First, set a "top": look at the 45-day line level, dead cross, double lines opening down, this determines that its big trend is bearish. It is currently slightly below the middle Bollinger band, which is 148.5. Why has sol not been able to break through 148.5 for such a long time, stopping at a maximum of 146? This is the reason. In the future, only if 148.5 is broken and held, will the big trend reverse to a bullish trend.
Currently, sol is operating between the lower middle bands of the 10, 15, 20-day and monthly Bollinger bands, with their lower bands between 114-102, which can be used as one of the references for bottom fishing.
At the same time, the 10, 15, and 20-day EMA 7-30 have all been broken, with no support. The monthly EMA 52 price is 109.5.
Therefore, the bottom fishing range before breaking the 100 level is between 114-102.
Considering extreme situations, a large spike may cause a false break at 100, with the levels after the false break being 96.25-95.65. If it breaks below 95, it will be considered a real break, and then we have to consider the lowest range of 86.25-84.85.
For short positions, all should be exited between 124.85-121.25, and there is no need to chase profits in the spiking part.
$SANTOS This coin I was just talking about with my friends, it's a coin whose rise and fall are completely unpredictable. Can you hold the spot? History will not simply repeat itself. This year, everyone has already set up in advance, and the profits from the market makers pulling the price are not that high anymore. The market makers may reconsider how to operate. Even if you hold this coin in spot, if it drops to the point where you doubt your life, you might also collapse mentally and exit. If it rises for a few days, you might also want to take profits early. The vast majority of people buy with expectations of 5x or 10x, but in fact, they can't last until that stage, or that stage may never come. Who can say for sure?
As soon as you guys send it, I know I can short it.
陈小艺
--
Attention XPL holders! The signals behind the giants' quiet entry
Recently, the PL price seems as calm as water, but the on-chain data shows undercurrents. As a veteran observing the Plasma ecosystem for a long time, I have noticed some abnormal signals worth paying attention to. On-chain anomalies: New giant whales are quietly laying out A careful analysis of on-chain data reveals: Multiple new addresses have quietly entered the top ten of the holder list Funds are entering through institutional-level channels Accumulation time is chosen during the low liquidity hours of the night A small order batch buying strategy is adopted This professional operation method is obviously not retail behavior, but rather organized institutional funds quietly positioning themselves. Related clues: The mysterious Sirius plan
Stop asking whether POL is worth holding! I tested it for six months: migrating 99% is just the beginning, and these three highlights of payment, RWA, and staking are what truly gets you hooked.
At the end of last year, I was still struggling with the MATIC tokens in my wallet — at that time, many public chains in the market were shouting about "ecosystem upgrades," but in practice, either the gas fees fluctuated wildly, or cross-chain transfers took a long time. It wasn't until early this year when I saw the official announcement from Polygon stating that "MATIC has officially migrated to POL" that I completed the migration with a try-and-see mindset, and only then did I truly feel that this "token swap" was a complete transformation of the entire Polygon ecosystem. Now, when I open my wallet again and look at the earnings generated from staking $POL , the instant transfer records using Polygon through Revolut, and the RWA projects that BlackRock is promoting on Polygon in my watchlist, I increasingly feel that Polygon 2.0 is not just a slogan, but is reshaping the way ordinary people access Web3, even changing the logic of how blockchain connects to the real world.