Bitcoinworld

BitcoinWorldSPYKER C8 PRELIATOR XXV COUPÉ 146 YEARS IN THE MAKING. A NEW ERA BEGINS.
SPYKER UNVEILS THE C8 PRELIATOR XXV COUPÉ, MARKING A NEW ERA FOR THE 146-YEAR-OLD DUTCH MARQUE
AMSTERDAM and CARMEL, Calif., Aug. 14, 2026 /PRNewswire/ – Spyker today unveils the Spyker C8 Preliator XXV Coupé, marking the beginning of a new era for the storied marque. The hand-built flagship hypercar, chassis number 270, pairs an 800-horsepower twin-turbo engine with a true manual gearbox and a handmade aluminum body, continuing Spyker’s coachbuilding tradition as it returns to The Quail during Monterey Car Week.
Far more than the evolution of an existing model, the Spyker C8 Preliator XXV Coupé is an entirely new automobile. Conceived from a clean sheet of paper, it combines uncompromising craftsmanship, aviation-inspired engineering and modern performance while remaining faithful to the design philosophy that has defined Spyker since the beginning: creating automotive art in motion, its designs akin to an aircraft for the road.
That idea is more than a metaphor. Aviation has been part of Spyker’s DNA since the company merged with the Dutch Aircraft Factory in 1914, influencing generations of its design and engineering. That lineage crystallized in 1919 with the Spyker C1 Aerocoque, the car that gave rise to an idea that still defines the company.
Spyker’s story began in the Netherlands in 1880, when brothers Hendrik Jan and Jacobus Spijker founded the company as coachbuilders manufacturing their very first car in 1898. In 1903, the brothers built the world’s first six-cylinder, four-wheel-drive car and showed it in London and Paris. In 1907, a Spyker raced from Peking to Paris, sponsored by Louis Vuitton, and finished second over roughly 15,000 kilometers of unchartered terrain.
These roots have taken a different shape in each generation of Spyker’s modern era, which began with the company’s revival in 2000. The first cars of that era, the Spyker C8 Spyder, C8 Laviolette and C8 Double12, carried aviation-style air intakes, propeller-inspired wheel rims, and an aviation dashboard. The Spyker C8 Aileron, introduced in 2009, moved the design language closer to a fighter jet, with turbine air intakes and turbine wheels. The Spyker C8 Preliator XXV Coupé has NACA ducts as air intakes, pushing the aviation concept further still and carries that evolution to its third generation: where a fin tail has so far been a subtle nod, first appearing on the 2006 Spyker D12 Peking-to-Paris, the Spyker C8 Preliator XXV Coupé brings it back in a bold way, echoing the prominent fin tail of the original 1919 Spyker C1 Aerocoque. The Spyker C8 Preliator XXV Coupé headlights carry the model’s own name: XXV, and its rear lights are shaped like fighter jet afterburners.
An aerospace idea runs through the smaller details as well: an isogrid lattice of interlocking triangles, developed to make rocket structures lighter whilst making them even stronger, appears in the car’s grilles, vents, pedals, exhaust mesh, and seat upholstery, engineering and design speaking the same language throughout. And then there is Spyker’s unmistakable exposed gear linkage, a signature Spyker design element from day one.
The body is hand-built in aluminum, on a spaceframe engineered entirely in-house and completely redesigned for this car, continuing Spyker’s long partnership with the craftsmen of Coventry Prototype Panels in England, where every exterior panel was newly shaped for the Spyker C8 Preliator XXV Coupé.
A Spyker takes roughly 2100 hours to build this way. The steering wheel is stitched with two needles at once, by one craftsman, over four hours. The dashboard in turned aluminum is a nod to the pre-1925 Spykers, milled by a workshop that has finished automotive parts since the same decade Spyker was founded in 1880. Even the screw heads inside the cabin are aligned by hand to face the same direction, a detail no owner will likely ever notice, which is precisely the point. Each chassis number is stamped by hand into the aluminum space frame, so that no two impressions are quite alike. The car on display at The Quail is chassis number 270, the last of 255 Spykers built since 2000. The car is finished in a vivid metallic Quail Green with subtle rose gold flakes, its brightwork finished in rose gold throughout, and its interior trimmed in a rich orange-brown leather the company calls Tuscan Saddle.
In an industry where carbon fiber has become the default, Spyker deliberately continues to work in aluminum. Not as a compromise, but because aluminum can be shaped, worked and polished by hand. It carries the touch of the craftsman and gives every car an individuality that cannot be replicated by an automated production process.
Said Spyker Founder and CEO Victor Muller, “While carbon fiber is rightfully celebrated for its technical virtues, we have always preferred aluminum, a living metal that can be shaped by the hand of an experienced craftsman, polished to perfection, its beauty only deepening with age, like a fine Cabernet. For Spyker, this is what modern ultra-luxury should feel like: rare, personal, and made by human hands.”
At the heart of the C8 Preliator XXV Coupé is a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8 producing 800 horsepower and 1,000 Nm of torque, with a top speed exceeding 217 mph. But the C8 Preliator XXV Coupé was never conceived around numbers alone. Unlike virtually every contemporary hypercar, it is equipped with a true manual gearbox. There are no shift paddles or automated substitutes. Every gear change remains a direct, mechanical interaction between driver and car. The same philosophy carries through to the cockpit. Digital interfaces are kept to a minimum, with a head-up display as the only screen. Everything else remains deliberately analogue, tactile and designed to be operated rather than watched.
Added Muller, “We deliberately chose a real manual transmission, not an automated imitation. You decide when to shift. You feel every gear change in your hand. And if you make a mistake, well, you bear the consequences. That is what driving a sports car should be, at least according to Spyker.”
Underneath, the fuel tank has been moved from the sills to a trapezoidal space behind the seats and ahead of the engine, a placement long used on Spyker’s Le Mans race cars and now brought to the road. The rear boot has been moved entirely to the front. In its place, the so-called butterfly mode, the entire car opens at the push of a button, as the earliest Spykers did, which means the engine bay itself had to be designed to the same standard as the rest of the car, a detail the company has compared to the movement of a fine Swiss Watch.
That craftsmanship draws on a hundred and forty-six years of company history. The car’s name, in Latin, means “warrior.” The label suits a marque that has lived by the same motto since 1914: Nulla Tenaci Invia Est Via, for the tenacious, no road is impassable.
Production of the C8 Preliator XXV Coupé will be limited to just 25 hand-built hypercars. Each will be individually commissioned, making every C8 Preliator XXV Coupé not simply a collector’s car, but a personal expression of its owner and a piece of Spyker history.
Looking Towards the Future
But the C8 Preliator XXV Coupé is not simply a celebration of Spyker’s past. It is the starting point for what comes next. Its debut marks the beginning of a new era for Spyker following Volodymyr Nosov’s investment and his becoming co-owner of the marque, and a strategic partnership with W Group, a major European fintech group specializing in blockchain technology and digital infrastructure.
The partnership brings together two worlds: 146 years of automotive heritage, craftsmanship and engineering with technological expertise, digital capabilities, and a forward-looking approach to building global businesses.
The ambition is not simply to bring a legendary automotive marque back. It is to build the next era of Spyker. That does not mean changing what makes a Spyker a Spyker. Spyker is not becoming a digital device on wheels. The hypercars will remain analogue.
Instead, technology will strengthen the world around the car. W Group’s technological capabilities and digital infrastructure will support the development of new client experiences, a broader digital ecosystem and new ways for Spyker to engage with owners and collectors around the world.
The principle is simple: preserve what makes Spyker timeless and use technology to build what comes next. The C8 Preliator XXV Coupé is the first expression of that vision. Spyker’s next chapter is expected to include the development of the Spyker D8 Peking-to-Paris SSUV, new digital and client experiences, and ambitions to return to endurance GT3 racing.
“The launch of this new hypercar marks a new era for Spyker. The partnership with Volodymyr Nosov underlines the long-term ambitions of the brand and its shareholders. We are building on everything that has made Spyker distinctive for 146 years while creating the foundation for what comes next. Spyker’s future has never looked brighter, and I am immensely proud of the employees, partners and suppliers who put their faith in us,” said Muller.
Volodymyr Nosov, Co-owner of Spyker and Founder and President of W Group, said, “We are bringing together more than a century of Spyker’s automotive heritage with W Group’s technological expertise, ambition and forward-looking mindset. Our goal was never simply to bring a legendary name back. We want to build the next era of Spyker, preserving everything that makes the marque iconic while opening it to new technologies, new experiences and a new generation of clients. The C8 Preliator XXV Coupé is the first statement of that ambition. And this is only the beginning.”
Following its world debut at The Quail, the C8 Preliator XXV Coupé will appear on the Concept Car Lawn at the Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance on August 16.
