The Cryptonomist

Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky faces a permanent ban from New York’s financial industries and up to $35 million in conditional payments under a legal settlement secured by Attorney General Letitia James on October 9, 2026. The agreement adds state penalties to his federal fraud conviction and 12-year prison sentence.
Key takeaways
Mashinsky is permanently excluded from New York’s securities, commodities and cryptocurrency industries.
The settlement’s payments depend on federal forfeiture and completion of his prison sentence.
Celsius bankruptcy distributions exceeded $3.4 billion as of August.
According to CoinDesk, the agreement settles the state’s civil case against Mashinsky, whom James sued in 2023. She accused him of giving hundreds of thousands of investors false assurances about the safety of deposits held at Celsius, including those of more than 26,000 New Yorkers.
The former Celsius CEO’s legal settlement sets conditional payments
The settlement requires Mashinsky to pay New York $25 million if he does not surrender $10 million in ill-gotten gains to the federal government, according to the attorney general’s office. A separate $10 million payment applies if he fails to complete his prison sentence.
Alongside those financial conditions, the agreement permanently prohibits him from working in New York’s securities, commodities and cryptocurrency industries. The permanent industry ban is part of the state settlement, separate from his federal criminal punishment.
Fraud allegations and federal punishment
After entering a guilty plea on charges tied to securities and commodities fraud, Mashinsky is now serving a 12-year federal prison sentence. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission also permanently barred him from commodities activity in June.
The state’s allegations centered on how he represented the lender’s safety. James said he misled investors, including more than 26,000 New Yorkers, about the security of their Celsius deposits.
Celsius bankruptcy recovery exceeds $3.4 billion
Customers and creditors had received more than $3.4 billion through Celsius bankruptcy proceedings as of August, James said. The lender stopped customer withdrawals in June 2022, then sought bankruptcy protection in July 2022.
When Celsius emerged from bankruptcy in 2024, it had planned approximately $3 billion in distributions comprising cryptocurrency and cash. That plan used Coinbase and PayPal to handle payments.
James challenges Celsius’ safety claims
James said Mashinsky presented Celsius as safer than a bank even as the lender pursued risky strategies with customer assets and hid losses. Those representations were part of her account of how investors were misled.
“I will not allow scammers to use cryptocurrencies to prey on unsuspecting New Yorkers,” James said.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

Tether temporarily froze approximately 1.45 million USDT in four THORChain vault addresses on TRON on October 9, 2026, interrupting swaps and related functions. The blacklist lasted about three hours before all four addresses were released, with their balances intact.
Wu Blockchain, citing The Defiant, reported that THORChain suspended TRON-related swaps and certain functions during the freeze, then restored the affected services after the reversal. THORChain co-founder Chad Barraford said the team had received no advance notice from Tether.
How Tether’s USDT freeze on TRON halted swaps
The blacklisting prevented the affected vaults from transferring USDT, disrupting the pooled assets used to support cross-chain trades. Crypto Briefing reported that TRON-based swaps and liquidity-provider operations went offline almost immediately after the action.
THORChain allows users to exchange native assets across different blockchains without wrapping them or handing them to a centralized exchange. Its vaults hold the pooled assets needed for those transactions.
Tether’s USDT freeze on TRON operated through the token contract’s addBlackList function, Crypto Briefing explained. That control prevents a listed address from sending USDT. In this incident, the tokens remained in the vaults while their movement was blocked.
The reversal covered all four THORChain addresses after about three hours. It did not clear the entire batch: another 19 addresses blacklisted alongside the vaults remained on the blacklist at the time of the report.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

Reports of Ledger hardware wallet theft have prompted an investigation into devices sold by CryptoBilis in Southeast Asia, with the manufacturer asking the reseller to suspend sales and shipments. Separately, onchain investigator Specter estimated losses of more than $86 million across hundreds of wallets.
According to Wu Blockchain, Ledger advised customers who purchased devices from CryptoBilis within the past 90 days not to initialize them. Customers who have already completed setup should consider transferring their assets to a new Ledger signer with a newly generated seed phrase.
The investigation and Specter’s estimate were reported on October 9, 2026. CoinDesk reported that the loss figure had not been independently confirmed. There is currently no evidence of a direct compromise of Ledger’s hardware wallets or core infrastructure.
Ledger hardware wallet theft reports point to suspected supply-chain attack
CZ described a single-vendor supply-chain attack as the apparent explanation, based on information available so far. He said a small number of users likely bought fake or tampered Ledger devices. That assessment is not a confirmed finding about how the funds were taken.
Specter’s investigation followed user reports on X and Reddit. The investigator traced suspicious addresses that received funds from hundreds of victim wallets on Ethereum, TRON and Bitcoin, putting estimated aggregate losses above $86 million.
Unchained, in a report carried by Yahoo, said Specter listed 10 addresses. Those addresses held more than $25 million at the last check, suggesting that most of the funds had already moved.
The Security Alliance asked people whose funds were drained to the listed addresses to contact it through the SEAL 911 Telegram bot. CZ added that the wider industry, along with those involved in the BNB ecosystem, would assist in tracking down and recovering the stolen funds.
Ledger said it would keep customers informed as its investigation progresses. Its request to CryptoBilis covers both sales and shipments of Ledger devices.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

EU-Kryptoplattformen haben bis zum 8. Januar 2027 Zeit, Kundenbestände an nicht zugelassenen Stablecoins abzubauen. Dies geht aus den am 8. Oktober veröffentlichten Leitlinien der Europäischen Wertpapier- und Marktaufsichtsbehörde (ESMA) hervor. Der Zeitplan für die Durchsetzung der EU-Stablecoin-Regulierung räumt Unternehmen bis zu drei Monate ein, um ihre entsprechenden Bestände abzubauen. In der Zwischenzeit müssen sie Dienste einstellen, über die Kunden weitere betroffene Token erwerben können.
Wichtigste Erkenntnisse
ESMA setzt eine Frist von drei Monaten für den Abbau nicht zugelassener Stablecoin-Bestände.
USDT und PayPal USD sind nicht gemäß MiCA zugelassen.

Die Humana-Aktie zeigt im Tageschart ein neutrales Bild: Der Schlusskurs am Donnerstag lag mit $387.12 unter der 20-Tage-EMA, aber über der 50-Tage-EMA. Der Stundenchart sorgt für zusätzlichen Abwärtsdruck.
Am Donnerstag, dem 8. Oktober 2026, eröffnete Humana bei $396.03, bewegte sich zwischen einem Tief von $375.86 und einem Hoch von $399.19 und schloss bei $387.12; der vorherige Schlusskurs hatte bei $396.51 gelegen. Das Handelsvolumen betrug 2,658,300 Aktien. Kurse und technische Indikatoren stammen von Twelve Data.
HUM — Tageschart mit Kerzen, EMA20/EMA50 und Volumen.
Die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse

The NFL is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to let states police sports wagers on platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket, challenging the federal government’s claim to exclusive authority. In a brief filed on October 8, 2026, the league argued that regulation of prediction markets needs stronger protections against manipulation and betting by people younger than 21.
Key takeaways
The NFL backs state oversight of sports prediction markets.
Federal courts have split over the CFTC’s exclusive authority.
Kalshi and the CFTC dispute the NFL’s account of their engagement.
According to CoinDesk, the NFL joined state governments, tribes, former regulator Gary Gensler and former Senator Chris Dodd in opposing exclusive federal oversight. New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to hear its dispute with Kalshi and resolve who can regulate these markets.
The NFL argues that sports prediction contracts amount to gambling, rather than financial swaps governed solely by federal authorities. The league told CNBC it is not opposed to prediction markets but considers the states better equipped to oversee them, given the federal regulator’s resource constraints.
NFL challenges federal prediction market regulation
The NFL’s brief argues that federal oversight provides fewer safeguards than state gambling regulation. It says the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, has not imposed standards as demanding as those enforced by state gaming authorities.
The league wants restrictions on contracts involving outcomes a single athlete can influence, such as a field goal attempt. It also objects to trades involving officiating, player injuries and information knowable before a game, including its first play. The NFL wants platforms to cooperate on prohibited bettor lists.
Age limits are another dividing line. Most states require sportsbook customers to be at least 21, while Kalshi accepts customers as young as 18, CNBC reported. The NFL says neither the CFTC nor prediction market companies have adopted its requested age floor or banned categories of bets vulnerable to manipulation.
The NFL told CNBC that football generated $1.8 billion in prediction market trading on the season’s first Sunday, more than half of total volume. Separately, The Athletic cited Ticker Tracker data showing NFL trading represented 65.8% of Kalshi’s sports volume on the Sunday preceding the filing.
Conflicting court rulings divide federal and state authority
One federal court has supported Kalshi’s position that the CFTC is its sole regulator, while two others have backed state authority. The CFTC maintains that its jurisdiction over exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket overrides state powers.
The Athletic reported that 20 states have challenged prediction markets in court. 39 states filed an amicus brief supporting New Jersey’s case on Wednesday. Tribal nations and organizations submitted their own brief on Thursday, seeking application of tribal gaming laws.
Dodd, a sponsor of the Dodd-Frank Act on which the CFTC bases its position, disputed that reading of the law. He wrote that it “did not set out to authorize nationwide sports betting through derivatives markets or displace decades of state and tribal primacy over gaming regulation.”
Kalshi and the CFTC contest the NFL’s account
Kalshi and the CFTC say they have sought engagement with the NFL on market integrity, challenging the league’s account of unanswered requests. Kalshi spokesperson Elisabeth Diana said: “We have consistently tried to engage proactively and constructively with the NFL to collaborate on market integrity with no response.”
Kalshi also told CNBC that the CFTC can police sports-related event contracts and that its ongoing rulemaking addresses many of the league’s concerns.
CFTC public affairs director Brooke Nethercott told The Athletic that the agency had engaged with the NFL “since day one.” She said the league declined a memorandum of understanding that would have enabled greater cooperation and information sharing.
The NFL urged prompt Supreme Court action, warning in its brief: “Billions of dollars will be bet on NFL games through prediction markets each season, and any delay from the court will result in increasing consumer harm and risk to game integrity.”
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

LSEG’s agreement with CMC Markets expands the trading and investing business’s access to financial data, news and analytics under a multi-year strategic deal. The partnership supports CMC’s multi-asset offering and its plans to develop products, enter markets and grow institutional and B2B relationships.
According to Finextra, the agreement broadens access to pricing and other financial information while giving CMC access to AI-ready content for future applications and workflows.
LSEG and CMC Markets agreement broadens data access
The agreement strengthens the data infrastructure supporting CMC’s multi-asset offering. Its expanded coverage includes real-time and delayed pricing, reference data, corporate actions data, news and analytical content.
The partnership is intended to provide more consistent, standardised financial information as CMC scales its business. That support extends to the development of new products, expansion into new markets and growth in institutional and B2B partnerships.
Data partnership supports technology-led growth
The agreement between LSEG and CMC Markets forms part of CMC’s strategy to build a more diversified, technology-led financial services business. Scalable infrastructure connects its trading, investing and institutional capabilities.
Access to LSEG’s AI-ready content adds a foundation for developing future AI-enabled applications and workflows across the business. The agreement also combines financial data and analytics with flexible access and specialist expertise to support CMC’s expansion.
Executives link broader access to scaling the business
Both businesses’ executives framed the partnership around CMC’s growth and diversification. Chris Coleman, LSEG’s Group Head of Sales and Account Management, said the combination of data, analytics and specialist support would help CMC scale, develop new client propositions and pursue innovation.
Lord Peter Cruddas, CMC Markets’ Founder and Chief Executive Officer, described the data provider as an important strategic partner. He said the agreement with LSEG would give CMC Markets greater capability for its next phase of growth.
“As CMC continues to grow and diversify, having the right data and technology behind the business is critical to how quickly and effectively we can scale,” Cruddas said. He also said broader access to trusted financial data would help the business move faster and strengthen the experience it delivers to clients.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

Die Übertragung von 12.267 BTC durch die US-Regierung, im Wert von rund 1,01 Milliarden US-Dollar, brachte Bitcoin, die bei dem Bitfinex-Hack von 2016 beschlagnahmt worden waren, in neue, nicht gekennzeichnete Wallets. Die am 8. Oktober 2026 gemeldeten Transfers lieferten keine Hinweise auf einen Verkauf und schienen eher auf eine Neuordnung der Wallets hinzudeuten.
Laut CoinDesk, das sich auf Daten von Arkham berief, stammten die Bitcoins aus einer Wallet mit Geldern, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Hack beschlagnahmt worden waren. Eine Transaktion ging an eine neue Adresse, eine zweite an eine andere Adresse. Für diese Transfers wurde keine Einzahlung bei einer Börse verzeichnet.

CaixaBank’s collaboration with Google Cloud will run until 2033, with the bank planning to deploy AI agents that help employees process financial information and automate routine work. The expanded agreement brings together artificial intelligence, data management and cloud infrastructure as part of the bank’s digital transformation.
Key takeaways
The agreement extends an alliance established in 2023.
Gemini Enterprise will support the bank’s AI agent deployment.
The programme combines data analytics, hybrid infrastructure, security and staff training.
As Finextra reports, the deal aims to streamline operations, aid employee decision-making and enable more tailored products and services for the bank’s millions of customers.
CaixaBank extends its Google Cloud collaboration to 2033
The extended partnership builds on an alliance that began in 2023. Its goals include integrating AI and data tools across the business while strengthening the infrastructure that supports them.
Three key areas anchor CaixaBank’s partnership with Google Cloud: data analytics and agentic AI, hybrid infrastructure and security, and staff training. The programme pairs technology deployment with support for employees who will use those tools in their daily work.
Gemini Enterprise will support financial analysis and routine work
CaixaBank will deploy Gemini Enterprise, Google Cloud’s platform for creating, governing and deploying AI agents. Teams will use these capabilities to condense complex financial information, automate repetitive tasks and improve everyday workflows.
Specialised agents will also help employees organise and classify documents, summarise detailed content and speed up internal decision-making. The bank plans to use advanced analytics and AI to extract useful insights from large repositories of data.
These applications are intended to reduce the time employees spend on routine information handling and improve how the organisation uses its data.
Hybrid infrastructure, security and staff training
The agreement will connect CaixaBank’s private environment with Google Cloud’s secure infrastructure, aiming to strengthen system resilience, expand capacity and improve service availability. It also includes advanced threat detection and security monitoring.
Those security capabilities will operate under the bank’s existing governance, security and privacy arrangements. The infrastructure work forms part of CaixaBank’s collaboration with Google Cloud as the bank’s technology requirements evolve.
The workforce programme includes specialised professional services, joint initiatives and training courses. These activities will equip teams to incorporate AI and data tools into their daily tasks while keeping their use aligned with the bank’s governance principles.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

