花太香

Chinese is truly profound, do you understand it?😅

Seedance 2.0: When "Filmmaking" Becomes a Command
The truly frightening aspect of Seedance 2.0 is not how clear the videos it generates can be, but how it has reduced "cinematic expression" from a professional skill to a simple command action. Input a piece of text or upload an image, and in 60 seconds, a video complete with sound effects and multi-angle storytelling is ready. This means that the bottleneck of creativity is no longer the equipment, team, or technology, but just the imagination itself.
This represents a structural shock to the content industry. In the past, visual expression was a scarce ability held by a few professionals; now, it is being rapidly democratized. Advertising, short videos, educational content, and brand storytelling will all experience a wave of explosive experimentation—many ideas that were previously deemed "not worth filming" will be fully realized for the first time.
But problems also arise. As the cost of video generation approaches zero, the credibility of visuals will be rapidly diluted. The difficulty in distinguishing truth from falsehood, ambiguous copyrights, and emotional manipulation could all be amplified. Seedance 2.0 liberates creation while forcing society to rethink: When anyone can "make a film," how do we judge authenticity, originality, and responsibility?
It is not simply about improving efficiency but reshaping the power structure of visuals.

The top of the list for #创作者任务排行榜 XPL has also been almost fixed, with two articles every day. They can score around 100 points, while I barely score 2 points a day. @币安广场 I want to ask, what are the standards for AI scoring, and why is the gap so large? 🥶

#创作者任务排行榜 VANAR's top ranking has almost remained unchanged, while others score over 100 points a day, I only get around 10 points, how can I play like this?😭😂

To be honest, the first time I saw Vanar say they wanted to create a new L1, I was skeptical. It's 2026, is block space still scarce with Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base...?
But after talking to a few friends working on applications, I found that the pain points are indeed different. The existing chains can 'run AI', but they don't 'run AI well'. It's like being able to cook in a rental apartment, but it will never be as convenient as your own kitchen.
Where is Vanar's differentiation? It's not 'a faster EVM', but an 'architecture redesigned for AI'. myNeutron's on-chain memory, Kayon's verifiable reasoning, Flows' automated orchestration—these are not optimizations, but things that didn't exist before.
The product has already been launched; it’s not in the white paper stage. myNeutron has real applications storing user data, Kayon has models reasoning on-chain, Flows has automated strategies executing. This is 'proof of being AI-ready', not 'slogans of being AI-ready'.
$VANRY is linked to these real usage amounts. Staking guarantees service quality, consumes paid computing resources, and governance decides network upgrades. Three use cases, one token, no fragmentation.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

周末重读《从0到1》，顺手查了Founders Fund的Portfolio——Plasma赫然在列。这让我重新审视这个项目：当硅谷最偏执的投资人押注一条链，他看到了什么？
Thiel的投资哲学很"反动"：避开竞争，垄断小众，然后扩张。PayPal如此，Facebook如此，Palantir如此。Plasma的打法如出一辙——不在通用公链红海厮杀，先垄断"稳定币支付"这个垂直场景，再图扩张。
这种"非主流"需要勇气。2024-2025年的叙事是"以太坊杀手""Solana杀手"，人人想做下一个万链之王。Plasma却宣布：我只做稳定币，其他让给你们。在FOMO横行的币圈，这种克制近乎叛逆。
但Thiel们看中的，或许正是这份"反共识"。当市场终于意识到"专用链>通用链"时，先行者已建立壁垒。Plasma的64亿TVL、Tether合作、零手续费体验，都是时间窗口内的积累，后来者难以复制。
我也在反思自己的偏见。曾经觉得"只做支付"是天花板，现在发现"把一件事做到极致"才是护城河。互联网没有通吃的巨头，但有无数隐形冠军——Stripe专注支付，Snowflake专注数据，Zoom专注视频。Plasma想成为加密世界的谁？
答案或许是：当未来某天，你扫码付款时，底层跑的是Plasma链——但你永远不会知道，也无需知道。就像今天用信用卡，没人关心Visa的架构。技术的终极胜利，是消失在体验背后。
Thiel说："伟大的公司做别人做不到的事，然后让这事看起来理所当然。"Plasma还在前半句的路上，但方向已然清晰。
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