About SpykerFounded in 1880 in the Netherlands, Spyker is one of the world’s oldest ultra-luxury automotive brands, hand-building exclusive hypercars to individual commission. The brand’s rich heritage includes creating the world’s first four-wheel-drive car in 1903, building planes from 1914 to 1918, and participating in Formula One and the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Today, the company produces vehicles exclusively in extremely limited numbers featuring aviation-inspired design elements.
About W Group W Group is a major European fintech group specializing in blockchain technology and digital infrastructure. Its ecosystem is built to make blockchain and digital assets secure, accessible and easy to use, serving more than 40 million users across 150 countries worldwide. At the heart of W Group is WhiteBIT, the largest European cryptocurrency exchange by traffic.
Contact:Suzanne Wellington Shamin Abas Associatessuzanne@shaminabas.com +1 (404) 543-3623. For a high-resolution image, click here.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/spyker-c8-preliator-xxv-coupe-146-years-in-the-making-a-new-era-begins-302851324.html
SOURCE Spyker
This post SPYKER C8 PRELIATOR XXV COUPÉ 146 YEARS IN THE MAKING. A NEW ERA BEGINS. first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUSD/JPY Breaches 160: What It Means for Markets and Policy Credibility
USD/JPY has climbed above the 160 level for the first time in decades, raising fresh concerns about the credibility of Japan’s economic policy framework and the potential for currency intervention by the Ministry of Finance. As of the latest trading session, the pair traded at 160.20, driven by persistent interest rate differentials between the US and Japan, with the Federal Reserve maintaining higher rates while the Bank of Japan remains cautious about tightening policy.
Why the 160 Level Matters
The 160 mark is more than a psychological threshold; it represents a critical test for Japanese policymakers. In 2022, intervention occurred near 145 and 150, but the current move beyond 160 signals that market forces are overwhelming verbal warnings. Analysts argue that each successive breach weakens the credibility of the Ministry of Finance’s commitment to stability, as traders increasingly test the limits of tolerance.
Historical context shows that the previous high was in 1990, when USD/JPY hit 160.35, before Japan’s asset bubble burst. The current level therefore resonates with memories of economic turmoil, amplifying concerns about import costs, inflation, and the Bank of Japan’s ability to normalize policy without triggering a bond market selloff.
Intervention Risks and Policy Response
The immediate question is whether Japan will intervene to support the yen. While officials have repeated their warning of ‘excessive volatility’, actual intervention remains uncertain due to the high cost and the need for US cooperation. A unilateral move could prove ineffective if the fundamental drivers—US yields and Japan’s negative rates—remain unchanged.
Market participants are also watching the Bank of Japan’s July policy meeting. Some expect a reduction in bond purchases, but a full rate hike seems unlikely given the fragile economy. The credibility gap lies in the BOJ’s communication: it has signaled normalization but has not followed through decisively, leaving investors to sell the yen with confidence.
Impact on Importers, Consumers, and Global Markets
For Japan, a weaker yen raises import costs for energy and food, squeezing households and small businesses. This could undermine consumer sentiment and complicate the BOJ’s inflation outlook. Globally, a sustained move above 160 may pressure other Asian currencies and prompt competitive devaluations, while also increasing the cost of servicing dollar-denominated debt for emerging markets.
Investors should also consider the carry trade: with Japanese rates near zero, borrowing yen to buy higher-yielding assets remains attractive. But if intervention occurs, sudden yen spikes could trigger margin calls and volatility across global markets, reminiscent of the 2022 episode when USD/JPY dropped by over 5% in a single day.
What Credibility Loss Means for the Yen
When a central bank and finance ministry lose credibility, market participants begin to disregard verbal interventions, requiring ever larger actual interventions to achieve the same effect. This dynamic is already visible: earlier warnings at 155 and 158 were ignored. The longer the yen remains weak, the harder it becomes to reverse expectations without a coordinated policy shift.
Moreover, the political dimension cannot be ignored. With an election cycle approaching, public discontent over the cost of living may pressure politicians to demand stronger action, potentially leading to politically motivated intervention that lacks economic coherence. This would further erode institutional credibility.
Conclusion
USD/JPY above 160 is a significant development that underscores the limits of Japan’s current policy mix. The credibility of the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Japan is under scrutiny, and the path forward is fraught with risks. For traders, the key levels to watch are 161 and 162, but the more critical factor is the policy response. As of now, no intervention has been confirmed, and the market remains on edge. The situation demands close monitoring, as the next move could be swift and impactful.
FAQs
Q1: What is the significance of USD/JPY reaching 160? A1: The 160 level is a psychological and historical threshold. It marks the highest level in over 30 years, raising concerns about Japan’s policy credibility and the potential for market intervention.
Q2: How might Japan respond to the yen’s weakness? A2: Japan could intervene in the foreign exchange market, as it did in 2022. However, unilateral intervention may be limited in effectiveness without US support and a shift in monetary policy fundamentals.
Q3: What are the risks of a weaker yen for the global economy? A3: A weaker yen can increase import costs in Japan, potentially fueling inflation. Globally, it may pressure other Asian currencies, affect trade balances, and trigger volatility in carry trades.
This post USD/JPY Breaches 160: What It Means for Markets and Policy Credibility first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldEdelman Financial Engines Discloses ~$34M in Spot Bitcoin ETFs; Tudor Investment Boosts IBIT Holdings
Edelman Financial Engines, a major U.S. investment advisory firm, holds approximately $34 million worth of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), according to a report from Bitcoin Magazine. The firm’s positions include shares of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and products offered by Grayscale, reflecting continued institutional adoption of digital asset vehicles.
Institutional Holdings Reveal Growing Crypto Exposure
The disclosure, based on recent regulatory filings, places Edelman among a growing list of traditional financial firms that have embraced spot Bitcoin ETFs since their U.S. debut in January 2024. While $34 million represents a modest fraction of Edelman’s total assets under management—which exceed $260 billion—the move signals a cautious but tangible shift toward digital assets within mainstream advisory practices.
Separately, Tudor Investment Corporation, the hedge fund founded by macro investor Paul Tudor Jones, increased its stake in BlackRock’s IBIT. As of the end of June, Tudor held 688,529 shares, valued at approximately $22.9 million, up about 19% from 579,083 shares in the prior quarter. Jones, a long-time Bitcoin advocate, has previously described the cryptocurrency as a hedge against inflation.
Why These Filings Matter
These disclosures arrive via quarterly 13F filings, which detail the U.S.-listed equity holdings of institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets. While 13F filings are often delayed and may not reflect current positions, they offer a valuable snapshot of how sophisticated investors are navigating the digital asset space.
The data also underscores the growing acceptance of spot Bitcoin ETFs as a regulated, accessible vehicle for gaining exposure to Bitcoin. Since their launch, these products have attracted billions in net inflows, with BlackRock’s IBIT emerging as the largest and most liquid among them.
Implications for the Broader Market
For individual investors, the involvement of firms like Edelman and Tudor adds a layer of credibility to Bitcoin as an institutional-grade asset class. It also suggests that advisors are beginning to allocate client capital to digital assets, albeit in measured increments. However, analysts caution that such positions remain small relative to overall portfolios, and volatility in the crypto market continues to pose risks.
Conclusion
The disclosures from Edelman Financial Engines and Tudor Investment highlight a gradual but steady integration of spot Bitcoin ETFs into traditional investment portfolios. While the dollar amounts are not transformative for the firms involved, they reflect a broader trend of institutional acceptance that could shape the future of digital asset investing.
FAQs
Q1: What are spot Bitcoin ETFs? Spot Bitcoin ETFs are exchange-traded funds that directly hold Bitcoin, allowing investors to gain exposure to the cryptocurrency without owning it directly. They trade on traditional stock exchanges and are regulated by the SEC.
Q2: Why are 13F filings important for tracking institutional crypto investment? 13F filings are quarterly reports that institutional investment managers must submit to the SEC, detailing their U.S.-listed equity holdings. They provide public visibility into how large investors are allocating capital, including positions in Bitcoin ETFs.
Q3: Does the Edelman disclosure mean all clients have crypto exposure? No. The $34 million position is likely part of a broader investment strategy and may not represent a significant allocation for most clients. Edelman Financial Engines offers personalized advice, and not all clients may have direct exposure to these ETFs.
This post Edelman Financial Engines Discloses ~$34M in Spot Bitcoin ETFs; Tudor Investment Boosts IBIT Holdings first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldGalaxy Research: CLARITY Act Passage Less Likely This Year, SEC and CFTC Fill the Gap
Galaxy Research, the research arm of Galaxy Digital, has indicated that the likelihood of the U.S. CLARITY Act becoming law this year is diminishing. The assessment comes amid growing legislative uncertainty, prompting the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to accelerate their own regulatory initiatives for digital assets.
Regulatory Shift: Rulemaking Over Legislation
The CLARITY Act, which aims to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, has faced an uphill battle in Congress. Galaxy Research notes that with the bill’s prospects fading, the SEC and CFTC are increasingly relying on existing authorities to craft standards for crypto issuance, trading, and market oversight. This includes formal rulemaking, interpretive guidance, and targeted exemptions.
These administrative steps are seen as a pragmatic response to the immediate regulatory void. However, Galaxy Research cautions that such measures are inherently fragile. A future administration could reverse or alter these rules, leaving the industry without the long-term stability that only congressional action can provide.
Implications for the Crypto Industry
For market participants, the shift toward agency-driven regulation introduces both opportunities and risks. On one hand, clearer rules—even if temporary—can help businesses navigate compliance and reduce legal uncertainty. On the other, the lack of a durable statutory framework may deter institutional investment and hinder innovation, as firms remain wary of sudden policy shifts.
Why This Matters
The outcome of this regulatory tug-of-war will directly impact how digital assets are issued, traded, and overseen in the United States. For investors and companies, understanding the current trajectory is essential for strategic planning. The absence of a congressional mandate means that the crypto market remains vulnerable to political and administrative changes, underscoring the need for proactive risk management.
Conclusion
While the CLARITY Act’s passage appears less likely this year, the SEC and CFTC are moving to fill the regulatory gap through administrative action. Yet, as Galaxy Research emphasizes, these measures are not a substitute for comprehensive legislation. The industry should prepare for continued uncertainty, while monitoring both regulatory developments and legislative progress in the coming months.
FAQs
Q1: What is the CLARITY Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed U.S. law aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets, defining which tokens are securities or commodities, and assigning oversight responsibilities to the SEC and CFTC.
Q2: Why is its passage uncertain? Legislative timing, competing priorities in Congress, and disagreements over key provisions have slowed progress. Galaxy Research now sees lower odds of passage this year.
Q3: How are the SEC and CFTC responding? Both agencies are accelerating their own rulemaking, interpretive guidance, and exemption processes to address the regulatory gap, though these measures can be reversed by future administrations.
This post Galaxy Research: CLARITY Act Passage Less Likely This Year, SEC and CFTC Fill the Gap first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldOndo Stocks Surpasses $1 Billion in Value as Ecosystem Surges
Ondo Stocks processed $27 billion in cumulative trading volume in 10 months since launch
Newly launched Ondo Perps clears $8 billion in cumulative volume
Ondo ecosystem crosses 200,000 holders, growing 20% in the last 30 days
NEW YORK, Aug. 14, 2026 /PRNewswire/ – Ondo Finance today shared a set of ecosystem milestones spanning its tokenized equities platform, Ondo Stocks, the recently launched perpetual futures venue powered by its technology, Ondo Perps, and Ondo-tokenized treasury products, USDY and OUSG, reflecting continued growth in onchain access to U.S. capital markets.
The figures indicate a maturing market structure for tokenized real-world assets (RWAs): sustained secondary liquidity across both centralized and decentralized venues, a new, fast-scaling derivatives venue, and a holder base that grew nearly 20% in the last 30 days alone.
Ondo Stocks tops $1 billion in tokenized equities and ETFsOndo Stocks now holds $1.01 billion in total value locked (TVL), less than a year after the platform launched in September 2025. Every token is fully backed by the corresponding stock or ETF, held with one or more licensed U.S. custodial broker-dealers. The platform became the world’s largest tokenized stocks provider by TVL within 48 hours of launching and remains as such today, with more than 440 assets available.
$27 billion in cumulative trading volume answers the tokenized stocks liquidity questionSince launch, Ondo Stocks has processed $27 billion in cumulative volume across centralized exchanges, decentralized exchanges, and primary mint/redeem activity. At roughly 26x the platform’s current TVL, the turnover figure suggests Ondo Stocks assets are being actively traded.
Ondo Perps clears $8 billion in cumulative volume, with activity continuing to accelerateOndo Perps, the ecosystem’s perpetual futures venue launched in July, recorded more than $8 billion in cumulative volume, with more than $5 billion in trading volume over the trailing 30 days from public launch and a high of $87m million in open interest. More telling than the total is the trajectory: daily volume has climbed steadily rather than spiking at launch and decaying, with the strongest sessions, peaking above $350 million, occurring in the most recent week rather than in the opening days.
Ondo ecosystem crosses 200,000 holders, up 20% in 30 daysOndo now counts 200,645 holders across its product suite, an increase of 20% over the prior 30 days, with 186,636 cumulative holders on Ondo Stocks alone. Monthly transfer volume across the ecosystem reached $2.82 billion, up 25.37% month over month, against 89,485 monthly active addresses. Holder growth and transfer velocity are both accelerating, indicating the growth is coming from new participants rather than from a concentrated set of existing accounts increasing position size.
Tier-one exchange distribution reaches $18 billion in CEX volumeTokenized Ondo Stocks assets have traded $18 billion across centralized exchanges, with $206 million currently held on-venue: $139 million on Binance, $32 million on Gate, $18 million on Bitget, and $6 million on MEXC. Major exchanges listing and holding tokenized equities represents a distribution channel that did not exist for real-world assets two years ago, and places tokenized U.S. equities alongside spot crypto on the venues where most global trading volume originates.
USDY tops $2 billion across a dozen networksOndo U.S. Dollar Yield (USDY), a tokenized note backed by short-term U.S. Treasuries and bank demand deposits, has reached $2.15 billion in total asset value with 15,604 holders and a 7-day APY of 3.49%. USDY is live on twelve networks, led by Ethereum at $1.1 billion, Stellar at $534 million, SEI at $258 million, and Solana at $179 million, with additional deployments on Mantle, Noble, Sui, Arbitrum, Aptos, MANTRA, BNB Chain, and Plume. USDY’s total asset value has more than doubled since the start of 2026.
About Ondo Finance Ondo Finance is a blockchain technology company. Its mission is to accelerate the transition to an open economy by building the platforms, assets, and infrastructure that bring financial markets onchain. For more information, visit https://ondo.finance.
This press release is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any digital assets or to enter into any transaction or trading relationship. Any products and services described are provided by relevant group entities only where permitted, and are subject to applicable laws, regulations, and client eligibility requirements.
Ondo Stocks are offered and sold by Ondo Global Markets (BVI) Limited to eligible non-US persons only and are not available to US persons. Certain statements in this release may be forward-looking, including statements regarding expected client uptake, the development of tokenized real-world asset markets, and the parties’ respective product roadmaps, and may use words such as “may,” “expects” or “is expected to.” Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual outcomes may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Please see additional important disclaimers related to Ondo Stocks at https://docs.ondo.finance/general-access-products/ondo-stocks/important-notes.
OUSG tokens are available solely to persons who are accredited investors (as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”)) and qualified purchasers (as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Additional terms and restrictions apply. See docs.ondo.finance/legal/terms-of-service, https://docs.ondo.finance/qualified-access-products/ousg, https://ondo.finance/ousg, app.ondo.finance and (as applicable) the Token offering documents for details.
Access to and use of the Ondo Perps platform (the “Platform”) is strictly prohibited for: (i) persons that are the target of any sanctions under any US, UK, EU or UN sanctions regulations; (ii) persons located in, resident in, or organized under the laws of any jurisdiction targeted by comprehensive embargoes under any such sanctions regulations; and (iii) (A) individuals located in, residing in or who are citizens of and (B) entities organized under the laws of, with a principal place of business in, or who are ultimately beneficially owned or controlled by individuals located in, residing in or who are citizens of: the United States, any of its states, possessions, territories or federal districts; or any other jurisdiction where the offering, sale, or trading of perpetual futures contracts on the Platform is prohibited by law.
Without limiting the foregoing, access to and use of the Platform is not available in the United States (or any of its states, possessions, territories or federal districts) or to U.S. persons.
Neither the Platform nor any perpetual futures contracts traded on the Platform are registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or with any other regulator or governmental authority within or outside of the United States. Additional terms and restrictions apply. See ondoperps.xyz for details.
The issuers of the tokens addressed in this press release and the entity making the Platform available, their affiliates, their respective shareholders and members, and their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants, agents and representatives (the “Ondo Persons”) do not endorse, the Ondo Persons do not make any representation or warranty whatsoever (express or implied, including but not limited to any warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement) regarding, and THE ONDO PERSONS SHALL NOT HAVE ANY LIABILITY WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO ANYONE’S USE OF, any third-party products, services or technologies referenced herein.
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/ondo-stocks-surpasses-1-billion-in-value-as-ecosystem-surges-302852158.html
This post Ondo Stocks Surpasses $1 Billion in Value as Ecosystem Surges first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBTC Perp Long/Short Ratios: Binance, OKX, Bybit Show Slight Short Bias
Bitcoin perpetual futures traders are showing a slightly cautious stance, with long/short ratios across the three largest crypto derivatives exchanges by open interest revealing a modest short bias. Over the past 24 hours, the aggregate ratio for BTC perpetual contracts stands at 51.23% long versus 48.77% short, according to exchange data.
Exchange-by-Exchange Breakdown
The split varies by platform, but the overall trend is consistent. On Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, long positions account for 48.36% of open interest, while shorts make up 51.64%. OKX shows a similar pattern, with 48.87% long and 51.13% short. Bybit, the third-largest venue for BTC perps, has the most pronounced short tilt: 47.75% long versus 52.25% short.
These ratios reflect the positioning of leveraged traders over the last day. A reading below 50% long indicates that more open interest is held in short positions, which can signal bearish sentiment or hedging activity. However, the deviations from 50% are relatively narrow, suggesting that the market is not overwhelmingly directional at this moment.
What This Means for Bitcoin Traders
Long/short ratios are a popular sentiment gauge, but they should be interpreted with care. A slight short bias does not necessarily predict a price drop; it can also mean that traders are positioning for downside protection or expecting volatility. Moreover, funding rates and liquidation levels often interact with these ratios, sometimes triggering squeezes in either direction.
For now, the data points to a market that is cautiously positioned, with no extreme conviction among leveraged participants. Bitcoin’s price action in the coming sessions may be influenced by broader macroeconomic factors, regulatory news, or shifts in spot demand, all of which can quickly alter the positioning landscape.
Why This Data Matters
For active traders and analysts, monitoring exchange-specific long/short ratios provides insight into where leveraged money is flowing. Discrepancies between exchanges can also reveal regional differences in trading behavior or liquidity conditions. While these figures are not a standalone predictor, they add valuable context to the broader market narrative.
Conclusion
In summary, the latest 24-hour long/short data from Binance, OKX, and Bybit shows a slight short bias across major BTC perpetual futures markets. The ratios are close to balanced, indicating that traders are not heavily committed to a directional bet. As always, these metrics should be used alongside other indicators and fundamental analysis for a fuller picture of market sentiment.
FAQs
Q1: What is a long/short ratio in perpetual futures? The long/short ratio compares the amount of open interest held in long positions versus short positions. A ratio above 50% long means more traders are betting on price increases, while below 50% suggests more are betting on declines.
Q2: Why do long/short ratios differ between exchanges? Each exchange has a different user base, trading volume, and liquidity profile. These factors can lead to variations in positioning, as traders on different platforms may have distinct strategies or access to different market information.
Q3: Can a high short ratio predict a price rally? Not necessarily. While a very high short ratio can sometimes lead to a short squeeze, it is not a reliable predictor on its own. Other factors like funding rates, liquidation levels, and market news also play crucial roles.
This post BTC Perp Long/Short Ratios: Binance, OKX, Bybit Show Slight Short Bias first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldInjective and Cardano Connect Testnets for Cross-Chain ADA and INJ Transfers
Injective has launched a live testnet integration with Cardano, enabling the transfer of ADA to Injective and INJ to Cardano. The development, first reported by Cointelegraph, marks a step toward greater interoperability between the two blockchain networks, though the feature remains in the testing phase and has not yet been scheduled for mainnet deployment.
What the Testnet Integration Involves
The integration allows users on the Injective testnet to move Cardano’s native token, ADA, onto Injective, and similarly, Injective’s native token, INJ, onto Cardano’s testnet. This cross-chain capability is designed to test the technical infrastructure needed for seamless asset transfers, potentially paving the way for broader DeFi and Web3 applications that span both ecosystems.
For Cardano, which has historically focused on peer-reviewed research and a methodical development approach, this integration represents another attempt to expand its DeFi footprint. For Injective, a layer-1 blockchain optimized for finance, the move aligns with its goal of creating a fully interoperable and composable financial ecosystem.
Why This Matters for Interoperability
Cross-chain interoperability remains a critical challenge in the cryptocurrency space. Most blockchains operate in silos, limiting the flow of assets and data between networks. Solutions like this testnet integration aim to bridge those gaps, enabling users to access a wider range of applications without needing to rely on centralized exchanges or complex bridging protocols.
If successful, the integration could eventually allow Cardano users to tap into Injective’s derivatives and lending markets, while Injective users could gain exposure to Cardano’s growing ecosystem of native assets. However, the timeline for a mainnet launch is unclear, and the teams have not yet announced specific dates or additional details about the testing process.
Potential Implications for Users and Developers
For developers, the testnet provides an opportunity to experiment with cross-chain applications and understand how the two networks interact. For users, the eventual mainnet deployment could simplify asset management by enabling direct transfers without third-party intermediaries.
It is important to note that testnet integrations often face delays or changes before reaching production. While the technical milestone is notable, the actual user impact will depend on how smoothly the integration scales, security considerations, and whether both communities adopt the cross-chain functionality.
Conclusion
Injective’s testnet integration with Cardano is a promising development for cross-chain interoperability, but it remains an early-stage test. Both projects have a history of cautious, research-driven progress, so a mainnet rollout may take time. For now, the news signals a continued push toward a more connected blockchain ecosystem, with potential benefits for developers and users once the technology matures.
FAQs
Q1: What does the Injective-Cardano testnet integration allow? It enables the transfer of ADA to Injective and INJ to Cardano on their respective testnets, testing cross-chain asset movement.
Q2: When will this be available on mainnet? No official timeline has been announced. The integration is currently in the testing phase, and mainnet deployment will depend on the success of these tests.
Q3: How can users benefit from this integration? If launched on mainnet, users could transfer assets directly between the two networks without centralized exchanges, potentially enabling access to a broader range of DeFi applications.
This post Injective and Cardano Connect Testnets for Cross-Chain ADA and INJ Transfers first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldSpot Bitcoin ETFs see $56.2M net outflow, extending three-day streak
U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded a net outflow of approximately $56.2 million on Aug. 14, marking the third consecutive trading day of net withdrawals, according to data from Farside Investors.
The continued outflows suggest a cautious sentiment among institutional and retail investors, despite the asset class having seen robust inflows earlier in the year. The recent streak has trimmed some of the gains from a period of sustained accumulation that had pushed total net inflows to over $17 billion since January.
Fund-level breakdown: BlackRock and Fidelity lead outflows
BlackRock’s IBIT, the largest spot Bitcoin ETF by assets under management, saw the most significant single-day outflow, with approximately $55.5 million leaving the fund. Fidelity’s FBTC also reported a net outflow of $6.8 million. These two products have historically been the primary drivers of net flows in the sector.
In contrast, Bitwise’s BITB bucked the trend, recording a modest net inflow of $6.1 million. Other funds, including those from Grayscale, ARK 21Shares, and VanEck, reported no significant net flow changes for the day, indicating a selective investor approach rather than a broad exodus.
The three-day cumulative outflow now stands at roughly $180 million, according to Farside data. While this represents a reversal from the early August surge, it remains modest compared to the scale of inflows seen during the first half of the year.
Market context: What’s driving the selling?
The recent outflows coincide with a period of heightened volatility in the broader cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin’s price has oscillated between $58,000 and $62,000 over the past week, struggling to establish a clear directional trend. Macroeconomic factors, including uncertainty around Federal Reserve interest rate policy and geopolitical tensions, have contributed to a risk-off sentiment among some investors.
Additionally, the market is digesting the impact of large distributions from the defunct Mt. Gox exchange and the German government’s earlier Bitcoin sales, which have added supply pressure. These events have led some ETF holders to take profits or reduce exposure, particularly after the strong rally in the first quarter.
Implications for investors and the market
For investors, the persistent outflows may signal a pause in the ETF-driven demand that helped propel Bitcoin to new all-time highs in March. However, it’s important to note that daily flows are inherently volatile and can reverse quickly. The fact that Bitwise still attracted inflows suggests that some investors view current prices as an opportunity to accumulate.
From a market structure perspective, the outflows reduce the net buying pressure from ETFs, which could weigh on Bitcoin’s price in the short term. Yet, the overall trend for 2024 remains positive, with ETFs having accumulated more than 800,000 BTC collectively. Analysts suggest that sustained outflows would need to persist for several more weeks to significantly alter the bullish long-term outlook.
Conclusion
The $56.2 million net outflow on Aug. 14 extends a three-day streak of withdrawals from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, led by BlackRock and Fidelity. While this reflects near-term investor caution, the broader context of strong year-to-date inflows and ongoing market maturation suggests the trend may be temporary. Investors will be watching upcoming economic data and Bitcoin’s price action for clues on whether the outflows will continue or reverse.
FAQs
Q1: What is a spot Bitcoin ETF? A spot Bitcoin ETF is a regulated exchange-traded fund that directly holds Bitcoin as its underlying asset, allowing investors to gain exposure to the cryptocurrency’s price without owning the digital asset themselves. Unlike futures-based ETFs, spot ETFs track the current market price of Bitcoin.
Q2: Why do ETF outflows matter? ETF flows are a key indicator of investor sentiment and demand. Sustained outflows can reduce buying pressure on Bitcoin, potentially leading to price declines, while inflows often signal increased institutional adoption and can support price appreciation.
Q3: How long can the outflows continue? It’s difficult to predict. Historically, ETF flows have been volatile, with periods of outflows often followed by inflows. The duration depends on broader market conditions, including Bitcoin’s price trajectory, macroeconomic factors, and investor risk appetite.
This post Spot Bitcoin ETFs see $56.2M net outflow, extending three-day streak first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBitdeer Sells All 253.4 BTC Mined This Week, Continuing Zero-Treasury Policy
Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin miner Bitdeer has sold all 253.4 BTC it mined this week, according to an official post on X. The company has maintained a zero-BTC treasury strategy since February, under which it immediately converts all mined Bitcoin into cash. As of Feb. 20, Bitdeer had reduced its BTC holdings to zero and has since continued to sell its entire mining output on a weekly basis.
Bitdeer’s Zero-Treasury Strategy: Context and Implications
Bitdeer’s decision to sell all mined Bitcoin marks a notable shift from the industry’s earlier trend of accumulating BTC on balance sheets. While many miners adopted a hold strategy during the 2021 bull market, the 2022 market downturn and subsequent volatility prompted several companies to reconsider. Bitdeer’s approach prioritizes liquidity and operational funding over long-term appreciation, a stance that may appeal to investors seeking stable cash flows.
The sale of 253.4 BTC at current market prices would generate roughly $17 million in revenue, based on Bitcoin’s recent trading range. This cash is likely earmarked for operational expenses, debt repayment, or expansion of mining capacity. By selling immediately, Bitdeer avoids the risk of price declines but also forgoes potential upside if Bitcoin’s price rises.
Industry Context and Market Reaction
Bitdeer is not alone in adopting a sell-as-you-mine approach. Other miners, including Core Scientific and Riot Platforms, have used similar strategies during different periods, though many have also retained portions of their output. The choice often reflects a company’s financial health, capital expenditure needs, and market outlook.
The zero-treasury policy also reduces the impact of Bitcoin price volatility on Bitdeer’s financial statements. This can be seen as a risk-management tool, especially for a company with significant capital-intensive operations. However, it also means Bitdeer shareholders do not gain direct exposure to Bitcoin price appreciation through the company’s balance sheet.
What This Means for Investors and the Market
For investors, Bitdeer’s strategy provides clarity: the company’s value is tied to its mining efficiency and operational performance, not to BTC price movements. This could be attractive to those seeking a more traditional equity investment within the crypto mining sector. For the broader market, consistent selling by miners can add downward pressure on Bitcoin prices, though Bitdeer’s volume is relatively small compared to overall trading volumes.
It’s also worth noting that Bitdeer’s move reflects a broader trend among some miners to deleverage and secure cash reserves, particularly after the challenges of the 2022 bear market. As the industry matures, we may see more miners adopt similar liquidity-first strategies.
Conclusion
Bitdeer’s sale of all 253.4 BTC mined this week is a continuation of its zero-treasury policy, a strategy that prioritizes liquidity and operational stability. While this approach forgoes potential gains from Bitcoin appreciation, it offers investors a more predictable financial profile. As the crypto mining sector evolves, Bitdeer’s strategy serves as a notable example of risk management in a volatile market.
FAQs
Q1: What is Bitdeer’s zero-treasury strategy? Bitdeer’s zero-treasury strategy means the company sells all Bitcoin it mines immediately, converting it into cash. This approach avoids holding BTC on its balance sheet, reducing exposure to price volatility.
Q2: How much Bitcoin did Bitdeer sell this week? Bitdeer sold 253.4 BTC mined this week. At current market prices, this would be worth approximately $17 million, though the exact amount depends on the price at the time of sale.
Q3: Why does Bitdeer choose to sell all its mined Bitcoin? Bitdeer likely sells to fund operational expenses, reduce debt, or finance expansion. The strategy provides immediate cash flow and minimizes the risk of holding an asset with volatile prices.
This post Bitdeer Sells All 253.4 BTC Mined This Week, Continuing Zero-Treasury Policy first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldSpot Ethereum ETFs See Flat Day as Net Flows Stall on Aug. 14
U.S. spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded no net inflows or outflows on Wednesday, Aug. 14, according to data from Farside Investors. The flat day followed a modest $5.9 million in net inflows the previous trading session, signaling a pause in investor activity across all nine spot ETH funds.
What the Data Shows
Farside Investors, which tracks daily flows for digital asset ETFs, reported that none of the spot Ethereum funds saw any net movement on Aug. 14. This means that while some funds may have experienced individual subscription or redemption activity, the overall net flow across the group was zero.
The absence of net flows comes after a period of mixed activity for these products. Since their launch in late July, spot ETH ETFs have seen volatile flows, with some days recording significant inflows and others seeing outflows. The flat day on Aug. 14 suggests that investors are taking a wait-and-see approach, possibly awaiting clearer market signals or macroeconomic cues.
Context: A Brief History of ETH ETF Flows
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved spot Ethereum ETFs in July 2024, marking a significant milestone for the cryptocurrency industry. The first few days of trading saw heavy volume, with inflows exceeding $1 billion initially. However, the momentum quickly cooled, and outflows became more common as some investors rotated out of higher-cost funds or took profits.
In the weeks leading up to Aug. 14, flows have been choppy. For instance, on Aug. 12, the funds saw net outflows of $13.7 million, while on Aug. 13, they recorded $5.9 million in inflows. The flat day on Aug. 14 breaks that pattern, but it does not necessarily signal a trend reversal. Market analysts often caution against reading too much into a single day’s flow data, as institutional activity can be lumpy.
Why This Matters to Investors
For crypto market observers, ETF flows are a key gauge of institutional sentiment. Sustained inflows typically indicate growing acceptance and demand, while outflows or flat days may suggest hesitation. The flat performance on Aug. 14 could be attributed to several factors, including broader market volatility, profit-taking after recent price gains, or simply a lull in institutional trading activity.
It’s also worth noting that spot ETH ETFs are still relatively new, and their daily flow patterns are not yet as established as those of spot Bitcoin ETFs, which have been trading since January. As such, investors should consider longer-term trends rather than overreacting to daily fluctuations.
Conclusion
The flat net flow on Aug. 14 for U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs underscores the ongoing volatility and uncertainty in the digital asset market. While the data from Farside Investors shows no net movement, it does not necessarily indicate a loss of interest in these products. Instead, it reflects a cautious stance among investors as they assess market conditions. As the ETF market matures, daily flow reports will continue to be a valuable, though not definitive, indicator of institutional sentiment.
FAQs
Q1: What does ‘no net flows’ mean for spot ETH ETFs? It means that the total inflows and outflows across all spot Ethereum ETFs on that day were equal, resulting in a net change of zero. Some individual funds may have seen activity, but collectively, no new money entered or left the group.
Q2: Why are daily ETF flows important? Daily flow data provides insight into investor sentiment and demand for a particular asset. For ETFs, consistent inflows can signal growing institutional adoption, while outflows may indicate profit-taking or reduced interest. However, single-day flows should be interpreted with caution due to potential market noise.
Q3: How do spot ETH ETFs differ from futures-based ETH ETFs? Spot ETH ETFs hold actual Ethereum tokens, providing direct exposure to the cryptocurrency’s price. Futures-based ETFs invest in Ethereum futures contracts, which may not perfectly track the spot price due to factors like contango. The approval of spot ETFs was seen as a major step for mainstream adoption of Ethereum.
This post Spot Ethereum ETFs See Flat Day as Net Flows Stall on Aug. 14 first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldDeFiLlama Founder Alleges Apple Took Months to Remove Impersonating App Store App
DeFiLlama founder 0xngmi has publicly criticized Apple’s response to a fraudulent application on the App Store that impersonated the popular decentralized finance (DeFi) analytics platform. In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), 0xngmi claimed that despite repeated reports to Apple regarding trademark infringement and impersonation, the fake app remained available for months before it was finally removed.
Timeline of Events
According to 0xngmi, the initial reports to Apple’s abuse and trademark complaint channels yielded no action. The founder stated that the app was not only misleading users but also potentially harmful, as it could be used to steal funds. It was only after 0xngmi downloaded the app, connected a wallet containing a small amount of funds, and confirmed that the app attempted to steal those funds, that Apple took the complaint seriously. Following this detailed report, the app was removed within days.
Implications for User Security
This incident highlights a broader concern within the cryptocurrency community regarding the presence of malicious apps on official app stores. Despite Apple’s review processes, fraudulent applications can sometimes slip through, posing significant risks to users who may not be able to distinguish between legitimate and fake services. For DeFi users, the consequences of interacting with a malicious app can be severe, including the loss of digital assets.
Why This Matters
The DeFiLlama case underscores the importance of vigilance when downloading applications related to cryptocurrency. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of app store reporting mechanisms and the responsibility of platform providers to protect users from impersonation and theft. For the broader crypto ecosystem, this incident serves as a reminder that security is a shared responsibility between users, developers, and platform operators.
Conclusion
The removal of the fake DeFiLlama app is a positive outcome, but the lengthy process highlights potential gaps in Apple’s response to such reports. Users are advised to verify the authenticity of any app before use, especially those related to financial services. As the crypto industry continues to grow, incidents like this may prompt calls for more stringent vetting processes and faster action on reported impersonations.
FAQs
Q1: What is DeFiLlama? DeFiLlama is a popular analytics platform that tracks total value locked (TVL) across various decentralized finance protocols. It is widely used by investors and enthusiasts to monitor the health and growth of the DeFi sector.
Q2: How can users protect themselves from fake apps? Users should always verify the developer name and app URL, read reviews, and check for official links from the project’s website or social media channels. Additionally, using hardware wallets and enabling two-factor authentication can add extra layers of security.
Q3: What should I do if I encounter a fake app? Report it to the app store immediately, providing as much detail as possible, including screenshots and evidence of fraudulent behavior. You can also alert the legitimate project’s team so they can take action.
This post DeFiLlama Founder Alleges Apple Took Months to Remove Impersonating App Store App first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUK Manufacturing Output Misses Expectations in June, Rising Only 0.5% Year-on-Year
UK manufacturing production grew by just 0.5% in June compared with the same month last year, falling short of the 1.2% growth forecast by economists, according to the latest official data.
What the Data Shows
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported that manufacturing output rose 0.5% year-on-year in June, a significant slowdown from the 1.1% annual growth recorded in May. On a monthly basis, manufacturing production was flat, with no change from May, while economists had expected a modest increase of 0.2%.
The broader index of production, which includes mining, energy, and water supply, also underperformed, rising only 0.3% year-on-year in June, below the consensus forecast of 1.0%.
Why This Matters for the Economy
Manufacturing accounts for roughly 10% of UK GDP, and its performance is closely watched as a bellwether for broader economic health. The weaker-than-expected output suggests that the sector is struggling to gain momentum amid persistent headwinds, including elevated interest rates, subdued global demand, and lingering supply chain uncertainties.
The data may influence the Bank of England’s monetary policy deliberations. With inflation still above the 2% target, the Bank has been cautious about cutting rates. However, signs of economic softness could strengthen the case for easing in the coming months.
Market Reaction and Outlook
Following the release, the British pound slipped slightly against the US dollar, while gilt yields edged lower, reflecting reduced expectations of aggressive rate hikes. Analysts note that the manufacturing sector’s struggles are not isolated, as recent surveys from the S&P Global UK Manufacturing PMI have also pointed to contraction in new orders and employment.
Looking ahead, the sector faces a challenging second half of the year. The Bank of England’s rate decisions, global trade dynamics, and domestic policy support will be key factors to watch. While the June data is disappointing, some economists caution against overinterpreting a single month’s figures, noting that the sector remains resilient in pockets such as aerospace and pharmaceuticals.
Conclusion
The UK manufacturing sector grew at a slower pace than expected in June, with year-on-year output rising only 0.5% against a forecast of 1.2%. The data highlights the ongoing challenges facing the sector, but it is not a definitive signal of a downturn. The Bank of England and market participants will likely scrutinize upcoming releases for further clues on the economy’s trajectory.
FAQs
Q1: What does ‘manufacturing production YoY’ mean? It compares the volume of goods produced by manufacturers in a given month (June) with the same month in the previous year, expressed as a percentage change.
Q2: Why did the actual figure differ from the forecast? Forecasts are based on economic models and surveys. Actual data can deviate due to unanticipated changes in demand, supply chain disruptions, or statistical revisions.
Q3: How does this affect the average consumer? Slower manufacturing growth can lead to reduced job creation and lower wage growth in the sector, potentially affecting overall economic confidence and consumer spending.
This post UK Manufacturing Output Misses Expectations in June, Rising Only 0.5% Year-on-Year first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUK Goods Trade Deficit Widens More Than Expected in June
The United Kingdom’s goods trade balance registered at £-23.007 billion in June, a larger deficit than the £-20.5 billion forecast, according to official data released this month. This widening shortfall underscores ongoing pressures in the UK’s external trade sector, with imports outpacing exports more than analysts had anticipated.
What the latest data reveals
The June figure marks a notable miss against market expectations, indicating that the UK’s trade in goods continues to struggle. The deficit reflects the difference between the value of goods imported and exported, and a wider gap often points to weaker export performance or stronger domestic demand for foreign products. While the Office for National Statistics (ONS) typically publishes this data alongside broader GDP and trade reports, the headline number alone signals that net trade may have acted as a drag on economic growth in the second quarter.
Economists had predicted a deficit of £-20.5 billion, but the actual outturn of £-23.007 billion suggests that global demand for UK goods may be softening, or that import prices have risen, possibly due to currency fluctuations or supply chain costs. The data also comes at a time when the Bank of England is closely monitoring inflationary pressures, and a wider trade deficit can influence the pound’s value and future monetary policy decisions.
Implications for the UK economy and markets
A larger-than-expected trade deficit can weigh on the British pound, as it implies more currency leaving the country than entering through trade. For businesses, this could mean higher costs for imported raw materials and components, potentially feeding into consumer prices. Conversely, exporters may find it harder to compete if the pound strengthens, although a weaker pound typically makes UK goods cheaper abroad.
The data also provides context for the Bank of England’s interest rate path. Policymakers often view trade balances as a signal of economic health, and a widening deficit might reinforce expectations of a more cautious approach to rate cuts. For investors, the miss could lead to adjustments in forecasts for UK GDP growth, as net trade is a component of the national accounts.
What should readers watch next
Looking ahead, market participants will be watching for revisions to the June data, as well as the next monthly release, to see if this trend persists. Additionally, the breakdown of exports and imports by sector—such as machinery, chemicals, or food—can offer deeper insights into which industries are driving the deficit. For now, the June figure adds to a mixed picture of the UK economy, which has shown resilience in services but faces headwinds in manufacturing and trade.
Conclusion
The UK’s goods trade deficit widened to £-23.007 billion in June, exceeding forecasts and highlighting ongoing challenges in the country’s external trade. While a single month’s data should be interpreted with caution, the miss underscores the need for continued monitoring of trade flows, currency movements, and broader economic policy responses.
FAQs
Q1: What is the goods trade balance? The goods trade balance measures the difference between a country’s exports and imports of physical goods. A negative balance indicates a trade deficit, meaning imports exceed exports.
Q2: Why does the trade deficit matter? A trade deficit can affect a country’s currency value, economic growth, and inflation. A wider deficit may weigh on GDP and influence central bank policy decisions.
Q3: How often is this data released? The ONS typically publishes trade data on a monthly basis, usually as part of the UK’s economic releases, with figures available about six weeks after the reporting period ends.
This post UK Goods Trade Deficit Widens More Than Expected in June first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUK Business Investment Rebounds to 0.8% YoY in Q2 2024, Reversing Q1 Contraction
The United Kingdom’s total business investment rose by 0.8% year-on-year in the second quarter of 2024, climbing from a revised -1.3% in the first quarter, according to official data released today.
What drove the rebound in business investment?
The turnaround follows two consecutive quarters of decline, suggesting that businesses may be regaining confidence despite a challenging economic environment. The quarterly growth rate also improved, with investment expanding by 0.5% in Q2 2024 compared to a 0.9% contraction in Q1.
While the figures are preliminary and subject to revision, they align with broader signs of economic resilience. The Bank of England’s gradual approach to interest rate cuts and easing inflation pressures have likely supported investment decisions.
How does this compare to historical trends?
Investment levels remain below pre-pandemic peaks, but the latest uptick signals a potential turning point. In 2019, business investment grew by around 2.5% annually, and the pandemic caused a sharp drop in 2020. The recovery has been uneven, with supply chain disruptions and Brexit-related uncertainties weighing on capital spending.
Economists note that sustained growth in investment is crucial for long-term productivity gains. The UK has lagged behind other G7 nations in investment as a share of GDP, a concern highlighted by policymakers.
Why this matters for the broader economy
Business investment is a key component of GDP, directly influencing job creation, innovation, and competitiveness. A rebound in capital spending can have multiplier effects across supply chains, boosting demand for machinery, technology, and construction services.
However, the data also underscores lingering fragility. High borrowing costs and geopolitical uncertainties continue to pose risks. The government’s recent fiscal policies, including investment incentives, may provide additional support in the coming quarters.
Conclusion
The 0.8% year-on-year rise in UK business investment in Q2 2024 marks a positive shift from the previous quarter’s contraction. While the recovery is still in its early stages, it offers a glimmer of optimism for economic growth. Monitoring upcoming quarters will be essential to determine whether this uptick is sustainable or a temporary fluctuation.
FAQs
Q1: What is the significance of the UK business investment growth in Q2 2024? The 0.8% year-on-year increase indicates that businesses are increasing spending on capital goods, which can stimulate economic growth and productivity. It reverses the previous quarter’s decline, suggesting improved business confidence.
Q2: How is business investment measured? Business investment is a component of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) that tracks spending by businesses on fixed assets like machinery, equipment, buildings, and intellectual property. It is typically reported quarterly by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
Q3: What factors could influence future business investment trends? Key factors include interest rates, inflation, government policies, global economic conditions, and political stability. Lower borrowing costs and fiscal incentives generally encourage investment, while uncertainty can dampen it.
This post UK Business Investment Rebounds to 0.8% YoY in Q2 2024, Reversing Q1 Contraction first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUK Manufacturing Production Falls 0.5% in June, Missing Expectations
UK manufacturing production contracted by 0.5% month-on-month in June, according to official data released today, falling short of the 0.2% decline economists had forecast. The drop marks a setback for the sector after a modest recovery in the previous month, raising fresh questions about the resilience of Britain’s industrial base amid elevated borrowing costs and subdued global demand.
What drove the decline in June?
The monthly fall was broad-based, with significant decreases in the manufacture of transport equipment, machinery, and electrical goods. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) noted that the decline was partly a correction after a stronger-than-expected May, when output rose by 0.4%. However, the underlying trend remains weak, with manufacturing output still below its pre-pandemic peak.
Analysts point to persistent headwinds: high energy costs, labor shortages, and weakening export orders from key trading partners. The Bank of England’s prolonged period of restrictive monetary policy has also weighed on investment and consumer demand for big-ticket items, which are often manufactured domestically.
Broader industrial picture
Manufacturing accounts for around 9.5% of UK gross domestic product, and its performance is closely watched as a bellwether for the wider economy. The June data follows a mixed second quarter: while services have shown resilience, the industrial sector has struggled to gain momentum. The total index of production, which includes mining, energy, and water supply, also fell by 0.6% in June, reflecting lower oil and gas extraction.
Year-on-year, manufacturing output was 0.7% lower than in June 2023, highlighting the sector’s struggle to return to sustained growth. The ONS data aligns with recent purchasing managers’ surveys that have consistently shown contraction in the manufacturing sector throughout the second quarter.
What this means for the economy
The weaker manufacturing figures may reinforce expectations that the Bank of England will proceed cautiously with further interest rate cuts. While the services sector has helped the economy avoid a recession, the industrial slump poses a risk to overall growth in the second half of the year. Policymakers will also be monitoring whether the decline is temporary or signals a more prolonged downturn, particularly as the new government has pledged to boost industrial strategy and ‘make in Britain’ a priority.
Conclusion
June’s manufacturing production data underscores the challenges facing the UK’s industrial sector. The 0.5% monthly contraction, worse than forecast, points to ongoing structural issues and a fragile recovery. As the Bank of England weighs its next policy move and the government sets out its economic agenda, the sector’s performance will remain a key indicator of the nation’s economic health.
FAQs
Q1: What does ‘month-on-month’ mean in this context? It compares the level of production in June with the level in May, showing the short-term change. A negative figure means output decreased from the previous month.
Q2: Why is manufacturing production important for the UK economy? Manufacturing contributes nearly 10% of GDP, supports high-skilled jobs, and drives exports. Its performance influences productivity, investment, and regional economic health.
Q3: Could this decline lead to a recession? While a single month’s data does not indicate a recession, persistent contraction in manufacturing, combined with weak services growth, could raise the risk. Economists will watch upcoming quarterly GDP figures for a clearer trend.
This post UK Manufacturing Production Falls 0.5% in June, Missing Expectations first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldNew Zealand Inflation Expectations Cool, Japan PPI Pressures Persist
New Zealand’s inflation expectations have fallen to a multi-year low, while Japan’s producer price index continues to climb, highlighting a divergence in monetary policy outlooks across the Asia-Pacific region as of early 2025.
New Zealand Inflation Expectations Decline
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s latest survey of expectations, released in the first quarter, showed that two-year-ahead inflation expectations dropped to 2.5%, down from 2.8% in the previous quarter. This brings expectations closer to the central bank’s 1-3% target band, suggesting that households and businesses are becoming more confident that price pressures will ease.
The decline is attributed to softer domestic demand, falling commodity prices, and the lagged effects of the RBNZ’s aggressive rate hiking cycle. The central bank has held the official cash rate at 5.5% since mid-2024, and markets are now pricing in a potential rate cut later this year as inflation cools.
Japan’s PPI Pain Continues
In contrast, Japan’s producer price index rose 3.2% year-on-year in January, up from 2.9% in December, according to the Bank of Japan. This marks the highest reading since mid-2023, driven by rising energy costs, a weak yen, and supply chain disruptions.
The persistent PPI pressure is complicating the Bank of Japan’s path toward normalizing monetary policy. While the BOJ has maintained its ultra-loose stance, policymakers have hinted at potential adjustments if inflation becomes more broad-based. However, the recent earthquake in the Noto Peninsula has added uncertainty to the economic outlook.
Why This Matters
The divergent inflation trends have significant implications for investors and businesses operating in the region. New Zealand’s easing price pressures could lead to earlier rate cuts, potentially boosting consumer spending and housing markets. Conversely, Japan’s rising producer costs may squeeze corporate margins and keep the BOJ cautious about tightening too soon.
For currency markets, the New Zealand dollar may weaken if the RBNZ cuts rates, while the Japanese yen could face further depreciation if the BOJ remains dovish. This dynamic affects trade competitiveness and capital flows across the Asia-Pacific.
Conclusion
As of early 2025, New Zealand’s inflation expectations are cooling, paving the way for potential monetary easing, while Japan’s producer prices remain stubbornly high, complicating the BOJ’s policy normalization. These contrasting trends underscore the uneven global recovery and the challenges central banks face in balancing growth and price stability.
FAQs
Q1: What is the current inflation target in New Zealand? The Reserve Bank of New Zealand targets inflation in a 1-3% range, with a focus on keeping future inflation expectations anchored near the 2% midpoint.
Q2: How does Japan’s PPI affect consumers? Producer price increases often pass through to consumer prices, though the pass-through can be partial. Persistent PPI gains may eventually lead to higher retail prices, affecting household purchasing power.
Q3: What could trigger a rate cut by the RBNZ? The RBNZ may consider cutting rates if inflation expectations remain subdued and actual inflation stays within target. Slowing economic growth and rising unemployment could also prompt earlier easing.
This post New Zealand Inflation Expectations Cool, Japan PPI Pressures Persist first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUK Economy Grows 0.6% in Q2, Beating Expectations as Services Sector Leads
The United Kingdom’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose by 0.6% quarter-on-quarter in the second quarter of 2024, surpassing market forecasts of 0.4%, according to the latest official data. This marks a continued recovery from the shallow recession experienced earlier in the year, driven largely by a strong performance in the services sector.
What the Data Shows
The quarterly expansion follows a 0.7% increase in the first quarter of 2024, indicating a steady upward trajectory for the British economy. The services sector, which accounts for around 80% of UK output, was the primary contributor, with notable growth in professional services, scientific activities, and the IT industry. Meanwhile, production output remained flat, and construction saw a modest decline, but the overall figures suggest broad-based resilience.
On an annual basis, GDP grew by 1.3% in the second quarter compared to the same period last year, also above expectations. The data aligns with the Bank of England’s more optimistic outlook, which has been supported by easing inflation and stronger household spending.
Market and Policy Implications
The better-than-expected growth figures are likely to influence the Bank of England’s monetary policy decisions. With inflation having cooled to 2.0% in May and June, policymakers may feel less pressure to maintain high interest rates. However, the Bank has remained cautious, emphasizing that services price inflation and wage growth are still elevated. As of August 2024, the base rate stands at 5.0%, and markets are pricing in a possible cut later in the year.
For businesses, the data signals a more stable demand environment, which could support investment plans. For households, sustained growth may translate into improved job security and real income gains, though the full impact of previous rate hikes is still filtering through.
What to Watch Next
Economists will be closely monitoring the third-quarter data for any signs of slowdown, especially given the lingering effects of high borrowing costs and global uncertainties. The upcoming Autumn Budget and the Bank’s next policy meeting in September will provide further clarity on the economic path.
Conclusion
The UK economy’s 0.6% quarterly growth in Q2 2024, above forecasts, reinforces the view that the recovery is gaining momentum. While risks remain, the data provides a solid foundation for policymakers and businesses as they navigate the second half of the year.
FAQs
Q1: What is the UK’s GDP growth rate for Q2 2024? The UK GDP grew by 0.6% quarter-on-quarter in Q2 2024, exceeding the 0.4% forecast.
Q2: Which sectors drove the UK’s economic growth? The services sector was the main driver, with strong contributions from professional, scientific, and IT activities.
Q3: How might this GDP data affect interest rates? The robust growth may give the Bank of England room to hold or cut rates, but decisions will depend on inflation and wage data.
This post UK Economy Grows 0.6% in Q2, Beating Expectations as Services Sector Leads first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldUK Economy Grows 0.3% in June, Beating Forecasts
The United Kingdom’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose by 0.3% in June, surpassing market expectations of 0% growth, according to official data released today. This positive surprise signals resilience in the British economy despite ongoing headwinds.
