Vanar Chain: In 2026, how fierce is this blockchain that 'can think for itself'?
Imagine the blockchain you usually use as a super secure ledger: recording transactions, transfers, and executing smart contracts, everything goes according to code. But it's clumsy! It can only "rote memorize," cannot think, cannot learn, and cannot summarize patterns from massive data. Now, the Vanar Chain ($VANRY ) of 2026 has stepped up, directly throwing out a harsh statement: "We are not adding AI plugins to the chain; we were designed for AI from the very beginning!" Sounds like science fiction? But it has already landed, and its market value is only around 14 million dollars (the price is hovering around 0.006 dollars), with a circulation of over 2.2 billion, ranking between 800-1000. Many old players see this number and their first reaction is: such a low-key dark horse, is it about to take off again?
By the end of 2025, many people are asking: With AI being so popular, which chain can truly run AI on the chain, rather than just serving as an interface? The answer may surprise many — it's not the loudest public chains, but rather the Vanar Chain ($VANRY ) with a market value of only 14 million dollars. Its core transformation can be summarized in one sentence: From "programmable blockchain" → "thinking blockchain". Unlike other projects that treat AI as a plugin, Vanar has rewritten the AI workload from its Layer 1 architecture: 1. The data layer directly compresses storage with verifiable logic (Neutron) 2. Natively supports AI inference and autonomous decision-making (Kayon, Axon modules) 3. Deep optimization for PayFi (on-chain payment finance) and RWA (real-world asset tokenization) 4. Still maintains EVM compatibility, with extremely low migration costs for developers. In plain terms: Other chains give you a hammer, Vanar directly gives you a smart hammer that can determine how much force to use. Currently, the price hovers around $0.006, with a low circulating market value, yet the completeness of the story is rapidly increasing. If the AI + Web3 narrative continues to ferment in 2026, Vanar is very likely to be the dark horse that "takes off suddenly". @Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Seedance 2.0: When "Filmmaking" Becomes a Command The truly frightening aspect of Seedance 2.0 is not how clear the videos it generates can be, but how it has reduced "cinematic expression" from a professional skill to a simple command action. Input a piece of text or upload an image, and in 60 seconds, a video complete with sound effects and multi-angle storytelling is ready. This means that the bottleneck of creativity is no longer the equipment, team, or technology, but just the imagination itself. This represents a structural shock to the content industry. In the past, visual expression was a scarce ability held by a few professionals; now, it is being rapidly democratized. Advertising, short videos, educational content, and brand storytelling will all experience a wave of explosive experimentation—many ideas that were previously deemed "not worth filming" will be fully realized for the first time. But problems also arise. As the cost of video generation approaches zero, the credibility of visuals will be rapidly diluted. The difficulty in distinguishing truth from falsehood, ambiguous copyrights, and emotional manipulation could all be amplified. Seedance 2.0 liberates creation while forcing society to rethink: When anyone can "make a film," how do we judge authenticity, originality, and responsibility? It is not simply about improving efficiency but reshaping the power structure of visuals.
From 0 to 1 in creating Web3 applications, Vanar enables ordinary people to get started
Brothers, do you share the same confusion as I do: Why has Web3 been promoted for so many years, yet applications are still so few? The core is simple: the technical barrier has blocked 99% of creativity! 🧱 No matter how good your ideas are, whether you want to create blockchain games, launch NFT brands, or build metaverse scenarios, the first step is to find programmers who understand Solidity, with a starting monthly salary of tens of thousands of U, and you also need to gather a technical team to refine it for half a year. Just this hurdle has directly deterred countless creative entrepreneurs without technical skills, and even the best ideas can only rot in their minds. Why has the internet been able to flourish? Because there are 'inclusive tools' like WordPress and Shopify, allowing novices to build websites and start businesses without needing to understand code, just by clicking and typing. What amazes me most about VanarChain (VANRY) is that it aims to create a 'super entrepreneurship workshop' in the Web3 space—turning all processes of developing Web3 applications into a 'production line', enabling ordinary people to easily create products.