In the world of crypto, we are obsessed with "growth hacking"—searching for that singularity that can ignite growth. Airdrops, Memecoins, point systems... we've tried all viral growth methods. But is it possible that we have been overlooking the most powerful, yet most despised growth engine: compliance?
Yes, that same "compliance" that sounds like it will make you yawn. But DUSK is turning it into a precise scalpel, cutting open a trillion-dollar market's vein.
Think about it, why are hedge funds hesitant to deploy their main capital on-chain? It's not the technical barrier, but the "responsibility" black hole. In anonymous or public environments, how do you prove your transaction is compliant? How do you handle audits? If something goes wrong, who is responsible?
DUSK's "auditable privacy" is essentially a tailored "responsibility delineation system" for institutions. It uses technology to answer all the above questions. The growth it brings is not from retail FOMO, but from institutional budget approvals. When licensed exchanges like NPEX choose DUSK, the signal they send is: "Here, is where you can do real business with real money."
This growth is cold, slow but lethal. It is not fireworks, but rising sea levels. The assets and trading depth brought by one institutional client can surpass that of ten thousand retail clients. And once the first institution successfully lands, clearing the legal and technical barriers for the entire process, the migration costs for later entrants will drastically decrease—that's the network effect brought by compliance.
DUSK's growth hacking strategy is not about competing for attention among Crypto natives, but directly addressing the deepest pain points in traditional finance and then "siphoning" their assets and liquidity on-chain. It is not building an amusement park, but a "financial special zone"—with its own set of rules (code law), but backed by the authority of the old world.
So, stop mocking "compliance" as boring. In this era of narrative fatigue and traffic competition, compliance, which we once viewed as shackles, might just be the ultimate key to unlocking the next growth cycle. DUSK is proving that the sexiest growth might begin with a dry legal opinion.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

The New Year's supplies are ready, and they even sent a bowl, very thoughtful.😂

Buddy, let's not talk about 'subversion' and 'revolution' anymore. I've been in this industry for twenty years and I'm tired of hearing it. Every time something new comes out, someone says 'the banks are going to collapse.' And what happens? The banks are still here, only the coffee machines in the lobby have changed from buttons to touch screens.
So when DUSK popped up, claiming to put some Dutch exchange bonds on the blockchain, my first reaction was: here comes another PPT artist.
But this time it seems a bit different. They didn't show me flashy charts, nor did they boast about processing a million transactions. What they showed me was a copy of a legally binding contract signed with NPEX, along with a small line: 'Pilot asset: 300 million euros.'
300 million. This number isn't very sexy, but it's specific. Specific enough to make the picky old guys in the legal department adjust their glasses, specific enough to make the risk management committee sit up straight. In finance, 'specific' is worth ten thousand times more than 'great.'
The 'auditable privacy' that DUSK is working on sounds very contradictory, right? But we old-timers understand it right away. It's like putting bulletproof glass on a bank vault—you know there's money inside (transparent enough to make regulators believe), but you don't know which bundle of cash belongs to whom (private enough to protect clients). They aren't creating new magic; they're using new tools to solve our oldest pain point: how to do business while complying with a bunch of damn rules.
Right now, the young people in my office are still debating which new public chain is more 'decentralized.' Meanwhile, I’ve started having my assistant give me a weekly data brief on that NPEX collaboration on DUSK. I don't need much, just two things: the number of on-chain settlements and the amount of stablecoin cross-chain flow.
I don't care whether it can change the world. I only care whether it can allow my clients to safely transfer a bond interest payment from Amsterdam to Singapore at 5:01 PM on Friday, with both sides' regulators nodding in agreement.
If it can, then this 'old dog' has really learned some new tricks. If it’s just another story... sigh, well, I've heard enough of those in the last twenty years.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

