曹达华88888
Open Trade
Occasional Trader
1.5 Years
5 Following
30 Followers
28 Liked
0 Shared
All
Quotes
Translate
确实该骂
The person who invented the new rules for Binance Alpha is truly a genius. Don't be foolish and rush in; now, if you want to claim the airdrop right at the beginning of the event, you need to spend 30 points. Every minute, it decreases by one point, down to a minimum of 10 points.
I saw someone say this will hurt studios and benefit retail investors. I don't know where the benefit is. Other studios have dedicated research teams; once one person has done the research, hundreds of accounts can determine which one is the most worthwhile to claim. Studios have many accounts, and they also divide them into high and low scoring accounts, and they can arrange them in rotation.
Retail investors only have a few accounts, and the points they can grind are not many. If they claim 30 points, after claiming, they might need to rest for half a month, and they also need to spend time researching which is more worthwhile to claim, which significantly increases the time cost for retail investors.
Moreover, don’t just listen to what others say; look at what you can get. This is a big casino. When they spend money on you, they want to get more from you. Previously, the airdrop was 10 or 15 points, and in one cycle, you could grab two or three. Retail investors wouldn’t spend too much thought. Now, an airdrop requires thirty points, so wouldn’t retail investors want to research which one is more worthwhile to claim? In the process of your research, won’t you see information about other coins, and then you want to buy, and then you get trapped? So under the new rules, you must be careful to manage your hands well and understand that you are here to take advantage, not to trade!
I saw someone say this will hurt studios and benefit retail investors. I don't know where the benefit is. Other studios have dedicated research teams; once one person has done the research, hundreds of accounts can determine which one is the most worthwhile to claim. Studios have many accounts, and they also divide them into high and low scoring accounts, and they can arrange them in rotation.
Retail investors only have a few accounts, and the points they can grind are not many. If they claim 30 points, after claiming, they might need to rest for half a month, and they also need to spend time researching which is more worthwhile to claim, which significantly increases the time cost for retail investors.
Moreover, don’t just listen to what others say; look at what you can get. This is a big casino. When they spend money on you, they want to get more from you. Previously, the airdrop was 10 or 15 points, and in one cycle, you could grab two or three. Retail investors wouldn’t spend too much thought. Now, an airdrop requires thirty points, so wouldn’t retail investors want to research which one is more worthwhile to claim? In the process of your research, won’t you see information about other coins, and then you want to buy, and then you get trapped? So under the new rules, you must be careful to manage your hands well and understand that you are here to take advantage, not to trade!
See original
All exchanges, one counts as one, and none can be as shameless as Gate.
1. The announcement on November 20 clearly stated that the refund is voluntary for users. Since it is a voluntary refund, users will definitely get back 100% of the BOB. Gate is still evading the issue and does not dare to answer this question directly. At that time, the coin price was 0.028. If only 50% of the unlocked amount is refunded, wouldn't everyone sell at the price of 0.028? Instead, you are asking Gate to buy back at the price of 0.023? Is the user foolish or is Gate foolish? Everyone just wanted to refund the 50% that was locked as well, so they did not choose to sell at 0.028 on the market, but rather let you buy back at 0.023. Can't you understand this?
2. It is said to be a voluntary refund, with users voluntarily refunding 100%. Why is only 50% refunded and the remaining 50% not refunded? Is this a voluntary refund?
3. The announcement clearly stated that the refunds pertain to all subscribed BOB, not the unlocked BOB. Why are you now afraid to face this question directly and instead evade it, giving irrelevant answers?
4. The announcement clearly stated that it guarantees 100% of users' refund rights. Refunding 50% is called 100% guarantee?
All exchanges, one counts as one, and the only ones who can be this shameless are you, Gate.
1. The announcement on November 20 clearly stated that the refund is voluntary for users. Since it is a voluntary refund, users will definitely get back 100% of the BOB. Gate is still evading the issue and does not dare to answer this question directly. At that time, the coin price was 0.028. If only 50% of the unlocked amount is refunded, wouldn't everyone sell at the price of 0.028? Instead, you are asking Gate to buy back at the price of 0.023? Is the user foolish or is Gate foolish? Everyone just wanted to refund the 50% that was locked as well, so they did not choose to sell at 0.028 on the market, but rather let you buy back at 0.023. Can't you understand this?
2. It is said to be a voluntary refund, with users voluntarily refunding 100%. Why is only 50% refunded and the remaining 50% not refunded? Is this a voluntary refund?
3. The announcement clearly stated that the refunds pertain to all subscribed BOB, not the unlocked BOB. Why are you now afraid to face this question directly and instead evade it, giving irrelevant answers?
4. The announcement clearly stated that it guarantees 100% of users' refund rights. Refunding 50% is called 100% guarantee?
All exchanges, one counts as one, and the only ones who can be this shameless are you, Gate.
See original
Gate go to hell
The trend of the BOB price increasingly proves that my guess is correct!