Six lines of server-log text pushed an AI guardrail’s rate of allowing prohibited actions from 0% to 63% in a study posted on October 8, 2026. The research examines typed decision model vulnerabilities, including an attack that changed an option’s name while leaving its definition and the text being judged untouched.
Key takeaways
Seven open-weight models scored 36%–72% on allow-or-block decisions.
Misleading option labels produced 93%–100% fail-open rates in four models.
The study recommends using these models to filter reviewer workloads, not make decisions alone.
Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo reported the findings in a paper published on arXiv. The evaluation tested the models as agent system guardrails across prompt-injection, jailbreak and toxic-content screening tasks.
How typed decision models act as guardrails
A typed decision model reads text and assigns probabilities to options defined by its caller, without generating text. Each option has a brief written definition; in agent systems, the model assesses a proposed tool call or incoming message to determine whether to permit it.
The seven evaluated models achieved 36% to 72% accuracy on allow-or-block decisions, compared with a 50% chance level. The paper also found sharply different defaults: one model permitted nearly everything, while another blocked nearly everything.
Typed decision model vulnerabilities involve two different errors
Fail-open errors permit actions that policy prohibits, making them security vulnerabilities. Fail-closed errors reject actions that policy permits, creating operational costs instead.
The study measured these error directions separately. A low rate for either one did not necessarily indicate reliable policy enforcement: it also reflected the model’s tendency to choose a particular answer.
Log text and option names changed decisions
On a synthetic set of agent tool calls, six lines of server-log text unrelated to the policy raised a guardrail’s fail-open rate from 0% to 63%. The model had otherwise assessed that policy correctly.
A separate attack targeted the permissive option’s label. Giving it a misleading name drove fail-open rates to 93%–100% across the four models that included the label in their input. Neither the option’s definition nor the assessed text changed.
Deterministic rules and the reviewer’s role
A deterministic rule operating on typed values achieved 100% accuracy across all six policies. The paper’s recommendation was to use decision models to reduce the number of cases reaching a reviewer, rather than give them sole decision-making authority.
The study’s code is available on GitHub.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described an “absolute isolation campaign” against Iran that combines naval blockades, travel restrictions and efforts to close land routes with a plan to seize about $1 billion in cryptocurrency. He framed the Trump administration’s approach as a move beyond financial sanctions, aimed at cutting the ruling regime off from international markets, transportation and financial resources.
Key takeaways
Bessent described an Iran campaign extending beyond financial sanctions.
The administration is targeting roughly $1 billion in Iranian cryptocurrency.
Bessent predicted a complete halt to Iran’s oil exports.
Washington is working with regional partners on overland restrictions.
Yahoo News reported that Bessent detailed these measures on Thursday, when he spoke with Greta Van Susteren at Newsmax’s NPolicy Summit in Washington, D.C., addressing questions about the extent to which U.S. sanctions were tightening the squeeze on Iran’s economy.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent outlines broader isolation
Bessent described a strategy that combines financial pressure with military and maritime measures to quarantine Iran’s ruling regime. The stated goal extends beyond restricting its finances to blocking access to transportation and international markets.
“We did have a maximum pressure campaign. Now we have an absolute isolation campaign and it’s working,” he told Van Susteren.
The measures he outlined include naval blockades, restrictions on international flights and efforts to close routes over land. Bessent said the administration had already isolated Iran economically and presented the broader campaign as producing results.
Oil exports and regime officials face restrictions
Bessent predicted that the blockades and restrictions would bring Iran’s oil exports to a complete halt. He described military action and maritime blockades as parts of the effort to shut down those exports.
“For the first time ever since they started pumping oil, the history of Iran, they will have no oil on the water for sale,” he said.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also claimed the measures were creating panic within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Citing a New York Times report, he said the IRGC “is now panicking amongst themselves.”
Air travel restrictions, in his account, prevent Iranian officials and regime-connected elites from leaving for personal trips or to access money abroad. He suggested that keeping those officials inside Iran would exert psychological pressure on the leadership.
Regional cooperation and the cryptocurrency seizure plan
Washington is working with regional partners to restrict land routes while targeting Iranian assets outside the traditional banking system. Bessent identified the United Arab Emirates and Oman as cooperating partners and said the administration was working with Pakistan and Turkey on overland closures.
“UAE has been a good partner. Oman has been a good partner. We’re working with Pakistan and Turkey to cut off all the land routes,” he said.
The cryptocurrency seizure remained a prospective action in his remarks. “We’re probably gonna seize a billion dollars of crypto this week,” Bessent said.
He added that the administration knew where the cryptocurrency was located: “And, you know, we know where it is and we are isolating them.”
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

The Senate inquiry into Tether is testing a distinction: holding the assets behind USDT is not the same as controlling its transfers. Senator Richard Blumenthal’s October 8, 2026 letter asks Cantor Fitzgerald for ownership, custody and compliance records, including details of a reported 5% stake he estimates is worth about $10 billion.
Key takeaways
Cantor’s requested response deadline is October 23, 2026.
Democratic investigators reported near-exclusive USDT use in 84% of selected Iran-linked wallets.
Tether says Iran-linked freezes reached roughly $550 million during 2026.
Reserve custody and blockchain freezing are separate functions.
Per crypto.news reports, the letter from Blumenthal—who serves as the top Democrat on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations—was directed at Cantor chairman Brandon Lutnick. He seeks revenue figures, ownership terms, reserve arrangements, audits, sanctions practices and communications about Tether’s regulatory affairs.
Tether Senate inquiry examines ownership and custody income
Blumenthal wants contractual records showing what Cantor earns from Tether and what services it provides. Most requested records cover the period beginning January 2023, alongside historical details of the partnership.
Starting in 2021, Cantor took on holdings of U.S. Treasury securities that back USDT, and by 2024, while Howard Lutnick was serving as chairman and CEO, the firm secured rights to what was reported as a 5% stake in Tether. Blumenthal estimates that interest rose from $600 million to about $10 billion after President Donald Trump returned to office. The valuation comes from external reporting, not a public share price or confirmed payment.
The senator also claims Cantor earns tens of millions of dollars annually from Tether’s assets. He requests yearly payments to Cantor and the Lutnick family, client-screening policies, information received from Tether and conditions for ending the partnership.
Howard Lutnick left Cantor’s leadership after his confirmation as commerce secretary in February 2025. Brandon became chairman, and another son, Kyle, became vice chairman. Blumenthal cites more than $250 million in reported income after Trump’s return, including a $192 million distribution from Cantor; those amounts are not entirely attributable to Tether.
The letter asks about the transfer of Lutnick’s interests to his children, possible Tether financing, and communications before and after his departure involving fundraising, lobbying, regulatory compliance and federal officials.
Iran-linked wallet findings and Tether’s freeze figures
Democratic subcommittee investigators reported that 84% of 846 wallets they examined used USDT exclusively or almost exclusively. Their September 28, 2026 report covered wallets sanctioned or targeted for seizure over associations with Iran and regional proxies—not a random sample of USDT users.
The report alleges Tether failed to freeze some wallets investigators linked to illicit finance. Blumenthal referred the findings to Treasury and the Department of Justice, seeking investigations into possible violations.
In a September 28 statement, Tether said cooperation with U.S. authorities helped freeze roughly $550 million during 2026 across wallets connected to Iran’s central bank and sanctions networks. It cited more than $344 million in two addresses in April and more than $130 million in four wallets in July. Those company-reported balances do not measure prohibited transfers prevented.
Reserve custody does not confer token-freezing authority
Cantor holds reserve assets; Tether operates the controls that block specified USDT addresses on supported blockchains. The Tether Senate inquiry asks about responsibilities across those distinct functions.
A wallet-to-wallet transfer does not require movement of a Treasury security. Minting and redemption can affect reserves, while a blockchain freeze prevents a designated balance from moving through the token contract. Freezing is separate from confiscation or payment to a victim.
Financial audits also address a different question from sanctions screening. Tether reported completing its first full financial-statement audit covering 2025 after announcing a Big Four engagement in March. An unqualified historical opinion does not establish compliance for individual wallet transactions in 2026.
Records requested and the next deadline
Blumenthal requests records documenting custody arrangements, independent audits, sanctions screening and regulatory communications. The letter also directs Cantor to preserve relevant records and requests its response by October 23, 2026.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