When "free" becomes the standard, Web3 truly begins — The historical resonance of Plasma and mobile payments
More than a decade ago, no one dared to believe that one could go out without a wallet, and a single phone could take you everywhere. The reason mobile payments have disrupted life is simple: it completely eliminates transaction friction. No fees, no waiting, no complex operations, just scan to pay, and it's ready to use with your eyes closed.
Today's Web3 is precisely stuck at the same crossroads. On traditional public chains, a small transfer incurs Gas fees, making the transaction fee for a cup of coffee more expensive than the coffee itself, and the operational threshold discourages ordinary people, keeping cryptocurrency confined to the “speculation” circle, unable to enter daily life.
What Plasma does is the "mobile payment revolution" in the Web3 world. It doesn't talk to you about complex technology, it doesn't get you caught up in inflated TPS, it only does one simple thing: brings stablecoin payments back to the essence of "free, simple, and user-friendly."
No Gas fees, no need to hold native coins, no need to learn complex operations, just open the wallet, transfer USDT, instant arrival, zero fees, full amount received. As natural as WeChat Pay, as easy as sending a message.
History often repeats itself. Mobile payments eliminated cash with "zero friction" back in the day, today Plasma opens the door to Web3 with "zero friction." When payments no longer have costs, no thresholds, no fuss, Web3 finally has a real chance to enter convenience stores, vegetable markets, and every corner of daily life.
It's not that the technology isn't good enough, but the direction must be right. Plasma's direction is the path Web3 should take: close to people, serving people, and making them feel it's useful.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

Brothers, to be honest:
It's now easier to launch a new L1 than to open a milk tea shop—but the survival rate is less than one in ten.
Why? Because the block space has long been sufficient.
Users are on Ethereum L2, developers on Solana, and liquidity is on Base...
Are you going to create another 'faster and cheaper' chain? Sorry, no one will move.
So how did @vanar manage to emerge?
The answer is simple: it doesn't sell chains, it sells products.
Look at what they are doing:
Virtua Metaverse, with Porsche and Warner Music investing real money
VGN gaming network, where players use AI assistants to earn money automatically every day
Kayon on-chain reasoning, brands using it for real-time anti-cheating
Flows automation, turning membership points into NFTs in seconds
It's not just a white paper dream; real income is being generated.
And the value of $ VANRY lies in these usages:
Every time you adjust AI, store a memory, or run a process, you consume $ VANRY—
Demand comes from production, not speculation.
So stop asking 'What number L1 is Vanar?'
It's not here to compete on 'block generation speed'; it's here to answer:
'In the AI era, how should Web3 be used?'
The answer is not in the papers, but in the user count of Virtua, the daily active users of VGN, and the renewal contracts of brands.
Do you think the next explosion point in Web3 is a new chain or a new product?
Let's discuss in the comments below👇
#vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain

It hurts, half of Chinese men haven't lived past 68 years old, are the brothers still staying up late to watch the market? 😂

In 2030, I redeemed funds in the DUSK ecosystem.
In 2030, on an ordinary Wednesday morning. I sat at the table, took a sip of slightly cool coffee, and clicked the 'redeem' option on the terminal—exchanging part of my shares in the 'European Green Infrastructure Bond Fund' for an equivalent amount of euros.
The whole process was as calm as breathing. No forms to fill out, no waiting for T+2 settlement period, no back-and-forth emails with the custodian bank. Just an on-chain signature, one confirmation.
But I knew that beneath my perception, a precise financial machine was operating silently:
My signature, first and foremost, was a key. It opened a smart contract deployed on the DUSK chain, which directly corresponded to the fund's asset pool far away in Luxembourg.
Upon waking the contract, it did not immediately process the assets but first sent an inquiry to my on-chain identity module. In an instant, a verifiable digital credential issued by my main bank and certified under the EU eIDAS 2.0 framework was invoked, proving that I am a compliant investor and not a sanctioned entity. All of this was completed in an encrypted channel, and my real identity was never exposed.
Verification passed. The contract then executed: the ownership record of the corresponding value of bonds was atomically updated on the distributed ledger, and an equivalent amount of euro stablecoin, issued by Société Générale, quietly appeared in another on-chain wallet I specified through the Chainlink CCIP cross-chain highway that had already been laid.
The epilogue is not the end. Almost simultaneously, my tax advisor's system and the Dutch tax authority's regulatory sandbox received a readable but immutable event log that precisely recorded the taxable nature and amount of this redemption. The entire process, from intention to settlement to reporting, was completed before my coffee had completely cooled.
There was no thrilling 'financial revolution', only the tranquility brought by perfectly meshing gears. What I redeemed was not a string of wildly fluctuating crypto tokens, but a financial bond with clear rights, traceable sources, fully protected throughout the process, and immediately usable. DUSK never appeared in the foreground; it had transformed into the fundamental laws that allow this complex process to operate as naturally as gravity.
The future has arrived, just unevenly distributed. And in some corners quietly woven by DUSK, it has already become as even as the morning light. @Dusk $DUSK #dusk