The position of 0.006 is a POC testing point, where most transactions have left traces 🐾, and it is likely to test and attack in this direction in the long term.

Tonight, Traders Yang will announce the second technical public signal, and the premise is the same: only when private domain comrades achieve a certain increase will it be disclosed. How many people benefited from the last public dusdt?

$BULLA reached 0.01, breaking through the dense footprints and liquidity above. The liquidity expectation direction has reversed. If you want to enter and go long, there are dense short-term retail stop-loss points near 0.0074 below. You can ambush low leverage at this point.

$BULLA As mentioned this afternoon, if you see my post, you won't mindlessly go long. A strong liquidation is likely to pass through this position at 0.006681 like paper. All retail stop-loss orders for long positions are placed at this level in the past two days. If it is to rise, it must also hit this liquidity.

If $BULLA cannot reach 0.009 in the short term, then it means it is the next $PIPPIN preparing to go into free fall.

$BULLA This is actually a great thing, 0.009 test see. This test concerns whether $BULLA is a dead cat bounce or a breakthrough of the backlog. Private domain comrades can pay attention to the changes in transaction volume and the footprint chart during the test.

Private domain comrades $BULLA only need to pay attention to one position: around 0.009. The poc area has accumulated most of the trapped positions and stop-loss footprints 🐾. Tonight is an exciting night. Operating a single line to achieve a 50 percent extreme controlled coin is a miracle.

$BULLA Just a reminder, the partners in the private domain are already holding positions. The more bizarre the token, the more we need to act. This afternoon, a K-line's fluctuation reached 50%. So, we can only use 2-3 times leverage to enter. This kind of bizarre token will definitely have operations to sweep liquidity controlled by the market makers. I can only remind you up to this point.

$币安人生 I gave everyone a free order, not sure if anyone saw it. I described everything from entry to take profit in detail. This was originally my private trade; partners in my private group got in at 0.077 and sold at 0.099. The price hadn't fully increased yet, and when it pulled back to around 0.085, I made it public in the square. I hope kind and beautiful friends can benefit from this public order. The original post is attached.

$币安人生 Friends in the private domain started long positions from 0.077, currently the highest point reached 0.094, an increase of 20 points with 3x leverage. The price has now retraced to around 0.85, and I believe this is a local point for retail friends to enter the market for the second time. The highest point at 0.099 remains our first take-profit point in the private domain. This second wave of entry points is now shared with everyone. Our private domain users' cost price is 0.077

$币安人生 Technical analysis. The cost price of my private domain partner is around 0.77. There will also be a strong trend.

$AGT skyrocketed +74% but funding rate annualized +144%——Textbooks say to chase long signals, but account ratio <1 and position ratio >1 tell a different story
One coin increased by 74% in 24 hours, yet the funding rate is +0.066%/4h (annualized +144%).
Textbooks would say: positive rate + skyrocketing = bull market confirmation, institutions are accumulating positions.
$AGT in reality: account ratio 0.50-0.70, position ratio 1.12-1.28.
Account ratio <1 means: there are fewer long accounts than short accounts.
Position ratio >1 means: there is more long position than short position.
The meaning of these two data points together is: retail investors are net short, institutions are net long.
This is not retail chasing long positions and getting trapped; it is institutions going long but retail does not believe.
An annualized funding rate of +144% means that longs need to pay close to $1200 in funding costs every 4 hours. Only those who can afford this cost can go long, not ordinary retail investors.
【Core Data】
| Indicator | Value |
|------|------|
| Price | $0.015 (24h +74%) |
| Funding Rate | +0.066%/4h (annualized +144%) |
| OI | $7.2M |
| Account Long-Short Ratio | 0.50-0.70 (retail shorting) |
| Position Long-Short Ratio | 1.12-1.28 (institutions going long) |
【Historical Comparison】
In February 2025 $PLAY: funding rate +14.4%, price +27%, account ratio 0.50, position ratio 1.03. Result: funding rate +14.4% lasted less than 12 hours before turning negative again.
This time $AGT is different:
① Positive funding rate annualized +144% is 10 times higher than PLAY's +14.4%
② Position ratio 1.12-1.28 is higher than PLAY's 1.03
③ Account ratio <1 (retail shorting) vs PLAY's ≈1
【Reversal Conditions】
① Funding rate drops back to around 0 → Institutions retreat
② OI quickly shrinks from $7.2M → Longs close positions
③ Price drops below $0.012 → Institutions stop loss
④ Account ratio rises to 1.0+ → Retail chases longs (contrary indicator)
⚠️ The above is for research reference only and does not constitute any investment advice. DYOR.