OpenAI projects $70 billion in annual revenue by the end of 2026, but comparing Anthropic’s revenue with OpenAI’s requires attention to what each company counts. The forecast includes sales through cloud partners, unlike OpenAI’s usual accounting, while its reported annualized revenue stood at roughly $50 billion at the end of September 2026.
According to Crypto Briefing, CEO Sam Altman discussed the year-end projection on Bloomberg. The report linked his remarks to expectations for valuation growth and suggested they could influence perceptions of OpenAI’s potential IPO timing.
CNBC separately confirmed the September revenue figure. It reported that a previously circulated $68 billion figure included gross revenue from OpenAI’s partners, citing a person familiar with the matter. That accounting approach helps make the comparison with Anthropic more direct.
How Anthropic and OpenAI revenue accounting compares
OpenAI’s $70 billion projection uses an approach aligned with Anthropic’s: it includes sales through cloud partners. OpenAI typically excludes those sales from its accounting, so the forecast and its usual revenue measure use different bases.
For the Anthropic-versus-OpenAI revenue comparison, CNBC reported that Anthropic told investors its annualized revenue run rate reached $65 billion at the end of July 2026. OpenAI’s September figure and year-end projection refer to different points in time.
The same CNBC report cited an OpenAI investor presentation showing 77% total run-rate growth in the third quarter and 107% enterprise run-rate growth over that period. Those figures provide additional detail on growth alongside the headline projection.
The revenue discussion also sits against OpenAI’s $852 billion valuation and preparations for a public offering, CNBC reported. The company confidentially filed its prospectus with regulators in June 2026, and executives have signaled that they are targeting a 2027 debut.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

Bitcoin’s price drop below $81,000 triggered nearly $1.1 billion in crypto liquidations, while newer holders moved tens of thousands of BTC to exchanges at a loss. The slide reached $80,350 on Bitstamp before Bitcoin recovered to around $82,500 on Friday, October 9—a level central to its bullish reversal pattern.
Key takeaways
CoinGlass recorded $1.09 billion in liquidations over 24 hours.
Bitcoin rebounded toward the $82,500 technical threshold.
Short-term holders transferred 55,600 BTC at a loss.
According to Cointelegraph, the Bitstamp low was Bitcoin’s weakest price since September 18. Separate onchain findings from CryptoQuant contributor Amr Taha showed that loss-making exchange transfers on Thursday exceeded the tally recorded during Bitcoin’s June sell-off, despite October’s much higher price.
Bitcoin’s price drop drives liquidations above $1 billion
CoinGlass put crypto market liquidations at $1.09 billion in the 24 hours ending at 10 a.m. UTC on Friday. Long positions accounted for $1.05 billion of Thursday’s total.
That was the largest daily liquidation tally since August 21. On that occasion, Bitcoin rose from $73,000 to $79,500, reached a two-month high and triggered $1.3 billion in crypto short liquidations.
This time, Bitcoin’s price fell to $80,350 on Bitstamp as liquidations mounted across the crypto market.
The $82,500 level anchors the reversal pattern
$82,500 is the breakout point for Bitcoin’s inverse head-and-shoulders pattern. The report identified holding that level as support as a requirement for confirming the bullish reversal.
The threshold had also been important during Bitcoin’s broader uptrend since early July. Friday’s recovery brought the price back toward it after the decline.
Trader and analyst Rekt Capital, who has followed the pattern and its resemblance to Bitcoin’s 2023 recovery, described the retest as failing in a Thursday post on X. His analysis highlighted the upcoming weekly candle close as key to assessing the pattern.
Short-term holders move 55,600 BTC at a loss
Short-term Bitcoin holders transferred 55,600 BTC to exchanges at a loss on Thursday, Taha reported. The category covers entities that have held Bitcoin for up to six months without selling.
A loss-making transfer means coins reached an exchange at a price below that of their previous transaction. Such movements often reflect an impulsive exit driven by fear of further declines, the report said.
CryptoQuant’s comparison showed Thursday’s loss tally exceeded that of June 26, when Bitcoin traded below $60,000 for a second consecutive day. Taha contrasted October’s price above $81,000 with June’s $59,300—a difference exceeding 36%.
According to the report, heavy selling driven by losses has, in the past, aligned with brief periods of capitulation, which may wear out weaker holders and lay the groundwork for a rebound. Taha also cautioned that users transferring coins to exchanges did not necessarily sell their entire positions.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

Cyprus is set to welcome leading professionals, innovators, entrepreneurs, investors, and technology experts for Cyprus Fintech Week 2027, taking place on May 5, 2027, at Cypria Maris Paphos.
The event will bring together key voices from the financial technology ecosystem to explore the latest developments shaping the future of finance.
Building on Cyprus Fintech Week’s focus on financial technology, trading, digital innovation, banking, payments, digital assets, artificial intelligence, security, and financial infrastructure, the event aims to create a platform for knowledge exchange, business connections, and new opportunities.
A Platform for the Future of Finance
As financial services continue to evolve through technology and digital transformation, Cyprus Fintech Week 2027 will provide an opportunity for industry professionals to discuss emerging trends, challenges, and opportunities across the fintech landscape.
The event will bring together representatives from financial institutions, fintech companies, technology providers, startups, investment firms, entrepreneurs, and other professionals working across the financial and technology sectors.
Key areas of interest will include Fintech, Banking, Payments, Trading, Digital Assets, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Blockchain, and Digital Financial Infrastructure.
Connecting Industry Leaders and Innovators
Cyprus Fintech Week aims to encourage meaningful connections between established businesses and emerging companies while creating opportunities for collaboration, investment, and knowledge sharing.
Attendees will have the opportunity to meet industry experts, founders, investors, executives, technology professionals, and other decision-makers while gaining insights into the technologies and developments shaping the future of financial services.
The event also supports the continued growth of Cyprus as a destination for fintech, innovation, and international business. The wider Cyprus fintech ecosystem continues to develop through the growth of startups, digital payment solutions, blockchain applications, and technology-driven financial services.
An Opportunity for Businesses and Media Partners
Cyprus Fintech Week 2027 will provide businesses with opportunities to increase their visibility, connect with relevant decision-makers, and participate in conversations surrounding the future of financial technology.
Media partners like The Cryptonomist will play an important role in helping bring the event and its industry discussions to a wider audience, supporting greater awareness of Cyprus’ growing fintech ecosystem and its international potential.
The event is expected to attract professionals interested in discovering new technologies, exploring business opportunities, building partnerships, and staying informed about developments across the fintech industry.
Event Details
Event: Cyprus Fintech Week 2027
Date: May 5, 2027
Venue: Cypria Maris Paphos, Cyprus
Website: cyprusfintechweek.com
About Cyprus Fintech Week
Cyprus Fintech Week is an industry-focused event designed to connect professionals across financial technology, trading, digital innovation, banking, payments, digital assets, AI, security, and infrastructure.
The event provides a platform for industry leaders, innovators, startups, investors, and professionals to exchange knowledge, build relationships, and explore opportunities within the evolving fintech ecosystem.