Gate web3's first phase of the new BOB project opened with a drop of over 60% below the subscription price. In order to calm public opinion and restore reputation and trust, Gate promptly issued a voluntary refund announcement, allowing users to refund the subscribed BOB.
On November 28, after completing the 50% unlock of the BOB refund, there was a half-month communication between Gate and the BOB project team regarding the subsequent 50% BOB refund matter, with no progress reported to everyone. This indicates that the communication was ineffective, and Gate has made no significant progress.
Gate web3's first phase of the new BOB project opened with a drop of over 60% below the subscription price. In order to calm public opinion and restore reputation and trust, Gate promptly issued a voluntary refund announcement, allowing users to refund the subscribed BOB.
On November 28, after completing the 50% unlock of the BOB refund, there was a half-month communication between Gate and the BOB project team regarding the subsequent 50% BOB refund matter, with no progress reported to everyone. This indicates that the communication was ineffective, and Gate has made no significant progress.
See original
#Gate.io The exchange is a power for users, but if no one stands up to resist, the power will think of itself as the truth!
These are my two Gate exchange accounts from before, but recent events have made me feel that Gate really lacks vision and is very deceptive. I consider this an eye-opener, and I hope everyone tries to stay away to avoid harm.
The more Gate targets me, the more I will insist on speaking out. If it doesn't let me have it easy, I won't let it have it easy either.
These are my two Gate exchange accounts from before, but recent events have made me feel that Gate really lacks vision and is very deceptive. I consider this an eye-opener, and I hope everyone tries to stay away to avoid harm.
The more Gate targets me, the more I will insist on speaking out. If it doesn't let me have it easy, I won't let it have it easy either.
See original
#Gate.io
Since Gate's official account has blocked and muted me,
I will make Gate's "heroic deeds" appear more in the comment sections and squares of other exchanges, just to let users of other exchanges avoid the pitfalls.
If you maintain integrity, why are your announcements inconsistent?
If you value reputation, why do you say refunds and then not refund, going back on your word?
If you cherish users, why do you come and go as you please, turning your back without compassion?
If you are upright, why do you hide in your shell and not dare to reply?
If you are guiltless, why do you block and mute users from speaking?
Since Gate's official account has blocked and muted me,
I will make Gate's "heroic deeds" appear more in the comment sections and squares of other exchanges, just to let users of other exchanges avoid the pitfalls.
If you maintain integrity, why are your announcements inconsistent?
If you value reputation, why do you say refunds and then not refund, going back on your word?
If you cherish users, why do you come and go as you please, turning your back without compassion?
If you are upright, why do you hide in your shell and not dare to reply?
If you are guiltless, why do you block and mute users from speaking?
See original
#Gate.io
This Gate is really lacking in stature, because BOB's new issuance has seriously broken, and the Gate officials actively announced that they were willing to refund all users who subscribed to BOB. As a result, after refunding 50%, they went back on their word and refused to refund everyone. I just mentioned this in the official comment section, and I just saw the reminder that I can't follow anymore. It should be that the official account has blocked me, right? It's really lacking in stature, deceiving users and not allowing them to speak. Actively announcing a 100% refund for BOB users and then going back on their word is a real situation, not fabricated. They don't even allow a single right to speak the truth???
This Gate is really lacking in stature, because BOB's new issuance has seriously broken, and the Gate officials actively announced that they were willing to refund all users who subscribed to BOB. As a result, after refunding 50%, they went back on their word and refused to refund everyone. I just mentioned this in the official comment section, and I just saw the reminder that I can't follow anymore. It should be that the official account has blocked me, right? It's really lacking in stature, deceiving users and not allowing them to speak. Actively announcing a 100% refund for BOB users and then going back on their word is a real situation, not fabricated. They don't even allow a single right to speak the truth???
See original
Gate Exchange Deceives Users
Gate deceives users in the BOB incident, and many problems can be found just from the announcement released by Gate.
1) On November 20th, in the case where the BOB listing fell more than 60% below the subscription price, an urgent, voluntary, and proactive announcement of a voluntary refund was issued.
a. Since the announcement indicates that the refund is voluntary, it means that as long as the user wants to refund, the user should receive 100% of the BOB they subscribed to. The announcement also states that Gate will refund the entire BOB subscribed to in the wallet, rather than the unlocked BOB; then why does Gate only refund 50% of the BOB and refuse to refund the remaining 50%?
1) On November 20th, in the case where the BOB listing fell more than 60% below the subscription price, an urgent, voluntary, and proactive announcement of a voluntary refund was issued.
a. Since the announcement indicates that the refund is voluntary, it means that as long as the user wants to refund, the user should receive 100% of the BOB they subscribed to. The announcement also states that Gate will refund the entire BOB subscribed to in the wallet, rather than the unlocked BOB; then why does Gate only refund 50% of the BOB and refuse to refund the remaining 50%?
Login to explore more contents