和成天下口味王

🚨 Sprinting to 20K Followers Milestone! 🚨

Contributing my part to the Binance platform

As a token of appreciation, a generous USDT red envelope rain 🧧🧧🧧 has already been distributed!

In the final moments, I rely on my brothers to lend me a helping hand! 🔥

#红包

Plasma ($XPL ) is it really hardcore, or just pure "cutting losses"?

Brothers, recently while chewing betel nut and scrolling through Twitter, I found that Plasma is getting quite a bit of attention. To be honest, there are so many public chains now that they are more fragmented than betel nut residue, my first reaction was: don't hype it, let's look at the evidence first.

After doing my homework, I tend to think that Plasma has something going for it. Many projects rush in claiming to "change the world", which makes my mouth bitter. Plasma, however, is quite cool-headed; it focuses on a "verification mindset". To put it simply, it isn't in a hurry to boast about how fast it runs, but rather clarifies how to prove that the accounts are correct. This logic of prioritizing survival before seeking stability really resonates with me.

Its core advantage lies in that straightforward verification architecture. It breaks down complex technology into very fine details, lowering the threshold and cost of verification for us. In this circle where trust is more precious than gold, this pragmatic technological path is the biggest advantage. I'm not sure if it can take off directly in this cycle, but I will keep an eye on its testnet activity and code update frequency. If the subsequent data matches up, this momentum will definitely be substantial. Brothers, let's verify rationally first, don't rush into it.

@Plasma

$XPL

#plasma

Flavor King Watch: Plasma this little guy has some chewiness! ($XPL )

Brothers, recently while chewing betel nut and watching the market, people keep asking me about this Plasma thing. To be honest, I was skeptical at first, after all, there are too many braggers in this circle, making it so that my mouth is almost tasteless. But what is our purpose as the 'Flavor King of Harmony'? First, preserve life, then get high!

I took a look at Plasma's underpants and found that this little guy does have some chewiness. You hear those big influencers shouting about what 'the king of public chains' and 'performance monsters', it makes me want to vomit. But this Plasma project, it doesn't play tricks.
What caught my eye the most is that it honestly puts 'verification' as the top priority. Just like our betel nut, it should have flavor and strength, it can't just fall apart when you chew it. Plasma is just that, it allows you to clearly see what each transaction is about, unlike some projects, where data is a black box operation, leaving people uneasy.
Where's the advantage? I think it's 'realistic'.

• No bragging: It balances efficiency and security, not just blindly pursuing speed, but first ensuring a solid foundation. This kind of stability, just like when we chew betel nut, the taste must be balanced, it can't just be sweet without strength.

• Visible costs: It lowers the threshold for verification, this thing ultimately reflects on us users as lower fees. No one's money comes from the wind, saving a bit is still saving.

I tend to believe that this project is not the kind of 'instant gratification' fast food, but rather has some aftereffects. Now don't rush into it, continue to see what kind of performance its mainnet can achieve. If the data can stand firm, then this little guy is really promising.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma

Don't let the 'Hundredfold Dream' blind you: The underlying logic of the payment track is the safe haven for large funds
Having immersed in the crypto market for a long time, people often fall into a kind of survivor bias: it seems that only abstract Memes or complex DeFi models are worthy of the term 'wealth creation.' But when you strip away the market's restlessness and penetrate the on-chain data, you will discover a truth that most people overlook—the undercurrent of stablecoin flow.
1. Pain Point: Payment logic 'discouraged' by high Gas fees
For a long time, Tron dominated the payment market with low fees. However, with frequent adjustments to network parameters, today’s Tron is no longer the 'paradise for the common people' it once was. Especially for users who need to frequently adjust positions or make small payments, the fees, which can be dozens or even hundreds of TRX, feel like an invisible wall.
The emergence of Plasma precisely hits this soft spot.
It did not directly challenge Solana's proud TPS, nor did it try to grab territory in Ethereum's ecological forest, but instead focused on one term: Gas Abstraction.
2. Experience: A 'dimensionality reduction' smoothness
I deeply experienced several transactions on the testnet, and the most intuitive feeling can be summed up in two words: refreshing.
• Native Payment: Plasma allows you to directly use the token you are transferring to pay fees, and under certain protocols, it can even achieve 'zero Gas.'
This experience enhancement brought by 'account abstraction' is simply a dimensionality reduction blow for new users. While major public chains are boasting about millions of TPS in the technological arms race, Plasma is quietly solving the smallest and most critical detail—returning payment to its essence.
Investment Advice: Focus on 'allocation,' light on 'gambling'
For $XPL , I do not recommend taking a speculative Meme mentality to go all in. On the contrary, it is more suitable to treat it as long-term payment infrastructure for allocation:
1. Practical Experience: Go run some nodes and experience that smoothness unbound by Gas.
2. Mental Settlement: Avoid the anxiety of hundredfold coins and treat it as a safe haven for large funds.
True change often begins at the micro level and is achieved through consensus. When the tide goes out, what remains is certainly something that solves real problems.
$XPL @Plasma #Plasma

