乔帮主退休月球收租

Sister's attention on Binance captain

If you can find a higher ratio than the boss ratio on the Binance platform, it must be a scam!

The ratio displayed in the screenshot is only to prove strength

It does not mean it will all be given to you, as this does not conform to human nature
And it violates platform regulations

Automatically opened automatic return, even if you can't find me
Used my invitation code to automatically receive

Now there are not many automatic KOLs opened

Those who say a 70 or 80 ratio must be so-called wild chicken platforms

Of course, if you want, I have everything, and my data can be opened to all ratios on any platform

Every quarter there must be an assessment

There are many people who do not meet the standards

The latest assessment from November to January, in just over a month, has reached and exceeded the assessment by more than one time

This quarter, a trading volume of 2 billion is no problem

Binance now has a booster system

Similar to agency, the original solitary struggle has turned into collaborative combat, working together

Can effectively gather capable and knowledgeable people around to work together

The quota is limited, of course, we hope to give it to friends who are willing to work

If you want to save money, regardless of big or small households

Or if you have resources and want to find a cash flow income

You can find the boss, let's huddle together for warmth.

Boss invitation code: JOENS

🙋‍♀️ If you have any questions, private message the boss

① Click on the Binance APP - Home, top left corner "three horizontal lines"

② Click the top right corner to scan

③ Scan the QR code image 4️⃣ to enter the chat room

帮主专属聊天室点这里

Creator earnings won’t be moved to Hong Kong 🇭🇰➕ Wise withdrawal application gets blocked—this one should be taken out for another round again.

Wow! X creators are getting a major update

Everyone’s talking about the threshold being lowered (5 million → 500,000), crackdowns on re-uploading/copying, and how this benefits original content

Going back to the thoughts we discussed earlier from the head mentor: if your purpose in making content is solely to “just take the platform’s ad/revenue,” then you’ll always be led around by the rules.

Today, with a 5-million threshold, you go to boost engagement. Tomorrow they change it to 500,000 and it only counts as “original,” so you change your strategy. The day after they change it again, and you have to start over.

This further highlights how important it is to build your own IP.

Creators’ earnings should really be a side benefit—not the main job. If you change your content direction just for a few hundred or a few thousand dollars a month, then you’re not a creator.

Lowering the threshold is a good thing, and cracking down on re-uploads is an even better thing. But the most important sentence is:

Build IP > chase the algorithm

Seeing this reminded me—I’m an early $stonks player too.

Even earlier, when Big Brother B was building the BAN, I was already there. And later, during the stonks community period, it really was one of the few times in web3 when there was a rare sense of cohesion.

Now $MSX has launched, but the outcome isn’t great—many people are getting counter-rugged and losing money.

That’s just how web3 is: trust and gamesmanship always coexist. The money you make because of trust, you might also lose back because of trust. That’s the essence of this game.

As for the outcome—those who profit and leave are smart, and those who lose but stay are true fans. There’s nothing to mock about either.

#MSX

Thanks to Brother Suo for @BTC_Alert_ and @dappOS_com for the airdrop

I opened the first box and got 1,333 $DOS. At 0.33 pre-market, that’s roughly 440U. The second box hasn’t been opened yet.

In a bear market, it’s free—over 400U isn’t much, but it’s really tasty. The key is it costs nothing. I previously just registered and used xBubble for a bit.

Brothers who haven’t checked yet, go take a look now: https://dappos.com/airdrop

#DOS

Grvt Honors What It Promised, Taking Off 🛫

Many post-90s male buyers have indeed achieved a short squeeze after they reach 30+, forcing shorts to get squeezed and driving a valuation reset.

But a short squeeze doesn’t equal a long-term uptrend—it’s very likely just a one-off price correction.

Because the fundamentals haven’t changed: it’s still the same revenue, the same mindset, the same lifestyle.

What’s changed is that a new batch of buyers who don’t really understand you has entered the market. What they’re benefiting from is an information gap, not genuine growth.

The companies that truly become long-term bull stocks are the ones that keep investing in themselves when nobody is paying attention—not those that wait for the market to turn and then package things up to sell and cut a new batch of retail investors.

A short squeeze is only a short-term, technical correction.
You need to become a real core asset.

Solved the case @AIW3_official Today I saw that other people had airdrops, and the boss thought: my followers also have more than 20,000, and my overall ranking isn’t bad either—so why is nobody looking for me? I’m doing too poorly.

Turns out @fugui8, Brother Fugui, had already sent me a private message. I only just clicked in and saw it a moment ago. I don’t usually look at DMs, but still, thank you, Brother Fugui. I didn’t receive anything though 🫡 because I hadn’t filled in the info.

Besides being envious of the airdrop, I was mainly afraid the boss isn’t involved in any circles—like, would I get forgotten too? Turns out I didn’t. I’m moved to tears.

Why was there not a single bit of movement before?

Today, an AIW3 airdrop is everywhere.

What level are the KOLs who can actually claim it?

It’s been a long time since I opened Duolingo.

On a tired night, I was actually healed by the notification sound saying I’d successfully checked in on Duolingo. Is that okay?

Anyone want to learn English together and check in?

Turns out gambling table touting directly eats into the bettors’ losses.

I’m curious—does the house really make guaranteed profits on each bet, or is it more like you lose nine times out of ten?

Since the platform is willing to take such a large percentage to share out, it really seems like there are KOL promotions involved.

Gate, to prove that “the user information leak isn’t our problem,” are you doxxing users directly on Twitter? Are you an exchange or a social engineering database?

And this logic doesn’t hold up in the first place:

In China, personal information leaks are widespread. With a little money, Telegram social engineering databases can find someone’s ID number, phone number, and address—this isn’t a secret.