The top of the list for #创作者任务排行榜 XPL has also been almost fixed, with two articles every day. They can score around 100 points, while I barely score 2 points a day. @币安广场 I want to ask, what are the standards for AI scoring, and why is the gap so large? 🥶
#创作者任务排行榜 VANAR's top ranking has almost remained unchanged, while others score over 100 points a day, I only get around 10 points, how can I play like this?😭😂
Plasma: A super highway tailor-made for 'digital dollars'
Imagine, you have hundreds of "digital dollars" (USDT) in your pocket, and you want to instantly send money to a friend on the other side of the globe, pay rent, or send living expenses to a brother working abroad… But what happens? Transferring on Ethereum costs you like a taxi driver who drank fake liquor, biting you dozens of times; Solana is fast, but during peak times, it’s like the Spring Festival high-speed rail, packed to the point of questioning life; Tron is the big brother, but there are always whispers about it being "too centralized, like a black car run by a big shot." At this moment, Plasma (XPL) bursts out like a delivery guy holding a fiery wheel, shouting: "Hey buddy, don’t squeeze! Use my express line—USDT transfer, zero postal fee, and it arrives in the blink of an eye!"
To be honest, the first time I saw Vanar say they wanted to create a new L1, I was skeptical. It's 2026, is block space still scarce with Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base...? But after talking to a few friends working on applications, I found that the pain points are indeed different. The existing chains can 'run AI', but they don't 'run AI well'. It's like being able to cook in a rental apartment, but it will never be as convenient as your own kitchen. Where is Vanar's differentiation? It's not 'a faster EVM', but an 'architecture redesigned for AI'. myNeutron's on-chain memory, Kayon's verifiable reasoning, Flows' automated orchestration—these are not optimizations, but things that didn't exist before. The product has already been launched; it’s not in the white paper stage. myNeutron has real applications storing user data, Kayon has models reasoning on-chain, Flows has automated strategies executing. This is 'proof of being AI-ready', not 'slogans of being AI-ready'. $VANRY is linked to these real usage amounts. Staking guarantees service quality, consumes paid computing resources, and governance decides network upgrades. Three use cases, one token, no fragmentation. @Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
This weekend I reread "From Zero to One" and casually checked the Founders Fund's portfolio—Plasma is surprisingly listed. This made me reassess this project: when the most paranoid investors in Silicon Valley bet on a chain, what do they see? Thiel's investment philosophy is quite "reactionary": avoid competition, monopolize niches, and then expand. PayPal did this, Facebook did this, Palantir did this. Plasma's approach is no different—rather than fighting in the red ocean of general public chains, it first monopolizes the "stablecoin payment" vertical scene, then aims to expand. This "non-mainstream" approach requires courage. The narrative for 2024-2025 is "Ethereum killer" and "Solana killer"; everyone wants to be the next king of all chains. Plasma, however, declares: I only do stablecoins; the rest is for you. In a cryptocurrency world where FOMO runs rampant, this restraint is almost rebellious. But what Thiel and others may value is this "anti-consensus". When the market finally realizes that "specialized chains > general chains", the pioneers will have established barriers. Plasma's $6.4 billion TVL, partnership with Tether, and zero-fee experience are all accumulations within a time window that are difficult for later entrants to replicate. I am also reflecting on my own biases. I once thought that "only doing payments" was a ceiling, but now I realize that "doing one thing to perfection" is the real moat. The internet doesn’t have an all-consuming giant, but there are countless invisible champions—Stripe focuses on payments, Snowflake focuses on data, Zoom focuses on video. Who does Plasma want to become in the crypto world? The answer may be: one day in the future, when you scan to pay, the underlying chain running is Plasma—yet you will never know, nor need to know. Just like today, when using a credit card, no one cares about Visa's architecture. The ultimate victory of technology is to disappear behind the experience. Thiel said: "Great companies do what others cannot, and then make it seem like it is obvious." Plasma is still on the first half of that sentence, but the direction is already clear. @Plasma $XPL #Plasma
When Regulation Becomes Agreement - On Dusk and the Institutional Consciousness of the Digital Age
We once thought that decentralization was a rebellion against authority. Code is law, and autonomy is freedom. But when the provisions of MiCA were finalized, and the audit request from AFM arrived, we suddenly realized: True freedom never arises in a vacuum, but grows within a trustworthy order. The emergence of Dusk Network coincides with this turning point of cognition. It did not shout 'disruption', nor did it advocate for 'anarchy'. It simply did one thing quietly: compiled the requirements of the system into the syntax of agreements. In its world, privacy is not a cloak for withdrawal, but a contract of precise disclosure;
