After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
“Learn position sizing first, then learn technical analysis.”
Most people do it in the wrong order—learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns first. You may be able to spot the direction correctly, but you still end up losing money.
The reason is simple: you didn’t do proper risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, and you pair it with a 2R risk-reward ratio, long term you’ll still have a positive expected value.
Someone said, “I’m always getting liquidated, or on my way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.”
That line made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that same road too. The feeling of resetting to zero again and again, and each time telling yourself, “Next time for sure”—I understand it all too well.
But what he said—“Not that greedy. I just want to learn”— in a market full of leverage dreams, someone who can say that already has the mindset half won.
The real people who can survive in the market were never the smartest, or the most reckless one who always takes big bets.
It’s the one who stays low-key, the one who’s willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the road, leave a comment and tell me which stage you’re stuck at.
During the time I was working as a KOL, I wasn’t actually happy.
Every day I had to produce content that looks “professional.” And when I told the truth—sometimes the direction wasn’t even that clear, but the platform needed you to give “a clear point of view.”
After a while, you wouldn’t know whether you were analyzing, or just performing analysis.
Later, I stepped out and returned to independent trading.
At first, my income was lower, but I could sleep.
Now, every post I share on the plaza is my real observations and trade logs— whether I profit or lose, I put it all out there.
Not many people do things like this, but I think it’s the right way.
Many people ask me: Quantitative trading or manual trading, which is better?
My answer: It depends on who you are.
If you can do: ✓ Rigorously follow stop-loss ✓ Not let emotions affect your decisions ✓ Maintain discipline in the long run
→ Manual trading can also be done well.
But if you find that you: ✗ Often “wait a bit longer” before taking a stop-loss ✗ Add to your position when you win, and gamble to win it back when you lose ✗ Chase when you see others making money
→ You need a system to help keep you in check.
Quant trading isn’t smarter—it’s more disciplined.
Resistance level: in the range 1–2% above (there was heavy prior trading here) Support level: around 1.5% below (along the uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increasing volume → direction is confirmed; you can follow If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and reassess
Even days without trading are also a kind of trading decision.
Now BTC suddenly jumps 5%—what is your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. Check the volume first, then decide D. Do nothing, and wait for the system signal
There’s no right or wrong answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
He traded for three years and kept losing. It wasn’t because his technique was poor—he could analyze everything clearly. It was because whenever he got it right, he was reluctant to take profit. Whenever he got it wrong, he was reluctant to cut losses.
In the end, what happened? When he was right, he made a little—when he was wrong, he lost a lot.
His expectancy was negative.
Later, he started using a fixed 1.5R take-profit and 0.5R stop-loss mechanism— no matter how he felt, no matter, “This time might be different.”
By the third month, the account finally returned to profit.
Not because his analysis had become more accurate, but because his expectancy finally turned positive.
When I built the first quantitative trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall #1: Overfitting Backtests looked ridiculously good, but the real trading account crashed as soon as I started live trading. Reason: I tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Pitfall #2: Ignoring trading fees Backtests made 50 bucks per trade, but after fees in live trading, only 15 bucks remained. Profit was cut by 70% straight away.
Pitfall #3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t go crazy placing trades.” Until one time the market moved in a way that wiped out 20% of my account, and I realized quant trading can still blow up.
The SYS series was built gradually only after I’d fallen into those three pitfalls. No pitfalls, no system.
A few key levels worth watching for BTC today 08/13
Current price: $63,360
Resistance levels: in the upper 1–2% range (heavy prior trading) Support levels: around the lower 1.5% (rising trendline)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks through resistance with increased volume → direction is confirmed; you can follow If it rises on decreasing volume → wait for a pullback, then reassess
A day without trading is also a kind of trading decision.
After trading for so long, I want to ask you a question.
Right now, what’s the biggest obstacle for you on your trading path?
A. I can’t understand technical analysis B. I understand it, but I can’t control my hands C. Position sizing has no rules D. Once my mindset goes sour, I fall apart
Leave a comment and tell me—I’ll definitely reply when I see it.
I’m not trying to sell a course. I’m just genuinely curious, and I also want to see where everyone gets stuck.
Not because I got the direction wrong, but because I used leverage and didn’t stop-loss.
At the time, my logic was: “I’ve analyzed it clearly—it’s definitely going to bounce back.”
But it simply didn’t.
That one incident cost me two years’ worth of savings.
Someone asked me how I dealt with my family back then.
I said: I didn’t tell them.
I carried it on my own for three months. Those three months, I couldn’t sleep at night every day— my mind was consumed with: how to earn the money back.
Later, I didn’t rush to make it back. Instead, I spent half a year rebuilding my system.
And it actually became more stable.
A liquidation isn’t the end—it’s the way it forces you to learn.
Why do I trust quantitative systems instead of “feelings”?
Because feelings can deceive you, but data won’t.
Looking back at my trading record over the past five years: · The two years of trading based on feelings: big account fluctuations, and so did my mood · The three years after going systematic: much more stable—even when losing, it was within expectations
Quant trading isn’t万能, but it does one very important thing: It prevents “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
When the signal comes, act. When it doesn’t, wait. That’s it.