But that actually means your review should be stricter, not looser.

When user information is found → that’s an issue with the entire internet.
But your platform approved fake KYC → that’s a problem with your platform, and it’s ultimately the step that led to the assets being transferred away.

From beginning to end, Gate has been answering off topic. Each response keeps shifting the focus: first Alipay, then people around you, and now proving that personal information is easy to look up.

By your logic, if all Chinese users’ information can be found, does that mean everyone on Gate is not safe?

This PR is really backfiring. Even as a passerby, I can’t watch it anymore—the issues are obvious to everyone.

$GRVT Big anti-rust? The performance is all at the second level. Also, it’s within what the other side expected. The wash has pretty much been done; you can buy a bit around 25–26.

After seeing both sides’ arguments, this matter has two issues that cannot be viewed together.

First: Did Gate’s KYC review actually fail in its duty?

This has to wait for a judicial appraisal. The aggrieved party has already publicly authorized the assessment. If the appraisal results prove that the materials were forged + the “live body” was not the person, then Gate’s review is indeed compromised—Gate can’t escape this layer.

Gate says, “The similarity is so high that it can’t be distinguished by the naked eye”—but that precisely shows your risk-control system isn’t sufficient in extreme cases. Large changes in assets should have more advanced verification methods; you can’t rely on just the naked eye.

Second: Who is the attacker—who are they, and where did the information come from?

On this point, Gate’s reasoning is sound. The attacker had two Alipay accounts, could complete device login confirmation, and recorded the screen. The amount of information here isn’t something ordinary hackers can accomplish. Alipay’s device verification mechanism isn’t something that can be bypassed casually.

Gate hints at “someone nearby.” That direction may not be unreasonable, but it’s something the police should investigate. It’s not a reason for Gate to use to shift blame for the first layer of responsibility.

Conclusion:

These two matters are independent—

1. Who the attacker is, and how the information leaked → This is a criminal case. The police should investigate.

2. Whether Gate’s review passed using fake materials → This is the platform’s responsibility.

Gate’s problem is that it mixes these two issues together, using doubts from the second layer to dodge responsibility from the first layer. But logically—even if it were someone nearby—Gate passing the fake KYC is still a fact.

Conclusion: If the materials are fake, Gate should compensate.

$Giggle official just posted a new project—we deleted it again?
Crypto for good, charity coins just started to pick up a bit—don't cause trouble.

It’s been a long time since I checked StandX’s updates. A few days ago, I just saw the new Community Vault feature—traders can open a vault so others can copy their trades.

Officially, they’re also holding a @StandX_Official Vault Manager Challenge.

Rules: Deposit 300 DUSD as margin. Prove your trading ability over 4 weeks. The winner in each single-track category gets 3,000 DUSD.

Three tracks:

1. ROI — purely based on return rate
2. MM Hours — market-making time (solo entry; principal capped at 3,000U)
3. Risk-adjusted returns

There are only 30 spots across the entire network—10 people per track. Total prize pool: 9,000 DUSD.

Give traders who believe they can compete a chance to prove themselves.

Even if you lose, it’s just a 300U tuition fee.

Registration deadline is August 6. There aren’t many spots—if you’ve got the skills, go sign up quickly.

Registration link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1ZcCI_V14chnxe5zm6zoSZdybfJi9V_Mg5oUO18sk8Tk/viewform

Everyone can see that the market situation is not good, and many big KOLs’ commission rebate nodes have also dropped to lower levels because the review process is difficult.

But you can look for top-tier nodes like the Help Master to open assistance/support, and you don’t need to pass any assessment.

This is a good thing—everyone is trading and spending more rationally. Transaction fees are actually the biggest revenue segment in web3 right now.

Promote yourself + save for your own use.
Don’t be lazy—many people can operate and save on transaction fees. The extra money is great for DCA into BTC as your daily expenses.

If you need it, see the third image to add a Binance friend ID.

Kaito mouth-lick upgrade—are you all starting to participate?

Everyone knows the old玩法: most of the posting earnings came from mindshare rewards, but the issues were also obvious—farming accounts are everywhere, and there’s a lot of volume farming.

Now with the new Katalyst, you can still earn money by posting, but the allocation logic has changed.

It’s not mainly about interaction volume; instead, it’s a comprehensive evaluation of your actual contribution to the project—mindshare, clicks, registrations, deposits, and other dimensions all carry weight.

80% of the prize pool goes to creators, and 20% to $KAITO stakers.

So far, the first one to go live is @Megapot. The top content earned $20,000 Tickets. Compared with the previous projects’ prize pool rewards, it seems a bit lower—but other projects have submitted around twenty entries, and the helper hasn’t shown the specific rules yet.

Anyway, it’s good to have things back—more things to do.

Still looking forward to it.

#KAITO

Sure enough, losing weight doesn’t need to be rushed

Besides semaglutide and tirzepatide, recently a few more new drugs were approved—specifically to address issues with muscle loss and rebound effects

The first people were the guinea pigs; as more drugs come out, the side effects will only get smaller and smaller

To be honest, I really find it ridiculous that this is what it has come to.

The approval process for small amounts of funds isn’t strict—so you could say it was just a certain employee’s oversight, and I can barely understand that.

But this is nearly a ten-million-level asset. The ID format doesn’t match, and there isn’t even a province listed.

How could such obviously fake documents pass the review?

At this point, it’s not a matter of who is right or wrong. This is a platform risk-control issue—so the platform should first compensate. After compensating, then they should go after the individuals and pursue accountability. That is the most basic responsibility of an exchange.

What’s truly terrifying isn’t just this one case. It’s that if the exchange’s risk control is like this, then everyone’s money isn’t safe.