$ENJ funding rate -0.706%/hour——Price increased by 60% but shorts are still adding positions

Textbook version: Price up 60% + negative funding rate = Shorts are squeezed out = Short squeeze ends = Bullish signal

Actual data (tonight 22:00):
- Price: $0.033 (+60%)
- Funding rate: -0.706%/hour (annualized about -6180%)
- OI: $15.9M
- 24h trading volume: 27.3B tokens / $810M

Paradox: At 08:00 the price was $0.026 with a rate of -0.617%/hour (annualized -5400%), but at 22:00 the price was $0.033 (+27%) with a rate of -0.706%/hour (deeper). The textbook would say that the shorts have been squeezed out—but the more negative rate indicates that new shorts are entering at a higher price.

Mechanism: Bulls pay shorts every 8 hours, annualized 6180%. In a normal market, this holding cost would force shorts to close their positions. But in ENJ: rate -0.7%/hour → holding shorts is extremely costly; price still rises → buying pressure is stronger than selling pressure; shorts haven't been squeezed out, but are paying to maintain their positions. This structure typically means: either shorts have insider information, or it's a hedging position, or there is organization involved.

Reversal condition: If OI starts to decline but price does not rise—then it indicates bulls are closing their positions, and a reversal is near.

Risk warning: This article does not constitute trading advice. All content mining addresses are tracked, and readers may incur commissions by clicking to trade.

$TNSR price increased by 35%, but the funding rate annualized -993%——textbooks say negative rate = short squeeze signal, but OI tells you another story
One coin, 24h price increased by 35%, funding rate -0.453%/4h (annualized -993%), but OI is only $4.99M
Textbooks say: price increases by 35% + negative rate = shorts being squeezed
But what does an annualized -993% mean? Every 4 hours shorts pay $1240, every day $7500
This is 100 times higher than the normal financing cost
Why are shorts still here paying 993% annualized? The answer: OI/Vol ratio is only 4.3%
Almost all positions are day trades, no one really holds overnight
Shorts open and close today, they have already run away—so the funding rate remains negative
Historical analogies: $REDU price +57%, annualized -2556%, result: spike and pullback
$NOMUSDT price +40%, annualized -65%, result: similarly spike and pullback
$TNSR now has an OI/Vol ratio of 4.3%, slightly higher, but essentially the same—price short-term explosion, position structure is mainly intraday
Conclusion: $TNSR is a "negative rate Pump" pattern, not a short squeeze
It is purely a short-term market driven by intraday funds, not a strategic bet
Reversal conditions: ① Funding rate expands to -0.8% or higher → strategic shorts rebuild positions ② OI quickly breaks through $15M from $5M → strategic funds enter ③ Price falls below $0.040 → intraday longs stop-loss
⚠️ Risk warning: The above is for research sharing, not a call
DYOR, high volatility small coins carry great risk, heavy positions are not recommended

$JOE price plummeted from a high of -24% but the funding rate annualized at -1186%——this is not the end of a short squeeze, but new shorts are holding on at lower prices.
Textbook says: funding rate annualized at -1186% = shorts are paying longs = short squeeze signal.
$JOE actual: price dropped from $0.077 to $0.059 (-24%), and the funding rate is still -1.08%/8h (annualized -1186%). Shorts were not squeezed out; they continued to add positions after the price decline.
## Key Data
Metric Value Note Price $0.0590524h High $0.07749 → Current $0.059 (-24%) Funding Rate -1.08327%/8h Annualized -1186% OI Open Interest $6.18M 24h Trading Volume $300.8M OI/Volume Ratio ~2.1% Extremely Abnormal
## Why did the price drop 24% but the rate is still -1186%?
Textbook logic: price drops → shorts should cover → buying pressure increases → rates narrow.
$JOE actual: price dropped from $0.07749 (24h high) to $0.059 (-24%), but the funding rate is still -1.08%/8h (annualized -1186%).
This means: the old shorts that were trapped are indeed cutting losses (which is why the price can drop), but new shorts are continuing to build positions near $0.059 (which is why the rate is still -1186%).
What does annualized -1186% mean? For every $1 million short position held, nearly $3550 is to be paid every 8 hours, about $10600 daily. This is 100 times higher than the legitimate financing costs of most altcoins.
## Conclusion
$JOE currently reflects a pattern of "organized new shorts continuing to hold on after the price decline." It’s not about being trapped at a high position; it’s about opening new shorts at the new price ($0.059). The annualized rate of -1186% indicates that this batch of new shorts is holding positions at extreme costs.
## Reversal Conditions
Funding rate narrows to below -0.3% → Shorts begin to admit defeat OI quickly expands from $6.18M to $10M+ → New shorts continue to enter Price drops below $0.050 → Longs cut losses, a new round of decline after the next 8h settlement (~5 hours later) rate does not continue to narrow → New shorts have not given up
⚠️ Risk Warning: The above is for research sharing, not a trading call. DYOR, high volatility in small coins carries significant risks, heavy investment operations are not recommended.