Netflix’s FTX drama “The Altruists” now has a trailer, bringing Sam Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison’s relationship—and the crimes behind the exchange’s collapse—to the screen. Released on October 8, 2026, the preview introduces an eight-episode series starring Anthony Boyle and Julia Garner, premiering on November 19, 2026.
Key takeaways
All eight episodes debut together on November 19, 2026.
Anthony Boyle portrays Bankman-Fried; Julia Garner portrays Ellison.
Higher Ground, started by Barack and Michelle Obama, is among the producers.
According to CoinCentral, Netflix shared the trailer through a post on X. The story centers on Bankman-Fried, who ran FTX, and Ellison, who led its sister trading firm, Alameda Research.
Netflix’s FTX drama arrives on November 19
All eight episodes of “The Altruists” will become available on November 19, 2026, crypto.news reported, citing Netflix’s release notice. The series was first announced in May 2025 and follows the pair’s relationship and decisions before their crypto businesses collapsed.
Cast and production behind “The Altruists”
Starring as Bankman-Fried and Ellison are Anthony Boyle and Julia Garner, with Boyle known for roles in Say Nothing, Masters of the Air, Tetris and Tolkien, and Garner recognized for Netflix projects such as Ozark, Inventing Anna, Maniac and The Get Down.
Former Alameda co-chief Sam Trabucco is portrayed by Alex Lawther, and ex-FTX executive Ryan Salame is played by Matt Rife. Nishad Singh is portrayed by Karan Soni, while Gary Wang is played by Eugene Young.
Bankman-Fried’s parents, Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried, are brought to life by Paul Reiser and Robin Weigert. Ellison’s mother, Sarah Fisher Ellison, is played by Jennifer Grey, and Terry Chen takes on the role of former Binance chief Changpeng Zhao.
Among the producers is Higher Ground, the production company founded by Barack and Michelle Obama. Serving as co-showrunners, co-writers and executive producers are Graham Moore and Jacqueline Hoyt. The first episode was directed by James Ponsoldt, with the series drawing on reporting from New York Magazine.
Trial testimony and personal decisions shape the drama
Netflix’s FTX drama connects the characters’ stated charitable beliefs with their approach to risk. One trailer line describes “going all-in every time” as “the mathematically optimal strategy.”
At Bankman-Fried’s 2023 criminal trial, Ellison testified that his understanding of effective altruism—a philosophy centered on maximizing good, including generating money for charitable purposes—led him to believe that prohibitions against lying and theft did not strictly apply to him.
Moore described people who began with charitable intentions before persuading themselves to commit crimes, with dishonesty escalating from a “little white lie.” According to Hoyt, the two had pushed each other toward building a company they thought could transform the finance industry, yet their relationship ultimately played a role in bringing about its downfall.
TechCrunch quoted Moore telling Netflix: “From the very beginning, I was so fascinated by both Sam’s and Caroline’s real stories.” Moore also said the drama explores private interactions beyond publicly recorded events.
The criminal case behind the series
After collapsing, FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022, and U.S. authorities subsequently brought fraud charges against Bankman-Fried and other executives. He was found guilty by a jury on seven counts related to fraud and conspiracy, and is now serving a 25-year prison sentence.
According to a March 2024 Department of Justice sentencing release, Bankman-Fried misappropriated over $8 billion from customers, committed fraud against FTX investors totaling more than $1.7 billion, and defrauded Alameda lenders of over $1.3 billion.
The department said customer deposits financed investments, political contributions, real estate and Alameda loan repayments. Its account also described systems allowing Alameda effectively unlimited cryptocurrency withdrawals, false lender statements, inflated investor figures and backdated documents.
Three years of supervised release were ordered by Judge Lewis Kaplan, along with forfeiture exceeding $11 billion, with recovered funds authorized for victim compensation. An appeals court upheld the sentence in August 2026, rejecting Bankman-Fried’s argument about possible customer repayments.
In September 2026, Bankman-Fried requested U.S. Supreme Court review of his conviction and challenged the forfeiture amount. He separately requested a pardon from Donald Trump.
Ellison pleaded guilty and testified against him. She was released from community confinement in January 2026 after a two-year sentence and agreed to a 10-year ban on serving as an officer or director at public companies.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

As of October 9, 2026, Dogecoin price trades at $0.08534 on Binance, with hourly recovery signals clashing against a bearish daily structure. The daily regime is neutral but sits below all three daily EMAs as momentum deteriorates. This is a recovery attempt inside weak broader structure.
DOGE/USDT — daily chart with candlesticks, EMA20/EMA50 and volume.
Key takeaways
Dogecoin trades at $0.08534, below all three daily EMAs despite short-term recovery signals on the hourly chart.
Daily RSI at 38.8 shows weakness without reaching oversold territory, while the daily MACD histogram is negative and widening.
The nearest resistance is the daily Bollinger lower band at $0.08564; a daily close above it is the first recovery trigger.
Fear & Greed Index at 59 (Greed) contrasts with Dogecoin’s defensive daily structure.
All-time DEX volumes on dogechain provide no evidence of fresh demand behind the current recovery.
Dogecoin price faces $0.08564 before a broader recovery can develop
A daily close above the daily Bollinger lower band at $0.08564 is required before any broader recovery can take shape. Below price, the daily pivot at $0.08494 serves as the first support, with daily S1 at $0.08018 below that. Re-entering the daily band would improve the mean-reversion case; losing the pivot would leave the recovery without its nearest daily foothold.
Bullish scenario: A daily close above the daily Bollinger lower band at $0.08564 would establish the first recovery trigger. The next resistance is the daily EMA50 at $0.08826, followed by daily R1 at $0.08881. This scenario would be invalidated by a subsequent daily close below the daily pivot at $0.08494. Even a successful band reclaim would represent structural repair, not proof of a fully bullish trend.
The hourly snapshot is more finely balanced: price is at $0.08536, just below the hourly pivot at $0.08538, although the last completed hourly candle finished above it at $0.08541. That pivot reclaim has therefore already occurred on a completed candle and should not be presented as a pending breakout. Hourly R1 at $0.08552 is the next resistance above price.
Bearish scenario: An hourly close below hourly S1 at $0.08526 would signal failure of the immediate recovery, exposing the hourly EMA20 at $0.08520 and then the daily pivot at $0.08494. A subsequent hourly close back above the hourly pivot at $0.08538 would invalidate that breakdown setup. The wider daily downside reference remains daily S1 at $0.08018.
The likeliest false signal is a brief push through nearby hourly resistance that fails to reclaim the daily band on a completed daily candle. The tight hourly levels and much larger daily volatility make an intraday breakout less decisive than it appears.
RSI improves intraday while daily MACD pressure deepens
Short-term momentum is improving, yet the daily picture continues to weaken. Daily RSI is falling and stands at 38.8: weak, but not oversold. Hourly RSI is rising across the supplied completed readings and stands at 48.3, still below the midpoint. The 15-minute reading is rising at 60.9. Together, these readings support a short-term recovery in momentum without overturning the daily weakness.
MACD draws a sharper distinction. The daily histogram is negative and widening, showing worsening downside momentum. The hourly histogram is positive but classified as flat, so it supports stabilization rather than accelerating upside strength. On the 15-minute chart, the histogram is negative and widening despite rising RSI. That conflict makes execution-level strength less convincing: the shorter chart does not offer clean momentum confirmation.
Price remains below daily averages despite short-term support
Dogecoin trades below all three daily EMAs, keeping the broader bias bearish even as intraday signals improve. Binance-derived daily EMAs place the EMA20 at $0.09173, the EMA50 at $0.08826 and the EMA200 at $0.09010. Price is below each, but the averages are not aligned in textbook bearish order. The bearish bias comes from price location and weakening momentum, not from a fully stacked daily downtrend.
Hourly price is above the EMA20 at $0.08520 but below the EMA50 at $0.08707 and EMA200 at $0.09149. Those hourly averages are bearishly aligned, which limits the structural significance of the short-term recovery. On the 15-minute chart, price is above the EMA20 at $0.08518 and EMA50 at $0.08498 but below the EMA200 at $0.08713; those averages are not aligned. The execution chart is firmer than the daily chart, but still incomplete.
The daily Bollinger midpoint is $0.09385 and its upper band is $0.1021. With price beneath the lower band, mean reversion is a plausible recovery framework, not a confirmed reversal. Hourly price sits above the hourly Bollinger midpoint at $0.08456 but below the hourly upper band at $0.08747, reinforcing the contrast between local recovery and broader weakness.
Daily ATR is $0.005331, compared with hourly ATR of $0.0008082 and 15-minute ATR of $0.0002549. These volatility readings put the narrow pivot gaps in perspective: crossing a nearby level alone is weaker evidence than closing beyond it and sustaining the relevant scenario.
ETF headlines and testnet development do not resolve the chart
Recent news around a Dogecoin ETF and DeFi testnet provides context but no directional signal for the current price. The Block’s October 8, 2026 report presented the Bitwise CEO’s view that the Dogecoin ETF failure showed a gap between ETF buyers and crypto-app users. Cryptonomist reported on October 2, 2026 that a Dogecoin DeFi testnet launched with Ethereum compatibility. These offer contrasting demand and development context, but neither headline establishes what caused the current price movement.
The supplied DEX data lists all-time DEX trading volume on dogechain of $58,675,096.00 for Yodeswap, $15,868,108.00 for Quickswap V3 and $633,533.00 for Wojak Finance. These are venue volumes on the blockchain, not Dogecoin-specific volume, fees or revenue. Without a comparable recent-period series, they cannot confirm fresh demand behind the recovery.
Greed contrasts with Dogecoin’s defensive daily structure
Broader market sentiment reads as Greed, yet Dogecoin’s own technical structure remains defensive. Alternative.me’s Fear & Greed Index is 59, classified as Greed. CoinGecko places total crypto market capitalization at $2.80 trillion and Bitcoin dominance at 59.07%. These broad readings do not establish a directional change in dominance or confirm strength in Dogecoin. The sentiment label is more constructive than the asset’s daily technical structure, leaving any recovery dependent on its own resistance tests.
FAQ
Is Dogecoin oversold in this snapshot?
No. Daily RSI is 38.8, while hourly RSI is 48.3 and 15-minute RSI is 60.9. None of these readings sits below the oversold threshold.
Does the dogechain DEX data show current Dogecoin demand?
No. The supplied figures are all-time venue trading volumes on dogechain, not Dogecoin-specific activity or a recent-period comparison that could confirm fresh demand.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, an investment recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument or cryptocurrency. The analysis provided is not indicative of future results. Investing in crypto assets and financial markets carries a high risk of capital loss. Always do your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decision.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

