《Europe has a solid foundation for growth in battery and electric vehicle manufacturing》 At first glance, this title makes you think of the Northvolt battery factory, right? They really wrote "The world's largest automotive power battery producer, CATL, has begun construction of a battery factory in Debrecen, Hungary. This project is expected to become the largest battery cell production base in Europe, with a potential annual production capacity of 100 GWh and total investment reaching 7.3 billion euros. The European Union has been trying to nurture local battery 'champion enterprises.' The Northvolt project, headquartered in Skellefteå, Sweden, was launched at the end of 2018 with an investment scale of 4 billion euros, and secured a 5 billion dollar loan guaranteed by the European Investment Bank and the Nordic Investment Bank for the expansion of this base — this is still the largest green loan in Europe to date. Although Northvolt subsequently announced bankruptcy, its Skellefteå factory with an annual production capacity of 16 GWh has been put into operation and is being sold to the American company Lyten." ========================== Bankruptcy is also a win
Merz showed the style of a pretender when he was elected; he is the first person in German history to win an election but not become Chancellor. The reason is simple: before the election, in order to win over voters, he said he would limit immigration. After the election, he stopped pretending: "I never considered it in my heart." He said before the election that he wouldn't touch the debt ceiling, and after: dumb voters, I was just playing with you, haha. German voters are almost fearful of immigration; AfD polls are rising day by day, and then Merz stopped pretending and decided to use judicial means to directly ban it. Since you've already gone AfD, there's no need to talk about any chivalry; everyone just goes for it. He strongly demanded to seize Russian money for Ukraine, but even his own party couldn't pass it. There’s no morality, no ability, but "almost cried."
If thoughts could be considered a crime, Merz would be sentenced to life imprisonment. This person's level of hypocrisy is almost akin to a fake person. Because normal humans wouldn't be hypocritical to that extent.
There are still quite a few people who pay this IQ tax when it comes to formaldehyde. For large items like home decoration and cars, there is generally no excessive formaldehyde in the actual decoration and furnishings; the main issue lies with the glue. Under normal circumstances, if the room is ventilated for half a year, the same goes for the car, and it basically stabilizes. The key is still a period of ventilation. It's best to buy a car or a house during a season suitable for ventilation.
Recently, there has been talk about expanding domestic demand. I took a look, and I think that the unified large market should be the fastest to advance and the least controversial. The rest will be considered later.
After so many years in the public opinion arena, I feel that the domestic opinion is mostly about 'making dumplings for a dish of vinegar'. While the foreign opinion is mostly about 'racism' + 'really silly'.
Just put "distillation" into chatgpt, do you know how chatgpt will respond? It just says that even chatgpt knows that some of you "Technical devaluation narrative "You are just imitating, not original" Legal/compliance intimidation narrative "Are you stealing data?" Big model myth narrative "Only a few companies can do AI" While the real world is industrialized, gray, and not romantic." This is what truly counts as humor [frown] Even chatgpt knows your little thoughts.
Don't mess around, some people can tell what others are thinking with just a glance. Some people still discuss things with me as if they are purely objective, but if everything were just objective, wouldn't there still be so many things in this world? Did Pei Pei praise Avatar 2 back then because it was so excellent? Ma Qianzu tried every means to argue that there are few Chinese webpages, so AI couldn't be developed, but later a bunch of AIs came out domestically, and Ma Qianzu said this matter was distilled. When DEEPSEEK came out, he hinted that 'it's really not easy for old China to produce a DEEPSEEK in such an environment.' Now it keeps popping up in waves, what else do you want to say? You tell me. Can't I see the meaning? In the United States, can it really be said to be 'friendly to disabled people'? It's not friendly to normal people either. Doughnuts are in America, having been beaten by the American police. Is it not enough to love America? Mainland people traveling to Hong Kong find that there is a lack of seating in public places, forced to squat, and are told by Hong Kong people that it is uncivilized. Is that what you think is 'uncivilized'? In Japan, in public places, people charging their phones are making noise; is that a problem with charging itself? Who isn't wrapping dumplings for a dish of vinegar? Don't tell me 'let's just discuss the matter.' If it were really just a matter of discussion, these things wouldn't happen. What else is there to discuss? What is there to talk about? How old are you? Don't you understand this principle? The reasons are clear to you, clear to me, and clear to everyone. Aren't we all just putting on an act to argue?