What Drove the Unexpected Growth?
While the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has yet to provide a detailed breakdown, the stronger-than-expected figure suggests broad-based gains across key sectors. Economists had anticipated stagnation, making this outperformance particularly notable. The services sector, which dominates UK output, likely contributed significantly, alongside potential rebounds in manufacturing and construction.
Implications for the UK Economy
This growth reading comes at a critical juncture. The Bank of England has been navigating a delicate balance between curbing inflation and supporting economic expansion. A stronger GDP print may reduce the urgency for further rate cuts, but policymakers will remain cautious given the uncertain global outlook.
For businesses and consumers, the data offers a glimmer of optimism. However, economists caution against overinterpreting a single month’s figure. Monthly GDP data can be volatile, and the underlying trend remains moderate.
What This Means for You
For households, sustained growth can translate into better job security and wage prospects. For investors, it may signal improved corporate earnings potential. Yet, the path forward remains clouded by geopolitical tensions and domestic policy shifts.
Conclusion
The UK economy’s 0.3% expansion in June, against expectations of no growth, provides a welcome boost. While it does not guarantee a robust recovery, it indicates that the economy is more resilient than feared. Policymakers and market watchers will now focus on upcoming data to assess whether this momentum can be sustained.
FAQs
Q1: What is GDP and why does it matter? GDP measures the total value of goods and services produced in a country. It is a key indicator of economic health, influencing policy decisions, investment, and consumer confidence.
Q2: How often is UK GDP data released? The ONS publishes GDP estimates monthly and quarterly. Monthly figures offer a short-term snapshot, while quarterly data provide a more stable trend.
Q3: What does ‘MoM’ mean in this context? MoM stands for month-over-month, comparing economic output from June to the previous month (May). This highlights short-term momentum.
This post UK Economy Grows 0.3% in June, Beating Forecasts first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldYen Intervention: MUFG Says Focus Shifts to Policy Signals
The Japanese yen’s recent intervention-driven rebound has shifted market focus to the Bank of Japan’s policy trajectory, according to MUFG analysts, as investors weigh the sustainability of the currency’s recovery against monetary policy signals.
Intervention Impact and Market Response
Japan’s Ministry of Finance intervened in the foreign exchange market in late April and early May, spending roughly ¥9.8 trillion to support the yen, which had fallen to a 34-year low beyond 160 per dollar. The intervention helped the yen strengthen to around 151 by mid-May, but MUFG notes that the currency’s direction now depends on policy actions rather than further official buying.
MUFG’s analysis suggests that the intervention provided a temporary floor, but sustained yen strength requires the Bank of Japan to signal a credible path toward policy normalization. The BOJ ended its negative interest rate policy in March, yet markets remain skeptical about the pace of future hikes, given the fragile economic recovery.
Policy Focus and BOJ Signals
According to MUFG, the market’s attention has turned to the BOJ’s communication and its quarterly outlook report, due in July. The bank’s summary of opinions from its April meeting showed policymakers debating the timing of further rate increases, with some members calling for a gradual approach to avoid disrupting markets.
MUFG highlights that the BOJ’s policy stance is now the primary driver for the yen. The bank’s governor, Kazuo Ueda, has emphasized that monetary policy will remain accommodative until inflation sustainably hits the 2% target, which complicates near-term yen support. This contrasts with the Federal Reserve’s higher-for-longer rates, keeping the interest rate differential wide and pressuring the yen.
What This Means for Traders and the Economy
For traders, the intervention has introduced a new layer of uncertainty. MUFG warns that while intervention can trigger short-term moves, it does not change the underlying fundamentals. The yen’s fate hinges on whether the BOJ can convince markets of its commitment to normalizing policy, and on US economic data that could shift Fed expectations.
For the Japanese economy, a stable yen is crucial for import prices and consumer spending. A weaker yen has inflated costs for energy and food, squeezing households and complicating the BOJ’s inflation outlook. The government’s intervention reflects concern over the economic impact of excessive currency volatility.
Conclusion
MUFG’s assessment underscores a pivotal moment for the yen. The intervention provided a temporary buffer, but the currency’s trajectory now rests on the Bank of Japan’s policy signals and global monetary conditions. Investors should monitor BOJ communications and US economic data for the next directional cue, as the yen remains highly sensitive to policy expectations.
FAQs
Q1: What did MUFG say about the yen intervention? MUFG stated that after the intervention, the market’s focus has shifted to the Bank of Japan’s policy signals. The intervention provided a temporary floor, but sustained yen strength requires a credible policy normalization path.
Q2: How much did Japan spend on the intervention? Japan’s Ministry of Finance spent approximately ¥9.8 trillion in late April and early May to support the yen, according to official data.
Q3: What factors will determine the yen’s future direction? The yen’s direction will be influenced by the Bank of Japan’s policy communications and actual rate hikes, as well as US economic data and Federal Reserve policy expectations, which affect the interest rate differential.
This post Yen Intervention: MUFG Says Focus Shifts to Policy Signals first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBinance CSO: Quantum Computing Not an Immediate Threat to Crypto Holders
Binance Chief Security Officer Jimmy Su has moved to calm concerns that quantum computing could soon undermine the cryptographic foundations of blockchain networks, stating that the technology does not yet pose an immediate threat to cryptocurrency holders. In a recent Q&A, Su addressed growing speculation within the crypto community about the potential for quantum machines to break the encryption that secures digital assets.
Context: The Quantum Computing Debate
Quantum computing has long been a topic of both fascination and anxiety in the tech world. Unlike classical computers, which use bits, quantum computers use qubits, allowing them to process complex calculations at unprecedented speeds. This has led to fears that, once sufficiently advanced, quantum machines could crack the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) and RSA encryption algorithms that underpin most blockchain networks, potentially allowing malicious actors to forge transactions or access private keys.
However, Su emphasized that the current state of quantum computing remains far from achieving this capability. While significant milestones have been reached in recent years, such as Google’s 2019 claim of quantum supremacy and IBM’s roadmap for larger quantum processors, the technology is still in its infancy. Error rates, qubit stability, and the sheer scale required to break real-world encryption remain formidable obstacles.
“The technology has not yet advanced to a level that would immediately threaten user assets,” Su said, according to the Q&A transcript. “The key is to prepare in advance before the environment changes.” This sentiment echoes the broader industry consensus that while quantum computing is a long-term concern, it is not a present-day emergency.
Real-World Threats: Phishing and Malware
Su also redirected attention to the more immediate dangers facing crypto users. He stressed that the practical risks users face every day are phishing, malware, social media deception, account theft, and poor wallet management. These threats, he noted, are the main current causes of actual fund losses, far outweighing any hypothetical quantum attack.
Phishing attacks, for instance, have become increasingly sophisticated, with scammers creating fake websites, sending fraudulent emails, and impersonating customer support agents to trick users into revealing their private keys or seed phrases. Malware, such as clipboard hijackers that replace a user’s wallet address with an attacker’s, also remains a common vector for theft. Social media deception, including giveaway scams and impersonation of influential figures, continues to exploit human trust.
Why This Matters to Crypto Users
Understanding the distinction between theoretical and practical risks is crucial for anyone holding digital assets. While it is wise to stay informed about technological developments like quantum computing, the most effective way to protect one’s funds is to focus on basic security hygiene. This includes using hardware wallets, enabling two-factor authentication, avoiding suspicious links, and double-checking wallet addresses before making transactions.
Su’s comments serve as a reminder that the crypto industry is still largely vulnerable to social engineering and user error. As the ecosystem grows, so too does the sophistication of attacks targeting individuals, making education and awareness essential components of security.
Conclusion
In summary, Binance’s Chief Security Officer has provided a measured perspective on the quantum computing threat, affirming that it is not an immediate danger to crypto holders. Instead, the industry’s most pressing security challenges remain rooted in everyday cyber threats and user behavior. By prioritizing robust security practices and staying vigilant against common attack vectors, users can better safeguard their assets in the near term, while the industry continues to prepare for future technological shifts.
FAQs
Q1: Can quantum computers break Bitcoin’s encryption? Currently, no. Quantum computers lack the scale and stability to break the elliptic curve cryptography used in Bitcoin. Experts estimate that a quantum computer with millions of qubits would be needed, far beyond today’s capabilities.
Q2: What is the most common way people lose cryptocurrency? According to security experts, the most common causes are phishing attacks, malware, social engineering, and mistakes like sharing private keys or sending funds to wrong addresses. These account for the vast majority of reported losses.
Q3: Should crypto holders worry about quantum computing? Not immediately, but it is prudent to follow developments. The industry is already exploring quantum-resistant cryptography, and users can prepare by staying informed and adopting good security habits in the meantime.
This post Binance CSO: Quantum Computing Not an Immediate Threat to Crypto Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.