In the world of crypto, we are obsessed with "growth hacking"—searching for that singularity that can ignite growth. Airdrops, Memecoins, point systems... we've tried all viral growth methods. But is it possible that we have been overlooking the most powerful, yet most despised growth engine: compliance? Yes, that same "compliance" that sounds like it will make you yawn. But DUSK is turning it into a precise scalpel, cutting open a trillion-dollar market's vein. Think about it, why are hedge funds hesitant to deploy their main capital on-chain? It's not the technical barrier, but the "responsibility" black hole. In anonymous or public environments, how do you prove your transaction is compliant? How do you handle audits? If something goes wrong, who is responsible? DUSK's "auditable privacy" is essentially a tailored "responsibility delineation system" for institutions. It uses technology to answer all the above questions. The growth it brings is not from retail FOMO, but from institutional budget approvals. When licensed exchanges like NPEX choose DUSK, the signal they send is: "Here, is where you can do real business with real money." This growth is cold, slow but lethal. It is not fireworks, but rising sea levels. The assets and trading depth brought by one institutional client can surpass that of ten thousand retail clients. And once the first institution successfully lands, clearing the legal and technical barriers for the entire process, the migration costs for later entrants will drastically decrease—that's the network effect brought by compliance. DUSK's growth hacking strategy is not about competing for attention among Crypto natives, but directly addressing the deepest pain points in traditional finance and then "siphoning" their assets and liquidity on-chain. It is not building an amusement park, but a "financial special zone"—with its own set of rules (code law), but backed by the authority of the old world. So, stop mocking "compliance" as boring. In this era of narrative fatigue and traffic competition, compliance, which we once viewed as shackles, might just be the ultimate key to unlocking the next growth cycle. DUSK is proving that the sexiest growth might begin with a dry legal opinion. @Dusk $DUSK #dusk
Dusk's KYC is not a threshold, but a programmable compliance building block
Brothers, today I did something counterintuitive: I voluntarily submitted my identification just to register for a crypto project's waitlist. Not because of FOMO, but because I wanted to personally verify: Can Dusk's so-called 'Confidential KYC' prove that I am a MiFID II qualified investor without exposing my privacy? The result made me realize that Dusk is compiling EU financial law into smart contracts. The matter started from the waitlist page of DuskTrade. Unlike other projects, it didn't say 'Early Access', but rather a cold statement:
Buddy, let's not talk about 'subversion' and 'revolution' anymore. I've been in this industry for twenty years and I'm tired of hearing it. Every time something new comes out, someone says 'the banks are going to collapse.' And what happens? The banks are still here, only the coffee machines in the lobby have changed from buttons to touch screens. So when DUSK popped up, claiming to put some Dutch exchange bonds on the blockchain, my first reaction was: here comes another PPT artist. But this time it seems a bit different. They didn't show me flashy charts, nor did they boast about processing a million transactions. What they showed me was a copy of a legally binding contract signed with NPEX, along with a small line: 'Pilot asset: 300 million euros.' 300 million. This number isn't very sexy, but it's specific. Specific enough to make the picky old guys in the legal department adjust their glasses, specific enough to make the risk management committee sit up straight. In finance, 'specific' is worth ten thousand times more than 'great.' The 'auditable privacy' that DUSK is working on sounds very contradictory, right? But we old-timers understand it right away. It's like putting bulletproof glass on a bank vault—you know there's money inside (transparent enough to make regulators believe), but you don't know which bundle of cash belongs to whom (private enough to protect clients). They aren't creating new magic; they're using new tools to solve our oldest pain point: how to do business while complying with a bunch of damn rules. Right now, the young people in my office are still debating which new public chain is more 'decentralized.' Meanwhile, I’ve started having my assistant give me a weekly data brief on that NPEX collaboration on DUSK. I don't need much, just two things: the number of on-chain settlements and the amount of stablecoin cross-chain flow. I don't care whether it can change the world. I only care whether it can allow my clients to safely transfer a bond interest payment from Amsterdam to Singapore at 5:01 PM on Friday, with both sides' regulators nodding in agreement. If it can, then this 'old dog' has really learned some new tricks. If it’s just another story... sigh, well, I've heard enough of those in the last twenty years. @Dusk $DUSK #dusk