AST SpaceMobile stock has a bearish daily bias, with its session close below all three exponential averages and near the lower Bollinger band. The hourly chart supports that view. However, positive 15-minute MACD readings complicate short-term timing without overturning the broader structure.
ASTS — daily chart with candlesticks, EMA20/EMA50 and volume.
Key takeaways
AST SpaceMobile stock closed at $56.93 on Thursday, down 6.13% from the previous session’s close of $60.65.
The daily close sits below the 20-session EMA at $60.24, the 50-session EMA at $63.26, and the 200-session EMA at $70.95.
Daily RSI14 is 43.2, below the neutral 50 threshold; the daily MACD histogram is 0.05, above zero.
The next-session daily pivot is $57.73, with first resistance at $59.5 and first support at $55.16.
Hourly RSI14 is 40.24 with a negative MACD histogram of -0.42; the 15-minute MACD histogram is positive at 0.14.
AST SpaceMobile stock: the daily chart sets a bearish bias
On Thursday, October 8, 2026, ASTS opened at $59.25. The session opened at $59.25, traded between a low of $55.96 and a high of $60.30, and closed at $56.93, against a previous close of $60.65. The stock fell 6.13% from the previous close of $60.65 on October 7, 2026. Prices and technical indicators are from Twelve Data.
The daily averages are bearishly aligned. Price sits below the 20-session EMA at $60.24, the 50-session EMA at $63.26, and the 200-session EMA at $70.95. That ordering places all three trend references above the session close. A bullish case therefore requires more than strength on the shortest timeframe.
Meanwhile, daily RSI14 stands at 43.2, below the neutral 50 threshold but outside oversold territory. The daily MACD line is -1, above its signal at -1.05, with a positive histogram of 0.05. These signals are mixed: RSI supports the bearish bias, while MACD retains a narrow positive separation from its signal.
The daily Bollinger lower band is $56.36, with the midpoint at $60.07 and the upper band at $63.79. The close sits above the lower band but below the midpoint, placing it in the lower portion of the envelope. Daily ATR14 reads $4.17, providing the volatility reference for assessing nearby levels.
For the next session, the daily pivot sits at $57.73, with first resistance at $59.5 and first support at $55.16. These levels are calculated from the last completed daily candle. The close lies below that next-session pivot, leaving it as an initial daily reference to reclaim.
The hourly chart confirms the bearish bias; 15-minute signals complicate timing
Hourly chart reinforces the bearish bias
Similarly, the session close sits below the hourly 20-hour EMA at $58.54. It is also below the 50-hour EMA at $59.32 and the 200-hour EMA at $61.43. The hourly averages are bearishly aligned. Hourly RSI14 is 40.24, below 50, while the MACD line at -0.86 sits below its signal at -0.44. The histogram is negative at -0.42, reinforcing the daily bearish reading.
The close lies between the hourly lower Bollinger band at $54.93 and the midpoint at $59.6; the upper band is $64.27. Hourly ATR14 is $1.16. When trading resumes, the hourly pivot is $56.77, with first resistance at $57.14 and first support at $56.59. The session close is above that pivot but below first resistance, despite remaining below the hourly averages.
15-minute chart offers mixed execution signals
In contrast, the 15-minute chart offers a less uniformly bearish execution picture. The close is just above the 20-quarter-hour EMA at $56.92. However, it remains below the 50-quarter-hour EMA at $58.02 and the 200-quarter-hour EMA at $59.58. RSI14 is 46.26, still below 50. The MACD line at -0.53 is above its signal at -0.66, with a positive histogram of 0.14.
The close also sits above the 15-minute Bollinger midpoint at $56.61 and below the upper band at $57.15. The lower band is $56.07, and ATR14 reads $0.5. For the next session, the 15-minute pivot is $56.79, with first resistance at $57.12 and first support at $56.63. These nearby references matter for execution, not for defining the main market bias.
Regulatory and integration news present competing narratives
During Thursday’s session, Yahoo Finance linked an ASTS decline to regulatory permission allowing SpaceX to reach ordinary phones without a wireless carrier. A separate Yahoo Finance report said Clear Street viewed the FCC’s October 29 agenda as mixed for AST SpaceMobile. Clear Street favored its carrier partnerships, flagged a real but narrow auction risk, and retained its Buy rating.
Meanwhile, a Yahoo Finance report published after Thursday’s close said AST SpaceMobile and TELUS completed their first integration test. It connected TELUS’ terrestrial wireless network with AST SpaceMobile’s satellite-based system for direct smartphone-to-satellite service in Canada. Yahoo Finance’s headline argued ASTS could be 67% undervalued on that progress; this was a valuation claim, not an established market value.
Another Yahoo Finance report published after Thursday’s close described an after-hours ASTS decline alongside SpaceX obtaining Grain spectrum. Those post-close reports should not be treated as explanations for the completed regular session. Separately, Yahoo Finance’s pre-open coverage said Wall Street sees $3.2 billion of cash burn before 2029. This adds financing context to the discussion.
Bullish and bearish conditions for AST SpaceMobile stock
A bullish scenario would require AST SpaceMobile stock to reclaim the daily pivot at $57.73 and clear daily first resistance at $59.5. Above those levels, the daily Bollinger midpoint at $60.07 and the 20-session EMA at $60.24 become the next relevant hurdles. Hourly RSI above 50 and a positive hourly MACD histogram would support that case. The current hourly readings do not meet those conditions.
Conversely, a break below the daily lower Bollinger band at $56.36 and the session low at $55.96 would undermine the bullish case. Daily first support at $55.16 would then be the next downside reference, followed by the hourly lower Bollinger band at $54.93. The bearish daily and hourly average alignments support this conditional downside scenario without confirming it.
Overall, ASTS stands at $56.93, below the next-session daily pivot at $57.73 and above the daily lower band at $56.36. Daily ATR14 of $4.17 remains the broader volatility reference. The unresolved question is whether the positive 15-minute MACD reading can coexist with a reclaim of daily resistance. The hourly chart does not support that bullish condition.
FAQ
What is the daily trend structure for AST SpaceMobile stock?
The daily chart shows a bearish structure. ASTS closed at $56.93, below the 20-session EMA at $60.24, the 50-session EMA at $63.26, and the 200-session EMA at $70.95. Daily RSI14 is 43.2, below the neutral 50 threshold. The daily MACD histogram is positive at 0.05, providing a mixed signal within the broader bearish alignment.
What are the key levels to watch in the next session?
The next-session daily pivot is $57.73, with first resistance at $59.5 and first support at $55.16. The daily Bollinger lower band is $56.36, with the midpoint at $60.07. On the hourly chart, the pivot is $56.77, with first resistance at $57.14 and first support at $56.59.
How do the short-term signals compare to the daily bias?
The hourly chart reinforces the bearish bias: hourly RSI14 is 40.24 with a negative MACD histogram of -0.42, and the close sits below all three hourly EMAs. The 15-minute chart offers mixed signals, with RSI14 at 46.26 and a positive MACD histogram of 0.14, complicating short-term execution timing.
What news developments surrounded AST SpaceMobile on Thursday?
During Thursday’s session, Yahoo Finance reported on regulatory developments involving SpaceX and the FCC’s October 29 agenda. After the close, Yahoo Finance published reports on AST SpaceMobile’s integration test with TELUS and described an after-hours decline alongside SpaceX obtaining Grain spectrum. Those post-close reports should not be treated as explanations for the completed session. Pre-open coverage from Yahoo Finance flagged Wall Street’s estimate of $3.2 billion in cash burn before 2029.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, an investment recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The analysis provided is not indicative of future results. Investing in financial markets carries a high risk of capital loss. Always do your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decision.
Cryptonomist and the author hold no positions in the financial instruments mentioned and receive no compensation from the companies covered.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