Talk about the big and small sections. Some people say my segment is a 'survival of the fittest mentality'. I ask, what does a normal person mean? Your American security is so chaotic, it only affects 'normal people', and when encountering disabled people, does it not get chaotic anymore? In shooting incidents, does it only shoot normal people, and when encountering disabled people, does it not shoot? When a robber comes across a disabled person, does he say: Hey, a disabled person, I won't rob you, I only rob normal people? That's impossible. In an environment like America, we can't even talk about 'giving disabled people humane care', we can't, far from it, first take care of normal people, who will take care of disabled people? Aren't they still normal people? Normal people need a safe ecology to take care of disabled people, the cost of providing normal people with a sense of security is far lower than giving disabled people personalized services. If we can't even take care of normal people, how can we talk about humane services for disabled people? What is Japanese morality? Have you seen the tea ceremony? The 'tea ceremony' is supposed to prioritize tea, but in reality, it's not, Japanese tea ceremony emphasizes the ritual. Then why use tea for the ritual? What do we Chinese people discuss about tea? Varieties, origin, tea brewing utensils, and most importantly, whether it tastes good or not. Japan doesn't emphasize this; what do Japanese people emphasize? Just the ritual. What other similar 'sense of ritual' exists? For example, certain management models are typical, Amoeba management, Toyota lean, QC groups, 5S. If the product is not good, they start messing around with all this nonsense. I don't want to hear your bragging about models, I want to ask about your product? This is Japanese morality. Applying Japanese morality in America means 'although normal people cannot be taken care of properly, disabled people can receive humane care'. Applying Japanese morality in business management means 'although the product cannot be delivered, my model is so advanced'. Four words: neglecting the root and pursuing the branches, still feeling proud, and being self-righteous.
What else is Zheng Zhihua discussing about humanity and how to care for disabled people? Didn't many UP owners post 'How America cares for disabled people'? Is there really 'care for disabled people' in America? Ivy League universities are experiencing shootings, and you want to discuss caring for disabled people with me? Normal people can't even survive. Can you prioritize? Are you stupid or what? Cricket, writing a short essay, is that all you can do? What else do you have to say? You can't call it a grand event; relying on one or two photos for a short essay, are you joking? When did Japanese morality also become popular in the country?
Recently there was an issue with Zheng Zhihua, and some people still argued with me, saying that Zheng Zhihua went back and called you guys barbarians. Once this issue is mentioned, it leads to the topic of humanization. As you know, mainlanders in Hong Kong want to consume but have no place to sit, so they can only squat, and then they are ridiculed by Hongkongers. You have seen this, right? I don't want to squat either, may I ask where you sit? I come to consume and there is no place to sit? Whose problem is it? The customer's problem, or the local problem? I am forced to squat, and you not only don't reflect but also blame me? So why does no one say this is a humanization issue? Why does no one mention that the lack of trash cans on Japanese streets is a humanization issue? Do you know how uncomfortable it is to carry trash back home? Some things are obvious, but when debated, strange arguments arise.
Regarding Taiwan, do you want me to speak the truth? Can some things be filmed? Do you want me to be honest? To be honest, it’s the two paragraphs below Why not argue? If you really send troops to take it, you don’t need to say anything; the 'cooperative local gentry' in Taiwan will fabricate some statements to cater to the current situation. If you don’t send troops to take it, then you’ll have daily arguments. The Japanese occupied Taiwan for a total of only 50 years, and they did not have large-scale immigration to Taiwan. Even so, in those 50 years, they cultivated a large group of pro-Japanese individuals in Taiwan. So, if you want to discuss this or that with me, it is meaningless. Japan in Taiwan also relies on the so-called 'cooperative political elites' in Taiwan to implement policies. In fact, the Weibo post I made has already been directly acknowledged by Taiwanese people, and they specifically mentioned: the Lin family of Cai, the Gu family of Zhongxin, and they directly stated: the DPP will have people come to warmly welcome the royal troops. That’s just how it is. Then there’s nothing left but to take action; taking action will solve the problem. Not taking action, there’s no need to argue.
The NYT article about the military report on the old Chinese is, I think, just a cover for the upcoming full withdrawal. In other words, the complete pullback is not only Trump's intention but also the Democrats' intention.
During Biden's term, I actually think Blinken can still keep his cool, Sullivan is generally mediocre, as for Pelosi, she is completely muddled. Not to mention how Sullivan speaks about her, who has she built good relationships with? Has she built a good relationship with Biden? No need to bring up Trump or the old Chinese. To forcefully push Harris, decades of friendship with Biden were thrown away. I give up.