飞哥BNB
290 Posts
飞哥BNB
期待你的关注😊😊😊，只买妖币😏
Open Trade
ALLO Holder
Frequent Trader
5.5 Months
8 Following
144 Followers
167 Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
PINNED
I think it should be useful.
CZ
·
--
(Chinese version below)
Too many people try to over-interpret “what does it mean?”
I was testing Trust Wallet today. And saw too many meme coins in the wallet clustering the interface, to the point it was hard for me to find BNB, so I tried to burn some tokens. Even that caused many community discussions.
Then I realized that I will never be able to “clean out” meme coins on the address. The more I burn them, the more people will send meme coins to the address.
The natural transparency of the blockchain means any interaction with this address will be over-interpreted by the community.
I even thought of requesting the Trust Wallet team to implement an “Ignore Coin” feature to avoid the clutter, but that feature will not be needed by 99.99% of people.
Here is the plan: I will donate/send the BNB and 币安人生 (that was bought using BNB) tokens to Giggle Academy. Then I will stop using this address. It will effectively be a burn address.
Too many people try to over-interpret “what does it mean?"
I was testing @TrustWallet today. I found that there were too many meme coins in the wallet—so many that it was even hard for me to find BNB—so I tried to burn some tokens. Even this action triggered a lot of community discussions.
I realized that I will never be able to “clean out” the meme coins on this address. The more I burn, the more people will send meme coins to the address.
The transparency of the blockchain means that any actions involving this address will be over-interpreted by the community.
I even considered asking the Trust Wallet team to add a feature called “Ignore Coin” to avoid the clutter in the interface, but this feature is something that 99.99% of people won’t need at all.
So the plan is as follows: I will donate/send the BNB and the “币安人生” tokens (bought with BNB) to Giggle Academy. After that, I will stop using this address, turning it into a burn address.
Too many people try to over-interpret “what does it mean?”
I was testing Trust Wallet today. And saw too many meme coins in the wallet clustering the interface, to the point it was hard for me to find BNB, so I tried to burn some tokens. Even that caused many community discussions.
Then I realized that I will never be able to “clean out” meme coins on the address. The more I burn them, the more people will send meme coins to the address.
The natural transparency of the blockchain means any interaction with this address will be over-interpreted by the community.
I even thought of requesting the Trust Wallet team to implement an “Ignore Coin” feature to avoid the clutter, but that feature will not be needed by 99.99% of people.
Here is the plan: I will donate/send the BNB and 币安人生 (that was bought using BNB) tokens to Giggle Academy. Then I will stop using this address. It will effectively be a burn address.
Too many people try to over-interpret “what does it mean?"
I was testing @TrustWallet today. I found that there were too many meme coins in the wallet—so many that it was even hard for me to find BNB—so I tried to burn some tokens. Even this action triggered a lot of community discussions.
I realized that I will never be able to “clean out” the meme coins on this address. The more I burn, the more people will send meme coins to the address.
The transparency of the blockchain means that any actions involving this address will be over-interpreted by the community.
I even considered asking the Trust Wallet team to add a feature called “Ignore Coin” to avoid the clutter in the interface, but this feature is something that 99.99% of people won’t need at all.
So the plan is as follows: I will donate/send the BNB and the “币安人生” tokens (bought with BNB) to Giggle Academy. After that, I will stop using this address, turning it into a burn address.
30D trade $AIO7.5K USDT
Alright, the dealer can bear more than I can, and it’s another day of missing the sale…$AIO
#sellmiss
#sellmiss
Verified
Using someone else’s knife to kill666
Zhao Changpeng’s address “destroyed” 4,444 “bull comes”? Don’t get fooled!
The token creator first mints 1 billion, then proactively stuffs 800 million into CZ’s publicly listed address, and later secretly uses contract permissions to call transferFrom to forcibly pull 4,444 tokens from the CZ address and throw them into a black hole—throughout the entire process, CZ had zero authorization and performed zero actions.
From the surface, it looks like CZ is dumping; in reality, it’s the project team using CZ as a tool—staging a performance to hype and build momentum for their own mediocre coin by borrowing a top-tier traffic address, then reaping the harvest.
#cz销毁
Zhao Changpeng’s address “destroyed” 4,444 “bull comes”? Don’t get fooled!
The token creator first mints 1 billion, then proactively stuffs 800 million into CZ’s publicly listed address, and later secretly uses contract permissions to call transferFrom to forcibly pull 4,444 tokens from the CZ address and throw them into a black hole—throughout the entire process, CZ had zero authorization and performed zero actions.
From the surface, it looks like CZ is dumping; in reality, it’s the project team using CZ as a tool—staging a performance to hype and build momentum for their own mediocre coin by borrowing a top-tier traffic address, then reaping the harvest.
#cz销毁
It seems that from now on, market makers will have to move over to decentralized exchanges. If you cause trouble on centralized exchanges, you’ll be sanctioned.$ASTER
#去中心化
#去中心化
It looks like the price I set for this order $AKE 0.008 is still too low. Let's wait for it to drop further, just like $SYN .
飞哥BNB
·
--
BearishThese $AKE and $SYN are the same, so you just need to plug in the pin, you know? I can’t really say whether my pending order price is higher or lower, you decide and take a look.
An eight-year “rat poison” takes effect: Buffett’s curse or Trump’s warning bell?
In 2018, at Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder meeting, Buffett delivered that infamous verdict—Bitcoin is “the square of rat poison.”
His logic was as cold as Omaha in winter: companies can make money, farms can produce food—what can Bitcoin produce? Nothing at all. It only relies on the next sucker to take the bag. Munger, even more cutting, added: “This is trading in… feces.”
Eight years later, in August 2026, the toxicity of the “rat poison” is finally starting to show.
The latest financial report from Trump Media Group (DJT) shows that in the first half of the year, its crypto-asset holdings recorded an on-book loss of over $360 million. Its Bitcoin exposure has been slashed significantly, and it has more thoroughly terminated its cooperation with Crypto.com’s CRO treasury. The official wording is very polished: “Changes in market conditions and business priorities.”
Translated plainly: they can’t take it anymore.
The ironic contrast is right in front of us—
On the left: a 94-year-old Buffett, still with not a single btc in his wallet, calmly watching the drama unfold;
On the right: the Trump camp that once proudly waved the banner of a “crypto superpower” is quietly slipping out the back door.
Is this a tactical retreat, or a death signal that the cycle has peaked?
When DJT’s stop-loss announcement and Buffett’s prediction from eight years ago appear in the news feed at the same time, the phrase “rat poison” sounds, in the end, like the brilliance of a prophet—or like a chorus of gleeful schadenfreude?
Who will be the next one to buy this “tulip”?
In 2018, at Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder meeting, Buffett delivered that infamous verdict—Bitcoin is “the square of rat poison.”
His logic was as cold as Omaha in winter: companies can make money, farms can produce food—what can Bitcoin produce? Nothing at all. It only relies on the next sucker to take the bag. Munger, even more cutting, added: “This is trading in… feces.”
Eight years later, in August 2026, the toxicity of the “rat poison” is finally starting to show.
The latest financial report from Trump Media Group (DJT) shows that in the first half of the year, its crypto-asset holdings recorded an on-book loss of over $360 million. Its Bitcoin exposure has been slashed significantly, and it has more thoroughly terminated its cooperation with Crypto.com’s CRO treasury. The official wording is very polished: “Changes in market conditions and business priorities.”
Translated plainly: they can’t take it anymore.
The ironic contrast is right in front of us—
On the left: a 94-year-old Buffett, still with not a single btc in his wallet, calmly watching the drama unfold;
On the right: the Trump camp that once proudly waved the banner of a “crypto superpower” is quietly slipping out the back door.
Is this a tactical retreat, or a death signal that the cycle has peaked?
When DJT’s stop-loss announcement and Buffett’s prediction from eight years ago appear in the news feed at the same time, the phrase “rat poison” sounds, in the end, like the brilliance of a prophet—or like a chorus of gleeful schadenfreude?
Who will be the next one to buy this “tulip”?
30D trade $INX5.8K USDT
Hero's Twilight
30D trade $我踏马来了3.2K USDT
$ASTER yet again destroyed, at this pace $ASTER by the end of the year the bull market could be poised to break through one dollar!
30D trade $INX5.8K USDT
It feels like every one of these positions is a loss, and it’s so uncomfortable—my daily profit gets withdrawn 😮💨
$ZKP $INX $ALLO
$ZKP $INX $ALLO
Whose users, whose heartache; whose users, whose protection.
This bg pin insertion is really too strong—$TUT 0.2 USD inserted into 1 USD. Let’s see how Brother Jia Yin handles it and responds.
This bg pin insertion is really too strong—$TUT 0.2 USD inserted into 1 USD. Let’s see how Brother Jia Yin handles it and responds.
$TST it turns out the coin sent the other day was to create hype for it; the effect has been pretty good, it’s rallied so much.
Log in to explore more content