CMG — daily chart with candlesticks, EMA20/EMA50 and volume. Key takeaways
CMG ended Thursday’s session at $32.68, a 6.21% gain from the prior session’s $30.77.
Daily RSI14 is 46.98, below the neutral 50 threshold, and the daily MACD histogram is -0.03.
Price sits below the daily 20-session EMA at $32.74, the 50-session at $33.72, and the 200-session at $35.39.
Hourly RSI14 is 64.8, above 50, and the hourly MACD histogram is 0.24.
Daily ATR14 is $1.26, up from $1.13 on the preceding candle.
On Thursday, October 8, 2026, CMG opened at $30.68, traded between a low of $30.46 and a high of $33.40, and closed at $32.68, against a previous close of $30.77. The prior session ended at $30.77 on October 7, 2026. Session volume was 71,969,000 shares. Prices and technical indicators are from Twelve Data.
Chipotle Mexican Grill stock: daily resistance remains the main hurdle
The daily chart remains bearish: price ended Thursday’s session below all three daily exponential moving averages, with the shortest average sitting just above the session’s end. That proximity creates an immediate test, but the broader structure points lower.
Daily moving average structure
The daily averages form a bearish alignment: price is below the 20-session EMA at $32.74. Further above sit the 50-session EMA at $33.72 and the 200-session EMA at $35.39. The proximity of the shortest average makes $32.74 an immediate test. However, clearing it alone would not resolve the broader bearish structure.
Daily momentum, volatility, and pivot levels
Daily RSI14 stands at 46.98, below the neutral 50 threshold. The MACD line is -1, below its signal at -0.97, with a negative histogram of -0.03. Both measures leave the daily bullish case unconfirmed, although the MACD line and signal are close together.
The daily Bollinger midpoint at $32.8 also sits above price, reinforcing the nearby resistance area. The lower band is $29.56 and the upper band is $36.05. Meanwhile, daily ATR14 increased to $1.26 from $1.13 on the preceding candle, indicating a larger measured trading range.
For the next session, the daily pivot sits at $32.18, with first resistance at $33.9 and first support at $30.96. Price sits above that pivot, offering a constructive reference point within an otherwise bearish daily setup.
CMG hourly strength conflicts with the daily bias
The hourly chart tells a different story: price sits above both short-term hourly averages and hourly momentum reads firmly positive. However, price remains below the 200-hour EMA at $33.29, while staying above the 20-hour and 50-hour EMAs.
Hourly moving averages and momentum
Price sits above the hourly 20-hour EMA at $31.88 and 50-hour EMA at $31.78. It remains below the 200-hour EMA at $33.29. The 20-hour and 50-hour EMAs sit beneath price.
Hourly RSI14 is 64.8, above 50 but below overbought territory. The hourly MACD line at 0.4 is above its signal at 0.16, producing a positive histogram of 0.24.
Hourly bands and pivot levels
Price is also above the hourly Bollinger midpoint at $31.5 and below the upper band at $33.4. Hourly ATR14 reads $0.51. When trading resumes, the hourly pivot is $32.81, with first resistance at $33.07 and first support at $32.39. Price sits below that next-session pivot.
Short-term timing and takeover coverage
The 15-minute chart offers mixed signals for execution timing, while Thursday’s session saw multiple reports around takeover exploration involving Chipotle Mexican Grill. Neither the technical nor the news picture provides a clear directional edge at the shortest timeframe.
15-minute technical picture
Price matches its 20-period EMA at $32.68. It sits above the 50-period and 200-period EMAs at $32.08 and $31.69. RSI14 is 53.84, above 50. However, the MACD line at 0.3 is below its signal at 0.4, with a negative histogram of -0.1.
Price lies between the 15-minute lower Bollinger band at $32.61 and midpoint at $32.88. The upper band is $33.16 and ATR14 reads $0.29. For the next session, the 15-minute pivot is $32.81, with first resistance at $33.07 and first support at $32.39. These levels provide timing context, not a replacement for the daily bias.
Takeover coverage context
During Thursday’s session, Yahoo Finance reported that the Financial Times said Starbucks had explored a potential takeover of Chipotle. Separately, Investing.com reported a surge in Chipotle options activity tied to takeover coverage, with the call/put ratio reaching 7.6x.
Seeking Alpha’s report published after Thursday’s close also described takeover exploration. On Friday, October 9, Yahoo Finance reported that retail sentiment toward Chipotle reached a yearly high. It was not published during Thursday’s session. Exploration is not an agreed or completed transaction.
CMG bullish and bearish scenarios
The path forward for Chipotle Mexican Grill stock hinges on whether price can overcome the cluster of resistance between $32.74 and $32.8.
Bullish scenario
A bullish scenario requires price to clear the daily 20-session EMA at $32.74. It must also overcome the Bollinger midpoint at $32.8. Holding above those levels would support a challenge to the daily 50-session EMA at $33.72. Next-session daily first resistance sits at $33.9. Daily RSI above 50 and a MACD line above its signal would strengthen that case.
Bearish scenario
Conversely, a break below next-session hourly first support at $32.39 would undermine the short-term bullish evidence. Below that lies the daily pivot at $32.18, followed by daily first support at $30.96. Failure there would invalidate the near-term bullish case. The session low at $30.46 and daily lower band at $29.56 would serve as further references.
Overall, CMG stands above the next-session daily pivot but below nearby daily average and Bollinger resistance. Daily ATR14 at $1.26 frames the volatility backdrop. The unresolved question is whether positive hourly readings can support a daily resistance break. Mixed short-term signals and unconfirmed takeover exploration complicate that picture.
FAQ
What is the daily technical structure for Chipotle Mexican Grill stock?
CMG ended Thursday’s session at $32.68, below all three daily exponential moving averages. The 20-session EMA sits at $32.74, the 50-session at $33.72, and the 200-session at $35.39. Daily RSI14 is 46.98, below the neutral 50 threshold, and the daily MACD histogram is -0.03. Daily ATR14 is $1.26, indicating a measured trading range.
What do the hourly indicators show for CMG?
The hourly chart offers a more constructive picture. Price sits above the 20-hour EMA at $31.88 and 50-hour EMA at $31.78. Hourly RSI14 is 64.8, above 50, and the hourly MACD histogram is 0.24. However, price remains below the 200-hour EMA at $33.29, while staying above the 20-hour and 50-hour EMAs.
What are the key resistance and support levels to watch?
Immediate daily resistance sits at the 20-session EMA of $32.74 and the Bollinger midpoint at $32.8. Above that, the 50-session EMA is $33.72 and next-session daily first resistance is $33.9. On the downside, next-session hourly first support is $32.39, followed by the daily pivot at $32.18 and daily first support at $30.96.
What takeover-related news was reported around Chipotle Mexican Grill?
During Thursday’s session, Yahoo Finance reported that the Financial Times said Starbucks had explored a potential takeover of Chipotle. Investing.com separately reported a surge in Chipotle options activity tied to takeover coverage, with the call/put ratio reaching 7.6x. Seeking Alpha, in a report published after Thursday’s close, also described takeover exploration. Exploration is not an agreed or completed transaction.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, an investment recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The analysis provided is not indicative of future results. Investing in financial markets carries a high risk of capital loss. Always do your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decision.
Cryptonomist and the author hold no positions in the financial instruments mentioned and receive no compensation from the companies covered.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

AT&T stock has a neutral daily bias despite Thursday’s gain. The closing price sits between key daily averages, while hourly indicators offer a more constructive reading. That conflict leaves a bullish case conditional on clearing overhead resistance.
T — daily chart with candlesticks, EMA20/EMA50 and volume.
Key takeaways
AT&T closed Thursday at $24.87, up 1.63% from the previous close of $24.47 on October 7, 2026.
The close sits above the daily 50-session EMA at $24.8 but below the 20-session EMA at $24.9 and the 200-session EMA at $24.97.
Daily RSI14 is 48.9, below the neutral 50; the daily MACD line is -0.21, below its signal at -0.12, with a negative histogram of -0.09.
Hourly RSI14 is 66.34 and the hourly MACD histogram is 0.04, contrasting with the unconfirmed daily readings.
A Seeking Alpha article published October 7 cited 10.37x 2026 earnings and a 4.58% forward yield for AT&T.
On Thursday, October 8, 2026, AT&T opened at $24.62, traded between a low of $24.50 and a high of $24.97, and closed at $24.87, against a previous close of $24.47 on October 7, 2026. The gain was 1.63% versus the previous close of $24.47 on October 7, 2026. Prices and technical indicators are from Twelve Data.
AT&T stock faces a mixed daily setup
The close stands above the 50-session exponential moving average at $24.8, but below the 20-session EMA at $24.9. The 200-session EMA at $24.97 also sits overhead. This is not a bullish alignment: the longer average is above both shorter averages, and price remains below two of them.
Meanwhile, daily RSI14 stands at 48.9, just below the neutral 50 threshold. The MACD line is -0.21, below its signal at -0.12, with a negative histogram of -0.09. These readings leave daily momentum short of a bullish confirmation.
The daily Bollinger mid-band at $25.15 is also above the close. Its lower and upper bands stand at $23.71 and $26.59, placing price inside the envelope but below its midpoint. Daily ATR14 reads $0.5, providing a volatility reference without establishing a directional bias.
Hourly strength does not resolve the daily resistance
In contrast, the close is above the hourly 20-hour EMA at $24.6 and the 50-hour EMA at $24.59. However, it remains below the 200-hour EMA at $25.02. The hourly structure supports the bullish side over shorter horizons, but it is not fully aligned.
Hourly RSI14 is 66.34, above 50 but below overbought territory. The hourly MACD line at 0.12 is above its signal at 0.07, with a positive histogram of 0.04. This conflicts with the negative daily MACD histogram rather than overturning the daily view.
Notably, the close sits above the hourly Bollinger mid-band at $24.56 and below the upper band at $24.96. Hourly ATR14 is $0.16. Nearby overhead levels remain relevant even with positive hourly momentum.
For execution context only, the 15-minute averages are bullishly aligned beneath the close. The 20-quarter-hour EMA is $24.79, above the 50-quarter-hour EMA at $24.66 and the 200-quarter-hour EMA at $24.64. RSI14 is 61.73, above 50 but not overbought. Price also sits above the 15-minute Bollinger mid-band at $24.76 and below its upper band at $25.05. ATR14 is $0.08.
Fiber coverage provides context, not proof of a price catalyst
Yahoo Finance’s report published on Wednesday, October 7, said AT&T agreed to fold its Gigapower assets into a new fiber joint venture. The partners are Global Infrastructure Partners and CPP Investments. Yahoo Finance reported a target of more than 60 million locations by 2030 and 50% ownership for AT&T. Its separate coverage described the venture as aiming to support debt reduction and growth.
At the same time, a Seeking Alpha article published on October 7 argued that the shares traded too cheaply. Seeking Alpha cited 10.37x 2026 earnings and a 4.58% forward yield. Those are the publication’s valuation claims, not technical confirmation of upside. An Investing.com report published after Thursday’s close described AT&T stock as tumbling, but its supplied snippet offered no AT&T-specific explanation.
Bullish and bearish conditions for the next session
Pivot levels and session references
When trading resumes, the daily pivot is $24.78, with first resistance at $25.06 and first support at $24.59. The hourly pivot is $24.86, with first resistance at $24.91 and first support at $24.84. The 15-minute pivot is also $24.86, with first resistance at $24.91 and first support at $24.84. These are next-session reference levels, not barriers established during Thursday’s trading.
Daily resistance levels overhead
The bullish scenario requires holding the daily 50-session EMA at $24.8 and clearing the 20-session EMA at $24.9. Beyond that, the daily 200-session EMA at $24.97 and hourly 200-hour EMA at $25.02 remain overhead. Clearing daily first resistance at $25.06 and the daily Bollinger mid-band at $25.15 would strengthen that case. Daily RSI above 50 and a MACD line above its signal would provide additional confirmation.
Daily support and downside references
Conversely, a break below the daily 50-session EMA at $24.8 and next-session daily pivot at $24.78 would weaken the bullish case. A break below daily first support at $24.59 and the session low at $24.50 would invalidate that support-based scenario. The daily lower Bollinger band at $23.71 is a further downside reference, not a projected destination.
Overall, AT&T stands above daily support but below several nearby resistance levels. Daily ATR14 of $0.5 frames the volatility, while positive hourly readings contrast with an unconfirmed daily bullish case. Whether price can clear those overhead levels remains unresolved.
FAQ
Where did AT&T stock close on Thursday?
AT&T closed at $24.87 on Thursday, October 8, 2026, gaining 1.63% from the previous close of $24.47 on October 7.
What are the key resistance levels for AT&T stock?
The daily 20-session EMA at $24.9, the daily 200-session EMA at $24.97, the hourly 200-hour EMA at $25.02, daily first resistance at $25.06, and the daily Bollinger mid-band at $25.15 all sit above Thursday’s close of $24.87.
What did Seeking Alpha report about AT&T?
A Seeking Alpha article published on October 7 argued that AT&T shares traded too cheaply, citing 10.37x 2026 earnings and a 4.58% forward yield. Those are the publication’s valuation claims.
What is the daily technical picture for AT&T?
Daily RSI14 is 48.9, below the neutral 50. The MACD line is -0.21, below its signal at -0.12, with a negative histogram of -0.09. The close at $24.87 sits above the daily 50-session EMA at $24.8 but below both the 20-session EMA at $24.9 and the 200-session EMA at $24.97.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, an investment recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The analysis provided is not indicative of future results. Investing in financial markets carries a high risk of capital loss. Always do your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decision.
Cryptonomist and the author hold no positions in the financial instruments mentioned and receive no compensation from the companies covered.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.