When "free" becomes the standard, Web3 truly begins — The historical resonance of Plasma and mobile payments More than a decade ago, no one dared to believe that one could go out without a wallet, and a single phone could take you everywhere. The reason mobile payments have disrupted life is simple: it completely eliminates transaction friction. No fees, no waiting, no complex operations, just scan to pay, and it's ready to use with your eyes closed. Today's Web3 is precisely stuck at the same crossroads. On traditional public chains, a small transfer incurs Gas fees, making the transaction fee for a cup of coffee more expensive than the coffee itself, and the operational threshold discourages ordinary people, keeping cryptocurrency confined to the “speculation” circle, unable to enter daily life. What Plasma does is the "mobile payment revolution" in the Web3 world. It doesn't talk to you about complex technology, it doesn't get you caught up in inflated TPS, it only does one simple thing: brings stablecoin payments back to the essence of "free, simple, and user-friendly." No Gas fees, no need to hold native coins, no need to learn complex operations, just open the wallet, transfer USDT, instant arrival, zero fees, full amount received. As natural as WeChat Pay, as easy as sending a message. History often repeats itself. Mobile payments eliminated cash with "zero friction" back in the day, today Plasma opens the door to Web3 with "zero friction." When payments no longer have costs, no thresholds, no fuss, Web3 finally has a real chance to enter convenience stores, vegetable markets, and every corner of daily life. It's not that the technology isn't good enough, but the direction must be right. Plasma's direction is the path Web3 should take: close to people, serving people, and making them feel it's useful. @Plasma $XPL #Plasma
Plasma's 'payment leg' has finally started to run! Stop only focusing on DeFi.
Friends, I've been browsing on-chain data these days, and the more I look, the more excited I get—Plasma's 'payment leg,' which has been criticized for half a year, is really starting to run fast! Do you remember what everyone said at the end of last year? 'DeFi is as fierce as a tiger in attracting deposits, payment implementation is two hundred and fifty' 'ConfirmoPay is just a PPT'... So what happened? 👉 Rain Card has opened applications in 12 EU countries, directly connected to Visa, USDT can be instantly converted to fiat for consumption; 👉 ConfirmoPay's January transaction volume exceeded 120 million USD, 80% came from real merchants (restaurants, e-commerce, logistics); 👉 NEAR Intents cross-chain settlement averages 35 million USDT per day, reducing remittance costs in Latin America by 60%.
Build a bridge to let AI move from digital to physical
Yesterday we talked about how AI can 'issue invoices', which connects commercial processes with reality. Today, let's zoom out further—what if what AI needs to manage is not an electronic invoice, but a real photovoltaic power station, a carbon sink in a forest, or a batch of bulk commodities on a sea freight? The true 'killer application' may not be how smart AI is in the virtual world, but how it can safely and reliably manage assets in the physical world. This is exactly the core battlefield anchored by the Vanar Chain: the on-chain transformation and intelligent management of Real World Assets (RWA). What it offers is not just mapping, but governance.
Brothers, to be honest: It's now easier to launch a new L1 than to open a milk tea shop—but the survival rate is less than one in ten. Why? Because the block space has long been sufficient. Users are on Ethereum L2, developers on Solana, and liquidity is on Base... Are you going to create another 'faster and cheaper' chain? Sorry, no one will move. So how did @vanar manage to emerge? The answer is simple: it doesn't sell chains, it sells products. Look at what they are doing: Virtua Metaverse, with Porsche and Warner Music investing real money VGN gaming network, where players use AI assistants to earn money automatically every day Kayon on-chain reasoning, brands using it for real-time anti-cheating Flows automation, turning membership points into NFTs in seconds It's not just a white paper dream; real income is being generated. And the value of $ VANRY lies in these usages: Every time you adjust AI, store a memory, or run a process, you consume $ VANRY— Demand comes from production, not speculation. So stop asking 'What number L1 is Vanar?' It's not here to compete on 'block generation speed'; it's here to answer: 'In the AI era, how should Web3 be used?' The answer is not in the papers, but in the user count of Virtua, the daily active users of VGN, and the renewal contracts of brands. Do you think the next explosion point in Web3 is a new chain or a new product? Let's discuss in the comments below👇 #vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain