There's really no point in getting jealous about how much others are making, how deep their pockets are, or how insane their ROI is, or even if they just happened to catch the right wave.
In investing, whether it's a year or a couple of years, the differences can be pretty glaring—you might see someone flipping their portfolio overnight, while others struggle for years; some stack profits with big capital, while others ride crazy gains like they’re using cheats. But once you stretch your view to five years, ten years, or even longer, those apparent disparities often get smoothed out by time.
Luck might score you a bargain, but eventually, you’ll pay the price for not having the right insight; leveraging your wins can backfire, and a single sharp market shakeup could wipe out both your principal and interest; the hype driven by bull runs will eventually settle back to your real level.
There’s no shortage of bright examples that eventually dim—some were once unstoppable, only to later suffer huge losses; others shone in one bull market but vanished in the next bear; and then there are those who bet big and crashed because of the same reckless courage.
So the hardest part of investing has never been about how explosive your annual returns are, but rather, after many years, can you still stand firm in this game?
Everyone has their own rhythm; some harvest early, while others awaken later; some rise before crashing, while others endure before winning. What really matters isn’t whether you rode a specific wave, but whether you can continuously refine yourself, dodge those potentially deadly pitfalls, protect your capital, and maintain your mindset.
At the end of the day, investing isn’t about short-term bursts of strength; it’s about whether you can withstand the cyclical ups and downs, remaining in the game when the noise dies down.
So there’s really no need to envy anyone; someone else’s harvest is their own rhythm, and your own accumulation is your own destination.
Everyone has their own trajectory; there are no shortcuts in life, because if you skip even a little, you won’t make it out.
It seems like I finally understand why ETH’s fund inflows have suddenly become so large recently—and even more strong than BTC, while also being more stable.
疯狂的Jerrick
·
--
Yesterday, ETH still had net inflows to new highs, but today it has changed direction downward following the same rhythm as BTC. This is not a good sign. $BTC
Why I’m looking at candlestick charts less and ETF fund flows more
Recently, a lot of people have been asking: Why isn’t BTC rising? Why is ETH starting to get stronger? Why does SOL always have someone to take the other side? Is HYPE the next big opportunity? If you look only at candlestick charts, it’s hard to find the answer. But if you put the BTC, ETH, SOL, and Hyperliquid ETF fund flows together, you’ll notice a very clear institutional fund-migration route. ETF flows—at its core, it’s Wall Street casting votes every day with real money. And in many cases, price is just the result of fund flows. Layer one: BTC—institutions are beginning to enter a waiting-and-seeing phase Recently, the data on the BTC ETF has been extremely thought-provoking.
Yesterday, ETH still had net inflows to new highs, but today it has changed direction downward following the same rhythm as BTC. This is not a good sign. $BTC
It looks like the U.S. and Iran are going to keep fighting. And it also looks like oil isn’t about to turn and drop either. I want to get in on this trade more.
"We’ll probably hit them again tonight."(今晚我们可能还会打。) Many people think: “Probably” means it’s uncertain. But if you’re familiar with Trump, you’d know: when he really doesn’t want to strike, he often says: We’ll see. I don’t know. We’ll think about it. And today he said: Probably Note: the military is already ready.
GPT-5.6 SOL, TERRA, LUNA— just from the names alone, they sound really “valuable”! Is it planning to use AI to trade cryptocurrencies, or does AI models are also starting to play with “decentralization”?
Don’t tell me that if the model crashes, it’ll also come up with something like “algorithmic stablecoins”—that would be really exciting! So, will it be that every time OpenAI releases a new model, SOL has to go up along with it? What do you think?
Will the main forces keep scanning back and forth with liquidity on both sides? I think that’s very likely. Everyone has already de-mythologized the idea of the US striking Iran. The decline is just a matter of momentum.
Why are they called the same thing? Apple Token Tesla Token Nvidia Token Some people hold real shares; others only have economic rights; some even buy only a price symbol. Don’t wait until a platform has problems to find out what you actually bought. Save this diagram for later.
MSTR bought a total of 2,225 bitcoins last Monday, the highest purchase volume in the past six weeks. Last week it only bought 1,361 as well, meaning this week is essentially double compared to last week. Investors still have a slight improvement in sentiment toward BTC after the modest rebound.
From the charts as well, you can see that investors’ enthusiasm for buying BTC in an uptrend is always much higher than their enthusiasm for buying BTC in a downtrend.
Although I just saw both MSTR’s stock price and the big coin fall quite a bit, for the coming week, my view is still that BTC will continue to trade sideways but trend upward.
So not reliable—this is unbelievable! The first time I’ve seen a news story where the president supports the players because they’re suspended! So can we bet that the U.S. team will advance?!