.

dapp.ultiland.io

Don't just focus on the increase, take a look at the project's "life-saving" underlying logic.

Brothers, recently many people have privately messaged me about Plasma. To be honest, my first reaction is to hold on to my wallet tightly. Nowadays, there are too many projects with flashy PPTs; we need to "speak plainly": is Plasma really solving problems, or is it just creating bubbles?

After doing my homework, I tend to give it a thumbs up. Many projects claim to be decentralized, but in reality, they're all black boxes. Plasma's advantage is that it doesn't pretend; the verification mechanism is very transparent. It's not like some chains that ignore everything just to pursue artificially high TPS; its logic is: first ensure that every transaction can be "verified at low cost," then talk about scalability.

I analyzed that its core moat is actually the reduction of trust costs. To put it simply, it allows us to feel assured when participating, without worrying about the underlying collapse every day.

I'm not absolute in my conclusion, but how will I verify it? Next, I'll keep an eye on its mainnet throughput and the actual node load rate. As long as the data isn't fabricated, this project is definitely sincere amid this wave of infrastructure development. First, look for evidence; don't rush into it.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma

Setting aside the background of $XPL , Plasma's "account abstraction" is truly something that can silence Web2

In the past few days, I tried to demonstrate transfers to several friends who know nothing about Web3. I used to have to explain for a long time what a mnemonic phrase is, what Gas is, and watch them nervously transfer 0.1 tokens for testing. But in Plasma's testing environment, this frustration has almost disappeared.

This is what fascinates me most about Plasma: it is not just building a chain; it is eliminating the "blockchain feeling".

Most public chains' so-called "account abstraction (AA)" still rely on complex smart contract wallets to fill the gaps, while Plasma has integrated the Paymaster at the protocol level. This means that when users transfer USDT, they don't need to understand what $XPL consumption is at all. This kind of logical "dimensionality reduction" in product design is the core asset that is underestimated.

In the current market, everyone is watching who has launched a new airdrop and who has more Twitter followers. Plasma's GitHub update frequency is very high, but the team is as low-key on social media as if they are doing research. This approach of "heavy on technology, light on performance" may lack the explosive moments that lead to instant surges in the short term, but from the perspective of RWA (real-world assets), the threshold it creates for ordinary users to seamlessly get started is the real killer.

To be honest, compared to those ecosystems that rely on pump and dump to maintain heat, I would rather bet on a foundational infrastructure that can make stablecoin transfers "as simple as sending a message".

@Plasma $XPL #plasma

Putting aside the K-line, the Piecrust virtual machine is the underestimated one in this round of the privacy track.

Recently, in order to run Dusk's smart contracts, I had to pick up Rust, which I had thrown aside for a long time. To be honest, the process of transitioning from Solidity to the Piecrust virtual machine was extremely painful; the limitations of memory safety are simply anti-human. But when I successfully ran a demo of private lending, I realized how superior it is in underlying architecture compared to ZK-Sync's Layer 2. The current Ethereum Layer 2 essentially calculates off-chain and then sends the results back on-chain, which still involves a trust assumption issue. Dusk's Piecrust is a native ZK virtual machine that has already implemented privacy protection and correctness verification at the moment of executing the code.

This technical fastidiousness causes its engineering progress to be as slow as a snail. Looking at the update frequency of the code on GitHub, it is evident that the team is struggling with some very low-level optimizations, such as zero-copy deserialization, which are tough nuts to crack. In the current market environment, this is particularly disadvantageous, as everyone is looking at whose story is better told and whose ecosystem is growing faster. Dusk's situation, where even a decent cross-chain bridge is not well established, indeed makes it hard to attract retail investors to enter and engage in mutual liquidation. I have been lurking in the community for a few days and found that those remaining are basically technical geeks and institutional parties that understand the RWA logic. Everyone is silent and quietly running nodes. This atmosphere is very similar to the early days of Ethereum, when no one thought smart contracts had any use, and everyone believed Bitcoin was the only truth. Now, Dusk's approach of treating zero-knowledge proofs as computational primitives looks quiet at the moment and lacks any wealth creation effect, but once the singularity of that asset going on-chain arrives, this kind of underlying infrastructure that can withstand financial-grade compliance pressure will definitely be much more resilient than those public chains that exist solely for speculation.

#Dusk @Trader Dusk $DUSK

The writing level of the New Concept Essay First Prize is no joke #孙宇晨曾颖

In the complex jungle of public blockchains, why do I have a particular fondness for Plasma's "subtraction"?

The current public blockchain race always reminds me of early digital single-lens reflex cameras—extremely powerful, but if you just want to take a snapshot of life, the complicated operation dial and heavy body are simply a nightmare.
What attracts me most about Plasma ($XPL ) is its courage to embrace subtraction.
Many L1 chains try to cram in every cutting-edge concept, but Plasma focuses on one point: the intuition of payments. Personally, I value its "Paymaster" design the most. On the vast majority of chains, transferring USDT feels like entering an absurd scenic spot where you must "buy a ticket (Gas) first to spend money"; whereas Plasma allows you to settle directly with stablecoins, even achieving zero fees through ecological subsidies.

The logic behind this is the pragmatism I agree with the most. Technology should not promote height through thresholds, but should serve breadth by lowering thresholds. Backed by Tether and Bitfinex, this background of being "born with a golden key" gives it a natural moat in terms of liquidity. In my view, $XPL is not just a governance token; it is more like a "passport" to an efficient financial empire. When payments become as natural as breathing, Plasma's value truly settles down.

@Plasma $XPL #plasma

This weekend I originally wanted to write a simple web-based Dapp to see if I could get Dusk's transfer interface to work, but I almost crashed my Chrome browser. It's completely different from the lightweight experience of Railgun, where you can mix coins directly by calling contracts on Ethereum; Dusk's front-end integration is as heavy as a brick. Can you believe that just loading that zero-knowledge proof Prover Key file requires users to download several hundred megabytes of data? This is a disaster on mobile, but in Dusk's design documentation, this seems to be regarded as a reasonable security cost.

I stared at the memory overflow logs of the WASM errors in the console, thinking to myself whether this development team had ever considered the bandwidth limitations of ordinary users. Although Railgun's gas fees are exorbitant, at least it's running on-chain, making it light on the user end. Dusk, on the other hand, in order to achieve its so-called 'privacy compliance', has thrown the heaviest cryptographic operations onto the browser. This 'fat client' design philosophy, while theoretically eliminating the possibility of node malfeasance, in practice creates a lagging experience that really makes you want to smash your mouse. I transferred some funds on the testnet, and just the dozens of seconds it took to generate the proof had the CPU usage pegged at one hundred percent, with the cooling fan roaring; you’d think I was mining.

Moreover, its documentation is extremely rudimentary, with many key API parameter explanations not matching the actual definitions in the codebase at all. I had to go through the history of Issues on Github to guess the correct parameter format. This roughness in engineering stands in stark contrast to the precise mathematical formulas in its white paper. This disconnect made me realize that Dusk never intended for current Web3 retail investors to play with it. Its complex identity hooks and local computation requirements are clearly designed for institutional traders with dedicated terminals. For them, security compliance is paramount, while user experience is secondary. This arrogance ensures that for a long time, it can only be an experimental piece in the hands of geeks or an internal settlement network for some compliance funds, and it will never become a mainstream application.

#Dusk @Dusk $DUSK